Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Throat culture positivity rate and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of beta-hemolytic streptococci in children on secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease

Abstract

Background

Among children diagnosed to have chronic rheumatic valvular heart disease (RHD) in Ethiopia, many have been observed to develop recurrence of rheumatic fever (RF) despite secondary prophylaxis. This study determined the throat culture positivity rate and drug susceptibility pattern of beta hemolytic streptococci (BHS) isolated from children attending a specialized cardiac clinic in Ethiopia.

Methods

Throat swabs were collected from 233 children receiving benzathine penicillin injection as secondary prophylaxis for RHD and cultured. The bacterial isolates were characterized using Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Drug susceptibility was tested with the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. Anti-streptolysin O (ASO) titers were determined using ASO latex reagents.

Results

The throat culture positivity rate for BHS was 24 % (56/233). Among the BHS bacterial strains isolated, four were characterized as S. pyogenes and another four as S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (Lancefield group A, C and G). All BHS were susceptible to penicillin except one isolate of S. agalactiae. Among 233 children enrolled, 46(19.7 %) showed increased ASO titer. Children who received antibiotic prophylaxis within 2-weeks of last injection had significantly lower BHS throat culture positivity rate than those injected every 4-weeks (p = 0.02). Children who missed at least one prophylaxis within the last 6 months had a higher BHS culture positivity rate than those who did not miss any (p = 0.0003).

Conclusions

The presence of groups A, C and G streptococci in the throat of children under secondary prophylaxis for RHD and increased ASO titer suggests failure of the regimen. This calls for further investigation into the causes of inadequate prophylaxis (including bioavailability of drugs used, optimal duration and patient compliance) and intervention.

Peer Review reports

Background

Rheumatic fever (RF) is a non-suppurative, auto-inflammatory multi-system response following infection by group A beta hemolytic streptococci (BHS) also known as Streptococcus pyogenes [1]. Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis expressing Lancefield group A (GAS), C (GCS) or G (GGS) antigen is phylogenetically related to S. pyogenes. It has recently emerged as a potential pathogen and there is concern that it might cause human infections similar to S. pyogenes including RF [2–5]. Eleven non-group A-BHS strains have previously been recovered from RF and/or rheumatic valvular heart disease (RHD) patients in Ethiopia [6].

Rheumatic heart disease is the most dreaded complication of recurrent RF. Unless treated, the valve damage can eventually lead to chronic intractable heart failure and premature death. In developing countries, facilities for this treatment are almost non-existent [7]. Although its incidence is decreasing in industrialized countries, RHD remains a major challenge in the rest of the world. The highest prevalence is in sub-Saharan Africa with a rate of 5.7 per 1000, compared to 1.8 per 1000 in North Africa, and 0.3 per 1000 in economically advanced countries [8]. In Ethiopia, RHD is the number one cardiac problem in children with a prevalence rate of 4.6–7.1 per 1000 [9, 10]. Data from hospitals indicate that about one third [32.8 % (256/781) [11] and 39.2 % (127/324) [12]] of heart disease cases are due to RHD. Among 457 cardiovascular deaths including cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) from January 1995 to December 2001 in the current study site, TikurAnbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH), 26.5 % (121) were due to RHD [13]. Güntheret al. also reported 125.3 per 1000 person-year mortality rate during 7 years of follow up of RHD patients at Dabat Health Centre in North Gondar, which amounted to 12.5 % annual mortality rate among RHD patients seen in this community [14].

The economic effects of the disability and premature death caused by these diseases are felt at both the individual and national levels through increased direct and indirect health care costs. The most cost effective approach for the control of RHD is secondary prophylaxis with penicillin injection every 3 or 4-weeks [14]. Careful penicillin delivery results in recurrence prevention also in high risk areas [15]. However, in our study setting in Ethiopia, implementation of secondary antibiotic prevention is challenged by missed opportunities for treatment, poor access to health care and inadequate treatment of tonsillopharyngitis with failure to eradicate S. pyogenes from the throat [14, 16]. Therefore, we investigated the throat culture positivity rate, BHS strain types and antibiotic susceptibility patterns and their relations to dose intervals of penicillin in children on secondary prophylaxis for RHD at TASH.

Methods

Study design and population

Two hundred and thirty-three children who were on secondary prophylaxis for RHD were enrolled in the study. The participants were recruited consecutively as they came to the cardiac clinic for their follow up appointment. The study was conducted at the Pediatric Cardiac Clinic of TASH in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, between July 2013 and June 2014.

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Review Committees of the College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University and the Armauer Hansen Research Institute/All African Leprosy Rehabilitation and Training Centre (AHRI/ALERT). Written informed consent was obtained from each child’s parent or guardian and assent from study participants older than 12 years. Parents/ guardians consented to sending bacterial isolates for typing at the Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway. Sample export permission was obtained from the Ethiopian Institute of Biodiversity and the Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, approved the analysis of the bacterial isolates.

Socio-demographic, risk factors, clinical and laboratory data

General socio-demographic characteristics and risk factors for the spread of BHS including assessment of adherence to penicillin intake were collected by a structured questionnaire. Additional laboratory and clinical data were collected from patient records.

Sample collection and processing

Throat swab samples were collected by trained nurses. The tonsillar fauces and the posterior pharyngeal wall behind the uvula were swabbed using sterile swab applicators (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Each swab was immersed into a test tube containing skim milk-tryptone-glucose-glycerin (STGG) medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The samples were stored at +4 °C and transported to the AHRI bacteriology laboratory within 8 h. Two ml of venous blood was aseptically collected from each study participant and serum stored at -80 °C. Anti-streptolysin O (ASO) latex reagents (LiNEAR Chemicals. s. L, Spain) were used to determine ASO titer according to manufacturer’s recommendations.

Isolation and characterization of ß-hemolytic streptococci

The throat swabs were streaked on 7 % defibrinated sheep blood agar plates (Becton, Dickinson, USA) and incubated under CO2 at 37 °C for 24–48 h. ß-hemolytic colonies were subcultured, and the isolates were tested with catalase test, Gram stain, and bacitracin susceptibility test. All catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci were stored in STGG media at -80 °C and transported to the University of Oslo on dry ice for further characterization. All BHS isolates were serogrouped by a streptococcal grouping latex kit (Pro-Lab Diagnostics, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) analyses was performed at the University of Oslo by the direct colony method by using the Microflex mass spectrometer (BrukerDaltonics, Germany) for species differentiation. Streptococcal strains isolated from throat swabs were re-cultivated on 5 % human blood agar media. A 1 μL inoculation loop full of each of the bacterial isolates was obtained from a fresh culture, deposited in duplicate on the target plate and smeared. The bacterial film was first overlaid with 1 μL formic acid (100 %) and then with 1 μL matrix α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA). Two spots were prepared for each bacterial isolate. The target plate was inserted into the Microflex mass spectrometer and the spectra generated were analyzed by the MALDI Biotyper 3.0 software (BrukerDaltonics, Germany) and matched to the Biotyper 3.0 database.

All BHS were tested for susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics with the disk diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) supplemented with 5 % defibrinated sheep blood using standard methods. The BHS were tested against the following antibiotics: penicillin G (10 units), oxacillin (1 μg,), ceftriaxone (30 μg), vancomycin (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), quinopristin-dalfopristin (15 μg), linezolid (30 μg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 μg). Test interpretation was done according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [17].

Data management and analysis

Data was entered and summarized using SPSS version 20 software (USA) and analyzed using the STATA software (StataCorp LP, College. Station, Texas, USA). Comparisons were made using the Chi—square test. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered indicative of a statistically significant difference.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants

Two hundred and thirty-three children in the age range of 5–15 years who were on secondary prophylaxis for RHD participated in this study. Three-fourths of them were aged between 10 and 15 years and girls accounted for 59.1 %. All of the participants were on monthly penicillin G prophylaxis. The most common valve lesions observed in the children were mitral regurgitation (92.3 %), tricuspid regurgitation (67.0 %) and aortic regurgitation (54.1 %). Eighty-nine (38.2 %) participants had been referred for possible surgical interventions, but only three had received this treatment.

Frequency of beta-hemolytic streptococcal culture positivity in children under prophylaxis

A total of 58 BHS were isolated from fifty-six participants. The throat culture positivity rate of BHS was 24 % (56/233). GAS occurred in 2.6 % (6/233) and accounted for 10.3 % of the BHS (6/58). Twenty-five (43.1 %) of the BHS belonged to serogroup F, 22 (37.9 %) to serogroup G, 2 to serogroup C, 1 to group B and 2 could not be allocated to any type. In addition to conventional characterization, all streptococcal strains were identified to the species level by MALDI-TOF MS (Table 1). The majority of the isolates belonged to S. anginosus (36.2 %) and S. constellatus (43.1 %). S. pyogenes and S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis accounted for 6.9 % each, while 5.2 % could not be classified. Among the 6 group GAS isolates, four were bacitracin-susceptible S. pyogenes and the other 2 were bacitracin-resistant S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis. S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis strains expressing either Lancefield group A, C or G were detected in this study.

Table 1 Species and serogroup distribution of beta hemolytic streptococci isolated from children with rheumatic heart disease

Speciation of 41 isolates which were difficult to distinguish as either α or β hemolytic on sheep blood agar plates showed that the majority were either S. parasanguinis or S. mitis (31.7 % each). S. oralis, S. pneumoniae, S. constellatus, and S. perioris accounted for 7.3, 4.9, 2.4, and 2.4 % of these strains, respectively. However, 19.5 % bacitracin-susceptible isolates could not be classified further. Most S. parasanguinis (84.6 %) and about half of S. mitis (54.5 %) were similarly bacitracin-sensitive. One single a-hemolytic S. constellatus isolate was found to possess Lancefield group C antigen.

Antibiotic susceptibility

All BHS isolates were susceptible to penicillin except for one strain of S. agalactiae. This isolate was also resistant to tetracycline, oxacillin, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin. All four S. pyogenes isolates were susceptible to penicillin and vancomycin. One isolate of S. pyogenes was resistant to erythromycin and another intermediately resistant. Overall, the sensitivity of BHS to erythromycin was 87 % (48/55 tested). All BHS were non-susceptible to oxacillin, and almost half of them (46.3 %) were also non-susceptible to ceftriaxone.

Anti-streptolysin O titer

Among 233 participants, 69 (29.6 %) had a positive ASO titer (≥200 IU/ml). Of these, 66.7 % (46/69) had ASO > 200 IU/ml, suggesting recent infection. The prevalence of an increased ASO titer was 19.7 %. Out of 8 children who had S. pyogenes or S. dysgalactiae in their throat culture, 6 had ASO titer ≥ 200 IU/ml, indicating an active infection. There was a statistically significant association between BHS culture positivity and ASO positivity (p = 0.0315) (Table 2). Among 56 patients for whom species and serogroups could be determined, 23 were positive for ASO titer (Figs. 1 and 2).

Table 2 Relationship between ASO titer and BHS infection in children on antibiotic prophylaxis for RHD
Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of BHS species and ASO titer among children on secondary antibiotic prophylaxis for RHD

Fig. 2
figure 2

ASO titer and BHS serogoup distribution among children on secondary antibiotic prophylaxis for RHD

Relationship between isolation of BHS from the throat and antibiotic use

Participants missing prophylaxis had a higher likelihood of having BHS in their throat (p = 0. 0003) (Table 3). Children who received antibiotic prophylaxis at intervals of between 22 and 28 days had 1.6 times higher risk to have been colonized by BHS than those receiving prophylaxis at intervals of ≤16 days (p = 0. 02, OR = 2.6, CI =1. 16–5.85) (Table 4). Children who received antibiotic prophylaxis at an interval of ≥ 29 days had a 2.6 times higher risk of BHS colonization (p = 0.003, OR = 3. 61, CI = 1.5–8.46).

Table 3 Risk factors associated with BHS colonization of throat in children on antibiotic prophylaxis for RHD
Table 4 Duration of interval between penicillin injections as risk factor for throat colonization with BHS

Of three participants who had S. pyogenes, two of them had received their last dose more than 16 days before but one had the last injection less than 16 days ago. In the same way, among 3 participants who had S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis, two had received injection at an interval of more than 16 days and only one less than 16 days ago.

Discussion

This study was carried out to determine the effectiveness of secondary antibiotic prophylaxis in eliminating GAS and other BHS from the throat of children with RHD under follow-up at a pediatric cardiac clinic of a tertiary hospital. Almost one quarter of the children (24 %) were culture positive for BHS in their throat, and 20 % had increased ASO titer suggesting active infection. Children who received antibiotic prophylaxis within 2-weeks of last injection had significantly lower BHS culture positivity rate than those injected every 4-weeks (p = 0. 02). Children who missed at least one prophylaxis injection within the last 6 months had a higher BHS culture positivity rate than those who did not miss any (p = 0.0003).

Defaulting from regular follow up is a strong contributor to mortality from RHD [14]. Four-week intervals of injections would be expected to have less defaulting rates than 3-week intervals. On the other hand, two-weekly and three-weekly intramuscular penicillin injections have been reported to perform better in reducing the recurrence of streptococcal throat infections and episodes of RF with higher concentration of penicillin in the serum when compared to four-weekly injection [18, 19]. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Heart Association both recommend a three-weekly regimen for individuals living in a high risk area [20, 21]. Although Ethiopia is a high risk area for RHD, the current regimen for secondary antibiotic prophylaxis in Ethiopia is a four- weekly administration of intramuscular penicillin G injections.

Among 230 patients, 30.9 % had a history of documented recurrence of RF which is comparable to a study conducted in a Pacific island population (38. of 144 participants) (p = 0. 145) [22]. Rheumatic heart disease frequency is higher in females (59.1 %), which is in agreement with population and hospital based studies conducted in Ethiopia and elsewhere [6, 23]. Eighty-nine (38.2 %) were referred for possible surgical intervention of which only three participants received this intervention. A delay in surgical intervention for more than 1 year was observed in 46.5 % (40/86) of cases. This delay of heart valve surgical intervention for more than 1 year was comparable with what it was like in Egypt 15-years ago [23].

In the current study, 29.6 % of the participants were positive for ASO and 20 % showed increased ASO titer indicating recent streptococcal infections. There was a statistically significant association between BHS culture positivity rate and ASO positivity, also considering patient age [24]. BHS expressing Lancefield group A, C and G infections are reported to cause a rise in ASO titer in serum [25–27]. This argues for infection rather than simple colonization.

The reason for a high prevalence of BHS and increased ASO titer despite antibiotic prophylaxis in the current study is not explained by lack of susceptibility to penicillin since no isolate was resistant to the drug in vitro. It appears that the timing of the antibiotic prophylaxis is a more significant factor. Children who received antibiotic prophylaxis within 2-weeks of the last dose exhibited significantly lower BHS culture positivity than those who received four-weekly injection (p = 0. 02). There was no statistically significant difference between 2- and 3-weeks of injection although a trend could be observed in that a higher percentage of participants showed more BHS culture positivity rate in the 3-week interval group. We have not evaluated the dynamics of penicillin bioavailability in our patients. Reduced serum penicillin G due to any cause may lead to ineffective prophylaxis. This could be due to poor quality of drugs as brands of penicillin prescribed may vary in effectiveness [23], but it could also be due to patient-specific factors. Some individuals have been reported to degrade penicillin G in their serum faster than others [18, 28]. This is obviously aggravated when the interval of injection is longer.

Recurrence of RF and reduced ability of penicillin to eradicate BHS are reported continuously from several parts of the world, indicating failure of benzathine penicillin G prophylaxis [18, 19, 29, 30]. A combination of factors has to be considered in each particular setting before an appropriate regimen is selected for the respective population [19]. One major problem in secondary prophylaxis for RHD is compliance. In our series, 14.2 % of the participants had missed one or more injections within the last 6-months of follow up, and these participants had a significantly higher BHS culture positivity rate (p = 0.0003) than others. We did not find any significant association of factors such as age, sex, history of family pharyngitis, uvulectomy and family educational status with culture positivity of BHS or failure of regimen.

The BHS culture positivity rate (24.0 %) was similar to a study conducted on chronic RHD patients about 25-years ago (20.45 %) (p = 0. 61) [6]. Although the children had received on-going monthly penicillin G prophylaxis this culture positivity rate was significantly higher than that reported for healthy schoolchildren in Addis Ababa by Abdissa and colleagues (17.7 %) (P = 0. 03) [31]. It seems that Group F and G BHS were prominent in the present study, a finding which is comparable with other studies conducted elsewhere, such as in Mumbai where Group C and G streptococcal disease burden was higher than GAS among schoolchildren [2, 32]. Even though the type of prophylaxis and the methodology is different, the present finding showed a lower culture positivity rate as compared with a carrier rate of 15.4 % GAS among 26 patients on once-weekly azithromycin (AZT), but higher than 22 patients taking oral penicillin (0 %) [33].

In addition to traditional methods (beta-hemolytic characteristics, catalase test, gram stains and serogouping), species identification was also performed by MALDI-TOF MS. Among six GAS, four were S. pyogenes. The other 2 were bacitracin-resistant S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis. In the current study, S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis possessing Lancefield group A, C and G were isolated. There are reports that S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis expressing Lancefield group A is on the rise as a pathogen [3, 34]. In the present study, four S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis were isolated from four RHD patients, raising a suspicion whether these organisms are associated with RHD. Pharyngeal Group C and G have often been detected in patients with RF/RHD in endemic countries but there is as yet no conclusive evidence whether these organisms do cause acute RF as is known for Group A strains [2, 6, 35, 36].

We observed that 3 BHS isolates and some alpha-hemolytic streptococcal isolates including S. pneumoniae were not correctly identified by MALDI-TOF MS speciation (very small score value and inconsistent results). Others have also observed that some strains were not correctly identified by this method and that improvements to this technique as well as complementary tests are needed [37].

In the present study, all GAS isolates were susceptible to penicillin, which is comparable with other studies conducted in Ethiopia and elsewhere [31, 38]. Penicillin-resistant GAS is not yet reported from this setting [38, 39]. Penicillin non-susceptible S. agalactiae/ group B streptococcus and susceptible group G and F streptococci were, however, observed in the present study, which is in contrast with studies conducted elsewhere [31, 32]. Penicillin and oxacillin susceptibility results were also discordant in this study.

In the present study, one GAS strain was erythromycin-resistant and another one intermediately susceptible to erythromycin. Erythromycin-resistant GAS strains are emerging. Studies have reported proportions of 96.1 % [39] and 38 % of GAS resistance to erythromycin [40]. One report high-lighted how macrolide treatment failure in streptococcal pharyngitis resulted in acute RF [40]. Thus, these are indications that antimicrobial drug resistance is emerging among BHS as well [32, 38]. For diagnostic purposes, the emerging bacitracin resistance S. pyogenes should be noted [41].

Presumptive identification of BHS on blood agar is not necessarily straight-forward. Human blood agar is not recommended for BHS isolation [42, 43]. We observed, as others have also experienced, that some alpha-hemolytic streptococci are difficult to differentiate from BHS, especially when the incubation time is extended to 48 h. Many of them were bacitracin susceptible (84.6 % of S. parasanguinis, 54.5 % of S. mitis and 8 unclassified others). In other studies, bacitracin susceptibility was reported in some GCS and as high as 67 % among GGS [44] and 12.2 % among non-group A BHS [45]. On the other hand, bacitracin resistance S. pyogenes was reported elsewhere [41]. This calls for improvements in typing techniques in clinical laboratories in order to monitor trends of RHD epidemiology and control.

Conclusion

A relatively high prevalence of BHS was detected among RHD patients who were under secondary antibiotic prophylaxis. S. pyogenes and S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis were isolated from the throat together with Group F and Group G streptococci. Therefore, the presence of GAS, GCS and GGS and increased ASO titer indicating recent streptococcal infection might suggest inadequate prophylaxis and may call for a review of the regimen in use and a better monitoring of trends with larger studies including bioavailability of penicillin lots in use. Continuous health education to caretakers and children regarding the importance of taking the benzathine penicillin prophylaxis on time as prescribed is recommended.

Abbreviations

AHRI:

Armauer Hansen Research Institute

ASO:

Anti-Streptolysin O

BHS:

Beta hemolytic streptococci

GAS:

Group A Streptococcus

GCS:

Group C streptococcus

GGS:

Group G streptococcus

MALDI-TOF MS:

Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization/-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry

RF:

Rheumatic Fever

RHD:

Rheumatic Heart Disease

STGG:

Skim milk, Trypton Soya broth, Glucose, Glycerin

TASH:

TikurAnbessa Specialized Hospital

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Lee JL, Naguwa SM, Cheema GS, Gershwin ME. Acute rheumatic fever and its consequences: A persistent threat to developing nations in the 21st century. Autoimmun Rev. 2009;9:117–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bramhachari PV, Kaul SY, McMillan DJ, Shaila MS, Karmarkar MG, Sriprakash KS. Disease burden due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (group G and C streptococcus) is higher than that due to Streptococcus pyogenes among Mumbai school children. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59:220–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandt CM, Haase G, Schnitzler N, Zbinden R, Lu¨Tticken R. Characterization of Blood Culture Isolates of Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. Equisimilis Possessing Lancefield’s Group A Antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(12):4194–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rantala S. Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis bacteremia: an emerging infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(8):1303–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rantala S, Tuohinen S. Two cases of cardiac device-related endocarditis due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (group C or G streptococci). BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:174. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tewodros W, Muhe L, Daniel E, Schalen C, Kronvall G. A one-year study of streptococcal infections and their complications among Ethiopian children. Epidemiol Infect. 1992;109:211–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Carapetis JR, McDonald M, Wilson NJ. Acute rheumatic fever. Lancet. 2005;366:155–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:685–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oli K, Porteous J. Prevalence of rheumatic heart disease among school children in Addis Ababa. East Afr Med J. 1999;76:601–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oli K, Tekle-Haimanot R, Forsgren L, Ekstedt J. Rheumatic heart disease prevalence among schoolchildren of an Ethiopian rural town. Cardiology. 1992;80(2):152–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Habte B, Alemseged F, Tesfaye D. The pattern of cardiac diseases at the Cardiac Clinic of Jimma University Specialised Hospital, South West Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2010;20(2):99–105.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mehadi Y, Gedlu E, Chali D. Pattern of cardiac disease at pediatric cardiac clinic of TikurAnbessa Hospital. Ethiopian Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health. 2006;2(1):27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oli K, Asmera J. Rheumatic heart disease in Ethiopia: could it be more malignant? Ethiop Med J. 2004;42(1):1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Günther G, Asmera J, Parry E. Death from rheumatic heart disease in rural Ethiopia. Lancet. 2006;367(9508):391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spinetto H, Lennon D, Horsburgh M. Rheumatic fever recurrence prevention: A nurse-led programme of 28-day penicillin in an area of high endemnicity. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011;47:228–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Petricca K, Mamo Y, Haileamlak A, Seid E, Parry E. Barriers To effective follow-up treatment for rheumatic heart disease in Jimma, Ethiopia: A grounded theory analysis of the patient experience. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2009;19(1):39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fifth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S25 (ISBN 1-56238-989-0 [Print]; ISBN 1-56238-990-4 [Electronic]). 950 West Valley Road: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Broderick MP, Hansen CJ, Faix DJ. Factors Associated with loss of Penicillin G concentrations in serum after intramuscular Benzathine Penicillin G injection: A meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012;31:722–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Manyemba J, Mayosi BM. Penicillin for secondary prevention of rheumatic fever. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2002;Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002227. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002227.

  20. Dajani A, et al. Treatment of acute streptococcal pharyngitis and prevention of rheumatic fever: a statement for health professionals. Committee on rheumatic fever, endocarditis, and kawazaki disease of the council on cardiovascular disease in the young, the American Heart Association. Pediatrics. 1995;90(4 Pt 1):758–64.

    Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Report of a WHO study group. Geneva. WHO technical report series. 1988; No. 764):19-21.

  22. Seckeler MD, Hoke TR, Gurka MJ, Barton LL. No demonstrable effect of benzathine penicillin on recurrence of rheumatic fever in Pacific Island Population. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010;31:849–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bassill A, Zaher SR, Zaki A, Abdel-Fatah M, Tognoni G. Profile of secondary prophylaxis among children with rheumatic heart disease in Alexandria, Egypt. East Mediterr Health J. 2000;6(2/3):437–46.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kotby AA, Habeeb NM, Ezz El Elarab S. Antistreptolysin O titer in health and disease: levels and significance. Pediatr Rep. 2012;4(1):e8. 0.4081/pr.2012.e8. PMID: 22690314.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Uckay I, Ferry T, Stern R, Ambrosioni J, Gamulin A, Andrey D, Djordjevic M, Bernard L, Hoffmeyer P, Lew D. Use of serum antistreptolysin O titers in the microbial diagnosis of orthopedic infections. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13(4):421–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Janssen TLTA, Janssen M, MacFarlane JD, DE Jong AJL. Post streptococcal reactive myalgia: A novel syndrome secondary to infection with group A or G streptococci. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37:1343–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Okumura K, Hara A, Tanaka T, Nishiguchi I, Minamide W, Igarashi H, Yutsudo T. Cloning and sequencing the streptolysin O genes of group C and group G Streptococci. Taylor Francis Group. 1994;4(5):325–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaplan EL, Chhatwal GS, Rohde M. Reduced ability of penicillin to eradicate ingested group A streptococci from epithelial cells: clinical and pathogenetic implications. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1398–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaplan EL, Johnson DR. Unexplained reduced microbiological efficacy of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G and of oral penicillin V in eradication of group a streptococci from children with acute pharyngitis. Pediatrics. 2001;108:1180–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baldassarri L, Creti R, Recchia S, Imperi M, Facinelli B, Giovanetti E, Pataracchia M, Alfarone G, Orefici G. Therapeutic failures of antibiotics used to treat macrolide-susceptible streptococcus pyogenes infections may be due to biofilm formation. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(8):2721–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Abdissa A, Asrat D, Kronvall G, Shitu B, Achiko D, Zeidan M, Yamuah LK, Aseffa A. Throat carriage rate and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of group A Streptococci (GAS) in healthy Ethiopian school children. Ethiop Med J. 2011;49(2):125–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Devi U, Borah PK, Mahanta J. The prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of beta-hemolytic streptococci colonizing the throats of schoolchildren in Assam, India. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011;5(11):804–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gopal R, Harikrishnan S, Sivasankaran S, Ajithkumar VK, Titus T, Tharakan JM. Once weekly azithromycin in secondary prevention of rheumatic fever. Indian Heart J. 2012;6401:12–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Katsukawa C, Tamaru A, Morikawa Y. Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. Equisimilis possessing Lancefield’s group A antigen. KansenshogakuZasshi. 2002;76(3):155–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McDonald M, Towers RJ, Andrews RM, Carapetis JR, Currie BJ. Epidemiology of Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis in Tropical Communities, Northern Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(11):1694–700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Brandt CM, Spellerberg B. Human Infections Due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae Subspecies equisimilis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:766–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, Raoult D. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(4):543–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Traub WH, Leonhard B. Comparative susceptibility of clinical group A, B, C, F, and G beta-hemolytic streptococcal isolates to 24 antimicrobial drugs. Chemotherapy. 1997;43(1):10–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Syrogiannopoulos GA, Grivea IN, Fitoussi F, Doit C, Katopodis GD, Bingen E. High prevalence of erythromycin resistance of Streptococcus pyogenes in Greek children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20(9):863–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Logan LK, McAuley JB, Shulman ST. Macrolide treatment failure in streptococcal pharyngitis resulting in acute rheumatic fever. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):e798–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Olender A, Letowska I, Karyński M, Kiernicka-Ciekot K, Pels K. Problems with identification of beta hemolytic streptococcus resistance to bacitracin isolated from patients with pharyngitis. Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2012;64(1):1–10. Polish.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Satzke C, Seduadua A, Russell FM. Comparison of citrated human blood, citrated sheep blood, and defibrinated sheep blood Mueller-Hinton Agar preparations for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumonia Isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(10):3770–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Russell FM, Biribo SSN, Carapetis JR. As a bacterial culture medium, citrated sheep blood agar is a practical alternative to citrated human blood Agar in Laboratories of Developing Countries. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(9):3346–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Vartian C, Lerner PI, Shlaes DM, Gopalakrishna KV. Infections due to Lancefield group G streptococci. Medicine. 1985;64:75–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gunn BA. SXT and TAXO A Disks for presumptive identification of group A and B Streptococci in throat cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1976;4(2):192–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the study participants and their caregivers. We thank Mrs. Amina Beshir and Hana Takele for help in data collection and Mrs. Tsehaynesh Lemma, Mrs. Selam Jemberu and Mr. Zebene Andarge for their assistance.

We thank Marie Noer and Anne K. Steffensen for technical assistance with the MALDI-TOF analysis.

Funding

This work was funded from AHRI core budget with contributions from the University of Oslo (Norway) and Addis Ababa University (Ethiopia) as well as the Research Council of Norway (RCN) (GLOBVAC projects #220901 and 234506). AHRI is supported by NORAD and SIDA.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

NZ and TT performed the laboratory activities. NZ and AA analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. DA, YW, AH, EG, TT and AA reviewed the manuscript. NZ, EG and AA participated in its design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Review Committees of the College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University and the Armauer Hansen Research Institute/All African Leprosy Rehabilitation and Training Centre (AHRI/ALERT). Written informed consent was obtained from each child’s parent or guardian and assent from study participants older than 12 years. Parents/ guardians consented to sending bacterial isolates for typing at the Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway. Sample export permission was obtained from the Ethiopian Institute of Biodiversity and the Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, approved the analysis of the bacterial isolates.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigus Zegeye.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zegeye, N., Asrat, D., Woldeamanuel, Y. et al. Throat culture positivity rate and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of beta-hemolytic streptococci in children on secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease. BMC Infect Dis 16, 510 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1841-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1841-3

Keywords