Association of Atopobium vaginae, a recently described metronidazole resistant anaerobe, with bacterial vaginosis
© Ferris et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 28 October 2003
Accepted: 13 February 2004
Published: 13 February 2004
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a polymicrobial syndrome characterized by a change in vaginal flora away from predominantly Lactobacillus species. The cause of BV is unknown, but the condition has been implicated in diverse medical outcomes. The bacterium Atopobium vaginae has been recognized only recently. It is not readily identified by commercial diagnostic kits. Its clinical significance is unknown but it has recently been isolated from a tuboovarian abcess.
Nucleotide sequencing of PCR amplified 16S rRNA gene segments, that were separated into bands within lanes on polyacrylamide gels by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), was used to examine bacterial vaginal flora in 46 patients clinically described as having normal (Lactobacillus spp. predominant; Nugent score ≤ 3) and abnormal flora (Nugent score ≥ 4). These women ranged in age from 14 to 48 and 82% were African American.
The DGGE banding patterns of normal and BV-positive patients were recognizably distinct. Those of normal patients contained 1 to 4 bands that were focused in the centre region of the gel lane, while those of BV positive patients contained bands that were not all focused in the center region of the gel lane. More detailed analysis of patterns revealed that bands identified as Atopobium vaginae were present in a majority (12/22) of BV positive patients, while corresponding bands were rare (2/24) in normal patients. (P < 0.001) Two A. vaginae isolates were cultivated from two patients whose DGGE analyses indicated the presence of this organism. Two A. vaginae 16S rRNA gene sequences were identified among the clinical isolates. The same two sequences were obtained from DGGE bands of the corresponding vaginal flora. The sequences differed by one nucleotide over the short (~300 bp) segment used for DGGE analysis and migrated to slightly different points in denaturing gradient gels. Both isolates were strict anaerobes and highly metronidazole resistant.
The results suggest that A. vaginae may be an important component of the complex bacterial ecology that constitutes abnormal vaginal flora. This organism could play a role in treatment failure if further studies confirm it is consistently metronidozole resistant.
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a syndrome that appears to represent a disturbance of the vaginal ecosystem associated with a shift in the microflora [1, 2]. Several adverse medical outcomes have been associated with BV [3–11]. While the cause of BV is not understood, some strong associations have been made between the syndrome and the presence of particular bacterial species, such as Gardnerella vaginalis and Prevotella sp. [2, 12]. Most of these, however, represent bacteria that have been detected by cultivation and identified by traditional morphological and biochemical methods.
Cultivation-independent (molecular) analyses, most notably sequencing of 16S rRNA genes PCR-amplified from microbial community DNA, offer a more systematic approach to detecting microbes in natural habitats  and a more concrete method of identification and classification [14, 15]. Molecular surveys of microbes in environmental samples have repeatedly shown that cultivated species do not represent the full complement of microbes in most habitats  and molecular analyses are now commonly used to survey bacterial flora in mammalian systems [17, 18].
One technique, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene segments, offers the possibility of revealing a significant portion of the bacterial flora in a sample as a pattern of bands on an acrylamide gel [19, 20]. The bands are separated based on their denaturing characteristics, i.e. sequences and the sequences of individual bands can be obtained allowing the identification of bacteria in the sample. DGGE patterns have been used to reveal changes in microflora and to identify microbes in a variety of habitats [20–26] including human vaginal flora [12, 27, 28] and other mammalian systems [29–32].
In the course of DGGE analyses of vaginal bacterial flora of normal and BV-positive patients, we detected a band whose sequence matched that of Atopobium vaginae (GenBank reference no. AF325325 and American Type Culture Collection [ATCC] #BAA 55) in 55% of BV positive patients. A. vaginae is a recently recognized species  whose clinical significance is unknown, though it has been identified recently as the cause of a tuboovarian abscess . The isolate described in this case report was found to be highly resistant to metronidazole. We isolated two A. vaginae strains from BV patients. Antibiotic susceptibility studies were performed using these two strains and the ATCC #BAA 44 strain. Details of these studies are presented below.
Subjects participated in two different protocols in two locations. In Indianapolis, adolescent females attending one of three adolescent health clinics were enrolled in a prospective cohort study of risk factors for the acquisition of STD's between May, 1999, and September, 2001. They were predominantly African-American (85%) ranging in age from 14 to 17. Having a sexually transmitted disease was not a prerequisite for enrolment but 84% of the cohort were sexually active at the time of testing. Informed consent was obtained from all participants as well as permission from the accompanying parent/guardian for entry into the study. Specimens were collected at the clinics in Indianapolis and were subsequently shipped overnight using cold packs to LSUHSC where they were processed and analyzed.
In New Orleans healthy women between the ages of 18–55 were enrolled into a study of the immune response to Candida albicans vaginitis through the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC), New Orleans, Louisiana. HIV infected and pregnant women were not eligible for participation in the study. The specimens used in this study were obtained prior to inoculation of C. albicans. All clinical research protocols were reviewed and approved by either or both of the Institutional Review Boards at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Centre (LSUHSC), New Orleans, LA, and Indiana University/Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN.
Specimen collection and processing
Specimens collected from enrolled subjects at both study sites consisted of two vaginal swabs followed by a vaginal lavage. One of the swabs was rolled onto a glass slide, air dried and then Gram stained for the microscopic assessment of BV using the Nugent criteria (0–3: normal, 4–6: intermediate and 7–10: BV) . A vaginal lavage was collected by washing the vaginal vault for 30 to 40 seconds using a syringe and 5 ml of non-pyrogenic sterile saline. One half ml was placed in a sterile vial and frozen at -70°C until thawed for DNA extraction.
A 0.5 ml aliquot of vaginal washes were collected in BBL Port-a-Cul vials from New Orleans women only. The samples were aseptically aspirated from the vial and then plated in a manner allowing quantitation of the most common organisms. Details of the media used and culture methods are available [see Additional file 1]. Colony types present in the highest concentrations were purified and identified using RapID ANA II System (Remel, Inc., Lenexa, KS) and API 20E (bioMerieux, Inc., Durham, NC) The type A. vaginae strain (BAA-55) was obtained from the ATCC and propagated following ATCC instructions.
Susceptibility testing of Atopobiumstrains
A. vaginae strains were tested for susceptibility to various antimicrobials using an NCCLS recommended broth microdilution method for anaerobic bacteria (NCCLS, M11-A5, 2001). Serial two-fold dilutions (0.05–256 μg/ml) of each antimicrobial were prepared in Brucella broth supplemented with vitamin K (1 μg/ml), hemin (5 μg/ml), and laked horse blood (5%). Ampicillin and sulbactam were combined in a 2:1 ratio. The inoculum for each isolate was prepared in pre-reduced Brucella broth by suspending each isolate to turbidity equal to a no. 1 MacFarland and further diluted to give a final inoculum size of 105 CFU per well (106 CFU/ml). Prior to inoculation all susceptibility plates were pre-reduced in an anaerobic environment for 4–5 hours. Inoculated plates were incubated anaerobically for 48 hours and read. The MIC endpoint was defined as the lowest concentration of each antimicrobial which inhibited the visible growth of the test isolate. Quality assurance was performed using B. fragilis ATCC 25285 and B. thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741.
Approximately 0.5 ml of vaginal lavage fluid was used to isolate bacterial DNA. Samples were pelleted in a table-top micro centrifuge (5 min, 16,000 rpm) and the material was suspended in ~600 μl of phosphate buffer (pH 7.5). Cells were lysed by bead beating and nucleic acids were isolated as previously described .
Details of PCR primers were discussed previously . One primer complements a region of the 16S rRNA gene conserved among members of the domain Bacteria (Escherichia coli positions 1055 to 1070; 5'-ATGGCTGTCGTCAGCT-3'). The other primer is based on a universally conserved region (E. coli positions 1392 to 1406) and incorporates a 40-base GC clamp (5'-CGCCCGCCGCGCCCCGCGCCCGGCCCGCCGCCCCCGCCCCACGGGCGGTGTGTAC-3'). PCR conditions were as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min with a final extension at 72 C for 7 min. All DGGE analyses were performed using a D-Code System along with accessories and reagents essentially as described by the manufacturer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Gels were 6% acrylamide, gradients were 20 to 80% UF (100% UF denaturant solution is 7 M urea, 40% deionized formamide). Gel spacers were 1.0 mm, glass plates were 16 cm high × 22 cm wide, loading wells were 1 cm wide. Denaturant gradients were formed using a model EP-1 peristaltic pump (Bio-Rad) at a flow rate of 5.0 ml/min and a model GM-20 gradient maker (CBS Scientific, Del Mar, CA). DGGE was run at 60°C at 70 V for 17 hrs. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide and imaged with a Gel-Doc system (Bio-Rad). DGGE bands were purified for sequencing by repeated transfer, PCR amplification and DGGE analysis as previously described .
Sequencing was performed by the LSUHSC genomics core facility. Raw sequence data were aligned and edited using Sequencher 3.1.1 software (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI) and compared to sequences in public databases using BLAST .
DGGE banding patterns of normal and BV positive samples
Examples of DGGE banding patterns obtained from 16S rRNA gene segments PCR-amplified from nucleic acids isolated from vaginal lavage samples of patients clinically described as having BV-positive (A) or normal (B) vaginal flora. The boxed area encloses examples of A. vaginae bands. These were found in 55% of BV-positive samples.
Identification of A. vaginaeby DGGE
Although the segment of the 16S rRNA gene used in our DGGE analysis is only ~300 nucleotides, it includes a highly variable region of the molecule  and the sequences did not match other (non-A. vaginae) 16S rRNA sequences in BLAST analyses . Based on the presence of bands at the appropriate position in denaturing gradient gels (illustrated by the boxed area in Figures 1 and 2), 55% (12/20) of BV positive samples contained A. vaginae, as opposed to 8.3% (2/24) of normal samples (P < 0.001 by Chi Square). In the two cases where A. vaginae bands were present in patients with "normal" vaginal secretions, both exhibited complex (BV-like) DGGE patterns (data not shown).
A. vaginaeculture identification and antibiotic susceptibility
Antibiotic susceptibility. MIC values (μg/ml) determined by NCCLS broth microdilution of Atopobium isolates to various antimicrobial agents.
The genus Atopobium was proposed in 1992  to accommodate bacterial isolates previously classified as Lactobacillus minitus, L. rimae and Streptococcus parvulus. The species A. vaginae (GenBank accession no. Y17195) was defined in 1999 from a vaginal isolate of a "healthy patient" though no description of the nature of vaginal flora in this patient was given . More recently, A. vaginae (GenBank accession no. AF325325) was reported as the infective agent in a tuboovarian abscess . The 16S rRNA gene sequences of Y17195 and AF32325 are indistinguishable though there are four undefined nucleotides in the sequence of the former.
This is the first report of the association of A. vaginae with abnormal vaginal flora. The appearance of prominent A. vaginae bands in 55% of patients with Nugent scores >3 suggests that the species was prominent in patients with abnormal vaginal secretions. The presence of A. vaginae DGGE bands in only 8.3% of samples from patients with normal flora suggests that A. vaginae was not prominent in normal vaginal secretions. It is unlikely that the frequency of the A. vaginae bands in BV-positive samples, and their absence from normal samples, is an artifact of the PCR amplification/DGGE method. The PCR primers complement sites on both Lactobacillus spp. and A. vaginae 16S rRNA genes, and A. vaginae and Lactobacillus bands co-occur in some specimens (Fig. 1). Thus there is no evidence that primer bias toward Lactobacillus spp. would explain the lack of A. vaginae bands in DGGE patterns of normal patients. The appearance of prominent A. vaginae bands in DGGE patterns of BV-positive patients is likely a true reflection of their prevalence in the bacterial ecology that constitutes the BV syndrome.
In some cases complex (BV-like) DGGE patterns were obtained from patients with normal vaginal secretion Gram stains. In fact this was the case in both samples that were normal by Nugent's criteria but also produced A. vaginae bands by DGGE analysis. There are almost certainly instances when vaginal flora cannot adequately be classified as normal or BV positive using the current criteria . We noted an array of DGGE patterns among patients diagnosed with BV. (Fig. 1A). These PCR-generated patterns provided a more objective and informative assessment of vaginal flora than standard clinical and/or Gram stain criteria. The ability to more fully resolve vaginal flora into patterns using DGGE, combined with the ability to correlate these patterns with bacterial species and aspects of disease, such as onset, progression or response to antibiotics, could lead to a better understanding of the BV syndrome [12, 27, 28].
As part of our evaluation of the potential role of DGGE in assessing vaginal flora we had evaluated a series of patients using quantitative culture techniques. The details of this evaluation will be the subject of a future publication. After detecting A. vaginae using molecular techniques, we reviewed our culture results to determine if any of our isolates had been identified as G. morbillorum, based on the report by Geissdorfer et al.  that their A. vaginae isolate was originally misclassified as this organism by the API ID32A system. We found that two of our isolates had been identified as G morbillorum using the RapID ANA II system. As did Geissdorfer et al., we found that our isolates were actually A. vaginae based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing and both proved to be strict anaerobes as was theirs. Of note is the fact that despite the original description of A. vaginae as a facultative anaerobe by Rodriquez Jovita et al  we found it to be a strict anaerobe using the type strain submitted to ATCC by these investigators. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear but the weight of evidence thus far indicates that A. vaginae is a strict anaerobe.
It is not surprising that A. vaginae has not been previously recognized in women with BV. The Gram stain appearance is that of a small Gram positive cocco-bacillus and members of the genus are known to produce large amounts of lactic acid. On this basis, some species belonging to the genus Atopobium were originally identified as Lactobacillus sp. In fact it was in the course of a study of vaginal lactobacilli that A. vaginae was originally identified . To our knowledge G morbillorum has not been reported in previous descriptions of normal or abnormal vaginal flora. Differences between bacteriologic methods could explain this discrepancy. It may be that some identification systems do not correctly separate anaerobic lactobacilli and streptococci from A. vaginae.
A potentially important observation is that A. vaginae appears to be highly metronidazole resistant. We have extended the observation of Geissdorfer et al  who first described metronidazole resistance in this species using their strain. Our two isolates and the originally described type strain are highly metronidazole resistant. Therefore, as all four known A. vaginae isolates are metronidazole resistant, this may be a characteristic of this species. Additional testing of new isolates will be required to confirm this possibility. Geissdorfer et al  reported their strain to be susceptible to penicillin, cefuroxime, cefoxitin and impenem. We found the organisms to be susceptible to clindamycin, cephalosporins, carbapenems, ampicillin/sulbactam and linezolid and were moderately susceptible to the quinolones. (Table 1). By disc diffusion our strains were resistant to gentamicin but susceptible to vancomycin. It is interesting to speculate that this organism could possibly contribute to BV treatment failures or relapses which are common . Prospective treatment studies are needed to determine whether or not A. vaginae and other metronidazole resistant organisms such as Mobiluncus curtisii might play such a role.
DGGE ananysis of segments of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene sequences appears to be a useful tool in describing the complex bacterial flora associated with BV, and relatively simple flora associated with normal vaginal environments. Our observations require confirmation in other populations of women, but it appears that A. vaginae may be a common component of the microbial flora associated with BV. A. vaginae would likely not be effectively cleared using metronidazole, the most common antibiotic used to treat BV. Further prospective treatment studies should be undertaken to elucidate the possible significance of A. vaginae in BV treatment failures or relapses.
This work was supported by Children's Hospital of New Orleans, a grant from the Louisiana Board of Regents (HEF [2001-04]-04) and a grant from National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases (U19 AI43024). The authors thank Melisa Barrouse and Denise Diodene for specimen collection, reading gram stains and bacterial cultures. We appreciate Candace Manders' help with antibiotic susceptibility testing.
- Eschenbach DA: History and review of bacterial vaginosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993, 169: 441-445.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hillier SL, Homes KK: Bacterial Vaginosis. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Edited by: Homes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh PA, Lemon SM, Stamm WE, Piot P and Wasserheit. 1999, New York, McGraw-Hill, 563-586.Google Scholar
- Moodley P, Connolly C, Sturm AW: Interrelationships among human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis, and the presence of yeasts. J Infect Dis. 2002, 185: 69-73. 10.1086/338027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joesoef MR, Karundeng A, Runtupalit C, Moran JS, Lewis JS, Ryan CA: High rate of bacterial vaginosis among women with intrauterine devices in Manado, Indonesia. Contraception. 2001, 64: 169-172. 10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00246-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jamieson DJ, Duerr A, Klein RS, Paramsothy P, Brown W, Cu-Uvin S, Rompalo A, Sobel J: Longitudinal analysis of bacterial vaginosis: findings from the HIV epidemiology research study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 98: 656-663. 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01525-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valyshev AV, Elagina NN, Bukharin OV: Anaerobic microflora of the female reproductive tract. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 2001, 78-84.Google Scholar
- Warren D, Klein RS, Sobel J, Kieke B., Jr., Brown W, Schuman P, Anderson J, Cu-Uvin S, Mayer K, Jamieson DJ, Holmberg S, Duerr A: A multicenter study of bacterial vaginosis in women with or at risk for human immunodeficiency virus infection. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 9: 133-141.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cu-Uvin S, Hogan JW, Caliendo AM, Harwell J, Mayer KH, Carpenter CC: Association between bacterial vaginosis and expression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in the female genital tract. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 33: 894-896. 10.1086/322613.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koumans EH, Kendrick JS: Preventing adverse sequelae of bacterial vaginosis: a public health program and research agenda. Sex Transm Dis. 2001, 28: 292-297. 10.1097/00007435-200105000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwebke JR: Bacterial Vaginosis. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2000, 2: 14-17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, Krohn MA, Gibbs RS, Martin DH, Cotch MF, Edelman R, Pastorek J. G., 2nd, Rao AV, et al.: Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995, 333: 1737-1742. 10.1056/NEJM199512283332604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burton JP, Cadieux PA, Reid G: Improved understanding of the bacterial vaginal microbiota of women before and after probiotic instillation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003, 69: 97-101. 10.1128/AEM.69.1.97-101.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ward DM, Bateson MM, Weller R, Ruff-Roberts AL: Ribosomal RNA analysis of microorganisms as they occur in nature. Adv.Microbial Ecol. 1992, 12: 219-286.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jousimies-Somer H: Recently described clinically important anaerobic bacteria: taxonomic aspects and update. Clin Infect Dis. 1997, 25 Suppl 2: S78-87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jousimies-Somer H, Summanen P: Recent taxonomic changes and terminology update of clinically significant anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria (excluding spirochetes). Clin Infect Dis. 2002, 35supplement1: S17-21. 10.1086/341915.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hugenholtz P, Goebel BM, Pace NR: Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180: 4765-4774.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kazor CE, Mitchell PM, Lee AM, Stokes LN, Loesche WJ, Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ: Diversity of bacterial populations on the tongue dorsa of patients with halitosis and healthy patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 558-563. 10.1128/JCM.41.2.558-563.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kumar PS, Griffen AL, Barton JA, Paster BJ, Moeschberger ML, Leys EJ: New bacterial species associated with chronic periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2003, 82: 338-344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muyzer G, De Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG: Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993, 59: 695-700.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Muyzer G: DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999, 2: 317-322. 10.1016/S1369-5274(99)80055-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferris MJ, Muyzer G, Ward DM: Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of 16S rRNA-defined populations inhabiting a hot spring microbial mat community. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996, 62: 340-346.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ferris MJ, Ruff-Roberts AL, Kopczynski ED, Bateson MM, Ward DM: Enrichment culture and microscopy conceal diverse thermophilic Synechococcus populations in a single hot spring microbial mat habitat. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996, 62: 1045-1050.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ferris MJ, Ward DM: Seasonal distributions of dominant 16S rRNA-defined populations in a hot spring microbial mat examined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63: 1375-1381.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jensen S, OvreÜs L, Daae FR, Torsvik V: Diversity in methane enrichments from agricultural soil revealed by DGGE separation of PCR amplified 16S rDNA fragments. FEMS Microbiol.Ecol. 1998, 26: 17-26. 10.1016/S0168-6496(98)00017-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murray AE, Preston CM, Massana R, Taylor LT, Blakis A, Wu K, DeLong EF: Seasonal and spatial variability of bacterial and archaeal assemblages in the coastal waters near Anvers Island, Antarctica. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998, 64: 2585-2595.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sievert SM, Brinkhoff T, Muyzer G, Ziebis W, Kuever J: Spatial heterogeneity of bacterial populations along an environmental gradient at a shallow submarine hydrothermal vent near milos island (Greece) [In Process Citation]. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999, 65: 3834-3842.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Burton JP, Reid G: Evaluation of the bacterial vaginal flora of 20 postmenopausal women by direct (Nugent score) and molecular (polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) techniques. J Infect Dis. 2002, 186: 1770-1780. 10.1086/345761.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burton JP, Dixon JL, Reid G: Detection of Bifidobacterium species and Gardnerella vaginalis in the vagina using PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003, 81: 61-63. 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00408-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCartney AL: Application of molecular biological methods for studying probiotics and the gut flora. Br J Nutr. 2002, 88 Suppl 1: S29-37. 10.1079/BJN2002627.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li M, Gong J, Cottrill M, Yu H, de Lange C, Burton J, Topp E: Evaluation of QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit for ecological studies of gut microbiota. J Microbiol Methods. 2003, 54: 13-20. 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00260-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Satokari RM, Vaughan EE, Akkermans AD, Saarela M, De Vos WM: Polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis monitoring of fecal bifidobacterium populations in a prebiotic and probiotic feeding trial. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2001, 24: 227-231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simpson JM, McCracken VJ, White BA, Gaskins HR, Mackie RI: Application of denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis for the analysis of the porcine gastrointestinal microbiota. J Microbiol Methods. 1999, 36: 167-179. 10.1016/S0167-7012(99)00029-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez Jovita M, Collins MD, Sjoden B, Falsen E: Characterization of a novel Atopobium isolate from the human vagina: description of Atopobium vaginae sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999, 49 Pt 4: 1573-1576.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geissdorfer W, Bohmer C, Pelz K, Schoerner C, Frobenius W, Bogdan C: Tuboovarian abscess caused by Atopobium vaginae following transvaginal oocyte recovery. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41: 2788-2790. 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2788-2790.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL: Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991, 29: 297-301.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ferris MJ, Kuhl M, Wieland A, Ward DM: Cyanobacterial ecotypes in different optical microenvironments of a 68 degrees C hot spring mat community revealed by 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer region variation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003, 69: 2893-2898. 10.1128/AEM.69.5.2893-2898.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Altschul S, Madden T, Schaeffer A, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman D: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schmalenberger A, Schwieger F, Tebbe CC: Effect of primers hybridizing to different evolutionarily conserved regions of the small-subunit rRNA gene in PCR-based microbial community analyses and genetic profiling. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001, 67: 3557-3563. 10.1128/AEM.67.8.3557-3563.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vasquez A, Ahrne S, Pettersson B, Molin G: Temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE) as a tool for identification of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus zeae and Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001, 32: 215-219. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00901.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanamoto T, Sato S, Inoue M: Genetic heterogeneities and phenotypic characteristics of strains of the genus Abiotrophia and proposal of Abiotrophia para-adiacens sp. nov. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 492-498.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Murcia AJ, Anton AI, Rodriguez-Valera F: Patterns of sequence variation in two regions of the 16S rRNA multigene family of Escherichia coli. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999, 49 Pt 2: 601-610.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nubel U, Engelen B, Felske A, Snaidr J, Wieshuber A, Amann RI, Ludwig W, Backhaus H: Sequence heterogeneities of genes encoding 16S rRNAs in Paenibacillus polymyxa detected by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 5636-5643.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cilia V, Lafay B, Christen R: Sequence heterogeneities among 16S ribosomal RNA sequences, and their effect on phylogenetic analyses at the species level. Mol Biol Evol. 1996, 13: 451-461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collins MD, Wallbanks S: Comparative sequence analyses of the 16S rRNA genes of Lactobacillus minutus, Lactobacillus rimae and Streptococcus parvulus: proposal for the creation of a new genus Atopobium. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992, 74: 235-240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donder GG, Vereecken A, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Salembier G, Spitz B: Definition of a type of abnormal vaginal flora that is distinct from bacterial vaginosis: aerobic vaginitis. Bjog. 2002, 109: 34-43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/4/5/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.