Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Identification and genotyping of bacteria from paired vaginal and rectal samples from pregnant women indicates similarity between vaginal and rectal microflora

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 9, Article number: 167 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The vaginal microflora is important for maintaining vaginal health and preventing infections of the reproductive tract. The rectum has been suggested as the major source for the colonisation of the vaginal econiche.

Methods

To establish whether the rectum can serve as a possible bacterial reservoir for colonisation of the vaginal econiche, we cultured vaginal and rectal specimens from pregnant women at 35-37 weeks of gestation, identified the isolates to the species level with tRNA intergenic length polymorphism analysis (tDNA-PCR) and genotyped the isolates for those subjects from which the same species was isolated simultaneously vaginally and rectally, by RAPD-analysis.

One vaginal and one rectal swab were collected from a total of each of 132 pregnant women at 35-37 weeks of gestation. Swabs were cultured on Columbia CNA agar and MRS agar. For each subject 4 colonies were selected for each of both sites, i.e. 8 colonies in total.

Results

Among the 844 isolates that could be identified by tDNA-PCR, a total of 63 bacterial species were present, 9 (14%) only vaginally, 26 (41%) only rectally, and 28 (44%) in both vagina and rectum. A total of 121 (91.6%) of 132 vaginal samples and 51 (38.6%) of 132 rectal samples were positive for lactobacilli. L. crispatus was the most frequently isolated Lactobacillus species from the vagina (40% of the subjects were positive), followed by L. jensenii (32%), L. gasseri (30%) and L. iners (11%). L. gasseri was the most frequently isolated Lactobacillus species from the rectum (15%), followed by L. jensenii (12%), L. crispatus (11%) and L. iners (2%).

A total of 47 pregnant women carried the same species vaginally and rectally. This resulted in 50 vaginal/rectal pairs of the same species, for a total of eight different species. For 34 of the 50 species pairs (68%), isolates with the same genotype were present vaginally and rectally and a high level of genotypic diversity within species per subject was also established.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that there is a certain degree of correspondence between the vaginal and rectal microflora, not only with regard to species composition but also with regard to strain identity between vaginal and rectal isolates.

These results support the hypothesis that the rectal microflora serves as a reservoir for colonisation of the vaginal econiche.

Peer Review reports

Background

The composition of the human vaginal microflora is affected by several host factors, including, among others, age, menarche, sexual activity, pregnancy and the use of contraceptives or spermicides, as well as individual habits such as douching [1]. Several bacterial species are known to colonize both the gastrointestinal and the reproductive tract, and the rectum has been suggested to play an important role as a source or reservoir for organisms that colonize the vagina [2, 3]. It is important to establish to which degree this is also the case for lactobacilli, the predominant group of microorganisms of the normal vaginal microflora, because these bacteria are generally known to produce endogenous microbicides such as lactic acid, which acidifies the vagina, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), toxic to other bacteria and viruses, including HIV [4]. Studies of vaginal lactobacilli have demonstrated that L. crispatus, L. jensenii, L. gasseri and L. vaginalis are the most commonly recovered species of H2O2-producing lactobacilli [5–9] and the absence of H2O2-producing lactobacilli in the vagina has been associated with an increased risk for bacterial vaginosis (BV) [10, 11]. BV has been linked to increased shedding of HIV in the female genital tract [12], increased acquisition of HIV [10] and herpes simplex virus type 2 [10, 12] and with preterm birth [13].

In order to document in more detail a possible rectal origin of the vaginal microflora, this study was set up not only to compare the bacterial species present in vagina and rectum, but in addition, to compare the genotypes of those strains belonging to species that were present simultaneously at both sampling sites of the same subject.

Methods

Patients

The study was approved by the research ethics committee (IRB protocol nr 2007/096) of Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. All women attending the clinic were included and participating women gave a written informed consent. Between April and December 2007, 132 paired vaginal and rectal swabs were collected from pregnant women at 35 - 37 weeks of gestation.

Sampling procedures

All specimens were collected using nylon flocked swabs that were submerged into 1 ml of liquid Amies transport medium (eSwab, Copan Diagnostics, Brescia, It.). For rectal specimens, a swab was carefully inserted approximately 1.5 - 2 cm beyond the anal sphincter and then gently rotated to touch anal crypts.

Vaginal samples were collected by inserting a swab into the vagina. The swab was rolled round through 360 degrees against the vaginal wall at the midportion of the vault. At Ghent University Hospital, the routine screening for group B streptococci of pregnant women is always performed during the prenatal consultation at 35-37 weeks' gestation according to the CDC guidelines for the prevention of perinatal Group B streptococcal disease [14]. All study samples were collected by midwives and transported to the Laboratory for Bacteriology Research of the University of Gent within 4 hours.

Culture and Gram staining

A total of 70 μl from the Amies liquid transport medium of each of the vaginal and rectal swabs was inoculated onto Columbia CNA agar with 5% sheep blood (Columbia CNA agar, Becton Dickinson, Erembodegem, Belgium) respectively De Mann Rogosa Sharp Agar (MRS, Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and then incubated at 37°C in an anaerobic chamber (10% H2, 10% CO2, 80% N2) (BugBox, LedTechno, Heusden-Zolder, B.) for 72 h. Another 50 μl of the vaginal swab suspension was taken for smear preparation for the Gram stain.

Gram stain based grading was carried out according to modified Ison & Hay criteria [15], as described by Verhelst et al. [16].

Grade Ia specimens contained mainly Lactobacillus crispatus cell types, i.e. plump, quite homogeneous lactobacilli, grade Ib contained non-L. crispatus cell types, i.e. long or short, thin lactobacilli, grade Iab contained mixtures of L. crispatus and non-L. crispatus cell types, grade I-like contained irregular-shaped Gram positive rods, grade II contained a mixture of Lactobacillus cell types and bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria (Gardnerella, Bacteroides-Prevotella and Mobiluncus cell types), whereas samples devoid of Lactobacillus cell types with the presence of only Gardnerella, Bacteroides- Prevotella or Mobiluncus cell types were classified as grade III. Finally, samples were classified as grade IV when Gram positive cocci were predominantly present and as grade 0 when no bacterial cells were present [16].

DNA-extraction from isolates

DNA was extracted from cultured isolates by alkaline lysis as follows: One bacterial colony was suspended in 20 μl of lysis buffer (0.25% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.05 N NaOH) and heated at 95°C for 15 min. The cell lysate was diluted by adding 180 μl of distilled water. The cell debris was spun down by centrifugation at 16,000 g for 5 min. Supernatants were used for PCR or frozen at -20°C until further use.

Identification of isolates

From all 132 women, 8 colonies per subject, i.e., one colony of each of the two most abundant colony types from both Columbia CNA and MRS agar plates and for both rectal and vaginal swabs were picked, i.e. a total of 1056 isolates. Isolates were identified by tRNA intergenic length polymorphism analysis (tDNA-PCR) as described before [8, 17–19]. Briefly, the tRNA-intergenic spacer regions were amplified by PCR using consensus primers, applicable to most bacterial species, and the resulting fingerprints, obtained by separation of the amplified spacers by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI310, were compared with those of a large library of reference strains of the different species, shown in previous studies to be part of the vaginal microflora. Isolates with fingerprints that did not match fingerprints already present in the library were considered as not identifiable.

Genotyping of isolates

Isolates of species present in both vagina and rectum of the same subject were genotyped using RAPD-analysis with RAPD Ready-to-Go beads (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) as described previously [20] with primer OPM1 (5' GTT GGT GGC T) at a final concentration of 2 μM, including 0.2 μM of fluorescent TET-labeled OPM1 primer. After 5 min at 94°C, 5 min at 35°C and 5 min at 72°C, reaction mixtures were cycled 30 times in a Veriti™ Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Ca.), with the following conditions: 30 s at 94°C, 1 min at 35°C, and 1 min at 72°C, with a final extension period of 5 min at 72°C. Reaction vials were then cooled to 10°C until electrophoresis.

Capillary electrophoresis

A volume of 11.9 μl of deionized formamide (ACE formamide, Lucron, De Pinte) was mixed with 0.6 μl of an internal size standard mixture containing 0.3 μl of the ROX-400 high-density size standard (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Ca.) and 0.3 μl of Map marker 1000 size standard (BioVentures, Murfreesboro, Tn.). One μl of RAPD-PCR product was added. The mixtures were denatured by heating at 95°C for 3 min and placed directly on ice for at least 10 min. Capillary electrophoresis was carried out using an ABI-Prism 310 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems) at 60°C, at a constant voltage of 1.5 kV, and at a more or less constant current of approximately 10 mA. Capillaries with a length of 47 cm and diameter of 50 μm were filled with performance-optimized polymer 4. Electropherograms were normalized using Genescan Analysis software, version 2.1 (Applied Biosystems).

Data analysis

tDNA-PCR and RAPD fingerprints were obtained as table files from the GeneScan Analysis software (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed with BaseHopper, an in house software program [17]. The obtained tDNA fingerprints were compared with those of a library of tDNA fingerprints obtained from reference strains, representing most vaginal species isolated in previous studies and previously identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing [8].

Similarity between RAPD fingerprints was calculated using the Dice algorithm. Clustering analysis was done with the Neighbor module of the Phylip software http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html, using the Neighbour joining algorithm. Isolates of which the RAPD fingerprints were clustered together, were inspected visually to confirm similarity.

Results

Categorization of vaginal microflora

Samples were categorized as grade Ia for 55 subjects (41.6%), grade Ib for 37 (28.0%), grade Iab for 13 (9.8%), grade I-like for 5 (3.8%), grade II for 14 (10.6%), grade III for 6 (4.5%) and grade 0 for 2 (1.5%).

The most common genus recovered from grade Ia, Ib and Iab specimens was Lactobacillus. Grade Ia samples contained predominantly L. crispatus (75.0%) and L. jensenii (43.6%), whereas L. gasseri (40.5%) and L. iners (27%) were the most frequently present species in grade Ib specimens. The five grade I-like specimens were found to contain respectively Bifidobacterium bifidum and Enterococcus faecalis, L. gasseri and E. faecalis, L. jensenii, L. gasseri and Gardnerella vaginalis or L. rhamnosus.

The most characteristic cultured organisms in grade II and grade III specimens were G. vaginalis (28% and 33%, respectively), Actinomyces neuii, Aerococcus christensenii, Atopobium vaginae and Finegoldia magna. The lactobacilli cultured from the six grade III specimens were respectively L. iners, L. gasseri, L. jensenii, L. crispatus, L. rhamnosus and a combination of L. gasseri and L. vaginalis.

Rectal and vaginal prevalence of different bacterial species

For a total of 132 women, 4 colonies each were picked from the vaginal and rectal sites, i.e. a total of 1056 colonies were picked and subjected to identification by tDNA-PCR. Of these, 844 could be identified.

A total of 103 isolates gave no amplification or tDNA-PCR patterns composed of only a few and short tRNA intergenic spacers. Most of the isolates for which no amplification or only a few fragments could be obtained, are probably corynebacteria, which yield poor tDNA-PCR fingerprints (unpublished data).

Finally, 109 isolates gave uninterpretable patterns, due to mixed cultures, as was confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing for 20 of these, whereby the sequences could not be interpreted because of ambiguities, pointing to mixtures.

The frequency of vaginal and rectal colonization by lactobacilli and the other most prominent bacterial species is shown in Table 1. A total of 63 bacterial species were identified, 9 (14%) occurring only vaginally, 26 (41%) only rectally and 28 (44%) in both vagina and rectum, with 8 species that could be isolated simultaneously from rectum and vagina of 47 subjects.

Table 1 Vaginal and rectal prevalence of 63 bacterial species among 132 pregnant women
Full size table

Overall, 121 of 132 pregnant women (92%) carried vaginal lactobacilli and 52 (39%) carried rectal lactobacilli. Seventy two pregnant women (54.5%) carried lactobacilli only vaginally, three only rectally (2%) and 49 (37%) in both sites, i.e. only three women out of 52 from whom lactobacilli could be isolated rectally, did not carry lactobacilli vaginally. L. crispatus was the most frequently identified Lactobacillus species isolated from the vagina (40%, i.e., 53/132 subjects positive of which 10 also carried L. crispatus rectally), followed by L. jensenii (32%), L. gasseri (30%), L. iners (11%) and L. vaginalis (10%).

Besides these five Lactobacillus species, all other species were encountered in no more than five subjects, except for G. vaginalis (8% of subjects positive).

L. gasseri was the most frequently isolated Lactobacillus species from the rectum (20/132 subjects positive), followed by L. jensenii (16) and L. crispatus (14). L. iners was isolated rectally from only 2 subjects. L. vaginalis was isolated only from the vagina, whereas L. fermentum, L. coleohominis and L. fermentum were only isolated from the rectum, at a frequency of ≤ 1%. Rectally, the most abundant species that could be cultured, were Streptococcus anginosus group (47/132 subjects positive), Finegoldia magna (40), Peptoniphilus indolicus (25) and E. faecalis (21).

Fourty six pregnant women (35%) were colonized by at least 2 different Lactobacillus species, with 42 of them only vaginally, two only rectally and another two both in the vagina and rectum. Taking into account vaginal and rectal colonization by more than one Lactobacillus species, 18 women (13.6%) were colonized by both L. crispatus and L. jensenii, of which 17 vaginally and one rectally, five (4%) by L. jensenii and L. gasseri of which 3 vaginally and 2 rectally and another 18 (13.6%) with other combinations of Lactobacillus species. Seven subjects (5.3%) were colonized vaginally by more than two Lactobacillus species. In total, of the 121 women colonized vaginally by lactobacilli, 42 (32%) were colonized by two or more Lactobacillus species and of the 52 women colonized by lactobacilli rectally, two (1.5%) were colonized by two Lactobacillus species. A total of 47 (35%) of 132 pregnant women were colonized both vaginally and rectally with the same species and 3 of these 47 women carried two species both vaginally and rectally. The species found to be simultaneously present in the same subject both rectally and vaginally were L. crispatus (n = 10 subjects), L. jensenii (14), L. gasseri (16), S. anginosus (3), S. agalactiae (3), S. salivarius (1), E. faecalis (2) and Bifidobacterium species (1). In summary, 50 vaginal/rectal pairs of the same species were observed in 47 subjects, for a total of eight different species.

Genotyping of bacterial isolates from the vagina and the rectum

For 34 of the 50 vaginal/rectal species pairs, isolates with the same genotype were present vaginally and rectally.

Table 2 presents the genotyping results for each of the 50 vaginal/rectal species pairs. We found the same genotype for both rectal and vaginal L. crispatus isolates in 7/10 subjects, for L. gasseri in 14/16, for L. jensenii in 7/14, for Bifidobacterium species in 1/1, for E. faecalis in 1/2, for S. agalactiae in 2/3, and for S. anginosus in 2/3.

Table 2 Genotyping results for the 50 cases in which the same species could be isolated from vagina and rectum of the same subject
Full size table

Figure 1 shows the genotyping results for four pregnant women for which rectal and vaginal isolates belonged to a single genotype, for L. gasseri (Figure 1), L. crispatus (Figure 2), L. jensenii (Figure 3) and E. faecalis (Figure 4).

Figure 1
figure 1

RAPD fingerprints of vaginal and rectal L. gasseri isolates of subject RVS090. Vaginal isolates: V3 and V4; rectal isolates: R3 and R4. x-axis: length of amplified DNA fragments expressed in bps. y-axis: peak height (fluorescence intensity of DNA-fragment as measured by ABI310 capillary electrophoresis).

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

RAPD fingerprints of vaginal and rectal L. crispatus isolates of subject RVS011. Vaginal isolates: V3 and V4; rectal isolate: R3. x-axis: length of amplified DNA fragments expressed in bps. y-axis: peak height (fluorescence intensity of DNA-fragment as measured by ABI310 capillary electrophoresis).

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

RAPD fingerprints of vaginal and rectal L. jensenii isolates of subject RVS111. Vaginal isolate: V4; rectal isolates: R3 and R4. x-axis: length of amplified DNA fragments expressed in bps. y-axis: peak height (fluorescence intensity of DNA-fragment as measured by ABI310 capillary electrophoresis).

Full size image
Figure 4
figure 4

RAPD fingerprints of vaginal and rectal E. faecalis isolates of subject RVS086. Vaginal isolates: V1 and V2; rectal isolates: R1 - R4. x-axis: length of amplified DNA fragments expressed in bps. y-axis: peak height (fluorescence intensity of DNA-fragment as measured by ABI310 capillary electrophoresis).

Full size image

Genotyping results: variability among multiple isolates per subject

For only 2 of the 9 vaginal samples of which more than one L. crispatus isolate was picked, all the isolates belonged to the same genotype. For the 7 other vaginal samples, 2 to 3 genotypes of L. crispatus were present. In 7 of the 10 cases for which rectal/vaginal pairs of L. crispatus were observed, the one or two rectal L. crispatus isolates had the same genotype of at least one of the one to four vaginal isolates. For only two of the 11 women for which more than one vaginal L. jensenii isolate was present, the genotype of all isolates was identical. For another two of these 11 women, all four isolates were genotypically different. For half (7/14) of the subjects with L. jensenii, the presence of identical rectal and vaginal isolates could be established.

For the other species, a similar pattern of large heterogeneity among the vaginal strains of the same species was also observed and about half of the women were found to carry at least one vaginal isolate genotypically identical to at least one rectal isolate.

Discussion

During the last decade, the composition of the vaginal microflora has been well characterised, using culture based and culture independent methods [8, 21–27]. However, the origin of lactobacilli and BV associated bacteria remains less well-understood and different opinions exist as to whether the vaginal bacteria are largely endogenous or whether there is continuous recolonizaton from the rectum. Few studies have addressed the species composition of both vagina and rectum in the same subjects [2, 3, 5] and only the study of Marrazzo et al. [3] genotyped paired rectal/vaginal isolates, from lesbian women. To our knowledge, this is the first study among pregnant women to address the relatedness of vaginal and rectal strains to the degree of clonal identity of the strains.

Rectal and vaginal occurrence of lactobacilli

Table 3 compares the findings of this study with those of two other groups with respect to rectal and vaginal colonization by lactobacilli. The four species predominant in the vagina, as established in this study, i.e. L. crispatus, L. jensenii, L. gasseri and L. iners are in correspondence with previous studies [2, 3, 6, 16, 28–30].

Table 3 Vaginal and rectal occurrence of Lactobacillus species, expressed as percentage of subjects positive, according to different studies
Full size table

Both Antonio et al. [2] and Marrazzo et al. [3] reported L. crispatus and L. jensenii twice as much vaginally compared to their rectal occurrence, whereas we report four, respectively three times higher abundance of these species vaginally. Both groups also found approximately equal abundance for L. gasseri in rectum and vagina, whereas we could isolate twice as much L. gasseri from the vagina. L. iners was found ten times more often vaginally than rectally in this study and 20 times more vaginally than rectally in that of Antonio et al. [2], while this species was virtually absent from the study of Marrazzo et al. [3]. L. vaginalis was not found by Marrazzo et al. [3] and virtually absent in the study of Antonio et al. [2], whereas we found a vaginal carriage rate of approximately 10%.

The differences in Lactobacillus vaginal microflora between studies may be attributed to several factors. One suggestion is that the intestinal lactobacilli differ geographically [5], and the same may be true for the vaginal lactobacilli [31]. Also the populations studied differ, e.g. pregnant women in our study vs. nonpregnant women in the study of Antonio et al. [2] and lesbian women in the study of Marrazzo et al. [3]. Strong differences may exist between women, e.g. on average only 30% of the women carry L. crispatus, differences between Caucasian and black women have been reported [32], and differences may be present for each woman because samples can be taken during different phases of the menstrual cycle. More technically related factors concern variations in the way that samples are taken, transported and treated, the fact that culture media and incubation methods may strongly influence the outcome, e.g. incubation in an anaerobic chamber yields more L. vaginalis than incubation in an anaerobic jar (see below) and the use of MRS agar precludes isolation of L. iners, and that identification has often been based on phenotypic methods [33, 34].

In addition, Kim et al. [35], reported that the vaginal microflora is not homogeneous throughout the vaginal tract but differs significantly within an individual with regard to anatomical site and sampling method used.

Apparently, when based on culture, the vaginal carriage rate for L. crispatus ranges between 20 and 40% (Antonio et al. [6], Kiss et al. [28], this study), although Marrazzo et al. [3] report a carriage rate of approximately 65%. The high percentage reported by the latter group could be related to the study of a different population (lesbian women), to the use of culture methods better suited for L. crispatus and corresponds better with results obtained by non culture based methods, as reported previously [16, 22, 26, 27, 32, 36–38].

Interestingly, in a previous study of our group [8], we isolated almost no L. vaginalis, using anaerobic jars and GasPak (Becton Dickinson), yielding an atmosphere of 15% CO2, 80% N2, and less than 1% O2. Since we started using an anaerobic chamber, with an atmosphere of 10% H2, 10% CO2, and 80% N2, the number of L. vaginalis isolations has increased significantly and this species is now among the five most abundant vaginal species. Possibly, the virtual absence of L. vaginalis in the studies of Antonio et al. [2] and Marrazzo et al. [3] might be explained by the use of anaerobic culture in jars.

Comparing the reported culture results for L. iners remains also problematic, because this species does not grow on MRS agar, specifically designed to culture lactobacilli, and the small colonies it forms on most media may be more easily overlooked.

The rectal occurrence of lactobacilli in culture-based studies may be underreported. Because of lactobacilli are the predominant species vaginally, they can be easily overgrown by the predominant rectal bacteria as they represent about 0,01% of the overall cultivable bacterial intestinal population [39, 40]. However, high occurrence of intestinal lactobacilli has been reported [41, 42]. The difference with our study might be explained by the fact that these studies used fecal samples, whereas we started from rectal swabbing.

The virtual absence of L. iners from the rectum in this culture-based study is in correspondence with the findings of the other culture-based studies [2, 3]. However, preliminary data, obtained by analyzing the same samples using L. iners specific realtime PCR, indicate that for most women for which this species could be isolated by culture from the vagina, also the rectal sample is L. iners PCR positive (data not reported).

In this population of pregnant women, we isolated lactobacilli more frequently from the vagina (121 subjects, 91.6%) than from the rectum (52 subjects, 39.3%), which is in correspondence with the findings of Antonio et al. [2], who reported vaginal recovery of lactobacilli in 74% and rectal recovery in 51% of a total of 531 nonpregnant females.

Although for many women from which lactobacilli could be isolated from the vagina, no lactobacilli were isolated rectally, most of the women that carried lactobacilli rectally, also had vaginal lactobacilli, i.e. few women carried lactobacilli only rectally.

Number of Lactobacillusspecies per individual

In our study, a total of 46 (35%) of 132 pregnant women carried two or more Lactobacillus species vaginally and/or rectally. Marrazzo et al. [3] reported 72% of 237 participants to be colonized overall by lactobacilli and 24% to be overall colonized with more than one Lactobacillus species. Antonio et al. [6] reported that 8% carried more than one Lactobacillus species in the vagina.

A total of 18 women in this study were colonized by both L. crispatus and L. jensenii (17 vaginally and one rectally). Vaginal colonization of women with L. crispatus and L. jensenii has been suggested to be advantageous in the maintenance of a normal microflora and the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases [2, 6].

Genotyping results: clonal identity between vaginal and rectal isolates

RAPD was used in this study to detect genotypic similarity of vaginal and rectal strains of the same bacterial species. We could show that for 34 of the 50 pairs (68%) for which several isolates of the same species were present both in vagina and rectum, genotypic identity could be observed between at least one of the vaginal and at least one of the rectal isolates. In another study, on the same population of women, we compared the genotypes of rectal and vaginal Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococci: GBS) isolates and found clonal identity between isolates from both sites in 18 of the 19 subjects [43], confirming that also for GBS the rectally occurring strains are frequently identical to their vaginal counterparts. Because of the close proximity of the rectum to the vagina, the isolation of H2O2-producing vaginal Lactobacillus species from the rectum suggests that it may play a role as a reservoir for these microorganisms [2].

Vaginal colonization by Lactobacillus species was found to be transient in many females [7], and the rectum may be a source for vaginal recolonisation by lactobacilli after a disturbance of the ecology that follows douching, menses or sexual intercourse. Studies conducted between 1960 and 1980 indicated that while most Lactobacillus strains found in the human intestinal tract are allochthonous, L. acidophilus, L. fermentum (now L. reuteri) and L. salivarius can be isolated from individuals over longer periods [44–48]. Since on the basis of current taxonomy L. crispatus [49], L. gasseri [50] and L. iners [51] belong to the L. acidophilus complex the rectum may be a source for vaginal recolonization by these Lactobacillus species.

Genotyping results: variability among multiple isolates per subject

We found a surprising high genotypic heterogeneity within species. For the 50 species for which isolates were available from both vagina and rectum of a total of 47 pregnant women, on average of 2.2 vaginal respectively 1.3 rectal isolates were genotyped and on average 1.6 vaginal genotypes and 1.1 rectal genotypes were found for these species. It can be expected that more species pairs, more intraspecies genotypic diversity and more identical genotypes in rectum and vagina will be found, when more isolates would be picked. Although we did not sample the same subjects at different time intervals, this finding suggests the occurrence of changes in the composition of the vaginal microflora, whereby different strains of a limited number of species may replace each other, and are may be exchanged between vagina and rectum.

The high transmissibility of strains was also established in the study of Marrazzo et al. [3] by the observation that many sexual partners carried genotypically identical strains. This hypothesis may be confirmed by long term follow up of individual women, e.g. during subsequent menstrual cycles, and by picking more isolates per subject and per site at multiple time points.

Conclusion

Although it has been claimed that the vaginal microflora originates from the rectal microflora, this is to our knowledge only the second study, besides the recent study of Marrazzo et al. [3] to address this in detail at the strain level. Several of the total of 63 species identified were found only vaginally (9, i.e. 14.3%) or only rectally (26, i.e. 41.3%), but 29 species (44.4%) were isolated from both sites, indicating that many species can colonize the vagina from the rectum or migrate to the rectum from the vagina. For the 8 species for which isolates were present simultaneously in the same subject in vagina and rectum, we found considerable genotypic diversity within the species (i.e. on average 1.36 genotypes for on average 1.79 isolates per subject), both in rectum and vagina, as well as identical genotypes present simultaneously in rectum and vagina for 70% of the 50 species pairs studied. All these data indicate a strong correlation between vaginal and rectal microflora, not only at the species level but also at the strain level.

It is possible that the rectal colonization by lactobacilli may function as a reservoir for the maintenance of a normal vaginal flora and that this may be associated with a decreased incidence of BV-associated adverse effects, as has been suggested [3].

References

  1. Wilson M: The reproductive system and its indigenous microbiota. In Microbial Inhabitants of Humans: their Ecology and Role in Health and Disease. 2005, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 206-250.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antonio MA, Rabe LK, Hillier SL: Colonization of the rectum by Lactobacillus species and decreased risk of bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis. 2005, 192 (3): 394-398. 10.1086/430926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marrazzo JM, Antonio M, Agnew K, Hillier SL: Distribution of genital Lactobacillus strains shared by female sex partners. J Infect Dis. 2009, 199 (5): 680-683. 10.1086/596632.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Klebanoff SJ, Coombs RW: Viricidal effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus on human immunodeficiency virus type 1: possible role in heterosexual transmission. J Exp Med. 1991, 174 (1): 289-292. 10.1084/jem.174.1.289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Song YL, Kato N, Matsumiya Y, Liu CX, Kato H, Watanabe K: Identification of and hydrogen peroxide production by fecal and vaginal lactobacilli isolated from Japanese women and newborn infants. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37 (9): 3062-3064.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Antonio MA, Hawes SE, Hillier SL: The identification of vaginal Lactobacillus species and the demographic and microbiologic characteristics of women colonized by these species. J Infect Dis. 1999, 180 (6): 1950-1956. 10.1086/315109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vallor AC, Antonio MA, Hawes SE, Hillier SL: Factors associated with acquisition of, or persistent colonization by, vaginal lactobacilli: role of hydrogen peroxide production. J Infect Dis. 2001, 184 (11): 1431-1436. 10.1086/324445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Claeys G, Verschraegen G, Delanghe J, Van Simaey L, De Ganck C, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M: Cloning of 16S rRNA genes amplified from normal and disturbed vaginal microflora suggests a strong association between Atopobium vaginae, Gardnerella vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis. BMC Microbiol. 2004, 4: 16-10.1186/1471-2180-4-16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilks M, Wiggins R, Whiley A, Hennessy E, Warwick S, Porter H, Corfield A, Millar M: Identification and H(2)O(2) production of vaginal lactobacilli from pregnant women at high risk of preterm birth and relation with outcome. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42 (2): 713-717. 10.1128/JCM.42.2.713-717.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hawes SE, Hillier SL, Benedetti J, Stevens CE, Koutsky LA, Wolner-Hanssen P, Holmes KK: Hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli and acquisition of vaginal infections. J Infect Dis. 1996, 174 (5): 1058-1063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin HL, Richardson BA, Nyange PM, Lavreys L, Hillier SL, Chohan B, Mandaliya K, Ndinya-Achola JO, Bwayo J, Kreiss J: Vaginal lactobacilli, microbial flora, and risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and sexually transmitted disease acquisition. J Infect Dis. 1999, 180 (6): 1863-1868. 10.1086/315127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cherpes TL, Meyn LA, Krohn MA, Lurie JG, Hillier SL: Association between acquisition of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women and bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 37 (3): 319-325. 10.1086/375819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, Krohn MA, Gibbs RS, Martin DH, Cotch MF, Edelman R, Pastorek JG, Rao AV, et al: Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995, 333 (26): 1737-1742. 10.1056/NEJM199512283332604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schrag S, Gorwitz R, Fultz-Butts K, Schuchat A: Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease. Revised guidelines from CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002, 51 (RR-11): 1-22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ison CA, Hay PE: Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics. Sex Transm Infect. 2002, 78 (6): 413-415. 10.1136/sti.78.6.413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Claeys G, Verschraegen G, Van Simaey L, De Ganck C, De Backer E, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M: Comparison between Gram stain and culture for the characterization of vaginal microflora: definition of a distinct grade that resembles grade I microflora and revised categorization of grade I microflora. BMC Microbiol. 2005, 5: 61-10.1186/1471-2180-5-61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Baele M, Baele P, Vaneechoutte M, Storms V, Butaye P, Devriese LA, Verschraegen G, Gillis M, Haesebrouck F: Application of tRNA intergenic spacer PCR for identification of Enterococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38 (11): 4201-4207.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Baele M, Storms V, Haesebrouck F, Devriese LA, Gillis M, Verschraegen G, de Baere T, Vaneechoutte M: Application and evaluation of the interlaboratory reproducibility of tRNA intergenic length polymorphism analysis (tDNA-PCR) for identification of Streptococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39 (4): 1436-1442. 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1436-1442.2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Baele M, Vaneechoutte M, Verhelst R, Vancanneyt M, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F: Identification of Lactobacillus species using tDNA-PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 2002, 50 (3): 263-271. 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00035-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Daele S, Vaneechoutte M, De Boeck K, Knoop C, Malfroot A, Lebecque P, Leclercq-Foucart J, Van Schil L, Desager K, De Baets F: Survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa genotypes in colonised cystic fibrosis patients. Eur Respir J. 2006, 28 (4): 740-747. 10.1183/09031936.06.00002706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou X, Bent SJ, Schneider MG, Davis CC, Islam MR, Forney LJ: Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. Microbiology. 2004, 150 (Pt 8): 2565-2573. 10.1099/mic.0.26905-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Backer E, Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Alqumber MA, Burton JP, Tagg JR, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M: Quantitative determination by real-time PCR of four vaginal Lactobacillus species, Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae indicates an inverse relationship between L. gasseri and L. iners. BMC Microbiol. 2007, 7: 115-10.1186/1471-2180-7-115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferris MJ, Norori J, Zozaya-Hinchliffe M, Martin DH: Cultivation-independent analysis of changes in bacterial vaginosis flora following metronidazole treatment. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45 (3): 1016-1018. 10.1128/JCM.02085-06.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferris MJ, Masztal A, Martin DH: Use of species-directed 16S rRNA gene PCR primers for detection of Atopobium vaginae in patients with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42 (12): 5892-5894. 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5892-5894.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Menard JP, Fenollar F, Henry M, Bretelle F, Raoult D: Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008, 47 (1): 33-43. 10.1086/588661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kalra A, Palcu CT, Sobel JD, Akins RA: Bacterial Vaginosis: Culture- and PCR-based Characterizations of a Complex Polymicrobial Disease's Pathobiology. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2007, 9 (6): 485-500. 10.1007/s11908-007-0074-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Srinivasan S, Fredricks DN: The human vaginal bacterial biota and bacterial vaginosis. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2008, 2008: 750479-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kiss H, Kogler B, Petricevic L, Sauerzapf I, Klayraung S, Domig K, Viernstein H, Kneifel W: Vaginal Lactobacillus microbiota of healthy women in the late first trimester of pregnancy. BJOG. 2007, 114 (11): 1402-1407. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01412.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Martinez RC, Franceschini SA, Patta MC, Quintana SM, Nunes AC, Moreira JL, Anukam KC, Reid G, De Martinis EC: Analysis of vaginal lactobacilli from healthy and infected Brazilian women. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74 (14): 4539-4542. 10.1128/AEM.00284-08.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Vasquez A, Jakobsson T, Ahrne S, Forsum U, Molin G: Vaginal lactobacillus flora of healthy Swedish women. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40 (8): 2746-2749. 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2746-2749.2002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Redondo-Lopez V, Cook RL, Sobel JD: Emerging role of lactobacilli in the control and maintenance of the vaginal bacterial microflora. Rev Infect Dis. 1990, 12 (5): 856-872.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou X, Brown CJ, Abdo Z, Davis CC, Hansmann MA, Joyce P, Foster JA, Forney LJ: Differences in the composition of vaginal microbial communities found in healthy Caucasian and black women. ISME J. 2007, 1 (2): 121-133. 10.1038/ismej.2007.12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McLean NW, Rosenstein IJ: Characterisation and selection of a Lactobacillus species to re-colonise the vagina of women with recurrent bacterial vaginosis. J Med Microbiol. 2000, 49 (6): 543-552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Reid G, McGroarty JA, Tomeczek L, Bruce AW: Identification and plasmid profiles of Lactobacillus species from the vagina of 100 healthy women. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1996, 15 (1): 23-26. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1996.tb00354.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim TK, Thomas SM, Ho M, Sharma S, Reich CI, Frank JA, Yeater KM, Biggs DR, Nakamura N, Stumpf R, et al: Heterogeneity of vaginal microbial communities within individuals. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47 (4): 1181-1189. 10.1128/JCM.00854-08.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Burton JP, Cadieux PA, Reid G: Improved understanding of the bacterial vaginal microbiota of women before and after probiotic instillation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003, 69 (1): 97-101. 10.1128/AEM.69.1.97-101.2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hill JE, Goh SH, Money DM, Doyle M, Li A, Crosby WL, Links M, Leung A, Chan D, Hemmingsen SM: Characterization of vaginal microflora of healthy, nonpregnant women by chaperonin-60 sequence-based methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 193 (3 Pt 1): 682-692. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.094.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thies FL, Konig W, Konig B: Rapid characterization of the normal and disturbed vaginal microbiota by application of 16S rRNA gene terminal RFLP fingerprinting. J Med Microbiol. 2007, 56 (Pt 6): 755-761. 10.1099/jmm.0.46562-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sghir A, Gramet G, Suau A, Rochet V, Pochart P, Dore J: Quantification of bacterial groups within human fecal flora by oligonucleotide probe hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000, 66 (5): 2263-2266. 10.1128/AEM.66.5.2263-2266.2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Harmsen HJ, Gibson GR, Elfferich P, Raangs GC, Wildeboer-Veloo AC, Argaiz A, Roberfroid MB, Welling GW: Comparison of viable cell counts and fluorescence in situ hybridization using specific rRNA-based probes for the quantification of human fecal bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000, 183 (1): 125-129. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb08945.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dal Bello F, Hertel C: Oral cavity as natural reservoir for intestinal lactobacilli. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2006, 29 (1): 69-76. 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.07.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Maukonen J, Matto J, Suihko ML, Saarela M: Intra-individual diversity and similarity of salivary and faecal microbiota. J Med Microbiol. 2008, 57 (Pt 12): 1560-1568. 10.1099/jmm.0.47352-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. El Aila NA, Tency I, Claeys G, Saerens B, Verhelst R, De Backer E, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M: Genotyping of Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococci) isolated from vaginal and rectal swabs of women at 35-37 weeks of pregnancy. BMC Infect Dis. 2009, 9 (1): 153-10.1186/1471-2334-9-153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Moore WEC, Holdeman LV: Human fecal flora: The normal flora of 20 Japanese-Hawaiians. Appl Microbiol. 1974, 27: 961-979.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lerche M, Reuter G: Isolierung und Differenzierung anaerober Lactobacillaceae aus dem Darm erwachsener Menschen (Beitrag zum Lactobacillus bifidus-Problem). Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkde Infektionskrankh Hyg Abt 1 Orig. 1961, 180: 324-356.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Reuter G: Das Vorkommen von Laktobazillen in Lebensmitteln und ihr Verhalten im menschlichen Intestinaltrakt. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkde Infektionskrankh Hyg Abt 1 Orig. 1965, 197: 468-487.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mitsuoka T: Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Laktobazillen aus den Faeces von Menschen, Schweinen, und Hühnern. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkde Infektionskrankh Hyg Abt 1 Orig. 1969, 210: 32-51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mitsuoka T, Hayakawa K, Kimura N: The fecal flora of man. IIIrd Communication: The composition of Lactobacillus flora of different age groups. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkde Infektionskrankh Hyg Abt 1 Orig A. 1975, 232: 499-511.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cato EO, Moore WE, Johnson JL: Synonymy of strains of "Lactobacillus acidophilus " group A2 (Johnson et al. 1980) with the type strain of Lactobacillus crispatus (Brygoo and Aladame 1953) Moore and Holdeman 1970. Bacteriol. 1983, 33: 426-428.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lauer E, Kandler O: Lactobacillus gasseri sp. nov., a new species of the subgenus Thermobacterium. Zentralbl Bakteriol MikrobiolHyg Abt1 Orig C. 1980, 1: 75-78.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Falsen E, Pascual C, Sjoden B, Ohlen M, Collins MD: Phenotypic and phylogenetic characterization of a novel Lactobacillus species from human sources: description of Lactobacillus iners sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1999, 49: 217-221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

Nabil Abdullah El Aila is indebted for a PhD Research funded by BOF-DOS of the University of Ghent- Belgium. BOF-DOS was not involved in the development of the study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, in the writing of the report nor in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Laboratory Bacteriology Research, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology & Immunology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

      Nabil Abdullah El Aila, Geert Claeys, Bart Saerens, Guido Lopes dos Santos Santiago, Ellen De Backer, Piet Cools, Rita Verhelst & Mario Vaneechoutte

    2. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

      Inge Tency, Hans Verstraelen & Marleen Temmerman

    Authors
    1. Nabil Abdullah El Aila
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Inge Tency
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Geert Claeys
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Hans Verstraelen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Bart Saerens
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Guido Lopes dos Santos Santiago
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Ellen De Backer
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Piet Cools
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Marleen Temmerman
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Rita Verhelst
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    11. Mario Vaneechoutte
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Mario Vaneechoutte.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors' contributions

    NE, RV, GC and MV participated in the development of the study design, the analysis of the study samples, the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, and in the writing of the report. IT, HV and MT participated in the development of the study design, the collection of the study samples, the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, and in the writing of the report. BS, PC, GLSS and EDB participated in the analysis of the study samples and interpretation of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Nabil Abdullah El Aila, Inge Tency, Rita Verhelst and Mario Vaneechoutte contributed equally to this work.

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    El Aila, N.A., Tency, I., Claeys, G. et al. Identification and genotyping of bacteria from paired vaginal and rectal samples from pregnant women indicates similarity between vaginal and rectal microflora. BMC Infect Dis 9, 167 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-167

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-167

    Keywords

    BMC Infectious Diseases

    ISSN: 1471-2334

    Contact us