Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prevalence of human Salmonellosis in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Infectious Diseases201414:88

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-88

Received: 4 April 2013

Accepted: 7 February 2014

Published: 19 February 2014

Abstract

Background

Human Salmonellosis is one of the major diseases in Ethiopia and several factors including under and mal-nutrition and HIV-AIDS may substantially contribute to its occurrence. Despite its importance, surveillance and monitoring systems are not in place and a comprehensive picture of its epidemiology is not available. The objectives of this study were to systematically review and estimate the prevalence of the disease and identify the dominant serogroups and serotypes in Ethiopia.

Methods

Published studies on Salmonellosis in Ethiopia were electronically and manually searched. Eligible studies were selected by using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Generic, methodological and statistical information were extracted from the eligible studies. The extracted data included sample sizes, the numbers of Salmonella positive samples, serogroups and serotypes. The variations in prevalence estimates attributable to heterogeneities were assessed and pooled prevalence was estimated by the random effects model.

Results

Twenty studies carried out between 1974 and 2012 were eligible. The pooled prevalence estimates of Salmonella in stool samples of diarrheic children, diarrheic adults and carriers were 8.72%, 5.68%, and 1.08% respectively. Invasive infections in children (5.71%) and adults (0.76%) were significantly different (p < 0.001). Non-typhi isolates accounted for 57.9% of the isolates from patients. Serogroup D occurred more frequently than serogroups C and B. S. Concord, S. Typhi, S. Typhimurium and S. Paratyphi were dominant and accounted for 82.1% of the serotypes isolated from patients.

Conclusion

The prevalence of Salmonellosis is considerable and most infections are due to four serotypes. The results imply the need for a policy to promote public hygiene and regularly screen individuals in contact with food items for public consumption.

Keywords

Ethiopia Human Prevalence Salmonella Serogroups Serotypes

Background

Salmonellosis is one of the major zoonotic diseases all over the world with annual estimates of 22 million cases and 200,000 deaths due to typhoid fever [1] and 93.8 million cases of gastroenteritis and 155 000 deaths due to non-typhoidal Salmonellae (NTS) [2]. In resource-poor settings of Africa, enteric fever is a public health concern [3] with an incidence of 10-100/100,000 cases per year [1]. Of the NTS, S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis are common [4, 5], and in 2002 each accounted for approximately 25% of the human isolates [6].

Children, the elderly and immunocompromised individuals are the high risk groups and case fatality rates of 38% in children [7] and 47% in adults [8] were recorded. Whilst typhoid fever shows little association with immunocompromise, NTS infections in HIV positive adults are associated with severe invasive diseases [9]. Bacteremia and focal infections are more likely to occur in immunocompromised than in immunocompetent children and infectious arteritis is one of the complications in adults [10]. Higher occurrences of bacteremia were associated with Malaria [11] malnutrition [5, 12] and recent antimicrobial use [13].

In Ethiopia, several factors including under and mal-nutrition, HIV-AIDS, the unhygienic living circumstances and the close relations between humans and animals may substantially contribute to the occurrence of Salmonellosis. Although surveillance and monitoring systems are not in place and its epidemiology is not described, qualitative and quantitative syntheses of previous studies could shed light on the occurrence of the disease and the major serotypes that frequently cause infections. The objectives of this study were to systematically review and estimate the prevalence of human Salmonellosis in Ethiopia by using meta-analytical methods. The outcomes of interests were the proportions of Salmonella isolated from diarrheal patients, febrile patients, apparently normal subjects and the dominant serogroups and serotypes.

Methods

The guidelines of the MOOSE group (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) [14] and the PRISMA group (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) [15] were followed in the reviewing. The PRISMA check list was used to ensure inclusion of relevant information (see Additional file 1).

Eligibility criteria

A study was eligible for quantitative syntheses if (i) its objective was not serotype specific; (ii) it was cross sectional; (iii) the samples were taken from patients that sought medical attention for either reasons of gastroenteritis and/or fever in health care settings or from apparently healthy individuals; (iv) it provided the sample size; (v) it described the microbiological methods; (vi) it provided the numbers of isolates and (vii) it was published in English. Other studies with relevant information on serogroups, serotypes typhoidal and NTS isolates were included in the reviewing.

Literature search strategies

Published studies were searched in Medline. Non-Medline indexed articles were searched in the lists of references of articles and by using Google scholars. Salmonell* and Ethiopia were the main MeSH terms in electronic searches. Additional searches were done by using the main MeSH terms with Boolean operators and other terms that included prevalence, incidence, antimicrobial resistance, human, animals, foods and Addis Ababa. The search covered articles published up to November 19, 2013.

Selection of studies

Initially articles with titles and abstracts that were not relevant to the outcomes of interests were excluded. The full texts of all articles screened for eligibility but one were either downloaded or obtained from the corresponding authors (Dr. Byleyegne Molla, Dr. Endrias Zewdu and Mr. Bayeh Abera) or from the archives of the College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University. Of the screened articles, duplicates and articles that did not meet the eligibility criteria were excluded.

Data extraction

The first author, year of publication, year of study, location, setting, sample size, age group, types of samples, microbiological methods, numbers of Salmonella positive samples, serogroups and serotypes were extracted from the eligible studies. The proportions of typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonellae, serogroups and serotypes were calculated by using the numbers of isolates as denominators. A serotype was considered to be dominant if its occurrence was more than 5% of the total serotyped isolates.

Data analysis

The data were stratified on the basis of feel of relative homogeneity [14] as hospital based and non-hospital based. The hospital based data were further grouped by sample type (stool and blood) and age group (adults and children). To produce conservative estimates, a zero reported for the number of Salmonella positive samples was imputed as 0.5 [16]. The study level prevalence estimates (p) and standard errors (se) were calculated by the following formulae: p = np/n and se. =√ p (1-p)/n: where np = the number of positive samples and n = the number of samples.

Investigation of bias

The qualities of the microbiological methods of the studies were assessed to determine the extent to which bias is introduced and results in inferential error. The risks of bias across studies were assessed by funnel plots [17] and the Duval and Tweedie non-parametric 'trim and fill’ linear random model [18]. The funnel plots were used to visually examine outliers and the tendencies of studies with small sample sizes to show larger prevalence estimates. The Duval and Tweedie method was used to calculate the unbiased estimate.

Heterogeneity analyses

The variations between studies were assessed by the Galbraith plot [19], the Cochran’s Q test and the Inverse variance index (I2) [20]. The Galbraith plot was used to graphically display the ratio of the prevalence estimates and the standard errors (p/se) against the reciprocals of the standard errors (1/se). Because of the reduced power of the Cochran’s Q test to test the between-study variation in small number of studies, the significance of the heterogeneities was tested at a 10% significance level [21]. The percentage of the variation attributable to heterogeneity was quantified by the Inverse variance index and values of 25%, 50% and 75% were considered as low, moderate and high heterogeneity respectively.

Sensitivity tests

A sensitivity test was done to assess the effects of outliers [22]. The Duval and Tweedie non-parametric linear random effects model [18] and single study omitted influence analyses were done to assess the sensitivities of the pooled prevalence estimates of Salmonella in diarrheal patients and apparently healthy subjects. A study was considered to be influential if the pooled estimate without it was not within the 95% confidence interval of the overall pooled estimate.

Quantitative data syntheses

To normalize the distribution of the data and incorporate the influence of sample size on the outcomes, the study level estimates were transformed to logit event estimates [23, 24]. The logit event estimates and the variances were calculated by the following formulae: Lp = Ln[p/(1 - p)] and V (Lp) = 1/(np) + 1/[n (1 - p)] where Lp = the logit event estimate; Ln = the natural logarithm; p = study level prevalence estimate; V = variance and n = sample size. The pooled logit event estimates were calculated by the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model [25] and back-transformed to prevalence estimates by the following formula: p = eLp/(eLp + 1): where e = the base of the natural logarithm. The Z test was used to test the significance of the prevalence estimates. The statistical significances of the differences in prevalence estimates between sub-groups were assessed by the Yates corrected Chi Square test [26, 27] and the strengths of associations were measured by Odds Ratios (OR). Alpha was set at 0.05.

Microsoft Office Excel 2007 was used to calculate the study level prevalence estimates and standard errors, the logit event estimates and standard errors and to transform the pooled logit estimates to prevalence estimates. The StatCalc epidemiologic calculator of Epi info™ (Version 3.5.1, Center for Disease Control, CDC, USA) was used to compare groups. All other analyses were done by using Stata (Version 11.1, Stata Corp, College Station, Texas).

Results

Eligible and excluded studies

Figure 1 shows the literature search results and the processes in the selection of eligible studies. A total of 138 studies were found of which 115 were excluded based on the titles and abstracts and one was excluded due to duplication. Of the 22 articles screened for eligibility, one study was excluded for it neither provided the number of samples nor separately presented the serogroups isolated from patients and controls [28]. Another study was excluded because it was conducted in a rehabilitation camp [29]. A total of twenty studies were considered eligible for qualitative and quantitative syntheses [3049]. Seven studies [30, 32, 3537, 41, 46] were used to estimate the prevalence of Salmonella in diarrheal patients. Four studies [31, 33, 42, 46] were used to estimate the prevalence of Salmonella in febrile patients. Eight studies [34, 3740, 4345] were used to estimate the prevalence of Salmonella in apparently healthy subjects. Of the hospital based studies, five reported serogroups [32, 35, 4648]; six reported the proportions of non-typhoidal and typhoidal Salmonella[32, 35, 4649] and two reported serotypes [46, 47]. Four non-hospital based studies reported serotypes [34, 40, 44, 45].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2334-14-88/MediaObjects/12879_2013_Article_3039_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

A flow diagram of the selection of eligible studies.

Characteristics of the eligible studies

Table 1 presents the characteristics of the eligible studies. The studies were conducted between 1974 and 2012 in Central, Eastern, Western, Southern and Northern Ethiopia. Except in three studies [4749], the samples were either stool or blood or both.
Table 1

Characteristics of the eligible studies

First authors

Location

Year of study

Setting

Age group

Sample source

Sample number

Positive

(%)

Ashenafi [30]

Addis Ababa

1982-1983

Hospital

Adults

s

1000

45

4.5

Ghiorgis [31]

Addis Ababa

na

Hospital

Children

b

634

28

4.4

Mache [32]

Addis Ababa

1995

Hospital

Adults

s

700

45

6.4

Asrat [33]

Addis Ababa

1996-1998

Hospital

Adults

b

1110

9

0.8

Nyeleti [34]

Addis Ababa

1999

ap

Adults

s

300

18

6

Mache [35]

Jimma

2000

Hospital

Children

s

384

59

15.4

Andualem [36]

Addis Ababa

2000-2001

Hospital

All

s

205

22

10.7

Awole [37]

Jimma

2001

Hospital

Adults

s

152

11

7.2

Awole [37]

Jimma

2001

ho

Adults

s

220

0

0

Birhaneselassie[38]

Dilla

2002

fh

Adults

s

107

1

0.9

Andargie [39]

Gondar

2003

fh

Adults

s

127

0

0

Zewdu [40]

Addis Ababa

2004

sm

Adults

s

68

5

7.4

Reda [41]

Harar

2007

Hospital

Adults

s

244

28

11.5

Abera [42]

Bahir Dar

2009

fh

Adults

s

384

6

1.6

Zenebe [43]

Jimma

2009-2010

Hospital

Adults

b

260

1

0.4

Addis [44]

Addis Ababa

2010

df

Adults

s

22

3

13.6

Dagnew [45]

Gondar

2012

fh

Adults

s

300

4

1.3

Beyene [46]a

Addis-Jimma

2006

Hospital

Children

s/r

1003

48

4.8

Beyene [46]a

Addis-Jimma

2006

Hospital

Children

b

222

17

7.7

Beyene [46]a

Addis Ababa

2004-2005

Hospital

Children

na

na

48

na

Gebre-yohannes [47]

Addis Ababa

1974-1981

Hospital

All

m

na

216

na

Gedebou [48]

Addis Ababa

1975-1980

Hospital

All

m

na

165

na

Wolday [49]

Addis Ababa

1993-1996

Hospital

na

m

na

110

na

Addis-Jimma = Addis Ababa and Jimma, ap = abattoir personnel, b = blood, df = dairy farm attendants, fh = food handlers, ho = samples taken in a hospital from patients with complaints other than gastro-enteritis and fever, m = mixed samples, na = not available, s = stool, sm = supermarket personnel, s/r = stool or rectal swabs.

aThe number of stool and blood samples and Salmonella positive samples were extracted from the Thesis but other data were extracted from the article.

Data from 5898 patients and 1528 apparently healthy subjects were considered for quantitative syntheses. The prevalence of Salmonella in stool samples of patients and apparently healthy subjects ranged from 4.5% to 15.4% and from 0% to 13.6% respectively. Of the 707 Salmonellae isolated from specimens taken from patients, 597 isolates were serogrouped and 329 were serotyped. Of the 37 Salmonellae isolated from apparently healthy subjects, 33 isolates were serotyped.

Risks of bias

Table 2 presents the microbiological methods employed in the isolation and identification of Salmonella. Pre enrichment was reported in four studies. Two studies reported two selective enrichment media, and six studies reported two plating media. Enrichment with Selenite containing media, plating with Salmonella Shigella agar and Desoxycholate Citrate agar were reported in 12, 7 and 5 of the studies respectively. Only one study reported pre enrichment broth, two selective enrichment and three plating media. Biochemical tests were reported in all studies but one and slide agglutination tests were reported in 10 studies.
Table 2

Microbiological methods used to isolate and identify Salmonella

First author

Pre-enrichment

Selective and differential media

BT

SAT

Ashenafi [30]

nr

SB, MA, BGA

yes

Yes

Mache [32]

nr

SF, MA, BGA,SSA

yes

Yes

Mache [35]

nr

SB, MA, SSA

yes

Yes

Andualem [36]

nr

SF, MA, SSA

yes

nr

Awole [37]

nr

MA, DCA, SSA

Yes

nr

Beyene [46]

nr

SF, DCA, XLD

yes

Yes

Reda [41]

nr

SF, DCA, XLD

yes

nr

Asrat [33]

nr

SB, MA, BGA

yes

Yes

Zenebe [43]

BHI

BA, MA

yes

Yes

Beyene [46]

BHI

DCA, XLD

yes

Yes

Nyeleti [34].

nr

RV, MA , BPLS

yes

Yes

Awole [37]

nr

MA, DCA, SSA

Yes

nr

Berhane selassie [38]

nr

SB, DCA

yes

Yes

Andargie [39]

nr

MA, BA, SSA

nr

nr

Zewdu [40]

BPW

SC, RV, BPLS, XLD, RA

yes

Yes

Abera [42]

nr

SF, SSA

nr

nr

Addis [44]

BPW

SC, RV, XLD

yes

nr

Dagnew [45]

nr

SF, SSA

yes

nr

BA = Blood agar, BHI = Brain Heart infusion agar, BGA = Brilliant Green agar, BPLS = Brilliant Phenol Lactose –Sucrose agar, BPW = Buffered Peptone Water, BT = Biochemical test, DCA = Desoxycholate Citrate agar, MA = MacConkey agar, nr = not reported, RA = Rambach agar, RV = Rappaport Vassilliadis, SAT = Slide Agglutination Test; SSA = Salmonella Shigella agar, SB = Selenite broth, SC = Selenite Cystine broth, SF = Selenite-F broth, XLD = Xylose Lysine Desoxycholate agar.

Outliers were detected in the funnel plots of the prevalence estimates of Salmonellae isolated from stool samples of diarrheal patients and apparently normal individuals (plots not shown). The pooled prevalence of Salmonella in diarrheal patients was not changed by the Duval and Tweedie method and the lowest and highest single study omitted estimates were 6.75% and 9.07% respectively. The pooled prevalence of Salmonella in apparently healthy individuals was slightly higher than the estimate calculated by the Duval and Tweedie method and the lowest and highest single study omitted estimates were 0.58% and 1.27% respectively. All single study omitted pooled estimates were within the 95% confidence intervals of the respective overall pooled estimates in diarrheal patients and apparently normal individuals.

Forest plots

Figure 2 presents forest plots of the untransformed prevalence estimates of Salmonella isolated from stool samples of diarrheal patients and apparently healthy subjects. The percentage of the variations in prevalence estimates attributable to heterogeneity (I2) were 87.3% in diarrheal patients and 83.7% in apparently normal subjects. All study level prevalence estimates of Salmonella in diarrheal patients were significantly different from zero (p < 0.05). Three study level prevalence estimates of Salmonella in apparently healthy subjects were not significantly different from zero (p > 0.05).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2334-14-88/MediaObjects/12879_2013_Article_3039_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Forest plot of the prevalence of Salmonella isolated from stool samples of patients (A) and apparently healthy subjects (B). aThe upper confidence limit of Addis [44] is off the scale and truncated.

Pooled prevalence estimates

The pooled estimates calculated based on the untransformed and logit transformed estimates are presented in Table 3. The differences in the pooled estimates of the untransformed and transformed data were negligible. The prevalence of Salmonella was higher in diarrheal children than in diarrheal adults (X2 = 10.93; p = 0.000; OR = 1.59 (95% CI = 1.20, 2.10), in febrile children than in febrile adults (X2 = 48.27; p = 0.000; OR = 8.16 (95% CI = 3.97, 17.25) and in individuals exposed to animal products or animals (super market personnel, dairy farm attendants and abattoir personnel) than in food handlers (X2 = 27.93; p = 0.000; OR = 5.62 (95% CI = 2.70, 11.88).
Table 3

Pooled prevalence estimates of Salmonella in patients that sought medical attention and in carriers

Group

Untransformed data

Logit transformed datac

Prevalence (95% CI)

I2, p valued

Prevalence (95%CI )

I2, p valued

Diarrheal patientsa

8.22 (5.75, 10.69)

87.3, 0.000

7.93 (5.30, 11.70)

90.8, 0.000

Diarrheal adults

5.58 (3.99, 7.17)

44.6, 0.164

5.68 (4.26, 7.53)

49.3, 0.139

Diarrheal children

9.97(-0.41, 20.36)

96.7, 0.000

8.72 (2.64, 25.18)

97.5, 0.000

Febrile adults

0.66 (0.19, 1.13)

0.0, 0.424

0.76 (0.41, 1.40)

0.0, 0.516

Febrile children

5.66 (2.52, 8.80)

64.4, 0.094

5.71 (3.31, 9.68)

70.5, 0.066

Over all carriers

1.08 (0.61, 1.55)

83.7, 0.000

2.75 (1.23, 6.17)

76.1, 0.000

Food handlers

1.09(0.73, 1.44)

79.2, 0.002

1.33 (0.75, 2.36)

0.0, 0.793

Othersb

6.45 (3.97, 8.92)

0.0, 0.562

6.83 (4.69, 9.85)

0.0, 0.391

aDiarrheal adults and children.

bIndividuals in contact with animal products or animals.

cThe pooled prevalence estimates of the logit transformed data were the summary measures.

dThe p values are estimated by the Cochran’s Q test.

Serogroups and serotypes

Typhoidal Salmonella (S. Typhi) accounted for 42.1% of the total isolates (Table 4) and for 8.7% of the isolates of children origin. Six serogroups were identified from patients (Table 5). Serogroup D occurred more frequently than serogroups C and B. In children, serogroup C ranked first followed by serogroup D. Thirty serovars were identified from specimens taken from patients of which S. Concord, S. Typhi, S. Typhimurium and S. Paratyphi were the first four dominant serotypes that accounted for 82.1% of the serotyped isolates (Table 6). In non hospital based studies, six serovars were identified: S. Anatum (7/33), S. Dublin (4/33), S. Meleagridis (5/33), S. Newport (5/33), S. Rough form (2/33) and S. Typhi (10/33).
Table 4

Frequencies and percentages of S. Typhi isolated from samples taken from patients

Study year

Number of isolates

Number of S.Typhi

%

Authors

1975-1980

164

123

75

48

1974-1981

216

105

48.6

47

1993-1996

110

48

43.6

49

1995

45

7

15.6

32

2000

59

13

22

35

2004-2006

113

2

1.8

46

1974 -2006

707

298

42.1

 
Table 5

Frequencies (%) of serogroups identified from samples taken from patients

Serogroup

Number and percentage of serogroups

[48]

[47]

[32]

[35]

[46]

Total (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

A

7 (4.3)

4 (1.9)

4 (8.9)

5 (8.5)

0

20 (3.4)

B

16 (9.8)

44 (20.4)

11 (24.4)

17 (28.8)

13 (11.5)

101(16.9)

C

17 (10.4)

42 (19.4)

14 (31.1)

13 (22)

86 (76.1)

171(28.6)

D

123 (75)

120 (55.6)

13 (28.9)

21(35.6)

9 (8)

286 (47.9)

E

1(0.6)

6 (2.8)

3 (6.7)

3 (5.1)

2 (1.8)

15 (2.5)

M

0

0

0

0

3 (2.7)

3 (0.5)

Total

164

216

45

59

113

597

Table 6

Frequencies (%) of serotypes isolated from samples taken from patients

Serotypes

Number of isolates

[47]

[46]

Total (%)

S. Concord

27 (12.5)

85 (75.2)

112 (34 )

S. Typhi

105 (48.6)

2 (1.8)

107 (32.5)

S. Typhimurium

24 (11.1)

7 (6.2)

31 (9.4)

S. Paratyphi

18 (8.3)

2 (1.8)

20(6.1)

Others

42 (19.4)

17 (15.0)

59(17.9)

Total

216

113

329 (100)

Discussion

Studies on human Salmonellosis in Ethiopia began in the 1970s. However, the number of studies so far carried out is small and do not include all segments of the population and geographic regions of the country. Most studies were carried out in Addis Ababa and risk factors that potentially influence the occurrence of the disease including the diversity of serovars were not sufficiently addressed to provide a comprehensive picture of the epidemiology of the disease. In addition to the small number of studies, the aggregate reporting and lack of distinct data by sample type and age group were constraints in estimating the prevalence of serogroups and serotypes.

The microbiological methods employed in the studies might have underestimated the numbers of Salmonella positive samples. The use of pre enrichment broth increases culture sensitivity and the numbers of isolates could differ by types of media [50]. Salmonella strains have different characteristics in enrichment media and there could be a differential recovery of one strain over another [51]. As the rates of isolation of strains differ in different media versions, multiple enrichment protocols were suggested to ensure the isolation of different strains [52]. The recovery rate of Salmonella, the sensitivities and positive predictive values of plating media were also reported to be higher after enrichment than direct culture [53].

The substantial variations in prevalence estimates attributable to heterogeneity could be due to differences in the study populations and the microbiological methods used to detect Salmonella. However, the pooled estimates were not sensitive to the effects of outliers and depict the importance of the disease as the random effects model considers the studies as samples of all potential studies.

The pooled prevalence of Salmonella in diarrheal patients is comparable with the estimate for SSA (8.36%) [54]. The present estimate appears to be lower than its actual occurrence due to the apparently lower sensitivities of the microbiological methods used in most of the studies. In addition, several patients do not seek medical attention for less severe gastroenteritis and are unable to cover medical costs for even severe cases. However, the widespread occurrences of several factors including malnutrition and under nutrition, HIV-AIDS, the close relationship between man and animals, the widespread backyard slaughtering practices, the raw meat consumption habits, the unhygienic food handling practices and the water sources of the larger segment of the population are suggestive evidences of its higher occurrence than is estimated in this study.

The higher occurrence of Salmonellosis in children compared to adults suggests a higher vulnerability of children to Salmonella infections. Disseminated diseases were reported in children with severe protein-energy malnutrition [55]. The bacterium was isolated from stool samples of pediatric patients [56] and demonstrated in malarial blood smears of febrile children [57]. Regardless of the small number of studies considered in this study, the pooled estimates show the importance of the disease in Ethiopian children as is the case in other countries in SSA [58].

Salmonellae were isolated from individuals working in food catering establishments, super market workers, dairy farm attendants and abattoir personnel. Although these individuals could either be asymptomatic or precocious or acute or convalescent or chronic carriers, all are potential sources of outbreaks. In the USA, a few food service employees were implicated for an outbreak that caused 617 (6.3%) illnesses [59].

The proportion of S. Typhi isolates tends to decline as of the 1970s while NTS infections show a relative increase. As the data were drawn from urban areas, improvements in hygienic and sanitary measures practiced in the years after the 1970s might have reduced the occurrence of typhoidal infections in urban areas. However, the proportional decreases in typhoidal infections do not reflect the substantial improvements in the hygienic and sanitary practices of the general population.

Serogroups D, C and B were the major serogroups and their occurrences differ by age group. Whilst serogroup C ranked first in children [35, 46], serogroup D was dominant in samples predominantly taken from adults [47]. Higher indexes of invasion were also recorded for serogroup D [48] and serogroup C [46]. In addition to the differences by age group, the proportions of serogroups may differ by sample type and study years.

S. Concord and S. Typhimurium were the first and third ranking NTS isolated from patients. In a global analysis of reports from 26 countries, S. Enteritidis (65%) and S. Typhimurium (12%) were the dominant serotypes isolated from 2000 to 2002 [6]. In Ethiopia, S. Enteritidis accounted for 1.8% of the isolates [46, 47] and less than five isolates were isolated from samples of cattle [60], sheep [61], pigs [62, 63] and chicken [64]. The differences in the preponderance of serovars across countries could be due to the variations in the epidemiology of the serotypes that may involve animal as well as environmental factors.

S. Concord was the first ranking serovar isolated from patients. Its occurrence was higher in samples taken from children [46] than in samples predominantly from adults [47]. The bacterium was isolated from Ethiopian children adopted in several European countries and the USA [6569] but not demonstrated in samples taken from domestic food animals and food items of animal origin. As S. Concord was reported to be highly invasive [46] and multi drug resistant [46, 47, 6569], it could be a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in children.

S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi are causes of enteric fever with similar disease patterns [69]. In the 1980s, typhoid fever was diagnosed in 1.1% of the Ethiopian immigrants in Israel [70] and a case fatality rate of 15.7% was reported in hospital admitted Ethiopian children [71]. In a recent study on patients with febrile illnesses, typhoid fever was recorded in 5.85% of the patients with a higher occurrence in children aged three to 14 years (6.6%) compared to children aged 15 to 17 years (1.1%) [72]. Although a systematic epidemiological study is not available, the lower living standard of the general population is a suggestive evidence that enteric fever is a threat in present day Ethiopia.

S. Typhimurium was the third ranking serovar that accounted for 15.3% of the NTS isolates [46, 47] and its occurrence is within the range of its global preponderance (10-30%) [73].This serotype was isolated from slaughtered cattle, sheep and camels [5658, 7476], minced beef [38, 64] and chicken samples [40, 77, 78] in Ethiopia and reported to be a common cause of invasive disease [4, 12] with a higher mortality rate in AIDS patients [79].

Of the isolates recovered from stool samples of carriers, S. Dublin and S. Newport could be of significant public health concerns. S. Newport was a cause of an outbreak in Gondar College of Health Sciences, Ethiopia where 79 (23%) students had manifest disease [80] and it was isolated in meat samples collected from supermarkets [40] and in samples taken from slaughtered animals [63, 74, 75]. S. Dublin was isolated from human clinical samples [47], slaughtered cattle [34, 60] and from meats collected from markets [34, 40, 64]. Significant associations of S. Dublin infection with raw milk consumption habits, higher invasion (65%), hospital admission (78.8%) and mortality rates (19.5%) were reported [81].

Limitations and implications of the study

The patient data were collected from Hospitals that provided services to both urban and rural inhabitants but the origin of the study subjects were not reported. However, it appears that most patients could be from urban areas because of the relatively better accesses to health care settings. Therefore, the pooled estimates are more applicable to patients in urban areas than to patients in rural areas.

The results of this study have several implications in clinical practices, policy issues and intervention measures and in research undertakings. First, as drug sensitivity tests are not routinely carried out in several clinical settings of the country, antimicrobials known to be effective against the dominant serovars could be used as empirical therapeutic agents. Secondly, the considerable occurrences of Salmonella in patients and apparently healthy subjects imply the need for a policy and intervention measures to promote public hygiene and regularly screen individuals that are in contact with food items meant for public consumption. In addition, the limited number of studies and the occurrence of serotypes of significant national and international concerns [46, 62, 63, 6568], entail the need for a large scale study to describe the epidemiology of the disease at a national level. The pooled estimates are more reliable than the single study estimates and could be used in the design of further studies.

Conclusion

The prevalence of Salmonellosis is considerable and a few serotypes that included S. Concord, S. Typhi, S. Typhimurium, and S. Paratyphi are the major causes of infections. There is a need of a policy and intervention measures to promote public hygiene and regularly screen individuals in contact with food items for public consumption. Further studies are required to adequately describe the epidemiology of human Salmonellosis in Ethiopia.

Author’s contributions

GT conceived the study design, searched the literature, extracted the data, analyzed the data, interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

I thank Dr. Byleyegne Molla, Dr. Sefinew Alemu, Dr. Endrias Zewdu and Mr. Bayeh Abera for supplying me with their articles and Dr. Tesfaye Sisay for his help in literature search.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University

References

  1. Crump JA, Luby SP, Mintz ED: The global burden of typhoid fever. Bull World Health Organ. 2004, 82: 346-353.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Majowicz SE, Musto J, Scallan E, Angulo FJ, Kirk M, O’Brien SJ, Jones TF, Fazil A, Hoekstra RM: The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010, 50: 882-889. 10.1086/650733.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kariuki S: Typhoid fever in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges of diagnosis and management of infections (Review). J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008, 2: 443-447.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gordon MA, Graham SM, Walsh AL, Wilson L, Phiri A, Molyneux E, Zijlstra EE, Heyderman RS, Hart CA, Molyneux ME: Epidemics of invasive Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium infection associated with multidrug resistance among adults and children in Malawi. Clin Infect Dis. 2008, 46: 963-969. 10.1086/529146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brent AJ, Oundo JO, Mwangi I, Ochola L, Lowe B, Berkley JA: Salmonella bacteremia in Kenyan children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006, 25: 230-236. 10.1097/01.inf.0000202066.02212.ff.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Galanis E, Lo Fo Wong DM, Patrick ME, Binsztein N, Cieslik A, Chalermchikit T, Aidara-Kane A, Ellis A, Angulo FJ, Wegener HC: Web-based surveillance and global Salmonella distribution, 2000–2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12: 381-388. 10.3201/eid1205.050854.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Walsh AL, Phiri AJ, Graham SM, Molyneux EM, Molyneux ME: Bacteremia in febrile Malawian children: clinical and microbiologic features. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000, 19: 312-318. 10.1097/00006454-200004000-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gordon MA, Banda HT, Gondwe M, Gordon SB, Boeree MJ, Walsh AL, Corkill JE, Hart CA, Gilks CF, Molyneux ME: Non-typhoidal salmonella bacteraemia among HIV-infected Malawian adults: high mortality and frequent recrudescence. AIDS. 2002, 16: 1633-1641. 10.1097/00002030-200208160-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gordon MA: Salmonella infections in immunocompromised adults. J Infect. 2008, 56: 413-422. 10.1016/j.jinf.2008.03.012. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2008.03.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hohmann EL: Nontyphoidal Salmonellosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 32: 263-269. 10.1086/318457.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Enwere G, Biney E, Cheung YB, Zaman SM, Okoko B, Oluwalana C, Vaughan A, Greenwood B, Adegbola R, Cutts FT: Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of community acquired invasive bacterial infections in children aged 2–29 months in the Gambia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006, 25: 700-705. 10.1097/01.inf.0000226839.30925.a5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Berkley JA, Lowe BS, Mwangi I, Williams T, Bauni E, Mwarumba S, Ngetsa C, Slack MP, Njenga S, Hart CA: Bacteremia among children admitted to a rural hospital in Kenya. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 39-47. 10.1056/NEJMoa040275.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pavia AT, Shipman LD, Wells JG, Puhr ND, Smith JD, McKinley TW, Tauxe RV: Epidemiologic evidence that prior antimicrobial exposure decreases resistance to infection by antimicrobial-sensitive Salmonella. J Infect Dis. 1990, 161: 255-260. 10.1093/infdis/161.2.255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB: Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000, 283: 2008-2012. 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group: Preferred Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6: e1000097-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Tricco AC, Ng CH, Gilca V, Anonychuk A, Pham B, Berliner S: Canadian oncogenic human papilloma virus cervical infection prevalence: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2011, 11: 235-10.1186/1471-2334-11-235. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-11-235View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Sterne JAC, Roger M, Harbord RM: Funnel plots in meta-analysis. Stata J. 2004, 4: 127-141.Google Scholar
  18. Littell JH, Corcoran J, Pillai V: Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses. 2008, New York: Oxford University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Galbraith RF: A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Stat Med. 1988, 7: 889-894. 10.1002/sim.4780070807.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Higgins JP, Thompson SG: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002, 21: 1539-1558. 10.1002/sim.1186.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Leandro G: Meta-analysis in medical research. The handbook for the understanding and practice of meta-analysis. 2005, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing LtdView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson DB: Meta-Analysis. Handbook of Quantitative Criminology. Edited by: Piquero AR, Weisburd D. 2010, New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 181-208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Calvo-Muñoz I, Gómez-Conesa A, Sánchez-Meca J: Prevalence of low back pain in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2013, 13: 14-10.1186/1471-2431-13-14. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-13-14View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Hurley JC: Lack of impact of selective digestive decontamination on Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator associated pneumonia: benchmarking the evidence base. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011, 66: 1365-1373. 10.1093/jac/dkr112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986, 7: 177-188. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang Y, Li X, Zhou F, Jin Q, Gao L: Prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis in mainland China: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2011, 6: e20343-10.1371/journal.pone.0020343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020343View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Gao L, Zhang L, Jin Q: Meta-analysis: prevalence of HIV infection and syphilis among MSM in China. Sex Transm Infect. 2009, 85: 354-358. 10.1136/sti.2008.034702. doi:10.1136/sti.2008.034702View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Asrat D: Shigella and Salmonella serogroups and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Ethiopia. East Mediterr Health J. 2008, 14: 760-767.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Desenclos JC, Zergabachew A, Desmoulins B, Chouteau L, Desve G, Admassu M: Clinical, microbiological and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of diarrhoea in Korem, Ethiopia. J Trop Med Hyg. 1988, 91: 296-301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ashenafi M, Gedebou M: Salmonella and Shigella in adult diarrhoea in Addis Ababa- prevalence and antibiograms. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1985, 79: 719-721. 10.1016/0035-9203(85)90201-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ghiorghis B, Geyid A, Haile M: Bacteraemia in febrile out-patient children. East Afr Med J. 1992, 69: 74-77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mache A, Mengistu Y, Cowley C: Salmonella serogroups identified from adult diarrhoeal out-patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: antibiotic resistance and plasmid profile analysis. East Afr Med J. 1997, 74: 183-186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Asrat D, Amanuel YW: Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from blood culture in Tikur Anbassa Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 2001, 39: 97-104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nyeleti C, Molla B, Hildebrandt G, Kleer J: The prevalence and distribution of Salmonellae in slaughtered cattle, slaughterhouse personnel and minced beef in Addis Ababa (Ethiopia). Bull Anim Health Prod Afr. 2000, 48: 19-24.Google Scholar
  35. Mache A: Salmonella serogroup and their antibiotic resistance patterns isolated from diarrhoeal stools of pediatric out patients in Jimma Hospital and Jimma Health Center, South West Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2002, 37: 37-45.Google Scholar
  36. Andualem B, Geyid A: Antimicrobial responses of Yersinia enterocolitica isolates in comparison to other commonly encountered bacteria that causes diarrhoea. East Afr Med J. 2005, 82: 241-246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Awole M, Gebre-Selassie S, Kassa T, Kibru G: Isolation of potential bacterial pathogens from the stool of HIV-infected and HIV-non-infected patients and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Jimma Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 2002, 40: 353-364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Birhaneselassie M, Williams B: A study of Salmonella carriage among asymptomatic food-handlers in Southern Ethiopia. IJNFS. 2013, 2: 243-245. doi:10.11648/j.ijnfs.20130205.15View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Andargie G, Kassu A, Moges F, Tiruneh M, Huruy K: Prevalence of bacteria and intestinal parasites among food-handlers in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia. J Health Popul Nutr. 2008, 26: 451-455.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Zewdu E, Cornelius P: Antimicrobial resistance pattern of Salmonella serotypes isolated from food items and personnel in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009, 41: 241-249. 10.1007/s11250-008-9181-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Reda AA, Seyoum B, Jemal Yimam J, Andualem G, Fiseha S, Jean-Michel Vandeweerd JM: Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Salmonella and Shigella isolates in Harar, Eastern Ethiopia. J Infect Dis Immun. 2011, 3: 134-139.Google Scholar
  42. Abera B, Biadegelgen F, Bezabih B: Prevalence of Salmonella typhi and intestinal parasites among food handlers in Bahir Dar Town, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2010, 24: 46-50.Google Scholar
  43. Zenebe T, Kannan S, Yilma D, Beyene G: Invasive bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Jimma University specialized hospital, Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2011, 21: 2-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Addis Z, Kebede N, Worku Z, Gezahegn H, Yirsaw A, Kassa T: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from lactating cows and in contact humans in dairy farms of Addis Ababa: a cross sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2011, 11: 222-10.1186/1471-2334-11-222. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-11-222View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Dagnew M, Tiruneh M, Moges F, Gizachew M: Bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among food handlers at Gondar University Cafeteria, Northwest Ethiopia. J Infect Dis Ther. 2013, 1: 105-doi:10.4172/jidt.1000105Google Scholar
  46. Beyene G, Nair S, Asrat D, Mengistu Y, Engers H, Wain J: Multidrug resistant Salmonella Concord is a major cause of salmonellosis in children in Ethiopia. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011, 5: 23-33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Gebre-Yohannes A: Salmonella from Ethiopia: prevalent species and their susceptibility to drugs. Ethiop Med J. 1985, 23: 97-102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Gedebou M, Tassew A: Antimicrobial resistance and R factor of Salmonella isolates from Addis Ababa. Ethiop Med J. 1981, 19: 77-85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolday D: Increase in the incidence of multidrug-resistant salmonellae in Ethiopia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998, 41: 421-423. 10.1093/jac/41.3.421.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hoorfar D, Baggesen DL: Importance of pre-enrichment media for isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine and poultry. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1988, 169: 125-130.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Singer RS, Mayer AE, Hanson TE, Isaacson RE: Do microbial interactions and cultivation media decrease the accuracy of Salmonella surveillance systems and outbreak investigations?. J Food Prot. 2009, 72: 707-713.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Gorski L: Selective enrichment media bias the types of Salmonella enterica strains isolated from mixed strain cultures and complex enrichment broths. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e34722-10.1371/journal.pone.0034722. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034722View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruiz J, Núnñez M, Díaz J, Lorente I, Pérez J, Gómez J: Comparison of Five Plating Media for Isolation of Salmonella Species from Human Stools. J Clin Microbiol. 1996, 34: 686-688.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Fletcher S, Stark D, Ellis J: Prevalence of gastrointestinal pathogens in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Public Health Africa. 2011, 2: doi:10.4081/jphia.2011.e30Google Scholar
  55. Shimeles D, Lulseged S: Clinical profile and pattern of infection in Ethiopian children with severe protein-energy malnutrition. East Afr Med J. 1994, 71: 264-267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Shimelis D, Tadesse Y: Clinical profile of acute renal failure in children admitted to the department of pediatrics, Tikur Anbessa Hospital. Ethiop Med J. 2004, 42: 17-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Aarsland SJ, Castellanos-Gonzalez A, Lockamy KP, Mulu-Droppers R, Mulu M, White AC, Cabada MM: Treatable bacterial infections are under recognized causes of fever in Ethiopian children. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012, 87: 128-133. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0171.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Morpeth SC, Ramadhani HO, Crump JA: Invasive non-Typhi Salmonella disease in Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 49: 606-611. 10.1086/603553.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Beatty ME, Shevick G, Shupe-Ricksecker K, Bannister E, Tulu A, Lancaster K, Alexander N, Zellner DE, Lyszkowicz E, Braden CR: Large Salmonella Enteritidis outbreak with prolonged transmission attributed to an infected food handler, Texas, 2002. Epidemiol Infect. 2009, 137: 417-427. 10.1017/S0950268808001362.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Alemayehu D, Molla B, Muckle A: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of Salmonella isolates from apparently healthy slaughtered cattle in Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2003, 35: 309-319. 10.1023/A:1025189204496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Molla W, Molla B, Alemayehu D, Muckle A, Cole L, Wilkie E: Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in apparently healthy slaughtered sheep and goats of central Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2006, 38: 455-462. 10.1007/s11250-006-4325-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Aragaw K, Molla B, Muckle A, Cole L, Wilkie E, Poppe C, Kleer J, Hildebrandt G: The characterization of Salmonella serovars isolated from apparently healthy slaughtered pigs at Addis Ababa abattoir, Ethiopia. Prev Vet Med. 2007, 82: 252-261. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.05.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Molla B, Berhanu A, Muckle A, Cole L, Wilkie E, Kleer J, Hildebrandt G: Multidrug resistance and distribution of Salmonella serovars in slaughtered pigs. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2006, 53: 28-33. 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00900.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Molla B, Kleer J, Sinell H: Occurrence, distribution and level of Salmonella in selected food items in Addis Ababa (Ethiopia). Fleischwirtsch Int. 1999, 4: 37-39.Google Scholar
  65. Fabre L, Delauné A, Espié E, Nygard K, Pardos M, Polomack L, Guesnier F, Galimand M, Lassen J, Weill FX: Chromosomal integration of the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase gene blaCTX-M-15 in Salmonella enterica serotype Concord isolates from internationally adopted children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 1808-1816. 10.1128/AAC.00451-08.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Hendriksen RS, Mikoleit M, Kornschober C, Rickert RL, Duyne SV, Kjelsø C, Hasman H, Cormican M, Mevius D, Threlfall J, Angulo FJ, Aarestrup FM: Emergence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Concord infections in Europe and the United States in children adopted from Ethiopia, 2003–2007. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009, 28: 814-818. 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181a3aeac.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Hendriksen RS, Kjelsø C, Torpdahl M, Ethelberg S, Mølbak K, Aarestrup FM: Upsurge of infections caused by Salmonella Concord among Ethiopian adoptees in Denmark. Euro Surveill. 2010, 15: 19587-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Vanhoof R, Gillis P, Stévart O, Boland C, Vandenberg O, Fux F, Collard J, Bertrand S: Transmission of multiple resistant Salmonella concord from internationally adopted children to their adoptive families and social environment: proposition of guidelines. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012, 31: 491-497. 10.1007/s10096-011-1336-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Maskey AP, Day JN, Phung QT, Thwaites GE, Campbell JI, Zimmerman M, Farrar JJ, Basnyat B: Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A and S. enterica serovar Typhi cause indistinguishable clinical syndromes in Kathmandu, Nepal. Clin Infect Dis. 2006, 42: 1247-1253. 10.1086/503033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Carmeli Y, Schapiro JM, Alkan M: Immigration of Ethiopians with typhoid fever to Israel: apparent lack of influence on the local population. Clin Infect Dis. 1994, 19: 1144-1146. 10.1093/clinids/19.6.1144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Worku B: Typhoid fever in an Ethiopian children’s hospital: 1984–1995. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2000, 14: 311-315.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Animut A, Mekonnen Y, Shimelis D, Ephraim E: Febrile illnesses of different etiology among outpatients in four health centers in Northwestern Ethiopia. Jpn J infect Dis. 2009, 62: 107-110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Helms M, Ethelberg S, Molbak K: International Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 infections, 1992–2001. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 859-867. 10.3201/eid1106.041017.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Sibhat B, Zewde BM, Zerihun A, Muckle A, Cole L, Boerlin P, Wilkie E, Perets A, Mistry K, Gebreyes WA: Salmonella serovars and antimicrobial resistance profiles in beef cattle, slaughterhouse personnel and slaughterhouse environment in Ethiopia. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011, 58: 102-109. 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01305.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Alemu S, Zewde BM: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from slaughtered cattle in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012, 44: 595-600. 10.1007/s11250-011-9941-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Molla B, Mohammed A, Salah W: Salmonella prevalence and distribution of serotypes in apparently healthy slaughtered camels (Camelus dromedarius) in eastern Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2004, 36: 451-458.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Tibaijuka B, Molla B, Hildebrandt G, Kleer J, Salah W: Occurrence of Salmonellae in retail raw chicken products in Ethiopia. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2003, 116: 55-58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Molla B, Mesfin A: A survey of Salmonella contamination in chicken carcass and giblets in central Ethiopia. Rev Med Vet. 2003, 154: 267-270.Google Scholar
  79. Fisk TL, Lundberg BE, Guest JL, Ray S, Barrett TJ, Holland B, Stamey K, Angulo FJ, Farley MM: Invasive infection with multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium definitive type 104 among HIV-infected adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 40: 1016-1021. 10.1086/428119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Aseffa A, Mengistu G, Tiruneh M: Salmonella Newport: outbreak of food poisoning among college students due to contaminated undercooked eggs. Ethiop Med J. 1994, 32: 1-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Werner SB, Humphrey GL, Kamei I: Association between raw milk and human Salmonella Dublin infection. Br Med J. 1979, 28: 238-241.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/14/88/prepub

Copyright

© Tadesse; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.