Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Uniform distribution of three Candida albicans microsatellite markers in two French ICU populations supports a lack of nosocomial cross-contamination

  • Odile Eloy1,
  • Stéphanie Marque1,
  • Françoise Botterel2, 3,
  • François Stephan4,
  • Jean-Marc Costa2, 5,
  • Virginie Lasserre6 and
  • Stéphane Bretagne2, 3, 7Email author
BMC Infectious Diseases20066:162

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-162

Received: 11 May 2006

Accepted: 13 November 2006

Published: 13 November 2006

Abstract

Background

The nosocomial acquisition of Candida albicans is a growing concern in intensive care units (ICUs) and understanding the route of contamination is relevant for infection control guidelines.

Methods

To analyze whether there is a specific ecology for any given hospital, we genotyped C. albicans isolates of the ICU of Versailles hospital (Hospital A) and compared the results with those previously obtained in another ICU in Henri Mondor hospital (Hospital B) using three polymorphic microsatellite markers (PMM).

Results

Among 36 patients with at least one positive culture for C. albicans, 26 had a specific multilocus genotype, two shared a common multilocus genotype, and 8 had the most common multilocus genotype found in the general population. The time interval between periods of hospitalization between patients with common genotypes differed by 13 to 78 days, thus supporting a lack of direct contamination. To confirm this hypothesis, the multilocus genotypic distributions of the three PMM were compared between the two hospitals. No statistically significant difference was observed. Multiple correspondences analysis did not indicate the association of a multilocus genotypic distribution with any given hospital.

Conclusion

The present epidemiological study supports the conclusions that each patient harbours his/her own isolate, and that nosocomial transmission is not common in any given ICU. This study also supports the usefulness and practicability of PMM for studying the epidemiology of C. albicans.

Background

Candida infections are a growing concern in patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) [1]. Among the yeasts involved, C. albicans is still predominant in ICUs, accounting for 55% of yeast bloodstream infections [2, 3]. Most of these infections are nosocomial, which raises the issue of their prevention. Understanding the route of contamination is of utmost importance in order to implement adequate preventive guidelines.

Genotyping is an approach that can be used to detect cross-contamination. Several genotyping techniques have been reported [4]. Among them, polymorphic microsatellite markers (PMM) have a high discriminatory power and a high throughput when fluorogenic primers and an automated sequencer are used for analysis[5, 6]. The data are computerizable and can be compared.

In a previous study on an ICU [7], we used genotyping to show that cross-contamination with C. albicans was unlikely and that most of the patients were colonized with their own strain. The aim of the present study was to determine whether this finding was specific or could be generalized to another ICU in another hospital. Moreover, if a nosocomial acquisition occurs in a given hospital, a C. albicans population specific to that hospital is expected. Therefore, we studied the genotypes of C. albicans isolates of a different ICU from a new hospital and compared the results with those previously reported to detect potential hospital-specific populations. The genotyping was performed using three PMM known to have a discriminatory power of 0.97 [5].

Methods

Study populations

The study was conducted in the ICU of Versailles hospital, referred to as Hospital A, located southwest of Paris, and the results were compared to those obtained in Henri Mondor hospital, referred to as Hospital B, located southeast of Paris, forty kilometres from Hospital A.

The ICU of Hospital A (18-bed ward) treats both medical and surgical patients whereas the ICU of Hospital B (16-bed ward) has only surgical patients. Patients above 18 years of age and at high risk for Candida infection were eligible for the study. The criteria for inclusion were recent abdominal surgery (<24 hours), gastrointestinal perforation or anastomotic leakages, urologic tract surgery and/or broad-spectrum therapy for more than eight days [7]. The following information was recorded for each patient: age, sex, new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) [8], presence of diabetes, immunodepression, wide-spectrum antibiotic therapy, orally administered amphotericin B, presence of arterial or central venous catheter, transfusion requirement, total parenteral nutrition, type of surgery and length of ICU stay. The Comité Consultatif de Protection des Personnes dans la Recherche Biomédicale of each hospital confirmed that no ethical approval was required since this observational study did not modify current diagnostic or therapeutic strategies. Written or oral informed consent was obtained from patients or from their relatives.

Sampling

In both hospitals, patients were sampled for colonization at entry in the ICU and then once weekly. The sampling consisted of skin and mouth swabs, urine, stools and tracheal aspirations. Clinical specimens were cultured on chromogenic medium for 48 hours at 37°C. All green colonies (CHROMagar® Candida for Hospital A) and blue colonies (Candida ID®, BioMérieux for Hospital B were identified as C. albicans. The others colonies were identified using commercially available strips (Api 20C®, BioMérieux in Hospital A or ATB ID32C®, BioMérieux in Hospital B) together with micromorphological analysis on rice-extract agar (Becton Dickinson). One colony per sample was put into 1 ml of 10% glycerol and frozen at -80°C until PCR analysis.

Microsatellite analysis

The surface of the C. albicans frozen aliquots was scraped with a loop and the material obtained was seeded on Sabouraud medium. After 24 h, one colony was directly suspended in 100 μl of sterile water and boiled to free DNA. After centrifugation for 3 minutes at 2000 × g, 2 μl of the supernatant was used to amplify three polymorphic loci named "CDC3", "EF3" and "HIS3" after the genes they are located closest to. Primers were designed to amplify the microsatellite markers and one primer of each set was 5'-labeled with different dyes as previously described [5]. In Hospital A, the PCR products were run in capillary and read using a 310 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The data were stored and analyzed using the 372 GeneScan software (Applied Biosystems).

The 372 GeneScan software automatically calculates the PCR fragment length according to the internal standard and gives fractional numbers. To check the reproducibility of the technique, we tested the B311 reference strain in ten separate experiments. This strain is heterozygous for the three markers and the length in base pairs (bp) of each allele is known [5]. The standard deviation was +/- 0.20 bp for CDC3, +/- 0.24 for EF3, and +/- 0.42 for HIS3. To assign a specific length to a PCR fragment, we systematically tested the B311 strain in all the PCR runs. All the PCR results were aligned with this reference strain. Therefore, each allele was named according to the length in bp of the amplified fragment after the alignment with the reference strain. When several isolates were available for a given patient, all the profiles were also aligned to check their similarity. When we observed electromorphs with one signal for a given locus, we considered that the isolates were homozygous for this locus [9].

Comparaison of PMM analysis between the two hospitals

In Hospital A, the PCR products were run in capillary and read using a 370 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems). For Hospital B [7], we ran the PCR products on a 36-cm long acrylamide urea gel and read the signals using a 377 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems). After analysis by the 372 GeneScan software (Applied Biosystems), we were obliged to make some corrections because of the different automated sequencers used in each place. The differences observed between the 377 – 310 sequencers for 6 reference strains (Ca 4918, IP1877/89, IP996/69, IP1880/89, H12, B311) were 0.4 nucleotide for CDC3, 2.4 nucleotides for EF3 and one nucleotide for HIS3. Therefore, using the B311 strain ran in each series, we calculated the differences between the length obtained with the 310 sequencer and that calculated with the 377 sequencer and reported in previous publications [5]. We added to each allele of each locus the difference calculated to obtain comparative results. As described above, each profile was compared with the B311 strain profile and the length in base pairs was given according to the known length of the B311 alleles.

Statistical analysis

Two kinds of statistical analysis were used to compare Hospital A and B's populations: the genotypic differentiation test called the G test and a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). The G test analyzes the diversity of diploid populations on multi-loci where multi-allelic possibilities exist and tests the null hypothesis that the distribution is identical across populations [10]. A likelihood test of the observations is performed and the result is given by a probability P based on a Fischer's test. If P > 0.05, the compared populations are considered as similar. This test is suitable for molecular markers such as PMM in diploid populations, with a high level of genetic diversity, when the loci can be considered independent [11]. The data were coded and analyzed using the GenePop software version 3.4 June 2003 [12].

A cluster analysis between the two populations was performed by MCA which is an ordination technique. MCA is a type of Correspondence Analysis (CA) which considerably expands the scope of Principal Components Analysis (PCA). The percentage inertia explained by axes takes the place of the percentage variance of PCA. PMM data can be coded by 1 (presence) or 0 (absence) for each of the possible allele. Such coding leads to complete disjunctive data used in the MCA. One byproduct is that the row and column projections in the new space may both be plotted on the same output graphic presentations. For our analysis, only the six first axes were considered for explaining the contingency table variability. Scatter plots were chosen for a graphic representation. They were centered in the first two axes. This analysis was performed using the XLSTAT (version 7.5) software package [13]. A hierarchical classification by a neighbor-joining with the squared Euclidian distances was determined from the six first axes of the MCA.

Results

In Hospital A, 1424 patients were hospitalized from 1st February 2000 to 31st January 2002, and 60 patients were included. Among them, 56 patients (93%) had at least one sample that was positive for Candida sp. For 11 of them, the culture was positive as early as the first day of hospitalization in the ICU. The 45 other patients had positive samples after a minimum of 72 hours. In Hospital B, 303 patients were hospitalized from 1st November 1999 to 31st October 2000, and 94 patients were included. Among them, 43 patients (46%) had at least one positive sample in culture and 36 had positive samples after a minimum of 72 hours. Table 1 lists the demographic data and the main characteristics of the patients in the two hospitals who acquired any Candida sp colonization after 72 hours of hospitalization. The percentage of acquisition after 72 h was 80.3% (45/56) in Hospital A and 83.7% (36/43) in Hospital B. The number of positive cultures for Candida spp. was 156 out of 333 (47%) specimens recovered in Hospital A. The figure was lower in Hospital B where 167 out of the 1126 (15%) samples were culture positive. Despite this finding, there was no significant difference in the distribution of Candida species (data not shown).
Table 1

Main characteristics of the patients who acquired any Candida sp colonization after 72 hours of hospitalization in Hospital A (45/56, i;e. 80.3%) and in Hospital B (36/43, i.e; 83.7%).

Patient characteristics

Hospital A n = 45 (%)

Hospital B n = 36 (%)

P

Age (years) mean ± SD

66.4 ± 15.4

62.6 ± 16.4

0.57

Sex ratio (M/F)

25/20

23/13

0.42

SAPS II score: mean points ± SD

45.5 ± 14

37.5 ± 14.5

0.19

Diabetes

4 (8.9)

6 (16.7)

0.28

Immunodepression

17 (37.8)

9 (25.0)

0.26

Previous administration of antibiotics

43 (95.6)

26 (72.2)

0.25

Oral amphotericin B

0

32 (88.9)

0.001*

Central venous catheter

37 (82.2)

34 (94.4)

0.40

Radial artery catheter

21 (46.7)

31 (86.1)

0.06

Transfusion requirements

17 (37.8)

29 (80.6)

0.03*

Total parenteral nutrition

15 (33.3)

27 (75.0)

0.03*

Abdominal surgery

11 (24.4)

21 (57.9)

0.03*

Liver transplant

0

3 (8.3)

0.10

Length of stay: median days (25th-75th percentiles)

21 (11–53)

31 (14.0–55.5)

0.07

*: statistically significant difference. P calculated by a Fisher's exact test.

In Hospital A, 82 isolates from different anatomical sites (Table 2) were genotyped from the 36 patients with at least one positive culture for C. albicans. The genotype was identical for a given patient whatever the anatomical site. Only one patient sequentially harboured two different genotypes in the same anatomical site (see below). In Hospital B, 122 C. albicans isolates from different anatomical sites (Table 2) from 30 patients had been genotyped [5].
Table 2

Source of the 82 C. albicans genotyped isolates from 36 patients in Hospital A and the 122 C albicans genotyped isolates from 30 patients in Hospital B.

 

No (%) of positive specimens

 

Clinical sample

Hospital A

Hospital B

P

 

Number

%

Number

%

 

Mouth, skin and superficial surgical wounds

38

46.3

1

0.8

0.001*

Peritoneal fluid, abscess, drain effluent and bile

3

3.6

50

41

0.001*

Stools and gastric secretions

15

18.3

18

14.7

0.350

Urinary tract

11

13.4

15

12.3

0.498

Respiratory tract

15

18.3

34

27.8

0.141

Blood

0

0.0

2

1.6

0.361

Central venous catheter

0

0.0

2

1.6

0.361

Total

82

100.0

122

100.0

 

* P < 0.05: significant differences. (P calculated by a Fisher's exact test).

In Hospital A, 36 patients had at least one positive culture of C. albicans and 19 patients had serial C. albicans isolates. Of these 19 patients, only one patient had two different genotypes of C. albicans. The first genotype was specific for the patient while the second genotype, obtained 8 days later, was a genotype found in other patients. Nevertheless, we kept both genotypes of this patient for further analysis. Among these 36 patients, 26 (72%) had a specific genotype, 8 (22%) shared the multilocus genotype characterized by CDC3: 117–125; EF3: 126–135; HIS3: 162-162 whose the frequency is 17% among 100 unrelated isolates [5], and two other patients (6%) shared another identical genotype (CDC3: 117–125; EF3: 130–131; HIS3: 162-162). None of the 8 patients sharing the most common multilocus genotype stayed in the ICU over the same period of time, the time interval between the dates of hospitalization in the ICU ranging from 28 to 78 days. The stay of the other 2 patients differed by an interval of 13 days. In Hospital B, the most common multilocus genotype had been found in three (10%) out of 30 patients whose stay in the ICU differed by 7 to 96 days.

Therefore, 37 genotypes from 36 different patients in Hospital A and 30 genotypes from 30 different patients in Hospital B were available for comparison. The allelic frequencies were not statistically different for 34 of the 38 different alleles observed. Table 3 reports the multilocus genotypes of the C. albicans isolates observed in the two hospitals. With the genotypic differentiation, the pairwise analysis across the two populations suggested that the populations were not significantly different (P > 0.05) for the three PMM: CDC3 (P = 0.12), EF3 (P = 0.25) and HIS3 (P = 0.12).
Table 3

Multilocus genotypes of the C. albicans isolates of the two hospitals studied.

CDC3 locus

EF3 locus

HIS3 locus

number of isolates

Allele 1

Allele 2

Allele 1

Allele 2

Allele 1

Allele 2

Hospital A (n= 37)

Hospital B (n = 30)

113

117

130

136

150

162

0

3

113

117

130

136

162

162

1

1

113

117

136

136

150

162

1

0

113

117

136

136

162

162

1

0

113

117

136

142

158

158

1

0

117

117

126

135

162

162

0

1

117

117

130

136

150

162

0

1

117

117

130

136

154

194

0

1

117

117

133

140

154

154

0

1

117

117

133

144

154

178

0

1

117

117

133

144

154

186

0

1

117

117

136

136

162

162

1

0

117

117

136

144

154

154

1

0

117

117

137

139

182

182

0

1

117

121

131

130

162

186

1

0

117

121

132

135

154

162

1

0

117

121

133

136

154

154

0

1

117

121

136

139

154

154

1

0

117

125

126

126

162

162

1

0

117

125

126

126

162

162

0

1

117

125

126

135

154

162

1

0

117

125

126

135

154

166

1

0

117

125

126

135

158

158

1

0

117

125

126

135

162

162

8

3

117

125

126

135

170

218

0

1

117

125

126

135

202

210

1

0

117

125

126

135

210

218

0

1

117

125

126

135

218

230

1

0

117

125

130

130

162

162

1

1

117

125

130

144

154

154

0

1

117

125

131

130

162

162

2

0

117

125

131

131

162

162

0

1

117

125

131

131

162

190

0

1

117

125

131

131

166

166

0

2

117

125

133

144

154

182

0

1

117

125

136

139

154

154

1

0

117

129

136

146

154

154

0

1

121

121

136

136

154

154

1

0

121

125

130

144

154

154

1

0

121

125

130

144

154

166

1

0

121

125

144

144

174

174

1

0

121

125

145

150

166

174

1

0

125

125

126

135

162

162

1

0

125

125

130

144

154

154

1

0

125

125

130

144

154

166

1

0

125

125

130

145

154

166

0

1

125

125

131

139

194

198

0

1

125

125

136

139

150

150

1

0

125

129

130

144

154

154

1

0

129

129

136

141

150

162

0

2

The isolates were also analyzed by MCA according to their multilocus genotype. MCA produced a multidimensional representation of the data, which were reduced in plane for convenience. The two first factor axes corresponding to the percentage of the total inertia of 7.56% and 7.29% respectively are shown on Figure 1. Both populations of Hospital A and B are superimposable on this representation without presenting clusters, except for two particular Hospital A multilocus genotypes (A31 and A32 on figure 1B). We determined that only the six first axes (a range of inertia from about 7.6 to 5.1%) present at least one significant correlation (t-test) with the initial variables. To confirm that the two populations were superimposed in all axes, we performed a hierarchical classification by a neighbor-joining with the squared Euclidian distances determined from the six first axes of the MCA. The corresponding unrooted tree is shown on Figure 2. We observed that independently of the origin of the multilocus genotypes, both populations were distributed in all branches of the tree without discriminate some clusters. No association of a genotype with a particular Hospital could be detected.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2334-6-162/MediaObjects/12879_2006_Article_426_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Multiple correspondences analysis for the 37 Hospital A multilocus genotypes and the 30 Hospital B multilocus genotypes. The projection in the plane defined by the two most informative axes is shown (axis 1 variance: 7.56%; axis 2 variance: 7.29%). Although different, some multilocus genotypes are superimposble because of the projection on the plane. Green spots: Hospital A genotypes; blue spots: Hospital B genotypes; red spots: commun genotypes between the two hospitals.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2334-6-162/MediaObjects/12879_2006_Article_426_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Unrooted tree obtained after hierarchical classification by a neighbor-joining with the squared Euclidian distances determined from the six first axes of the multiple correspondence analysis. Same colour code as in Figure 2. Multilocus genotypes numbers are arbitrary.

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to compare the genotypes of C. albicans in two ICUs of two different hospitals to determine whether or not cross-contamination occurs. In Hospital B, a previous study had concluded that there was a low probability of cross contamination between patients [7]. This was confirmed in the present study in Hospital A. Among 36 patients, 26 had a specific C. albicans multilocus genotype and, once colonized, the patient usually kept the same genotypes whatever the anatomical site. However, eight patients shared a multilocus genotype which is the most common multilocus genotype among independent isolates [5]. The probability of cross-contamination was low given that they were not hospitalized at the same time in the ICU. Fomites might have had a reservoir role. However, in ICUs, the cleaning procedures between patients exclude this possibility. We cannot rule out that a medical staff member might have served as a common contaminator. However, the most common shared multilocus genotype also belongs to the most common genotype in the general population, which accounted for 17% of 100 unrelated C albicans isolates [5]. The fact that some genotypes are more frequent than others has already been reported for C. albicans by other authors using PMM [6, 1416]. This may be due to the 0.97 discriminatory power of the present PMM and can be solved by using other PMM [6] to increase the discriminatory power or by using another typing method such as MLST [17]. This may also be due to the lack of a sexual cycle in C. albicans and the expansion of some clones [18].

Similarities were found regarding the epidemiology of C. albicans, i.e. that most fungal infections that arise in an ICU are caused by unrelated strains, although there were differences between the two hospitals which could have led to less similarities. For instance, the ICU of Hospital A treats medical and surgical patients. In contrast, Hospital B recruits only surgical patients, deemed to be more susceptible to infections since they are more immunocompromised (liver transplant, pancreatitis) or have undergone more invasive procedures. What was in fact surprising was the vast difference in the percentage of positive culture between both hospitals, 47% (156/333) in Hospital A versus 15% (167/1126) in Hospital B. The role of the different media used for fungal growth seems unlikely. An explanation could be could be the role of amphotericin B prophylaxis, implemented in Hospital B only, which could have hampered yeast growth. Other studies have reported similar differences in yeast colonization between 50% [1] and 90% [19]. This underlines the difficulties in standardizing clinical specimens and the microbiological procedures. However, despite these differences, the percentage of patients exhibiting a C. albicans colonization after 72 h was similar between the two hospitals (Table 1) and the species distribution was also similar.

The second point of our study was to determine whether there was a C. albicans population specific to a given hospital, which might have suggested a nosocomial transmission or a difference in the patient population hospitalized. The G test and the MCA of PMM genotypes concluded with the absence of a C. albicans population specific to a given hospital (Figure 1A and 1B). Using the moderately repetitive sequence Ca3 to fingerprint C. albicans isolates in two distant hospitals in New Zealand [20], the authors have provided indirect evidence of nosocomial transmission of hospital-specific C. albicans strains in one hospital but not the other. Interestingly, these results were obtained under conditions in which no candidiasis outbreak occurred in either hospital, as was the case in our study. Therefore, more systematic screening to investigate C. albicans populations in ICUs might suggest intra-hospital acquisition and lead to reinforcement of clinical procedures. Of course, when an outbreak occurs, the genotyping of the C. albicans isolates can demonstrate the exogenous acquisition and should lead to preventive measures [21].

The PMM analysis produces computerizable data. However, technical issues should be pointed out since different migration techniques (acrylamide gel versus capillary) and not genome instability led to different allele sizes from the same genotype. The lengths of the PCR fragments and their secondary structures probably interfered with the migration [22]. This should be taken into consideration when comparing results between different laboratories, especially when the lengths of the PCR fragments differ in only one or two bases. Nevertheless, this shortcoming does not change the multilocus genotypes and the discriminatory power does not depend on the migration technique used. Agreement between laboratories should be achieved by using reference strains with known allelic lengths. Despite very few limitations, the PMM technique is well-designed for screening large number of isolates with limited workload. The same technique can be advantageously designed for the study of other yeasts, especially C. glabrata [23] which is the second leading species encountered in ICUs.

Conclusion

The present study reinforces previous statements obtained from a single hospital supporting the fact that patients harbour their own C. albicans isolate [7, 24]. We also found that there was no genotype specific to any given hospital, thus reinforcing the hypothesis that nosocomial transmission exceptionally occurs in patients hospitalized in the ICU. Therefore, attempts aimed at preventing C. albicans colonization should focus on controlling the risk factors rather than on limiting cross-contamination as this yeast rarely appears responsible for cross-contamination between patients in the same ward.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Françoise Dromer from Institut Pasteur, Paris, for her critical reading of the manuscript and Dr Gael Lecellier from Université Versailles-Saint Quentin en Yvelines for his help in the statistical analysis.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire de Parasitologie, Hôpital André Mignot
(2)
Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor-APHP
(3)
Unité Mixte de Recherche BIPAR 956, Université Paris 12
(4)
Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre
(5)
Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire, Hôpital américain
(6)
Université de Pharmacie de Paris 5
(7)
Centre National de Référence de Mycologie et des Antifongiques, Institut Pasteur

References

  1. Eggimann P, Garbino J, Pittet D: Epidemiology of Candida species infections in critically ill non-immunosuppressed patients. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003, 3: 685-702. 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00801-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Tortorano AM, Peman J, Bernhardt H, Klingspor L, Kibbler CC, Faure O, Biraghi E, Canton E, Zimmermann K, Seaton S, Grillot R: Epidemiology of candidaemia in Europe: results of 28-month European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) hospital-based surveillance study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004, 23: 317-322. 10.1007/s10096-004-1103-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ: Role of sentinel surveillance of candidemia: trends in species distribution and antifungal susceptibility. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 3551-3557. 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3551-3557.2002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Soll DR: The ins and outs of DNA fingerprinting the infectious fungi. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000, 13: 332-370. 10.1128/CMR.13.2.332-370.2000.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Botterel F, Desterke C, Costa C, Bretagne S: Analysis of microsatellite markers of Candida albicans used for rapid typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 4076-4081. 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4076-4081.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Sampaio P, Gusmao L, Correia A, Alves C, Rodrigues AG, Pina-Vaz C, Amorim A, Pais C: New microsatellite multiplex PCR for Candida albicans strain typing reveals microevolutionary changes. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 3869-3876. 10.1128/JCM.43.8.3869-3876.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Stephan F, Bah MS, Desterke C, Rezaiguia-Delclaux S, Foulet F, Duvaldestin P, Bretagne S: Molecular diversity and routes of colonization of Candida albicans in a surgical intensive care unit, as studied using microsatellite markers. Clin Infect Dis. 2002, 35: 1477-1483. 10.1086/344648.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F: A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. Jama. 1993, 270: 2957-2963. 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa JM, Eloy O, Botterel F, Janbon G, Bretagne S: Use of microsatellite markers and gene dosage to quantify gene copy numbers in Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 1387-1389. 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1387-1389.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Raymond M, Rousset F: GENEPOP (version1.2):population genetic software for exact test and ecumenicism. J Heredity. 1995, 86: 248-249.Google Scholar
  11. Goudet J, Raymond M, de Meeus T, Rousset F: Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics. 1996, 144: 1933-1940.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. GenePop website. [wbiomedcurtineduau/genepop].
  13. XLSTAT (version 7.5) software package. [wwwxlstatcom].
  14. Dalle F, Dumont L, Franco N, Mesmacque D, Caillot D, Bonnin P, Moiroux C, Vagner O, Cuisenier B, Lizard S, Bonnin A: Genotyping of Candida albicans oral strains from healthy individuals by polymorphic microsatellite locus analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 2203-2205. 10.1128/JCM.41.5.2203-2205.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Lott TJ, Fundyga RE, Brandt ME, Harrison LH, Sofair AN, Hajjeh RA, Warnock DW: Stability of allelic frequencies and distributions of Candida albicans microsatellite loci from U.S. population-based surveillance isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 1316-1321. 10.1128/JCM.41.3.1316-1321.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Fundyga RE, Lott TJ, Arnold J: Population structure of Candida albicans, a member of the human flora, as determined by microsatellite loci. Infect Genet Evol. 2002, 2: 57-68. 10.1016/S1567-1348(02)00088-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tavanti A, Gow NA, Senesi S, Maiden MC, Odds FC: Optimization and validation of multilocus sequence typing for Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 3765-3776. 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3765-3776.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Lott TJ, Effat MM: Evidence for a more recently evolved clade within a Candida albicans North American population. Microbiology. 2001, 147: 1687-1692.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sandven P, Giercksky KE: Yeast colonization in surgical patients with intra-abdominal perforations. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001, 20: 475-481. 10.1007/s100960100531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmid J, Tay YP, Wan L, Carr M, Parr D, McKinney W: Evidence for nosocomial transmission of Candida albicans obtained by Ca3 fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33: 1223-1230.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Viviani MA, Cogliati M, Esposto MC, Prigitano A, Tortorano AM: Four-year persistence of a single Candida albicans genotype causing bloodstream infections in a surgical ward proven by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 218-221. 10.1128/JCM.44.1.218-221.2006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wenz H, Robertson JM, Menchen S, Oaks F, Demorest DM, Scheibler D, Rosenblum BB, Wike C, Gilbert DA, Efcavitch JW: High-precision genotyping by denaturing capillary electrophoresis. Genome Res. 1998, 8: 69-80.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Foulet F, Nicolas N, Eloy O, Botterel F, Gantier JC, Costa JM, Bretagne S: Microsatellite marker analysis as a typing system for Candida glabrata. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 4574-4579. 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4574-4579.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor BN, Harrer T, Pscheidl E, Schweizer A, Rollinghoff M, Schroppel K: Surveillance of nosocomial transmission of Candida albicans in an intensive care unit by DNA fingerprinting. J Hosp Infect. 2003, 55: 283-289. 10.1016/S0195-6701(03)00295-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/162/prepub

Copyright

© Eloy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement