Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Symptoms and sources of Yersinia enterocolitica -infection: a case-control study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Aug 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gianluca Matteoli
29 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jugsharan Virdi
2 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingo Autenrieth
2 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kare Molbak
23 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Leila Sihvonen
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingo Autenrieth
15 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gianluca Matteoli
16 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kare Molbak
26 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jugsharan Virdi
6 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Leila Sihvonen
Resubmission - Version 3
6 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Leila Sihvonen
Resubmission - Version 5
14 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 May 2010 Editorially accepted
20 May 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-10-122

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement