Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of three methods for ascertainment of contact information relevant to respiratory pathogen transmission in encounter networks

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Niel Hens
4 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hiroshi Nishiura
10 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Babak Pourbohloul
22 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Riley
24 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - James McCaw
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hiroshi Nishiura
1 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Niel Hens
12 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Riley
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - James McCaw
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - James McCaw
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
10 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-10-166

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement