A prospective study of hearing changes after beginning zidovudine or didanosine in HIV-1 treatment-naïve people
- Jeffrey T Schouten†1Email author,
- David W Lockhart†2,
- Thomas S Rees†3,
- Ann C Collier†4 and
- Christina M Marra†4, 5
© Schouten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 05 August 2005
Accepted: 20 February 2006
Published: 20 February 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Aug 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Sep 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - A.D. McNaghten|
|22 Nov 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Jeffrey Schouten|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Nov 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Dec 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - A.D. McNaghten|
|10 Jan 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Jeffrey Schouten|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|10 Jan 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Feb 2006||Editorially accepted|
|20 Feb 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-6-28|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.