Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A comparative epidemiologic analysis of SARS in Hong Kong, Beijing and Taiwan

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Weijia Xing
19 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mary-Louise McLaws
9 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Eric Lau
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Weijia Xing
2 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mary-Louise McLaws
12 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Eric Lau
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Eric Lau
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
6 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
6 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-10-50

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement