Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Current crisis or artifact of surveillance: insights into rebound chlamydia rates from dynamic modelling

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Aug 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Smith
15 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Fisman
21 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - David Vickers
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - David Vickers
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Smith
5 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - David Vickers
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - David Vickers
Resubmission - Version 6
9 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
16 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
16 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-10-70

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement