Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evidence for waning of latency in a cohort study of tuberculosis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Nov 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Morten Harboe
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul van Helden
21 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yukari Manabe
28 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Wilkinson
19 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Morten Harboe
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Morten Harboe
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Wilkinson
17 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Morten Harboe
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
20 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Morten Harboe
Resubmission - Version 7
20 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
23 Feb 2010 Editorially accepted
23 Feb 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-10-37

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement