Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Flocked nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate for detection of respiratory tract viruses in immunocompromised adults: a matched comparative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Oana Falup-Pecurariu
25 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fausto Baldanti
2 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carlo Federico Perno
11 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Lars Öhrmalm
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Lars Öhrmalm
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
26 Nov 2010 Editorially accepted
26 Nov 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-10-340

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement