Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Lack of implementation of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) vaccination policy in household contacts of HBV carriers in Italy

  • Paola Scognamiglio1,
  • Enrico Girardi1Email author,
  • Mario Fusco2,
  • Pierluca Piselli1,
  • Silvana Russo Spena3,
  • Carmela Maione2,
  • Francesco Aurelio Pisanti4,
  • Diego Serraino5 and
  • the Collaborating Study Group6
BMC Infectious Diseases20099:86

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-86

Received: 04 February 2009

Accepted: 07 June 2009

Published: 07 June 2009

Abstract

Background

In Italy, HBV vaccination is recommended and offered free of charge through the National Health Service to selected population groups – e.g., family members of an HBsAg carrier, healthcare workers, newborns and those who were 12-years old in 1991. However, a significant proportion of cases of acute hepatitis B still occur in Italy among persons who should have been vaccinated. We analysed HBV sero-prevalence data of two vaccination target populations (people born after 1980 and household contacts of an HBV carrier) living in a southern Italian area in order to evaluate HBV vaccine coverage and its possible determinants.

Methods

Between 2003 and 2006, we carried out a cross-sectional, population-based, sero-epidemiological survey on HBV infection on 4496 randomly selected individuals (aged 20 years or more) from the general population of the province of Naples. Sera were tested for antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBsAg) by commercial immunoassays. Prevalence of past or current HBV infection and of HBV vaccination-induced immunity was calculated in two vaccination target populations. To analyze the association of epidemiological and socioeconomic characteristics with HBV vaccination of household contacts, we calculated crude and multiple logistic regression (MLR) odds ratio (OR).

Results

Prevalence of HBV vaccine-induced immunity (anti-HBs alone) was much lower among household contacts (25%) than among those who had been targeted for universal adolescent vaccination (81.6%). Male sex, older age, unemployment and lower education levels were associated to lower immunization rates.

Conclusion

Understanding the different uptake of hepatitis B vaccination in these populations may provide useful information for optimizing vaccination campaigns in other contexts. Our data clearly demonstrated the need of improving the uptake of vaccination for household contacts of HBV carriers.

Background

In Italy, since 1984 HBV vaccination has been recommended and offered free of charge by the National Health Service to high-risk groups – e.g., family members of HBsAg carriers, healthcare workers. In 1991, vaccination became mandatory for all newborns and for twelve year-old adolescents [1]. According to the Acute Hepatitis National Surveillance System (SEIEVA), the incidence of acute hepatitis B decreased from 5.1 cases per 100,000 persons in 1991 to 1.3 per 100,000 persons in 2005. However, a significant proportion of cases of acute hepatitis B still occur in Italy among persons who should have been vaccinated [1].

To provide further insight into missed opportunities for HBV prevention in Italy, we analyzed HBV sero-prevalence data of two target populations for HBV vaccination, i.e., people born after 1980 and household contacts of an HBV carrier, collected in a population-based survey on viral hepatitis infections [2]. The survey was conducted in the province of Naples, an area of southern Italy with the highest incidence rates of liver cancer in Europe and where about 90% of liver cancers are attributable to infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or HBV [3].

Aim of this analysis was to compare HBV vaccination coverage between two target populations.

Methods

Between 2003 and 2006, we carried out a cross-sectional, population-based, sero-epidemiological survey on hepatitis virus infections in the province of Naples. Methods of this survey have been previously described in detail [2]. Briefly, 4496 randomly selected individuals (aged 20 years or more), after signing informed consent, donated a blood sample and completed a standardized questionnaire, which included questions on HBV infected households and on HBV vaccination. The study protocol conformed to the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and had been approved by the CCR Board of Ethics.

Sera were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and for antibodies to HBV-core antigen (anti-HBc) using enzyme immunoassays (Cobas Core ll, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA); for antibodies to HBV-surface antigen (anti-HBs) by enzyme immunoassays (Anti-HBs Quant EIA II – Roche Diagnostics): samples with a reactivity >10 IU/L were considered positive [4].

For the purpose of this analysis, positive results for anti-HBc were considered to indicate past or current HBV infection, while positivity for anti-HBsAg (anti-HBs) only was considered indicative of HBV vaccination-induced immunity. Individuals who tested negative for all HBV serological markers were considered as non immune/non infected.

Statistical analysis

Prevalence of past or current HBV infection and of HBV vaccination-induced immunity was calculated in two vaccination target populations i.e. persons born ≥ 1980 and household contacts of an HBV carrier. To analyze the association of epidemiological and socioeconomic characteristics with HBV vaccination of household contacts, we compared, among those born before 1980, individuals with immune protection with those not immune/not infected. As a measure of association, we calculated odds ratio (OR) and multivariate logistic regression odds ratio (MLR-OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The MLR was adjusted for gender, age, as a priori chosen variables, and for variables significantly associated with immune protection in univariate analysis. We also performed a sensitivity analysis considering as "vaccinated", subjects that reported to have been vaccinated but testing negative for anti-HBs.

To evaluate agreement between vaccination status according to self-report and that obtained from laboratory results, we calculated the percentage of agreement and the kappa (k) statistic. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS package (version 15.00 SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).

Results

Among 577 study subjects born between 1980 and 1983 who should have been vaccinated at the age of 12 years, the overall prevalence of past or current HBV infection was 3.3%. The prevalence of HBV vaccination-induced immunity was 81.6% (471/577).

Among 247 individuals born before 1980 who reported living with an HBV carrier, the rate of anti-HBs seropositivity was 15.4% (38/247). Excluding 95 subjects with past or current HBV infection, the prevalence of anti-HBs seropositivity among households was 25% (38/152). This proportion was significantly lower than that recorded among those born between 1980 and 1983 (p = 0.0000). The overall agreement among these individuals between self-reported and serologic evidence of vaccination was 87.2%, with a k = 0.58 (p = 0.0000).

The prevalence of HBV vaccination-induced immunity among not infected household contacts born before 1980 according to socio-demographic characteristics is presented in table 1. In the final multiple logistic regression model (including terms for gender, age, education and occupation) socio-economic factors significantly associated with HBV vaccination were female gender, younger age and being employed. Sensitivity analysis confirmed these associations (data not shown).
Table 1

HB vaccination-induced immunity among not infected households born before 1980 according to socio-demographic characteristics

 

Vaccine-induced immunitya

  
 

Not Vaccinatedb N (%)

Vaccinatedc N (%)

OR (95% CI)

MLR-ORd (95% CI)

Total

114 (75.0)

38 (25.0)

  

Gender

    

   Male

47 (81.0)

11 (19.0)

1

1

   Female

67 (71.3)

27 (28.7)

1.7 (0.8–3.8)

2.6 (1.0–6.6)

Age

    

   for each 10 year increase

  

0.42 (0.40–0.45)

0.60 (0.38–0.87)

Education

    

   0–8 years

74 (81.3)

17 (18.7)

1

1

   ≥ 9 years

40 (65.6)

21 (34.4)

2.3 (1.1–4.8)

1.4 (0.6–3.3)

Current employment

    

   Employed

40 (67.8)

19 (32.2)

1

1

   Unemployed

10 (83.3)

2 (16.7)

0.4 (0.1–2.1)

0.2 (0.0–0.9)

   Student, retired, housewife

55 (84.6)

10 (15.4)

0.4 (0.2–0.9)

0.4 (0.1–1.0)

   Unknown

9 (56.2)

7 (43.8)

1.6 (0.5–5.1)

1.3 (0.4–4.4)

Marital status

    

   Ever Married

95 (77.2)

28 (22.8)

1

 

   Single

14 (63.6)

8 (36.4)

1.9 (0.7–5.1)

 

   Unknown

5 (71.4)

2 (28.6)

1.4 (0.2–7.4)

 

Infected family member

    

   Partner

24 (80.0)

6 (20.0)

1

 

   Parent

26 (63.4)

15 (36.6)

2.3 (0.8–6.9)

 

   Other

34 (75.6)

11 (24.4)

1.3 (0.4–4.0)

 

   Unknown

30 (83.3)

6 (16.7)

0.8 (0.2–2.8)

 

a In some items, the sum does not add up to the total because of missing values.

b All markers negative (HBsAg; anti-HBc; anti-HBs)

c Only anti-HBs positive

d Adjusted for gender, age and education and current employment

Discussion

In our study, HBV vaccination coverage significantly differed between two target populations studied in the same geographical area at high HBV prevalence. Vaccine coverage among individuals who should have been vaccinated at the age of 12, in agreement with previous surveys [5, 6], was quite high (81.6%) although lower than 93.6% coverage measured globally in Italy [6].

In contrast, the prevalence of anti-HBs seropositivity among household contacts of an HBV carrier was 15.4%, reaching 25% if we exclude those already infected, and we found that 46.1% of contacts were still HBV susceptible. Our data are similar to those found in a study in the United Kingdom showing that only 27% of susceptible contacts were immunized [7]. Understanding the different uptake of HBV vaccination in these two populations may provide useful information for optimizing HBV vaccination campaigns in other contexts.

In vaccination campaign for 12 year-old individuals, vaccine candidates were directly contacted by health districts vaccination units, after identification through lists of residents or lists of school attendees. Moreover a vaccination certificate was required for eighth grade final examination [5]. In contrast, vaccination for household contacts relies on referral to vaccination units of candidates by family physicians or by other health care providers involved in the diagnosis and care of HBV infection. Indeed, there is evidence of a low level of attention on family spread of HBV infection both by many patients and their physicians [8, 9]. We could then speculate that active involvement of vaccination units may have been a key factor in promoting access to HBV vaccination. Our study also shows that individuals' factors may contribute to lack of immunization among household contacts of an HBV carrier. In fact in our study population, older persons, those unemployed and those with lower education were less likely to have HBV vaccination-induced immunity. These observations suggest that targeted strategies should be implemented to reach these persons.

We identified some potential limitations and weaknesses of our study. Considering anti-HBs a proxy of vaccination can introduce a misclassification of outcome because in some HBV vaccinated individuals antibody titres decline with time after the first vaccination, to below the level of 10 IU/L and some are non-responders [4]. On the other hand there was a good agreement between serological results and self reported data on vaccination, similar associations were found when we used self-reported vaccination as an outcome in the analysis instead of anti-HBs positivity. Another limitation of this study is that we have defined "household contacts of an HBV carrier" on the basis of a self-administered questionnaire but we do not have any clinical confirmation of this information.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our data clearly demonstrated the need of improving the uptake of vaccination for household contacts of HBV carriers. Active recruitment of potential candidates into vaccination programs may be needed to achieve this goal. In this context information campaigns for HBV infected patients and health care providers may be needed and implementation of centralised, hospital-based immunisation programs, including home visits, should be considered [10].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Collaborating Study Group consists of the following members who have contributed to this study: Giuseppe Ippolito, Simona Barzoni Secchia, Stefania Bellelli, Maria Rosaria Capobianchi, Fabrizio Carletti, Claudia Cimaglia, Paola Di Folco, Anna Rosa Garbuglia, Luca Iezzi, Mariacarmela Solmone, Massimiliano Scuderi (National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani, IRCCS, Rome); Felice Avella, Pietro Di Cicco, Pasquale Quadrano (Campania Cancer Registry, Naples, Italy); Letizia Gigli, Raffaele Palombino, (Unit of Epidemiology and Prevention, ASL NA4 Brusciano, Naples); Luigino Dal Maso (National Cancer Institute, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS, Aviano).

This research project was sponsored by "Ricerca Finalizzata" and "Ricerca Corrente" INMI L. Spallanzani; 'Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro', and 'International Agency for Research on Cancer' (CRA/ICE/05/08), Lyon, France.

The authors are grateful to Carla Nisii for revising the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Epidemiology and Preclinical Research, Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive, "L. Spallanzani" IRCCS
(2)
Registro Tumori della Regione Campania
(3)
Unit of Epidemiology and Prevention
(4)
Clinical Pathology Unit
(5)
Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico IRCCS
(6)
Members of the Collaborating Study Group are cited in the acknowledgements section

References

  1. Mele A, Tosti ME, Mariano A, Pizzuti R, Ferro A, Borrini B, Zotti C, Lopalco P, Curtale F, Balocchini E, Spada E, The National Surveillance System for Acute Viral Hepatitis (SEIEVA) Collaborating Group: Acute hepatitis B 14 years after the implementation of universal vaccination in Italy: areas of improvement and emerging challenges. Clin Infect Dis. 2008, 46: 868-875. 10.1086/528687.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fusco M, Girardi E, Piselli P, Palombino R, Polesel J, Maione C, Scognamiglio P, Pisanti FA, Solmone M, Di Cicco P, Ippolito G, Franceschi S, Serraino D, The Collaborating Study Group: Epidemiology of viral hepatitis infections in an area of southern Italy with high incidence rates of liver cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2008, 44: 847-853. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.01.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Franceschi S, Montella M, Polesel J, La Vecchia C, Crispo A, Dal Maso L, Casarin P, Izzo F, Tommasi LG, Chemin I, Trépo C, Crovatto M, Talamini R: Hepatitis viruses, alcohol, and tobacco in the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006, 15: 683-689. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gabbuti A, Romanò L, Blanc P, Meacci F, Amendola A, Mele A, Mazzotta F, Zanetti AR: Long-term immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccination in a cohort of Italian healthy adolescents. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 3129-3132. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Adamo B, Stroffolini T, Sagliocca L, Simonetti A, Iadanza F, Fossi E, Tancredi F, Mele A: Ad hoc survey of hepatitis B vaccination campaign in newborns of HBsAg positive mothers and in 12-year-old subjects in southern Italy. Vaccine. 1998, 16: 775-777. 10.1016/S0264-410X(97)00273-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Stroffolini T, Cialdea L, Tosti ME, Grandolfo M, Mele A: Vaccination campaign against hepatitis B for 12-year-old subjects in Italy. Vaccine. 1997, 15: 583-585. 10.1016/S0264-410X(96)00197-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Richardson G, Evans MR, Westmoreland D: Hepatitis B immunisation of household contacts: retrospective study of vaccine coverage. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001, 55: 934-935. 10.1136/jech.55.12.934.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Raimondo G, Isgrò G, Caccamo G, Pollicino T, Squadrito G, The Calabrian HBV Study Group: Is there a downgrading in the alert about the hepatitis B virus infection in Italy?. Dig Liver Dis. 2007, 39: 257-261. 10.1016/j.dld.2006.12.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Weinberg MS, Gunn RA, Mast EE, Gresham L, Ginsberg M: Preventing transmission of hepatitis B virus from people with chronic infection. Am J Prev Med. 2001, 20: 272-276. 10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00298-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. van Steenbergen JE, Baayen D, Peerbooms PG, Coutinho RA, Hoek van den A: Much gained by integrating contact tracing and vaccination in the hepatitis B antenatal screening program in Amsterdam, 1992–1999. J Hepatol. 2004, 40: 979-985. 10.1016/S0168-8278(04)00089-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/9/86/prepub

Copyright

© Scognamiglio et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement