Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A discrepancy of Chlamydia trachomatis incidence and prevalence trends in Finland 1983–2003

  • Erika Lyytikäinen1, 2,
  • Marjo Kaasila1,
  • Eija Hiltunen-Back1, 3,
  • Matti Lehtinen1, 4,
  • Kaisa Tasanen2,
  • Heljä-Marja Surcel1Email author,
  • Pentti Koskela1 and
  • Jorma Paavonen5
BMC Infectious Diseases20088:169

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-169

Received: 14 July 2008

Accepted: 18 December 2008

Published: 18 December 2008

Abstract

Background

Reported rates of Chlamydia trachomatis are on the rise contradicting the declining rates of C. trachomatis associated reproductive sequelae in Western countries. Population based evaluation of the real trend of C. trachomatis infection is important to contemplate prevention efforts. We studied C. trachomatis occurrence during the past 20 years in Finland comparing incidence rate data based on serology and reported C. trachomatis laboratory notifications.

Methods

A random sample of 7999 women with two consecutive pregnancies within five years was selected from the population of the Finnish Maternity Cohort (FMC) serum bank stratified by calendar year and age. C. trachomatis IgG antibodies were determined by a standard peptide-ELISA. The reported incidence rates of C. trachomatis infections based on case notifications were obtained from the National Registry of Infectious Diseases (NIDR).

Results

C. trachomatis seroprevalence rates decreased significantly from 1983 to 2003 both in women under 23 years of age (23.3% to 9.2%) and in women between 23–28-years of age (22.2% to 12.6%). However, seroconversion rates increased from 31 per 10000 person years in 1983–85 to 97 per 10000 person years in 2001–2003 (incidence rate ratio 3.2, 95% CI, 1.1–8.7) among the older age group. Seroconversion rate was highest (264) in 1983–1985 in the younger age-group, then declined and subsequently increased again (188) in 2001–2003. The incidence based on seroconversions was in agreement with the reported incidence rates in both age groups.

Conclusion

C. trachomatis seroprevalence rate decreased during 1983–2003 among fertile-aged women in Finland. During the same time period incidence rates based both on seroconversions and reported laboratory notifications of diagnosed C. trachomatis infections increased. The discrepancy between the C. trachomatis incidence and seroprevalence trends warrants further studies.

Background

Chlamydia trachomatis is a major threat to the reproductive health of women [1]. National surveillance programs have largely failed to reduce the disease burden caused by C. trachomatis [2]. In the Nordic countries, incidence rates have increased between 1999 and 2005 [35]. In Finland, the incidence of reported C. trachomatis infections increased by 60% over the last 10 years, peaking in the age group of 15–24 [6]. Since most chlamydial infections are asymptomatic [7], true incidence may well be higher than that based on reports.

In a population based study, we recently reported declining C. trachomatis antibody prevalence rates [8]. The decrease was countrywide although small clusters of high prevalences were seen around large cities and in the Southeastern part of the country [8]. Similar trend has been reported from Japan [9]. These reports suggest that the control efforts may have been efficient.

To clarify the discordance between the reported infection rates to the National Infectious Disease Register (NIDR) and the seroprevalence rates, we studied the incidence rates of C. trachomatis infection by serology using paired serum bank samples. In order to have a better understanding of the real trend of C. trachomatis infections in the population, we compared incidence rate data based on serology and reported C. trachomatis laboratory notifications.

Methods

Finnish Maternity Cohort

More than 98% of pregnant women in Finland (altogether 750000) have participated in the serological screening for congenital infections (syphilis, HIV, and hepatitis B) during the first trimester. Approximately 50% of the women become pregnant again within 5 years of the first pregnancies and donate 2nd blood samples to the Finnish Maternity Cohort (FMC) serum bank. The blood samples have been stored in FMC serum bank at the National Public Health Institute (KTL) since 1983 and the FMC serum bank comprises approximately 1.5 million serum samples.

A total of 275 505 women (< 29 years of age) with paired serum samples were identified for C. trachomatis antibody testing as previously described [8]. The FMC cohort was divided into 28 strata according to calendar year (by 3 year periods i.e. 1983–1985, 1986–1988, 1989–1991, 1992–1994, 1995–1997, 1998–2000, 2001–2003) and age (< 20, 20–22, 23–25 and 26–28) as described [8]. A random subsample of 200 or 400 women in each stratum was obtained. A total of 401 women were excluded because of missing data. Eventually, 7999 women were tested for C. trachomatis IgG-antibodies (Table 1).
Table 1

Number of women (n) with at least 2 pregnancies within 5 years selected randomly by age and calendar time of possible seroconversion

Age

1983–85

n

1986–88

n

1989–91

n

1992–94

n

1995–97

n

1998–00

n

2001–03

n

Total

< 20

194

190

198

193

177

184

184

1320

20–22

195

195

193

199

187

194

185

1348

23–25

390

390

388

394

376

365

362

2665

26–28

393

397

384

389

366

367

370

2666

Total

1172

1172

1163

1175

1106

1110

1101

7999

The study was approved by the institutional ethical committee and the FMC steering committee.

National Infectious Disease Register

Surveillance of sexually transmitted C. trachomatis infections is based on mandatory notifications according to a Communicable Diseases Act and Decree of 1987. Between 1987 and 1997, confirmed C. trachomatis positive cases were reported to the NIDR by physicians, but from 1997, by laboratories only (between 1995 and 1997 by both). The laboratory notification includes personal identification number (PIN), gender, age, place of sampling and test used. Data are updated weekly. Same person may have been reported more than once if the time interval exceeded three months. Data after 1995 can be accessed at http://www3.ktl.fi/stat and is available in fixed subgroups of age, time period of diagnosis and gender. Data from earlier years 1987–1994 have been reported elsewhere [10].

C. trachomatis incidence rates were recorded in two age groups (≤ 24, and 25–29-year-olds) in four different time periods (1995–1997, 1998–2000, 2001–2003, 2004–2006).

Serology

Serum IgG antibodies to C. trachomatis were analyzed in a single set of experiments by commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA), as previously described [8]. The results were expressed as mean absorbance (optical density 450 mm) of duplicated samples minus the mean absorbance of the reagent blank divided by the cut-off value. A value of greater than 1.4 was considered positive [8].

Statistical analysis

Two youngest and two oldest age groups were combined for statistical analyses into two categories (women below 23 years and those between 23 and 28 years of age; Table 1). Baseline samples (first pregnancy serum sample) were used to calculate C. trachomatis seroprevalence rates. Differences in seroprevalence rates were tested using binomial test for differences in proportions. All 6632 women who were seronegative at the baseline were eligible for analysing the incidence rates. C. trachomatis incidence data was based on seroconversions i.e. the second sample of the baseline seronegative woman was positive. Incidence rates were estimated by the number of seroconversions divided by person years of follow-up. The time for each seroconversion was assumed to be in the midpoint of the two samplings. Crude incidence rate ratio with 95% confidence interval was calculated. Statistical analyses were performed using R 2.6.0 (R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria) and SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Results

C. trachomatisseroprevalence trends

C. trachomatis seroprevalences did not differ between women who were < 23 years of age and those between 23 and 28 years of age (Figure 1A) as their 95% confidence intervals overlapped at each calendar time point (data not shown). The highest C. trachomatis seroprevalence rates of 23.3% (CI 19.1–27.5) and 22.2% (19.3–25.1) occurred in 1989–1991 in the younger age group and in 1992–1994 in the older age group. Thereafter, the rates declined significantly (p < 0.001) being 9.2% (6.3–12.2) in 2001–2003 in the younger group and 12.4% (10.0–14.8) in 1998–2000 in the older age group.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2334-8-169/MediaObjects/12879_2008_Article_760_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Chlamydia trachomatis a) seroprevalence (%) with the number of prevalent cases and b) incidence (per 10 000 person years) with the number of seroconversions in pregnant women during 1983–2003.

C. trachomatisincidence rates based on seroconversions

A total of 161 seroconversions occurred among 6632 (2.4%) women who were seronegative at baseline. The rate of seroconversions varied from 3.4% to 5.7% in the younger age group and from 0.8% to 2.3% in the older age group.C. trachomatis incidence rates were higher in women who were < 23 years of age than in women between 23 and 28 years of age through out the whole time period although the difference decreased towards 2003 (Figure 1B).

C. trachomatis incidence rate based on seroconversions was 214 (95% CI 172–256) per 10000 person years in the younger age group and 57 (CI 43–71) per 10000 person years in the older age group. In the younger age group the incidence was highest (264 per 10000 person years, CI 142–386) at the beginning of the 1980s (Figure 1B) and lowest (166 per 10000 person years, CI 68–264) between 1992 and 1994. In 2001–03 the incidence rate increased to 188 (CI 86–290). However, no statistically significant time trends were observed.

In the older age group, the incidence was lowest (31, CI 3.8–58) between 1983 and1985. The incidence increased to 97 (CI 48–146) in 2001–2003 (not significant linear trend, p = 0.10). The relative difference in the incidence rates between 1983–1985 and 2000–2003 was significant (rate ratio 3.2, 95% CI, 1.1–8.7).

C. trachomatisincidence rates based on laboratory notifications

The point estimates based on the rates of the NIDR notifications were in line with C. trachomatis incidence rates based on seroconversions (Table 2). According to the laboratory notifications, C. trachomatis incidence increased in both age-groups (< 24 and 25–29 years of age) since 1995–1997 (Table 2). The incidence rates were highest in women below 24 years of age with 1.5-fold increase from 245 (95% CI 237–253) between 1995 and 1997 to 374 (95% CI 365–383) between 2004 and 2006. A moderate 1.3-fold (CI 1.21–1.43) increase from 57 (CI 53–61) to 70 (CI 66–75) was noted in the women between 25 and 29 of age.
Table 2

Chlamydia trachomatis incidence rates per 10 000 person years (95% confidence interval) based on serology or laboratory reports

  

Time period

 

Age group

1995–1997

1998–2000

2001–2003

FMC

< 23-year-olds

166 (68 – 264)

222 (110 – 334)

188 (86 – 290)

 

23–28-year-olds

33 (4 – 62)

64 (24 – 103)

97 (48 – 146)

NIDR

15–24-year-olds

245 (237–253)

307 (298–315)

374 (365–383)

 

25–29-year-olds

57 (53 – 61)

64 (60 – 68)

70 (66 – 75)

FMC = Finnish Maternity Cohort; NIDR = National Infectious Disease Register

Discussion

We showed that the C. trachomatis incidence rates based on serology were in line with the incidence rates based on laboratory notifications. The increasing incidence trends were at variance with decreasing C. trachomatis seroprevalence rates. Our results suggest that the true incidence rates can best be demonstrated by seroconversions detected in paired serum samples. The serum bank material used is likely to reveal the true population based incidence.

The number of cases with seroconversions followed the common u-shaped curve of reported C. trachomatis cases especially among the younger age group [1, 4, 10]. The conformity between the FMC and NIDR incidence rates indicates that the increasing trend is real. Testing of more individuals and using more sensitive diagnostic tests would not fully explain the increasing Chlamydia incidence rates.

The discrepancy between reported cases and seroprevalence rates is not easy to explain. Such discrepancy have earlier been reported from British Columbia during an extensive C. trachomatis control program [1]. Earlier diagnosis and treatment may lead to impaired immune response [1] which then reduces the overall seroprevalence rate in the population. Reinfection rates have not been analysed from the Finnish NIDR. However, increasing seroconversion rate suggests that the reported chlamydia rates are not explained merely by high reinfection rate.

The observed discrepancy between the incidence rate and seroprevalence is comparable with the declining trend of the long-term sequelae of C. trachomatis infection, e.g. PID, preterm delivery and ectopic pregnancy in Finland over the last ten years [11, 12] and suggest that the infection burden in the population would be decreasing. However, it can not be excluded that the increasing incidence rate reflects changes in the serotype distribution or type replacement with less pathogenic strains over time. More research is needed to know whether this could be a consequence of improved diagnosis and efficient treatment of symptomatic infections caused by virulent C. trachomatis serotypes linked with stronger symptoms [1317].

On the other hand, direct comparison of the FMC data and NIDR data is not straightforward. Most C. trachomatis infections occur in adolescents [5, 18, 19] with risk taking behaviour [20]. Although the FMC serum bank covers almost all pregnant women and is population based, it lacks infertile women and to a large part also adolescent women. Furthermore, contact tracing efforts probably lead to increasing test numbers and more asymptomatic cases reported to the NIDR.

Knowledge of C. trachomatis seroprevalence and incidence trends is extremely important since these trends reflect prevention efforts in the population. Furthermore, epidemiologic data are important not only for monitoring C. trachomatis infection trends but also for identification of breakthrough mutants [21]. A recent survey among elementary school students showed that the age of sexual debut is decreasing and condom use is inconsistent [22]. Increasing rates of reported C. trachomatis infection and the high incidence based on seroconversions fit into the picture. There is no national screening program in Finland although some maternity clinics routinely test women. Nevertheless, the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health has prepared a recommendation for opportunistic screening in Finland but significant reduction in the C. trachomatis rates is unlikely to take place unless systematic screening is implemented.

Conclusion

This study confirms the decline of C. trachomatis seroprevalence in Finland since the middle of 1990s'. Simultaneously demonstrated rising seroconversion rates in different individuals are in accordance with the reported laboratory notifications in the NIDR suggesting that the increasing infection rates are not only due to repeated infections. Based on our results, population-based C. trachomatis incidence rates can be demonstrated by seroconversions detected in paired serum samples. The discrepancy between the C. trachomatis incidence and seroprevalence trends warrants further studies.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Helsinki University Hospital Research Funds and Oulu University Hospital. This work is associated with the goals described in the European Framework Programme 6 (FP6)-funded EpiGenChlamydia Consortium (EU FP6: LSHG-CT-2007-037637).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Public Health Institute, Oulu and Helsinki
(2)
Deparment of Dermatology, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital
(3)
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Helsinki University Hospital
(4)
University of Tampere, School of Public Health
(5)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki

References

  1. Brunham RC, Pourbohloul B, Mak S, White R, Rekart ML: The unexpected impact of a Chlamydia trachomatis infection control program on susceptibility to reinfection. J Infect Dis. 2005, 192 (10): 1836-1844. 10.1086/497341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization: Global prevalence and incidence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections. 2001, [http://www.who.int/docstore/hiv/GRSTI/003.htm]Google Scholar
  3. World Health Organization: 2006, [http://data.euro.who.int/cisid/]
  4. Moi H: Care of sexually transmitted infections in the Nordic countries. Int J STD AIDS. 2001, 12 (12): 819-823. 10.1258/0956462011924326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fenton KA, Lowndes CM: Recent trends in the epidemiology of sexually transmitted infections in the European Union. Sex Transm Infect. 2004, 80 (4): 255-263. 10.1136/sti.2004.009415.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. The National Public Health Institute (KTL): Infectious Diseases in Finland. [http://www.ktl.fi/attachments/suomi/julkaisut/julkaisusarja_b/2006/2006b17.pdf]
  7. Paavonen J, Eggert-Kruse W: Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on human reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 1999, 5 (5): 433-447. 10.1093/humupd/5.5.433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lyytikainen E, Kaasila M, Koskela P, et al: Chlamydia trachomatis seroprevalence atlas of Finland 1983–2003. Sex Transm Infect. 2008, 84 (1): 19-22. 10.1136/sti.2007.027409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yamamoto T, Moji K, Kusano Y, Kurokawa K, Kawagoe K, Katamine S: Trend in Chlamydia trachomatis infection among pregnant women in the past ten years in Japan: significance of Chlamydia trachomatis seroprevalence. Sex Transm Dis. 1998, 25 (10): 516-521. 10.1097/00007435-199811000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hiltunen-Back E, Haikala O, Kautiainen H, Ruutu P, Paavonen J, Reunala T: Nationwide increase of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Finland: highest rise among adolescent women and men. Sex Transm Dis. 2003, 30 (10): 737-741. 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000086606.77125.66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Makinen J: Ectopic pregnancy falls in Finland. Lancet. 1996, 348 (9020): 129-130. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64643-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, Tapper AM: The incidence of preterm deliveries decreases in Finland. Bjog. 2008, 115 (1): 38-43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Millman K, Black CM, Stamm WE, et al: Population-based genetic epidemiologic analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis serotypes and lack of association between ompA polymorphisms and clinical phenotypes. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8 (3): 604-611. 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.08.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Geisler WM, Suchland RJ, Whittington WL, Stamm WE: The relationship of serovar to clinical manifestations of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2003, 30 (2): 160-165. 10.1097/00007435-200302000-00013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lan J, Melgers I, Meijer CJ, et al: Prevalence and serovar distribution of asymptomatic cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infections as determined by highly sensitive PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33 (12): 3194-3197.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Anttila T, Saikku P, Koskela P, et al: Serotypes of Chlamydia trachomatis and risk for development of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Jama. 2001, 285 (1): 47-51. 10.1001/jama.285.1.47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kari L, Whitmire WM, Carlson JH, et al: Pathogenic diversity among Chlamydia trachomatis ocular strains in nonhuman primates is affected by subtle genomic variations. J Infect Dis. 2008, 197: 449-456. 10.1086/525285.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hiltunen-Back E, Haikala O, Kautiainen H, Paavonen J, Reunala T: A nationwide sentinelclinic survey of chlamydia trachomatis infection in Finland. Sex Transm Dis. 2001, 28 (5): 252-258. 10.1097/00007435-200105000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. LaMontagne DS, Baster K, Emmett L, et al: Incidence and reinfection rates of genital chlamydial infection among women aged 16–24 years attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics in England: a prospective cohort study by the Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group. Sex Transm Infect. 2007, 83 (4): 292-303. 10.1136/sti.2006.022053.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Jolly AM, Moffatt ME, Fast MV, Brunham RC: Sexually transmitted disease thresholds in Manitoba, Canada. Ann Epidemiol. 2005, 15 (10): 781-788. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.05.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Soderblom T, Blaxhult A, Fredlund H, Herrmann B: Impact of a genetic variant of Chlamydia trachomatis on national detection rates in Sweden. Euro Surveill. 2006, 11 (12): E061207 1-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health: [http://www.stakes.fi/verkkojulkaisut/tyopaperit/T1-2005.pdf]
  23. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/8/169/prepub

Copyright

© Lyytikäinen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement