Leptospirosis in the Asia Pacific region
© Victoriano et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 19 March 2009
Accepted: 4 September 2009
Published: 4 September 2009
Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonotic infection that has been recognized for decades, but the problem of the disease has not been fully addressed, particularly in resource-poor, developing countries, where the major burden of the disease occurs. This paper presents an overview of the current situation of leptospirosis in the region. It describes the current trends in the epidemiology of leptospirosis, the existing surveillance systems, and presents the existing prevention and control programs in the Asia Pacific region.
Data on leptospirosis in each member country were sought from official national organizations, international public health organizations, online articles and the scientific literature. Papers were reviewed and relevant data were extracted.
Leptospirosis is highly prevalent in the Asia Pacific region. Infections in developed countries arise mainly from occupational exposure, travel to endemic areas, recreational activities, or importation of domestic and wild animals, whereas outbreaks in developing countries are most frequently related to normal daily activities, over-crowding, poor sanitation and climatic conditions.
In the Asia Pacific region, predominantly in developing countries, leptospirosis is largely a water-borne disease. Unless interventions to minimize exposure are aggressively implemented, the current global climate change will further aggravate the extent of the disease problem. Although trends indicate successful control of leptospirosis in some areas, there is no clear evidence that the disease has decreased in the last decade. The efficiency of surveillance systems and data collection varies significantly among the countries and areas within the region, leading to incomplete information in some instances. Thus, an accurate reflection of the true burden of the disease remains unknown.
Leptospirosis is a globally important zoonotic disease [1–3], most commonly found in tropical or sub-tropical countries and may be prevalent in both urban and rural settings. Annual incidence is estimated from 0.1-1 per 100,000 in temperate climates to 10-100 per 100,000 in the humid tropics. A disease incidence of more than 100 per 100,000 is encountered during outbreaks and in high-exposure risk groups . Worldwide prevalence rates remain underestimated [4, 5], most likely as a result of the protean nature of the disease.
Leptospirosis is caused by spirochetes of the genus Leptospira. Leptospires were first identified as the cause of Weil's disease in Japan, where it was common among coal miners . The genus Leptospira contains at least 18 species classified on the basis of DNA relatedness and more than 300 serovars based on agglutinating LPS antigens. Approximately half of the pathogenic serovars belong to L interrogans or L. borgpetersenii. Saprophytic species such as L. biflexa occur in the environment, but play no role in disease.
Rodents and domestic mammals, such as cattle, pigs and dogs, serve as major reservoir hosts [6–8], but Leptospira has been isolated from virtually all mammalian species. Infected animals may excrete leptospires intermittently or regularly for months or years, or for their lifetime . Vaccinated animals may still shed infectious organisms in the urine .
The spectrum of clinical presentations of human leptospirosis ranges from asymptomatic to fatal. The majority of infections is subclinical or results in mild self-limiting systemic illness . However, the case fatality rate in severe leptospirosis may be as high as 20% . A particular problem is that that leptospirosis can be misdiagnosed, due to its wide spectrum of symptoms which may mimic the clinical signs of many other diseases, such as dengue fever, hantavirus infection and malaria.
This review describes the current trends in the epidemiology of leptospirosis in the Asia Pacific region, the existing surveillance systems for leptospirosis in these regions, and presents the existing prevention and control programs in the region. Data on the prevalence of leptospirosis in each country were sought from official national organizations, international public health organizations, online articles and the scientific literature. However, the efficiency of surveillance systems and data collection varies significantly among the countries and areas within the region, leading to incomplete information in some instances.
Data were obtained from official national organizations, international public health organizations, personal communications, MEDLINE, online articles and the scientific literature. Papers were reviewed and relevant data were extracted.
Results and discussion
I. Surveillance Systems
Surveillance of leptospirosis has proven to be an effective public health tool in preventing large outbreaks of the disease . Whereas effective surveillance systems with appropriate laboratory support exist in developed countries in the Asia Pacific region, they are generally lacking in the disease-endemic, developing countries. Even when present, the systems may not meet acceptable international quality assurance standards. Despite the existence of the WHO case definition for leptospirosis, the infrequent use of confirmatory laboratory testing, and the inability to link clinical, epidemiologic, and laboratory data have hindered system utility .
A functional disease surveillance system, for both humans and animals, is essential for the effective control of leptospirosis. In addition to a number of research institutions, there are three WHO collaborating centers for leptospirosis in the region: the WHO/FAO/OIE Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Leptospirosis, Australia and Western Pacific Region based in Brisbane, Australia, and the Regional Medical Research Center in Port Blair, India.
The actual incidence of leptospirosis in the Asia Pacific region is not well-documented, similar to the situation in many regions worldwide. Aside from underreporting, incidence data are further compromised by the unavailability of laboratory diagnosis . Within the Asia Pacific region, Southeast Asia and Oceania appear to have the highest incidence of leptospirosis .
Major outbreaks of the disease in South-East Asia due to flooding were reported in Orrisa (1999), Jakarta (2003) and Mumbai (2005). It has been a continuing and significant problem in the densely populated, flood-prone low lying areas of India.
In India, the disease has been found more commonly associated with natural disasters especially during the monsoon period at which times acute epidemics may eventuate . A multi-centric study in India showed that leptospirosis accounts for about 12.7% of cases of acute febrile illness responsible for attendance at hospitals . Carrier animals include rats, pigs, cattle, bandicoots and dogs. The predominant serovars are Copenhageni, Autumnalis, Pyrogenes, Grippotyphosa, Canicola, Australis, Javanica, Sejroe, Louisiana, and Pomona. Outbreaks of leptospirosis have increasingly been reported from Kerala, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka and sporadic cases have been reported from Goa, Andhra Pradesh and Assam .
Leptospirosis has been known to be endemic since the early part of 20th century on the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, where serovars Ratnapura, Valbuzzi and Grippotyphosa have been recently documented as causes of severe epidemics . Highest rates occur during October to November, with seroprevalence of up to 55% in the general population . Interestingly, the predominance of leptospirosis in coastal regions is most likely correlated with the presence of semi-domestic brown rats. In the inland urban regions, other serovars with other host animals/rodents were presumed to cause the 'mild' leptospirosis that is usually unrecognized or misdiagnosed. The Maldives reported their first confirmed case of human leptospirosis in November 2000. Since then, the disease is under national surveillance (Geela Ali-personal communication. Director, Center for Community Health and Disease Control, Maldives).
In Bangladesh and Nepal, countries with similar environmental and sanitary conditions to those in India, the problem of overcrowding also contributes to the burden of disease [16, 17]. A serological survey in a rural flood prone district of Bangladesh in 1994 showed 38% seropositivity in 89 samples of human sera tested, indicating that the rural population is at high risk of leptospiral infection . In 2000, acute-phase serum specimens from 359 dengue-negative patients in Dhaka were assessed for leptospirosis; Leptospira was detected by PCR in 63 (18%) of them. Poverty and poor education were implicated as conditions leading to rodent-borne transmissions . A number of serological studies carried out in Nepal during the last decade showed the presence of antibodies against major Leptospira spp. prevalent in Asia. [17, 19, 20]. There are no published human leptospirosis data for Bhutan. However, suspected leptospirosis human cases have been reported from Chukha district during summer season after flooding in 2008. Cases commonly present with a history of fever for 10 days and autopsy reports indicate organ failure or pulmonary hemorrhage as cause of death. The National Center for Animal Health has detected leptospirosis cases among pigs based on positive serology. (Karma Lhazeen - personal communication. Programme Officer, Vector-borne Disease Control Programme, Gelephu, Bhutan)
Increasing numbers of leptospirosis cases have been observed over recent years in Sri Lanka despite the implementation of a set of strategies for its control and prevention. It has a reported annual incidence of approximately 14/100,000. Over 19 leptospiral serovars belonging to over 7 serogroups have been isolated and incriminated as the causative agents of leptospirosis in humans and/or animals throughout the country . Peak incidence is associated with the rice paddy-harvesting seasons wherein an increase in the rodent population in and around the fields is observed. The majority of patients [43.5%] had been exposed in the paddy fields, indicating occupational exposure among the farmers . In 2007, a total of 2195 cases was reported, 40% more than in the previous year. An unusually high case fatality rate and high reporting were noted in districts not previously identified as high risk areas . This alarming trend has cautioned the Ministry of Health to re-assess its on-going strategies on leptospirosis.
In Thailand, data from disease notification reports indicated an increase in the incidence rate from less than 0.3 per 100,000 in 1995 to 23.7 in 2000, with a drop in subsequent years. The vast majority of the cases [90%] was reported in the Northeast region, primarily as a result of flooding  and the emergence of a highly virulent clone . A recent seroprevalence study at a hospital on the Thai-Myanmar border revealed that 17% of patients who sought treatment for fever were diagnosed with leptospirosis . Most infections occur in agricultural workers, primarily rice producers, whose bare-footed activity during work in rice fields constitutes the main risk. Outbreaks of leptospirosis correspond with the rainy season, with an increase in cases beginning in August and decreasing in November. In Myanmar, veterinary investigations have reported the presence of leptospirosis in the animal population  while data for human leptospiral cases are not available.
Leptospirosis probably poses a severe and highly underestimated continuous health problem in Indonesia. In 2001, 139 human serum samples were tested out of which 18.7% were positive, indicating predominantly presumptive serovar Bataviae infections . In the wake of massive flooding in Indonesia in January 2002, a leptospirosis outbreak occurred, notably in the capital Jakarta on Java. In this outbreak, 12.0% out of 418 samples were seropositive against serovars Bataviae or Hardjo . During this outbreak, high seropositivity rates were detected among potential domestic infection reservoirs such as cats, dogs and cattle. There has been a nationwide increase in the number of reported human cases since 2006. Out of 667 reported human cases in 2007, 93% were laboratory confirmed. The case fatality rate was 8%. In the first quarter of 2008, 269 cases have been detected [Asri Mohammad - personal communication. WHO country office, Indonesia].
A suspected clinical case of leptospirosis was recorded during the flooding season in Timor-Leste in 2006 but it could not be confirmed [Sidartha Yuwono - Personal communication. WHO country office, Timor-Leste].
For the year 2008, the total number of notifications for Australia was 112 cases . This is the lowest number of reported cases in over ten years and represents a downward trend since a peak in 1999. This reduction has been attributed to persistent drought conditions over the last few years. The northern state of Queensland accounts for most of the leptospirosis cases in the country [71.2%], with serovars Zanoni, Australis and Hardjo accounting for 58.9% of these. The disease has been mainly an occupational hazard of livestock and agricultural workers. Serovars Arborea and Topaz have recently emerged as significant causes of human leptospirosis. In the southern temperate climate states, serovar Hardjo acquired from cattle constitutes the main infecting serovar.
Leptospirosis is the most common occupationally acquired infectious disease in New Zealand. The great majority of cases of leptospirosis occurs among livestock farm workers and meat processing workers . An assessment of human leptospiral epidemiology in New Zealand, conducted by Thornley et al.  from 1990 to1998, showed an annual incidence of 4.4 per 100,000 population. However, the analysis of trends over this 9-year period revealed that a changing epidemiological pattern was evident, with the emergence of L. borgpetersenii serovar Ballum as a more frequent cause of human infection.
The Philippines faces a serious problem of leptospirosis. Poor sanitation and the increase in urban slums along with frequent typhoons and expansion of flooding areas in the country have exacerbated the risk of infection . Information on the prevalent Leptospira serovars among humans in the Philippines dates back to the late 1960s and 1970s, when antibodies against serovars Pyrogenes, Bataviae, Pomona, Grippotyphosa, Manilae and Javanica were detected among high-risk workers such as abattoir employees, dog pound workers and fish inspectors in Manila. Outbreaks of leptospirosis due to flooding were reported in prisons, penal farms and in many parts of the country [32, 33]. Yanagihara et al.  performed a seroepidemiological survey from 1998 to 2001, showing that 70% of suspected leptospirosis patients (1,200) were seropositive. They also isolated leptospires from humans and rats (both house and field) in metropolitan Manila and nearby provinces, and also in the city of Iloilo. In 1999, the Department of Health listed leptospirosis as a notifiable disease in the country.
In Japan, the number of leptospirosis cases had increased, reaching more than 200 reported deaths annually until 1960 [34, 35], mostly in rice-field farmers. Since then, this number has decreased rapidly, primarily due to the mechanization of agriculture in this country, farmers' use of rubber boots when working in the fields and the use of an inactivated vaccine [7, 10]. Currently, less than 20 human cases are reported annually, mostly contracted during recreational activities or imported from Southeast Asian countries, or by contact with imported infected animals [7, 36]. Serovars Icterohaemorrhagiae, Copenhageni, Autumnalis, Hebdomadis and Australis have been recognized as major causes of human leptospirosis. Most current cases are confined to the southernmost islands, the Okinawa archipelago [7, 36].
The first leptospiral case in Korea was documented in 1984, and since then, it has become recognized as a major public health problem . Serovars Lai, Copenhageni and Canicola were isolated from 1984-1990 . A leptospiral vaccination programme was initiated in 1988, targeting high risk groups in the rural areas and may have been responsible for the reduction of cases in the succeeding years. However, during the last decade, cases have been increasing slightly. In the year 2007, 208 cases of human leptospirosis were recorded. The bulk of cases consisted predominantly of rice field farmers, occurred in the rural areas of Jeonnam and Jeonbuk (Sang-Hee Park - personal communication, NIH, Korea Center for Disease Control & Prevention. ).
To date, 37 serovars from humans and animals have been isolated in Malaysia . Human infections in the 1950s, depicted as febrile cases, were commonly observed in military personnel and civilians . Succeeding investigations revealed that the disease is an occupational hazard mostly for people engaged in agricultural and livestock activities, such as cattle farmers, veterinary staff, tin miners, farmers and paddy planters . Recent studies reported a high enzootic incidence in the animal population [40, 41]. In 2000, a recreational event-related outbreak of leptospirosis originated in Malaysia .
Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos have been considered endemic for leptospirosis. In 2002, a study by Laras and colleagues  confirmed the endemicity of the disease in many areas in these countries. In this study, Hurstbridge, Bataviae and Icterohaemorrhagiae were reported to be the predominant serovars identified in patients with clinical jaundice. Serovar Bataviae, on the other hand, was most frequently isolated from patients with non-malarial febrile illness. Pyrogenes and Hurstbridge were the principal serogroups identified among patients with hemorrhagic fever. Recent seroprevalence studies conducted in flood-prone rural areas in Laos  and in southern Vietnamese children  showed an overall seroprevalence of 23.9% and 12.8%, respectively. In a human seroprevalence study conducted in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam (1998), Bataviae was identified as the most common serogroup . Meanwhile, the highest seroprevalence rate among sows in the same area was recorded with serovar Bratislava . A study in Takeo province, Cambodia estimated an annual incidence of 7.65 per 100,000 population  with Javanica and Australis as the main serogroups.
Leptospirosis has been notifiable since 1955 in People's Republic of China. Accumulated evidence from 1955-1993 showed an annual incidence of 7.1 per 100,000 with a mortality rate of 1.0% in 26 provinces across the mainland [Gu J-W, Jiang X-G, Guo X-K, unpublished]. Cases were concentrated in July to October, particularly in August and September. Icterohaemorrhagiae and Pomona are the dominant serogroups frequently associated with leptospirosis in the country [Gu J-W, Jiang X-G, Guo X-K, unpublished]. From January 2002 to October 2007, the Ministry of Health reported about 1,500 confirmed cases and 50 deaths in mainland China . There is a low incidence of leptospirosis in Hong Kong SAR. There was only 1 local case in 2001, 2 local cases in 2002, 1 imported case in 2003 and 1 imported and 5 local cases in 2004, 7 in 2005 and 1 in 2006 . Although no published reports on human leptospirosis in Mongolia can be found, the disease is most likely endemic, as numerous seroprevalence studies indicate a high incidence of animal leptospirosis .
In a regional human leptospirosis survey conducted in the Western Pacific Islands , among 263 cases of suspected leptospirosis cases from September 2003 to December 2005, 69 were confirmed from 7 islands: Futuna, Raiatea and the Marquesas Islands, where outbreaks were apparent, and Vanuatu, Fiji, Palau and Wallis where sporadic cases indicated the presence of the disease. Icterohaemorrhagiae and Australis were the dominant presumptive serogroups, indicating linkage to a rodent reservoir. The rate of exposure has more often been related to normal daily activities than following a specific occupational exposure. According to World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) data, the disease is enzootic in French Polynesia and New Caledonia. In a retrospective study of 192 cases of human leptospirosis in New Caledonia from 1989 to 1993, the annual incidence rate was estimated to be 30 per 100,000 population . Serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae was the most prominent among the forty isolates obtained. The annual incidence between 2002 and 2008 has varied from 6.1 to 92 per 100,000, with a large increase in incidence in 2008 (92/100,000) and with signs that this will increase further in 2009. Notifications up to 8 June 2009 were 134, which would equate to an overall figure of over 150/100,000 if the trend continues for the remainder of the year.
Leptospirosis has been considered endemic in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands , although its actual incidence is unknown. Serological evidence in Palau indicates that up to 8 percent of "viral syndrome" cases (fever of unknown origin in an adult) were related to acute leptospirosis .American Samoa reported its first laboratory-confirmed human case in April 2003. A year later, a seroprevalence survey was conducted, showing that 17% of the enrolled adults have had prior infection, with Bratislava as the dominant serovar . Leptospirosis in Papua New Guinea dates back to the 1970s; however, data collection on the disease is scarce. A recent investigation in livestock found a dominance of serovar Hardjo .
Summary of incidence of leptospirosis in the Asia Pacific region.
Annual incidence per 100,000
India (Andaman and Nicobar Islands)
Wallis and Futunaa
Moderate (1 to 10)
Hong Kong SAR
Papua New Guinea
Western Pacific islands not mentioned above
III. Prevention and Control
Leptospirosis is a preventable disease. Control measures must include risk communications, improvement in sanitation and living conditions, and rodent control, as well as both prophylactic and therapeutic medical and veterinary interventions.
a. Social control measures
Social control measures are an essential component of the success of prevention and control of leptospirosis. Effective risk communication strategies will ensure that appropriate approaches are used with identified at-risk groups, but also with the groups that can influence the knowledge and practices of these at-risk groups. Such approaches include awareness, health promotion and health education, advocacy and capacity building.
Leptospirosis has typically been considered an occupational disease and thus social control measures directed towards agriculture and other at-risk workers are critical. For instance, a study suggested that the use of trousers and long skirts among pond cleaners in Thailand is a strong protective factor against infection and that further education efforts on protective practices are needed . Awareness of the disease, particularly its protean manifestations, and education about preventative measures with labor organizations and employers should also be implemented. Intensive, well-directed education and publicity campaigns in New Zealand, used in conjunction with a campaign for immunization of cattle, were successful in reducing the incidence of leptospirosis [29, 30, 36].
In urban slums with high levels of poverty, environmental sources of transmission include open refuse deposits and animal reservoirs, open sewers and flooding; infection is thus associated with exposure in and around the household . Several approaches are needed to reduce risk factors in these situations. Health education campaigns targeted at household occupants as well as advocacy on social determinants of health and concrete actions to reduce health inequity are also needed. Moreover, awareness and education are necessary among administrative, education and health professionals in human and veterinary medicine including primary health care workers, wild life and conservation scientists and infrastructure and urban planners .
b. Rodent control
Rodents are recognized as the most important reservoirs in the transmission of leptospirosis [3, 10], especially of more severe forms. Rodent-vector control activities must consider the epidemiological implications, ecology, and dynamic population of the rodents . Sample collection of rodent species as well as documentation of their infestation levels is required . The use of rodenticides, entrapment of animals, and improved sanitation have been shown to successfully diminish the risk of leptospirosis transmission [60, 61]. In India, the timing of rodent control was shown to be a vital consideration in the prevention of disease transmission. The rodent breeding period starts with the southwest monsoon , suggesting that rodent control measures in the pre-monsoon period would bring better vector control.
On-going research into numerous vaccine preparations for humans and animals is well documented. This includes the use of inactivated and attenuated vaccines, recombinant protein or lipoprotein vaccines, LPS vaccines and DNA vaccines [62, 63].
The local variability in serovars of endemic leptospiral strains complicates the development of a vaccine that could be used worldwide [6, 10]. Current bacterin vaccines elicit immunity that is generally restricted to serovars with related agglutinating LPS antigens. In the region, human vaccines against Leptospira are available in China, Japan, Korea and Vietnam (Sang-Hee Park - personal communication, NIH, Korea Center for Disease Control & Prevention. ), whereas commercial Leptospira vaccines for animals are available in many countries [62, 64]. Although treatment and vaccination of livestock are not mandatory, low sporadic occurrence of the disease in these animals was observed in endemic countries after initiation of a vaccination program [6, 65]. Vaccination of domestic animals may be considered too expensive in developing countries, and, in any event, may not prevent leptospiruria in vaccinated animals . Clearly, vaccination is not possible for non-domestic reservoir animals.
Use of doxycycline as a prophylactic measure has been reported , but is clearly only suitable in instances where exposure can be predicted accurately and is for a short period of time. It is not appropriate as a routine, long term, community-based practice.
Leptospirosis remains a major endemic environmental disease in most countries in the Asia Pacific Region. Socio-economic conditions, population density, climatic and environmental conditions, and behavioral and occupational habits of humans are determinants of the incidence and prevalence of the disease. The ability of all countries in the region to accurately report and monitor leptospirosis hinges strongly on their respective capacity to provide accurate and reliable diagnostic and reporting services.
Leptospirosis is preventable. Host/reservoir control measures, environmental control programs and animal vaccination, in conjunction with a strong surveillance system may significantly reduce, if not eliminate, the disease. Thus, an effective collaboration among countries in the region is the key to successfully combating this public health problem.
- Adler B, de la Peña Moctezuma A: Leptospira and Leptospirosis. Vet Microbiol. 2009Google Scholar
- Bharti AR, Nally JE, Ricaldi JN, Matthias MA, Diaz MM, Lovett MA, et al: Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003, 3: 757-771. 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00830-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: Leptospirosis worldwide, 1999. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 1999, 74: 237-242.Google Scholar
- Leptonet: Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, [http://www.leptonet.net]
- World Health Organization: Human leptospirosis: guidance for diagnosis, surveillance and control. 2003, World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Faine S, Adler B, Bolin C, Perolat P: Clinical leptospirosis in humans. Leptospira and leptospirosis. 1999, MediSci, Melbourne, 2Google Scholar
- Yanagihara Y, Villanueva SYAM, Yoshida S, Okamoto Y, Masuzawa T: Current status of leptospirosis in Japan and Philippines. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007, 30: 399-413. 10.1016/j.cimid.2007.05.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vinetz JM, Glass GE, Flexner CE, Mueller P, Kaslow DC: Sporadic urban leptospirosis. Ann Intern Med. 1996, 125: 794-798.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sejvar J, Tangkanakul W, Ratanasang P, Dowell SF, Sangjun N, Bragg S, Ashford D, Tappero J: An outbreak of leptospirosis, Thailand-the importance of the laboratory. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Pub Hlth. 2005, 36: 289-295.Google Scholar
- Levett PN: Leptospirosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001, 14: 296-326. 10.1128/CMR.14.2.296-326.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Siozopoulou V, Christou L, Akritidis N: The globalization of leptospirosis: worldwide incidence trends. Int J Infect Dis. 2008, 12: 351-357. 10.1016/j.ijid.2007.09.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jena AB, Mohanty KC, Devadasan N: An outbreak of leptospirosis in Orissa, India: the importance of surveillance. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 1016-1021. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01293.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: Report of the Brainstorming Meeting on Leptospirosis Prevention and Control. Mumbai, 16 - 17. 2006, February , WHO India and Regional Medical Research Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre for Diagnosis, Research, Reference and Training in LeptospirosisGoogle Scholar
- Sehgal SC, Sugunan AP, Vijayachari P: Leptospirosis: disease burden estimation and surveillance networking in India. South East Asian J Trop Med Pub Hlth. 2003, 34 (suppl 2): 170-177. 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3575-3580.2004.Google Scholar
- Vijayachari P, Ahmed N, Sugunan AP, Ghousunnissa S, Rajender Rao K, Hasnain SE, Sehgal SC: Use of fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism for molecular epidemiology of leptospirosis in India. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 3575-3580. 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3575-3580.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- LaRocque RC, Breiman RF, Ari MD, Morey RE, Janan FA, Hayes JM, Hossain MA, Brooks WA, Levett PN: Leptospirosis during dengue outbreak, Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 766-769.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Murdoch DR, Woods CW, Zimmerman MD, Dull PM, Belbase RH, Keenan AJ, Scott RM, Basnyat B, Archibald LK, Reller LB: The etiology of febrile illness in adults presenting to Patan Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 70: 670-675. 10.1017/S0950268800051220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morshed MG, Konishi H, Terada Y, Arimitsu Y, Nakazawa T: Seroprevalence of leptospirosis in a rural flood prone district of Bangladesh. Epidemiol Infect. 1994, 112: 527-531. 10.1017/S0950268800051220.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rai SK, Shibata H, Sumi K, Uga S, Ono K, Shrestha HG, Matsuoka A, Matsumura T: Serological study of leptospira infection in Nepal by one-point MCA method. J Infect Dis Antimicrob Ag. 2000, 17: 29-32.Google Scholar
- Myint K, Murray C, Scott RM, Shrestha MP, et al: Evaluation for leptospirosis in Royal Nepalese Army volunteers. Paper presented at 13th Asia Pacific Military Medicine Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. 11-16. 2003, MayGoogle Scholar
- Weekly Epidemiological Report: Managing leptsopirosis outbreaks. 17 - 23 November 2007, Epidemiological Unit, Ministry of Healthcare & Nutrition, Sri Lanka. 2007, 34 (47): 1-2.Google Scholar
- Abeysinghe MRN: Circular on the Prevention and Control of Leptospirosis. 2008, Epidemiology Unit, Ministry of Health, SriLankaGoogle Scholar
- Tangkanakul W, Smits HL, Jatanasen S, Ashford DA: Leptospirosis: An emerging health problem in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Pub Hlth. 2005, 36: 281-288.Google Scholar
- Thaipadungpanit J, Wuthiekanun V, Chierakul W, Smythe LD, Petkanchanapong W, Limpaiboon R, Apiwatanaporn A, Slack AT, Suputtamongkol Y, White NJ, Feil EJ, Day NPJ, Peacock SJ: A dominant clone of Leptospira interrogans associated with an outbreak of human leptospirosis in Thailand. PLoS Neglected Trop Dis. 2007, 1: e56-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000056.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ellis RD, Fukuda MM, McDaniel P, Welch K, Nisalak A, Murray CK, Gray MR, Uthaimongkol N, Buathong N, Sriwichai S, Phasuk R, Yingyuen K, Mathavarat C, Miller RS: Causes of fever in adults on the Thai-Myanmar border. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 74: 108-13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Organization for Animal Health. [http://www.oie.int]
- Hartskeel RA: Report of the leptospirosis outbreak in Indonesia, 2002. WHO/FAO/OIE/RIVM Leptospirosis Reference Centre, KIT Biomedical Research, Amsterdam. Report submitted to WHO South East Regional OfficeGoogle Scholar
- 2008 National Leptospirosis Surveillance Report by the WHO/FAO/OIE Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on leptospirosis. [http://www.health.qld.gov.au/qhcss/lepto.asp]
- Crump JA, Murdoch DR, Baker MG: Emerging infectious diseases in an island ecosystem: The New Zealand perspective. Emerg Inf Dis. 2001, 7: 767-772.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thornley CN, Baker MG, Weinstein P, Maas EW: Changing epidemiology of human leptospirosis in New Zealand. Epidemiol Infect. 2002, 128: 29-36. 10.1017/S0950268801006392.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liongson LQ, Tobias GQ, Castro PPM, [Eds]: Pressure of urbanization: flood control and drainage in Metro Manila. 2000, University of the Philippines Center for Integrative Developments StudiesGoogle Scholar
- Basaca-Sevilla V, Cross JH, Pastrana E: Leptospirosis in the Philippines. Southeast J Trop Med Pub Hlth. 1986, 17: 71-74.Google Scholar
- Roces MC, Abad-Viola G, Guzman JC, Villanueva N, Claveria RB, Roque V: Update on leptospirosis cases at Manila City Jail. FETP Letter for Secretary DOH, Philippines. 1999Google Scholar
- Mori M: Epidemiology and prophylaxis of leptospirosis. Antibiot Chemother. 1992, 8: 646-652.Google Scholar
- Nakamura M: Leptospirosis - Present status of leptospirosis in Japan. Antibiot Chemother. 2001, 17: 2154-2159.Google Scholar
- Infectious Agents Surveillance Reports. 2008, [http://idsc.nih.go.jp/iasr/29/335/tpc335.html]
- Cho MK, Paik SB, Oh HB, Song C: Bacteriological studies on leptospirosis in Korea. Korean J Epidemiol. 1984, 6: 16-35.Google Scholar
- Kim SS, Kim JS: Epidemiologic characteristics and trends of leptospirosis. Korean J Epidemiol. 1994, 16: 66-83.Google Scholar
- Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [http://www.cdc.go.kr]
- El Jalii IM, Bahaman AR: A review of human leptospirosis in Malaysia. Trop Biomed. 2004, 21: 113-119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bahaman AR, Ibrahim AL, Adam H: Serological prevalence of leptospiral infection in domestic animals in West Malaysia. Epidemiol Infect. 1987, 99: 379-392.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sejvar J, Bancroft E, Winthrop K, Bettinger J, Bajani M, Bragg S, Shutt K, Kaiser R, Marano N, Popovic T, Tappero J, Ashford D, Mascola L, Vugia D, Perkins B, Rosenstein N, Eco-Challenge Investigation Team: Leptospirosis in "Eco-Challenge" Athletes, Malaysian Borneo, 2000. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9: 702-703.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Laras K, Cao BV, Bounlu K, Nguyen TK, Olson JG Thongchanh S, Tran NV, Hoang KL, Punjabi N, Ha BK, Ungsa SA, Insisiengmay S, Watts DM, Beecham HJ, Corwin AL: The importance of leptospirosis in Southeast Asia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 67: 278-286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawaguchi L, Sengkeopraseuth B, Tsuyuoka R, Koizumi N, Akashi H, Vongphrachanh P, Watanabe H, Aoyama A: Seroprevalence of leptospirosis and risk factor analysis in flood-prone rural areas in Lao PDR. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008, 78: 957-961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thai KTD, Binh TQ, Giao PT, Phuong HL, Hung LQ, Van Nam N, Nga TT, Goris MG, de Vries PJ: Seroepidemiology of leptospirosis in southern Vietnamese children. Trop Med Int Hlth. 2006, 11: 738-745. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01619.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van CT, Thuy NT, San NH, Hien TT, Baranton G, Perolat P: Human leptospirosis in the Mekong delta, Viet Nam. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 92: 625-628. 10.1016/S0035-9203(98)90787-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boqvist S, Chau BL, Gunnarsson A, Olson Enqvall E, Vagsholm I, Magnusson U: Animal- and herd-level risk factors for leptospial seropositivity among sows in the Mekong delta, Vietnam. Prev Vet Med. 2002, 53: 233-245. 10.1016/S0167-5877(01)00263-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seng H, Sok T, Tangkanakul W, Petkanchanapong W, Kositanont U, Sareth H, Hor B, Jiraphongsa C: Leptospirosis in Takeo province, Kingdom of Cambodia 2003. J Med Assoc Thailand. 2007, 90: 546-551.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Health of the People's Republic ofChina. [http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/wsb/index.htm]
- Medical news Today. [http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/50138.php]
- Odontsetseg N, Sakoda Y, Kida H: Serological evidence of the persistence of infection with Leptospira interrogans serovar Hardjo in cattle in Mongolia. Microbiol Immunol. 2005, 49: 865-869.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berlioz-Arthaud A, Kiedrzynski T, Singh N, Yvon J-F, Roualen G, Coudert C, Uluiviti V: Mutli-centre survey of incidence and public health impact of leptospirosis in the Western Pacific. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 101: 714-721. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.02.022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Merien F, Perolat P: Public health importance of human leptospirosis in the South Pacific: a five-year study in New Caledonia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996, 55: 174-178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Villagomez J, Brostrom R, Diaz E, Tagabuel J, Habib F: Leptospirosis in the Northern Mariana Islands. Inform' Action [PPHSN quarterly bulletin]. 2001, 10: 4-7.Google Scholar
- Pineda M: Leptospirosis in Palau. Inform' Action [PPHSN quarterly bulletin]. 2001, 8: 9-11.Google Scholar
- Winger K, Aguilar J, Besser R, Rosenstein N, Lark T: Leptospirosis: A seroprevalance survey on American Samoa. Presented at the 54th Annual Epidemic Intelligence Service Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. April 11-15, 2005. 2005Google Scholar
- Wai'in PM: Epidemiology of infection with Leptospira species in livestock in Papua New Guinea. 2007, Murdoch University, [http://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/browse/view/adt-MU20080617.141905]Google Scholar
- Phraisuwan P, Spotts Whitney EA, Tharmaphornpilas P, Guharat S, Thongkamsamut S, Aresagig S, Liangphonghphanthu J, Junthima K, Sokampang A, Ashford DA: Skin wounds and control strategies, Thailand, 1999. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002, 8: 1455-1459.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Holt J, Davis S, Leirs H: A model of leptospirosis infection in an African rodent to determine risk to humans: Seasonal fluctuations and the impact of rodent control. Acta Trop. 2006, 99: 218-225. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.08.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mohan Rao A: Preventive measures for leptospirosis: Rodent control. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006, 24: 325-328.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guidelines and prevention for control of leptospirosis. 2006, World Health Organization, [http://www.whoindia.org/LinkFiles/Communicable_Diseases_Guidelines_for_Prevention_and_Control_Leptospirosis.pdf]
- Koizumi N, Watanabe H: Leptospirosis vaccines: past, present and future. J Postgrad Med. 2005, 51: 210-214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Z, Jin L, Wegrzyn A: Leptospirosis vaccines. Microb Cell Fact. 2007, 6: 39-10.1186/1475-2859-6-39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: Initiative for Vaccine Research [IVR]. Leptospirosis. [http://www.who.int/vaccine_research/diseases/zoonotic/en/print.html]
- A surveillance review of leptospirosis and implication for quarantine policy-precis. 2000, [http://www.aqis.gov.au]
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/9/147/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.