Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Cost of shingles: population based burden of disease analysis of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia

Abstract

Background

Around 30% of the population will experience herpes zoster (HZ), 10% of whom develop postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Together, these illnesses produce a significant economic burden to the healthcare system.

Methods

Administrative healthcare data collected over the period of April 1st 1997 to March 31st 2014 were analyzed to determine the healthcare system burden of HZ using direct medical costs. Episodes of HZ were identified using international classification of disease (ICD) codes. Trends in age-adjusted (AA) HZ-rates were analyzed by piecewise-regression. Total annual and per-episode costs were determined for drug treatment, medical care, and hospitalizations within each year.

Results

The incidence of HZ increased by 49.5% from 1997/98 to 2013/14. Piecewise-regression of AA-rates revealed a steady AA-rate of 4.7 episodes/1000 person-years (PY) from 1997/98 to a breakpoint in 2008/09, after which rates began to increase reaching 5.7 episodes/1000 PY in 2013/14.

Drug costs rose significantly (p <0.03) from $89.77/episode (95% CI: $82.96, $96.59) to $127.34/episode (95% CI: $117.24, $137.44). Medical costs increased (p <0.0001) from $57.98/episode (95% CI; $55.26, $60.70) to $78.84/episode (95% CI; $74.08, $83.61). Hospitalization rates declined from 3.10% in 1997/98 to 1.36% in 2011/12, resulting in cost dropping from $397/episode (95% CI; $284, $511) to $195/episode (95% CI; $129, $260).

Total annual costs of HZ and PHN were $1,997,183 in 2011/12, 4.7% lower than the 1997/98 costs of $2,095,633.

Conclusion

A significant increase in annual number of HZ cases was observed, driven largely by demographic factors. A 21% increase in the AA-incidence reveals changes in HZ rates beyond those expected by population shifts.

The large increase in incidence of HZ, with rising per episode medical and prescription costs were offset by dramatic drops in hospitalization rates, the net effect of which has been to hold the total costs relatively constant. However, the decrease in hospitalization rates slowed over the last half of the study, settling at 1.3% in the last 4 study years. The likely future of HZ burden is one of rising costs, primarily driven by the demographic shifts of an increasing and aging population.

Peer Review reports

Background

The varicella zoster virus (VZV) causes varicella zoster (VZ) upon initial infection, affecting the skin and its sensory neurons. As VZ resolves, the virus enters a latent state in neuronal ganglia, remaining there for life [1–3]. Reactivation of VZV, typically within singular ganglia, causes herpes zoster (HZ), a dermatological condition similar in symptoms to VZ but causing moderate to severe pain [4, 5]. A potential complication of HZ is postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), a longer lasting pain syndrome caused by inflammation or virus-induced nerve damage [4–6].

Before a VZ vaccine became available in 1999 (Varivax, Merck Frosst Canada & Co), nearly all persons were infected with VZV, typically as a child. By the age of 40, VZV prevalence was 95–97% [7, 8]. Virtually this entire pre-VZ vaccine population is at risk of developing HZ, with an incidence estimated at between 1.2 and 6.3 cases per 1000 person years (PY), with rates increasing with age. The lifetime prevalence of HZ is between 20–30%, rising to 50% by age 80 [2, 7, 9, 10].

The antiviral drugs acyclovir, valacyclovir, and famciclovir are the cornerstone of HZ treatment and reduce the duration and severity of symptoms, including pain [11]. Treatment should begin within 72 h of the onset of symptoms and continue for 7 days [2, 6, 12]. Antiviral drugs have been reported to account for 50–70% of the drug cost for treated cases of HZ [13–16]. Other drugs used to treat HZ pain include analgesics, opioids, glucocorticoids, and topical lidocaine.

Despite being relatively common, there is no a standard definition of PHN, particularly in reference to the duration of pain which differentiates continuing HZ pain from PHN. One of the more common criteria used is the persistence of pain for 90 days or more post-HZ diagnosis. Studies using this definition report that 5–15% of HZ cases convert to PHN [13–15, 17–19]. PHN is a challenging condition to treat. The Canadian Pain Society consensus statement and the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) treatment guidelines list tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), gabapentin, and pregabalin as first line; and opioids or topical lidocaine as second line treatment options for PHN [20, 21].

In randomized controlled trials, the HZ vaccine (Zostavax®, Merck), introduced to Canada in September 2009, was shown to reduce the burden of HZ by 61%, decrease the relative risk of HZ by 51%, and that of PHN by almost 67% [16, 22–24].

A number of recent studies have looked at the burden of HZ-PHN in a variety of health care systems, including Belgium [25], France [26], Germany [14, 27], Greece [28], Italy [13, 29], Spain [18], the United Kingdom [15], and Israel [17]. However, little recent Canadian data have been published. To establish the current burden of HZ and PHN in the setting of a universal healthcare system, and to look at long term trends in their treatment costs, a retrospective, population based study was conducted over the 15 year period from 1997/98 to 2011/12 in Manitoba, Canada.

Methods

Using an observational, cohort-based methodology, the incidence and burden of HZ and PHN were examined from April 1st 1997 to March 31st 2014 using administrative healthcare data from the province of Manitoba, Canada. Data was obtained from the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (MCHP), which maintains a data repository containing records of virtually every contact between Manitoba residents and the province’s universal healthcare system [30, 31]. All records are de-identified but contain a unique number that allows researchers to link individual patient records across databases.

Databases used included the Drug Program Information Network (DPIN), a community-pharmacy based prescription processing system that enables submission of online insurance claims by pharmacies, the Medical Services database which contains records of fee-for-service medical claims, Hospital Discharge Abstracts containing summary data of each hospital stay; the Manitoba Immunization Monitoring System (MIMS) database which contains records on vaccines administered in the population, and the Manitoba Health Registry from which population counts and basic demographics on individuals can be obtained.

Cases of HZ were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes. This method has been shown to be highly selective (positive predictive value 93%) and sensitive (97.5%) [32]. Individuals with one or more ICD-9-CM (Clinical Modification) codes starting with ‘053’, or ICD-10-CA (Canadian enhancement) codes starting with ‘B02’ were classified as HZ cases, with episodes starting on the date of the first code. HZ was considered to have converted to PHN when medical services claims or prescriptions for HZ were received 90 days or more after diagnosis.

Multiple episodes of HZ were allowed provided two conditions were met: 1) a minimum of 2 years had elapsed since the start, and 2) a minimum of 180 days had elapsed since the last HZ ICD code of the preceding episode. To avoid misclassification of prevalent episodes, episodes with start dates prior to April 1st 1997 were discarded. Episodes in individuals under 20 years of age were excluded from the analysis to avoid misclassification of potentially miscoded VZ cases. Furthermore, to avoid misclassification of physician visits regarding HZ vaccine as episodes, the MIMS database was searched for HZ vaccination records. As MIMS does not capture all HZ vaccinations we also used DPIN to search for vaccine prescriptions, and medical claims to find vaccination tariff codes, using these as surrogate markers of vaccination. Any HZ episode starting within 30 days of vaccination was excluded.

Pharmacotherapy was assessed using DPIN. Prescriptions for acyclovir, valacyclovir, and famciclovir dispensed in the first 30 days of an episode were classified as HZ antiviral treatment. DPIN was searched by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) class. Prescriptions for nabilone (ATC class A04AD), local anesthetics (D04A), systemic corticosteroids (H02A), NSAIDS (M01), opioids (N02A), ASA, acetaminophen (N02B), anticonvulsants (N03A), and antidepressants (N06A) were categorized as HZ pain prescriptions, provided that several conditions were met: 1) treatment of pain with any drug class began within 90 days following diagnosis; 2) use of a drug class was incident to diagnosis; and 3) use after the later of 90 days post-diagnosis and date of last ICD code for HZ was continuous. Use within a drug class was considered incident if less than 30 of the 90 days pre-diagnosis had prescription coverage from that class. Continuous use was defined as the ongoing dispensing of prescriptions of the above-named ATC classes, with no gaps between consecutive prescriptions greater than 200% of the duration of the earlier prescription.

All costs were adjusted for inflation to 2013 Canadian dollars using the Statistics Canada consumer price index.

HZ episodes were further stratified into two subcategories based on PHN status: HZ episodes with no diagnosis of PHN (HZ-only), and HZ episodes that converted to PHN (HZ-PHN). Costs were analyzed across all HZ episodes, and then within each stratum separately. The Manitoba Pharmacare fiscal year (April 1st to March 31st) was used for analysis over time. All costs and events were considered to have been incurred in the fiscal year of diagnosis.

Due to observation time required, two separate reporting periods are used. Epidemiology is reported from 1997/98-2013/14, as only a single observation is required to diagnose HZ, and no follow-up time is required. For burden analysis, two years of observable time is required to capture costs accruing over episodes, especially for HZ-PHN. Therefore, to capture all costs associated with each episode and allow for equal follow-up time we only report burden results of episodes initially diagnosed before the end of the 2011/12 fiscal year.

Statistical analysis

The number of episodes and incidence rate of HZ, and PHN conversion rates were calculated for each study year. We calculated annual incidence rates (per thousand person years) using population counts from the Manitoba Health registry for that particular year. The annual age-adjusted incidence rate was then determined by calculating age group-specific rates, and using them to directly standardize the overall incidence rate, with the 1997 Manitoba age-distribution as our reference structure. A segmented regression analysis was conducted to examine an apparent change in incidence of HZ. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis was used for trend analysis of costs and utilization. Due to non-linearity and high variance a t-test was used to compare annual hospital costs over the first (1997/98-2003/04) and last (2004/05-2011/12) halves of the study period.

SAS® version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and Microsoft Excel 2013® (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond WA) were used for data analysis. Approvals were granted by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board and the Manitoba Health Information Privacy Committee.

Results

Epidemiological analysis: 1997/98 to 2013/14

A total of 73,886 episodes of HZ were diagnosed between 1997/98 and 2013/14, an overall crude incidence rate of 4.99 cases/1000 person-years (PY). As we have previously reported [33], a sustained upward trend in the annual numbers of HZ episodes was observed across the study period (Table 1). There were 5,746 episodes of HZ identified in 2013/14, a 49.5% increase from 1997/98.

Table 1 Overall health system burden of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in Manitoba, Canada

To adjust for the effects of an increase in the size and age distribution, the age-adjusted (AA) incidence rate was calculated and plotted (Fig. 1), revealing an abrupt change in the observed trends in AA-rates starting around 2009/10. Piecewise regression on the AA-incidence revealed a breakpoint in July 2009 (F(3,13) = 59.6 p < 0.0001). Prior to 2009/10, the incidence of HZ remained relatively steady (p = 0.96) at 4.70 cases/1000 PY (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.65, 4.75). Starting in 2009/10 the AA-incidence began increasing on average by 0.29 cases/1000 PY/year (95% CI: 0.20, 0.37), reaching 5.70 cases/1000 PY in 2013/14, a 21% increase from pre-2009/10 level.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Piecewise regression on age adjusted incidence of herpes zoster. The age adjusted incidence of herpes zoster was calculated using 1997 as the reference year for age standardization. A highly significant breakpoint was found in July 2009 (p < 0.0001). Varicella zoster vaccinations were added to the routine childhood vaccination schedule in 2004. Abbreviations: VZV, varicella zoster vaccinations; BP, breakpoint; HZ, herpes zoster; CI, confidence interval

Burden of disease analysis: 1997/98 to 2011/12

Drug utilization trends

Trends in drug utilization, medical claims cost, hospitalizations, and total cost were examined over the period from 1997/98 to 2011/12.

Antiviral treatment rates increased from 41.7 to 62.9% (F(1,13) = 220 p < 0.0001 R2 = 0.94) over this period. The cost per treated episode dropped from $139.61 to $96.20 due to the introduction of generic antiviral drugs. The mean cost of pain treatment per episode increased by over 111% for HZ, rising from $31.59 (95% CI: $25.35, $37.84) to $66.81 (95% CI: $56.84, $76.79), and by 94% for HZ-PHN, from $291 (95% CI: $225, $358) to $566 (95% CI: $478, $655) over the same interval. On average, HZ-PHN episodes were responsible for 83% of pain-related drug costs, a proportion that remained unchanged over time (p = 0.57).

The mean cost for all drug treatment rose significantly (F(1,13) = 6 p < 0.03 R2 = 0.32), from $89.77 (95% CI: $82.96, $96.59) to $127.34 (95%CI: $117.24, $137.44). This increase occurring within the first three study years (Fig. 2). There was a significant upward linear trend in the total annual drug cost (F(1,13) = 30.4 p < 0.0001 R2 = 0.70), a result of the increase in the number of HZ cases and the rise in mean per episode cost.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cost per episode of herpes zoster by treatment modality. The mean cost of treating herpes zoster was determined within each year and regression analysis performed (solid lines). Significant trends were found for all modalities: prescription and medical costs p < 0.0001; hospitalization p < 0.0002. All costs have been adjusted to 2013 Canadian dollars using Statistics Canada consumer price index

Trends in medical care

An upward trend in utilization of medical services was observed (F(1,13) = 59.5 p < 0.0001 R2 = 0.82), The number of medical claims per episodes of zoster rose slightly from 2.53 claims/episode (95% CI: 2.41, 2.65) to 2.80 claims/episode (95% CI: 2.67, 2.93), while the costs per medical claim rose 23% (F(1,13 = 59.9, p < 0.0001 R2 = 0.82). Together, these trends produced a linear increase in the per episode cost (F(1,13 = 48.0 p < 0.00001 R2 = 0.76) from $57.98/episode (95% CI: $55.26, $60.70) in 1997/98, to $78.84/episode (95% CI: $74.08, $83.61) in 2011/12 (Fig. 2). The effect of these trends is amplified by the increase in HZ cases resulting in a significant increase in total annual medical costs (F(1,13 = 182.0 p < 0.0001 R2 = 0.93) (Table 1).

Hospitalization trends

The cost per HZ related hospitalization did not change significantly over the study period with a mean of $12,038/ hospitalization (95% CI: $11,068, $13,007). The overall mean length of stay was 13.95 days (95% CI: 12.71, 15.19), this also did not change significantly (1997/98 vs. 2011/12 t = −1.62, p = 0.11). There was a sharp drop in the rate of HZ-related hospitalization across the study period (F(1,13) = 49.6 p < 0.0001 R2 = 0.79), from 3.10% in 1997/98 (119 hospitalizations) to 1.36% in 2011/12 (68 hospitalizations). This resulted in the mean per episode cost of hospitalization dropping significantly (F = 25.0 p = 0.0002 R2 = 0.62) from $397 (95% CI: $284, $511) to $195 (95% CI: $129, $260), a decline of 51.0%.

Hospitalization costs accounted for 48.5% of total costs in 2011, down from 72.9% in 1997/98. The mean annual cost over the first half of the study (1997/98-2003/04) was $1,145,074 (95% CI: $968,817, $1,321,331), significantly higher than the mean cost of $710,400 (95% CI: $560,336, $860465) seen over last half of the study (2004/05-2011/12) (t(13) = 4.55, p = 0.0005).

Trends in total cost

The annual total health care costs of treating HZ are shown in Table 1. Linear regression analysis revealed no significant trend across the study period (p = 0.25) with the total health system burden of HZ and PHN being 4.7% lower in 2011/12 than in 1997/98. While less than 10% of HZ episodes converted to PHN, they accounted for almost 35% of total costs overall (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Overall Burden of Herpes Zoster: 1997/98 to 2011/12. The total economic and epidemiologic burden of herpes zoster was determined for the period from 1997/98 to 2011/12 and are shown in the above figure. The inner circle shows the number of episodes broken down by post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) status, with the orange portion representing episodes in which it occurred, while the outer ring breaks down the total costs in 2013 Canadian dollars. While PHN accounted for less than 10% of all episodes, it was responsible for 35% of total costs

Burden of herpes zoster in 2011/12

There were 4984 diagnosed episodes of HZ in 2011/12, an incidence of 5.3 episodes/1000 PY. Of these, 497 went on to develop PHN, a conversion rate of 10.0%. Hospitalization accounted for 49% of total cost, medical services for 20%, and prescription drug costs for 32%. Although PHN occurred in only a tenth of all episodes, they were responsible for 41.6% of hospital costs, 21.3% of medical cost, and 49.7% of drug costs. Overall, HZ-PHN episodes accounted for 38.5% of total HZ-related costs.

The mean cost of an episode of HZ in 2011/12 was $401 (95% CI: $318, $484). The mean cost for HZ that converted to PHN (HZ-PHN), including the cost of treating PHN, was $1614 (95% CI: $1009, $2220). HZ episodes not associated with PHN (HZ-only) had a mean cost of $266 (95% CI: $204, $329), 16.5% of HZ-PHN episodes.

The mean cost of treating an episode of HZ with prescription drugs in 2011/12 was $127.34. Of this, 52.5% was from the treatment of pain with a mean cost of $66.81 (95% CI: $56.84, $76.78), the remainder arising from antiviral treatment at a mean of $60.53 (95% CI: $60.43, 59.92). For HZ-PHN episodes the mean drug cost was $635 (95% CI: $547, $723) with pain treatment accounting for 89% of this cost at $566/episode (95% CI: $478, $655). HZ-only episodes had a mean drug cost of $71.12 (95% CI: $69.18, $73.05), over 83% of which was due to antiviral prescriptions treatment.

The average HZ episode in 2011/12 resulted in 2.80 (95% CI: 2.67, 2.93) medical claims for a mean cost of $78.84 (95% CI: $74.08, $83.61). The average HZ-PHN episodes resulted in 5.57 claims (95% CI: 4.86, 6.29) with a mean cost of $168.30 (95% CI: $128.79, $207.81), while the average HZ- only episodes resulted in 2.49 claims (95% CI: 2.38, 2.60) with a mean cost of $68.93 (95% CI: $66.08, $71.79).

HZ-related hospitalization was uncommon, and occurred in 1.36% of episodes in 2011/12 with a mean cost per stay of $14,258/hospitalization (95% CI: $9,461, $19,056). HZ-PHN episodes were more frequently hospitalized at a rate of 5.0%, whereas HZ-only episodes had a hospitalization rate of 1.0%. There was no significant difference in the cost per hospitalization between HZ-PHN and HZ-only episodes so these results were combined. The cost of hospitalization averaged across all HZ episodes was $194.54 (95% CI: $115.90, $273.17).

Discussion

This study explored the burden of HZ in terms of healthcare system costs. A significant increase in the incidence of HZ, independent of demographic shifts in the population, was found to begin in 2009/10. The medical cost per episode increased, as did total annual costs. There was an increase in the per episode cost of drug treatment over the first 3 years of study period, after which costs stabilized and remained relatively constant. The combination of these trends in per episode costs arising from medical care and drug treatment were multiplied by the increase in the annual incidence of HZ, causing total outpatient costs to increase. However, this increase was offset by the dramatic drop in rates of hospitalization and the resulting decrease in hospital costs.

Although hospitalization is uncommon in HZ patients, at a cost of $12,000 per stay it has a disproportionate impact on the total burden. In 1997/98, hospital costs accounted for almost three quarters of total HZ costs, this proportion had dropped to 40–50% over the final study years. This is a result of a dramatic change in rates of hospitalization, which dropped from 3.10% in the first study year to 1.36% in the last year. However, it appears that this is the floor to hospitalization rates, as the downward trend appears to have ended midway through the study.

The same is not true regarding the trends seen in number of cases, prescription drug costs, and medical service utilization. The number of HZ cases increased by 50% from 1997/98 to 2013/14, largely driven by demographic changes. The cost per episode of medical care has also seen sustained increases. Increasing costs of pain treatment were offset by drops in antiviral costs leaving the per-episode drug cost steady, however, the increasing number of episodes has resulted in increasing total drug costs. These trends do not appear to be slowing down, and if hospitalization rates have indeed plateaued, it may be the case that the burden of zoster will increase in the future.

The 49.5% increase in the crude incidence of HZ, which began to rise after 2009/10, is one of the most interesting results of this analysis. A significant portion of this increase is related to demographic changes in the province, namely, an increase in the population coupled with an upward shift in the age distribution. However, after controlling for these factors by calculating the incidence rate, and adjustment of rates to a standard age distribution, there remained a significant 21% increase in HZ left to be explained.

One possible explanation is based on exposure to wild VZV, circulating in the population, acting as an exogenous boost to HZ cell-mediated immunity in latently infected adults [34–36]. It has been proposed that an unintended consequence of VZ vaccination programs could be an increase in HZ rates. However, researchers have found mixed evidence when searching for such an effect at the population level [34, 37–42]. A study published using data from Alberta, Canada also found an increase in the rates of HZ. However, they reported that this trend preceded the introduction of the VZ vaccine [39]. Another Canadian study looking at this same issue in Ontario found no increase in HZ rates [40]. However that study ended just as the upward trend reported here began. While this study was not designed to examine such a relationship, it is interesting to note that the VZ vaccinations were added to the routine schedule of universally provided childhood vaccinations in 2004, just 5 years before the increase began. Uptake rates rose quickly as the program was rolled out across various age groups. By 2007/08 over 26% of all children under 18 had been vaccinated, and 76% of those who were scheduled to be vaccinated were [43].

While the HZ vaccine was introduced in 2009, it has not been covered by the provincial insurance drug program and has had limited uptake in Manitoba. As such, it is not possible to assess the potential impact of the HZ vaccine on the economic burden of HZ in Manitoba. However, some jurisdictions are now providing the HZ vaccine free of charge to those over age 65 [44]. In the future the impact of wide spread use of the HZ vaccine in these jurisdictions may allow a full assessment of the impact of vaccination on HZ burden. An important limitation to our results on the burden of HZ is that only direct medical expenses have been considered. There are other sources of burden for both patient and society outside of this narrow focus, perhaps the most important being changes to individuals’ quality of life, especially for those individuals affected by PHN. Societal costs such as lost productivity, disability payments, and opportunity costs are also outside of the scope of this study. However, this analysis has numerous strengths, including the fact that costs are not estimated based on models nor inferred from a sample but rather directly measured across the entire provincial population. This study examined 15 years of healthcare data, allowing us to see changes over an extended period of time.

Conclusion

This study explored the burden of HZ in terms of healthcare system costs. A significant increase in the incidence of HZ, independent of demographic shifts in the population, was found to begin in 2009/10. The medical cost per episode increased, as did total annual costs. Per-episode drug costs remained level, with increased mean costs of treating pain offset by decreases in antiviral cost per treatment. The combination of increase per-episode medical costs, and constant per-episode drug costs were multiplied by increasing numbers of episodes, causing total outpatient costs to increase. However, this was offset by a dramatic drop in rates of hospitalization.

Abbreviations

AA:

Age-adjusted

ASA:

Acetylsalicylic acid

ATC:

Anatomical therapeutic chemical classification

CI:

Confidence intervals

DPIN:

Drug program information network

HZ:

Herpes zoster

HZ-only:

Herpes zoster without the involvement of postherpetic neuralgia

HZ-PHN:

Herpes zoster with postherpetic neuralgia

ICD:

Using international classification of disease

ICD-10 -CA:

ICD version 10, Canadian enhancement

ICD-9-CM:

ICD version 9, clinical modification

MCHP:

Manitoba centre for health policy

MIMS:

Manitoba immunization monitoring system

NSAIDS:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

OLS:

Ordinary least squares regression

PHN:

Postherpetic neuralgia

PY:

Person-years

VZ:

Varicella zoster

VZV:

Varicella zoster virus

References

  1. Hope-Simpson RE. The nature of herpes zoster: a long-term study and a new hypothesis. Proc R Soc Med. 1965;58:9–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmader KE, Dworkin RH. Natural history and treatment of herpes zoster. J Pain. 2008;9(1 Suppl 1):S3–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gnann JW, Whitley RJ. Clinical practice. Herpes zoster. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(5):340–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gershon AA, Gershon MD, Breuer J, Levin MJ, Oaklander AL, Griffiths PD. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis and epidemiology of herpes zoster. J Clin Virol. 2010;48 Suppl 1:S2–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mueller NH, Gilden DH, Cohrs RJ, Mahalingam R, Nagel MA. Varicella zoster virus infection: clinical features, molecular pathogenesis of disease, and latency. Neurol Clin. 2008;26(3):675–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dworkin RH, Johnson RW, Breuer J, et al. Recommendations for the management of herpes zoster. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44 Suppl 1:S1–S26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brisson M, Edmunds WJ, Law B, et al. Epidemiology of varicella zoster virus infection in Canada and the United Kingdom. Epidemiol Infect. 2001;127(2):305–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fairley CK, Miller E. Varicella-zoster virus epidemiology--a changing scene? J Infect Dis. 1996;174 Suppl 3:S314–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson RW, Alvarez-Pasquin M-J, Bijl M, et al. Herpes zoster epidemiology, management, and disease and economic burden in Europe: a multidisciplinary perspective. Ther Adv Vaccin. 2015;3(4):109–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brisson M, Edmunds WJ, Gay NJ, Law B, De Serres G. Modelling the impact of immunization on the epidemiology of varicella zoster virus. Epidemiol Infect. 2000;125(3):651–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Massengill JS, Kittredge JL. Practical considerations in the pharmacological treatment of postherpetic neuralgia for the primary care provider. J Pain Res. 2014;7:125–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ono F, Yasumoto S, Furumura M, et al. Comparison between famciclovir and valacyclovir for acute pain in adult Japanese immunocompetent patients with herpes zoster. J Dermatol. 2012;39(11):902–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gialloreti LE, Merito M, Pezzotti P, et al. Epidemiology and economic burden of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia in Italy: a retrospective, population-based study. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ultsch B, Köster I, Reinhold T, et al. Epidemiology and cost of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in Germany. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14(6):1015–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gauthier A, Breuer J, Carrington D, Martin M, Rémy V. Epidemiology and cost of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia in the United Kingdom. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137(1):38–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oxman MN, Levin MJ. Vaccination against herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Infect Dis. 2008;197 Suppl 2:S228–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Weitzman D, Shavit O, Stein M, Cohen R, Chodick G, Shalev V. A population based study of the epidemiology of herpes zoster and its complications. J Infect. 2013;67(5):463–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cebrián-Cuenca AM, Díez-Domingo J, San-Martín-Rodríguez M, Puig-Barberá J, Navarro-Pérez J. Epidemiology and cost of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia among patients treated in primary care centres in the Valencian community of Spain. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11(1):302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Edmunds WJ, Brisson M, Rose JD. The epidemiology of herpes zoster and potential cost-effectiveness of vaccination in England and Wales. Vaccine. 2001;19(23–24):3076–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Attal N, Cruccu G, Baron R, et al. EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(9):1113–e88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moulin D, Boulanger A, Clark AJ, et al. Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: revised consensus statement from the Canadian pain society. Pain Res Manag. 2014;19(6):328–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmader KE, Oxman MN, Levin MJ, et al. Persistence of the efficacy of zoster vaccine in the shingles prevention study and the short-term persistence substudy. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(10):1320–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Oxman MN, Levin MJ, Johnson GR, et al. A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(22):2271–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Drug Products Database. Health Canada website. http://webprod5.hc-sc.gc.ca/dpd-bdpp/index-eng.jsp. Accessed 9 Jan 2017.

  25. Bilcke J, Ogunjimi B, Marais C, et al. The health and economic burden of chickenpox and herpes zoster in Belgium. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;140(11):2096–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Blein C, Gavazzi G, Paccalin M, Baptiste C, Berrut G, Vainchtock A. Burden of herpes zoster: the direct and comorbidity costs of herpes zoster events in hospitalized patients over 50 years in France. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15(1):350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ultsch B, Siedler A, Rieck T, Reinhold T, Krause G, Wichmann O. Herpes zoster in Germany: quantifying the burden of disease. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11(1):173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lionis CD, Vardavas CI, Symvoulakis EK, et al. Measuring the burden of herpes zoster and post herpetic neuralgia within primary care in rural Crete, Greece. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12(1):136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Di Legami V, Gianino MM, Atti MCD, et al. Epidemiology and costs of herpes zoster: background data to estimate the impact of vaccination. Vaccine. 2007;25(43):7598–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roos LL, Brownell M, Lix L, Roos NP, Walld R, Macwilliam L. From health research to social research : privacy, methods, approaches. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:117–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jutte DP, Roos LL, Brownell MD. Administrative record linkage as a tool for public health research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:91–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Klompas M, Kulldorff M, Vilk Y, Bialek SR, Harpaz R. Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia surveillance using structured electronic data. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(12):1146–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Friesen KJ, Falk J, Alessi-severini S, Chateau D, Bugden S. Price of pain: population-based cohort burden of disease analysis of medication cost of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Pain Res. 2016;9:543–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Brisson M, Gay NJ, Edmunds WJ, Andrews NJ. Exposure to varicella boosts immunity to herpes-zoster: implications for mass vaccination against chickenpox. Vaccine. 2002;20(19–20):2500–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Solomon BA, Kaporis AG, Glass AT, Simon SI, Baldwin HE. Lasting immunity to varicella in doctors study (L.I.V.I.D. study). J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38(5 Pt 1):763–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Thomas SL, Wheeler JG, Hall AJ. Contacts with varicella or with children and protection against herpes zoster in adults: a case–control study. Lancet. 2002;360(9334):678–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chao DY, Chien YZ, Yeh YP, Hsu PS, Lian IB. The incidence of varicella and herpes zoster in Taiwan during a period of increasing varicella vaccine coverage, 2000–2008. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;140(6):1131–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Edmunds WJ, Brisson M. The effect of vaccination on the epidemiology of varicella zoster virus. J Infect. 2002;44(4):211–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Russell ML, Dover DC, Simmonds KA, Svenson LW. Shingles in Alberta: before and after publicly funded varicella vaccination. Vaccine. 2014;32(47):6319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tanuseputro P, Zagorski B, Chan KJ, Kwong JC. Population-based incidence of herpes zoster after introduction of a publicly funded varicella vaccination program. Vaccine. 2011;29(47):8580–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Leung J, Harpaz R, Molinari NA, Jumaan A, Zhou F. Herpes zoster incidence among insured persons in the united states, 1993–2006: Evaluation of impact of varicella vaccination. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(3):332–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ogunjimi B, Van Damme P, Beutels P. Herpes zoster risk reduction through exposure to chickenpox patients: a systematic multidisciplinary review. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hilderman T, Katz A, Derksen S, et al. Manitoba immunization study. Winnipeg: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy; 2011. http://mchp-appserv.cpe.umanitoba.ca/reference/MB_Immunization_Report_WEB.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2017.

  44. Government of Ontario. Ontario’s Routine Immunization Schedule. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/immunization/static/immunization_tool.html. Published 2016. Accessed 9 Jan 2017.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy for use of data contained in the Population Health Research Data Repository under project #H2014:411 (HIPC# 2014/2015-35). The results and conclusions are those of the authors and no official endorsement by the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Manitoba Health, or other data providers is intended or should be inferred. Data used in this study are from the Population Health Research Data Repository housed at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba and were derived from data provided by Manitoba Health.

Funding

This work was supported by an investigator initiated grant from Merck Canada.

Availability of data and materials

All data used in this analysis were obtained from the Manitoba Population Health Research Data Repository, with access granted through the Manitoba Center for Health Policy. Due the private nature of the data within the repository, and the provincial regulations set for in the Manitoba Health Information Privacy Act, we cannot make our raw data publically available.

Authors’ contributions

KJF designed this study, analysed the data, and wrote this manuscript. SB assisted in study design, analysis, and manuscript preparation. SAS was involved in the initiation of this study. SAS, JF, and DC provided guidance on study design, and extensively reviewed and commented on this manuscript throughout the editing process. All authors have reviewed and approved the final paper.

Competing interests

The study was supported by a grant from Merck Canada but the authors declare that they have no additional competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the University of Manitoba’s Health Ethics Review board {H2014:411 (HS17918)}. Due to the retrospective, observational nature of the study, and the regulations regarding the use of de-identified administrative health data within the province of Manitoba, no individual patient consent is required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn Bugden.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Friesen, K.J., Chateau, D., Falk, J. et al. Cost of shingles: population based burden of disease analysis of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. BMC Infect Dis 17, 69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2185-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2185-3

Keywords