Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: ELISA versus PCR for diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Dec 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alejandro Schijman
17 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Reithinger
8 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Emmanuel Brasil
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Reithinger
11 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alejandro Schijman
16 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Emmanuel Brasil
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alejandro Schijman
14 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Reithinger
16 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Emmanuel Brasil
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
22 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Emmanuel Brasil
Resubmission - Version 6
22 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
25 Nov 2010 Editorially accepted
25 Nov 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-10-337

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement