Virulence difference between the prototypic Schu S4 strain (A1a) and Francisella tularensisA1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains in a murine model of infection
© Molins et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 26 September 2013
Accepted: 28 January 2014
Published: 6 February 2014
The use of prototypic strains is common among laboratories studying infectious agents as it promotes consistency for data comparability among and between laboratories. Schu S4 is the prototypic virulent strain of Francisella tularensis and has been used extensively as such over the past six decades. Studies have demonstrated virulence differences among the two clinically relevant subspecies of F. tularensis, tularensis (type A) and holarctica (type B) and more recently between type A subpopulations (A1a, A1b and A2). Schu S4 belongs to the most virulent subspecies of F. tularensis, subspecies tularensis.
In this study, we investigated the relative virulence of Schu S4 in comparison to A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains using a temperature-based murine model of infection. Mice were inoculated intradermally and a hypothermic drop point was used as a surrogate for death. Survival curves and the length of temperature phases were compared for all infections. Bacterial burdens were also compared between the most virulent type A subpopulation, A1b, and Schu S4 at drop point.
Survival curve comparisons demonstrate that the Schu S4 strain used in this study resembles the virulence of type B strains, and is significantly less virulent than all other type A (A1a, A1b and A2) strains tested. Additionally, when bacterial burdens were compared between mice infected with Schu S4 or MA00-2987 (A1b) significantly higher burdens were present in the blood and spleen of mice infected with MA00-2987.
The knowledge gained from using Schu S4 as a prototypic virulent strain has unquestionably advanced the field of tularemia research. The findings of this study, however, indicate that careful consideration of F. tularensis strain selection must occur when the overall virulence of the strain used could impact the outcome and interpretation of results.
KeywordsPrototypic strains Murine model Fever Francisella tularensis Tularemia Schu S4 A1a
Tularemia, a disease caused by the Gram-negative bacterium Francisella tularensis, was first confirmed as a human infection in 1913 in a 21 year-old meat cutter from Ohio who developed ulcerative conjunctivitis and lymphadenitis after handling infected meat . Approximately 25 years later, Foshay isolated F. tularensis (previously named Bacterium tularense) strain Schu from a finger ulcer of a patient in Ohio . Virulence studies conducted in various animal models showed that this strain (also referred to as strain Sm) was of high virulence with an LD100 in rabbits of 1–100 bacterial cells [3–5]. Additionally, time to death experiments in guinea pigs and mice revealed that animals infected with this strain died earlier than those infected with a type B strain by one day when infecting mice and 3 to 4 days when infecting guinea pigs . In 1951, Eigelsbach et al. conducted a study using the Schu strain to determine if F. tularensis colony morphology correlated with pathogenicity and immunogenic properties . This study revealed colony morphologies that varied in color (buff, blue or grey), texture (smooth or nonsmooth) and LD100 (range from 1–10 to avirulent). One colony type, designated Schu S4, for smooth (S) variant clone #4, was described as a smooth blue colony with a watery consistency, and highly virulent in mice with an LD100 of 1–10 organisms. Schu S4 has subsequently served as the representative strain for pathogenic studies of F. tularensis subspecies tularensis (type A), the most virulent of the three F. tularensis subspecies, tularensis (type A), holarctica (type B) and mediasiatica. Given its extensive use as a prototypic type A strain, the complete genome for Schu 4 was sequenced in 2005 .
Within the last decade, it has become increasingly clear that type A strains do not represent a uniform population. Multi-locus variable number tandem repeat (MLVA), pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), whole genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and whole genome sequencing have all been used to demonstrate a major split into two subpopulations, A.I (A1) and A.II (A2) [8–13]. Additional PFGE analyses have further identified two A1 subpopulations, A1a and A1b . Although type A strains are well documented to be more virulent than type B strains (LD100 in rabbits of 1–100 bacterial cells for type A strains as compared to an LD100 of 109 for type B strains) [4, 15], more recent studies have revealed differing levels of virulence between the type A subpopulations A1a, A1b and A2 [14, 16, 17]. An epidemiological analysis of culture-confirmed human tularemia in the United States showed that infections caused by A1b strains resulted in significantly higher mortality (24%) than infections caused by A1a (4%) or A2 (0%). Logistic regression analysis of A1b infections further indicated that this higher mortality rate was not linked to host characteristics, suggesting that A1b strains have an intrinsic characteristic which makes them more virulent than A1a or A2 strains . Additionally, a virulence study using a murine model of infection found that mice infected with A1b died significantly earlier than mice infected with A1a or A2 . These results correlate with epidemiological findings for type A infections in humans and demonstrate the utility of murine models for identifying virulence differences among F. tularensis type A subpopulations.
Schu S4 has been classified by PFGE and SNP analysis as a type A strain belonging to the A1a and A.I.Br.SCHU S4 subpopulations, respectively [13, 14] indicating the prototypic type A strain does not fall within the PFGE group of type A strains with highest virulence. Previous analyses indicate mice are a suitable system to monitor differences in virulence if survival curves opposed to LD50 are analyzed [16–18]. Additionally, most studies requiring an animal model for the study of F. tularensis are conducted in mice due to their ease of use. We therefore investigated the relative virulence of Schu S4 in comparison to A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains isolated from more recent human cases using a murine model of infection and generated survival curves based on subcutaneous temperature measurements . Our results revealed that the Schu S4 strain used in this study most closely resembles the virulence of type B strains, and is less virulent than all other type A strains tested here; A1a, A1b, and A2 strains.
Strains and culture conditions
The Schu S4 strain tested here is available through BEI (catalog number NR-643) and was deposited by the Centers for Disease Control. Schu S4 was grown from frozen stocks (−70°C) on cysteine heart agar supplemented with 9% sheep blood (CHAB) at 35°C for 48 h, followed by subculture onto CHAB for 24 h at 35°C. A bacterial suspension for inoculations was prepared in sterile saline. Colony forming units (CFU) in the inoculum was verified by spotting 50 μl of the inoculum onto each quadrant of two CHAB quad plates (8 replicates total) and letting the plates dry without spreading. CFU were counted after 48–72 hours of growth at 35°C. The Schu S4 strain used in this study was typed using PFGE as previously described [11, 14].
Additional F. tularensis strains (n = 8) (see Additional file 1), two A1a (MO02-4195 and OK01-2528), two A1b (MA00-2987 and MD00-2970), two A2 (WY96-3418 and NM99-1823), and two type B (KY99-3387 and MI00-1730) strains, used in this study were described previously [16, 18]. Several of these strains are available through BEI (WY96-3418, MA00-2987 and KY99-3387, and their respective catalog numbers are NR-644, NR-645 and NR-647).
Mice and experimental protocol
Specific pathogen-free female C57BL/6 J mice, (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) 8–9 weeks of age, were used. For Schu S4 infections, mice (n = 7) were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane to effect and infected intradermally with 10–20 CFU (50 μl) via the tail dermis. Control mice (n = 7) were inoculated with 50 μl of saline. Seven mice were infected with Schu S4 to ensure sufficient power to detect a scale shift in the fitted survival curve corresponding to a mean survival time of at least one day. The temperature of infected mice was monitored every 1–2 hours (minimum of 12 observations per day) until they reached their drop point. The drop point is the time at which a febrile mouse’s temperature first drops below the mean temperature of the normal (early afebrile) phase . Therefore, the mean temperature of the normal phase was determined for each mouse and mice were euthanized once the drop point was observed. Mice were given food at libitum and an exercise wheel was provided in every cage. All animal procedures were approved by the Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol number 08–012) and performed in accordance with the guidelines on the care and use of laboratory animals . All animal experiments with F. tularensis were conducted in ABL3 facilities. Data for mice infected with strains representing each of the four F. tularensis subpopulations (A1a, A1b, A2 and type B) was previously published [16, 18]. Mice were infected with Schu S4 during Round 2 of the previously published experiments . In Round 2 experiments, seven mice were infected with strains MA00-2987 (A1b), MO02-4195 (A1a), NM99-1823 (A2) and MI00-1730 (type B), in addition to the seven control mice and seven Schu S4 infected mice described here. An additional infection of seven mice with MA00-2987 was also performed and these mice were euthanized at drop point.
Survival times for Schu S4 infected mice were modeled according to a Weibull distribution (allowing both the scale and shape parameters to differ by strain) using the drop point as a surrogate of death. Previous experiments demonstrated that statistical inference from a comparison of survival curves generated for F. tularensis strains based on drop point were the same as those obtained using observed time to death . Additionally, drop point is an ethical experimental endpoint, as mice are still responsive to stimuli and taking food and water. Standard diagnostics including residual plots and goodness of fit tests were used to validate the model fits. The survival curve generated for Schu S4 infected mice was compared to survival curves previously generated for eight F. tularensis strains; two A1a, two A1b, two A2 and two type B [16, 18]. Survival curves for F. tularensis A1a, A1b, A2 and type B infected mice were also fitted to drop points, although mice were allowed to expire in order to establish and validate the drop point temperature model . Differences in the parameter estimates (shape and scale) of the survival curves were considered statistically significant if p < 0.008, with this level of significance determined using the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Survival function parameters were simulated from the estimated parameter distributions. From these, 10,000 survival times were simulated and used to compute the probability that a mouse infected with one strain “fails” before a mouse infected with a second strain for each F. tularensis group (A1a, A1b, A2 and type B as well as Schu S4). This was done 1,000 times to create distributions for the estimated probabilities from which 95% confidence intervals were obtained.
Comparisons between the lengths of time spent in the normal and febrile phases by Schu S4 infected mice and mice infected with A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains were performed using a weighted ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons using Tukey’s method with an overall Type I error of 0.05.
Quantitative bacteriology and mouse and organ weights
Mice infected with Schu S4 (A1a) were euthanized at drop point and whole organs (spleen, liver and lungs) and blood were removed aseptically. Whole organs and blood were also taken from control, non-infected mice and from mice infected with strain MA00-2987 (A1b) and euthanized at drop point [16, 18]. Each organ was weighed and sterile saline was added (5 ml to spleen and lungs and 10 ml to liver) prior to homogenization using a Stomacher 80 micro Biomaster (Seward, Bohemia, NY). Homogenized samples were serially diluted in sterile saline and aliquots (50 μl) were spotted in duplicate onto CHAB agar quadrant plates without spreading. Colonies were counted after 48–72 h of growth at 35°C. Whole blood was collected from the abdominal aorta and diluted into sterile saline and plated as described . Bacterial load comparisons were performed using MANOVA with an overall Type I error rate of α = 0.05 and confidence intervals for Pearson’s correlation were computed using Fisher’s z-transformation. Mice were weighed prior to infection and at drop point.
Virulence comparison between Schu S4and other A1a strains
Virulence differences between F. tularensis strain Schu S4 and F. tularensisA1b, A2 and type B strains
Significant differences (p < 0.008) were observed in both the scale and shape parameters of the survival curve for Schu S4 infected mice when compared to the survival curves of mice infected with either A1b or A2 strains, and in the shape parameter when compared to the survival curve of mice infected with type B strains (Figure 2). There was no significant difference in the scale parameters between the survival curves of mice infected with Schu S4 as compared to type B strains (0.05 < p < 0.10). These data indicate that the mice infected with Schu S4 reached drop point significantly later than mice infected with A1b or A2 strains and that there was no statistical difference in the time to drop point between mice infected with Schu S4 as compared to type B strains. Additionally, as observed in the comparison with A1a strains, mice infected with Schu S4 reached drop point within a significantly narrower timeframe as compared to mice infected with A1b, A2 or type B strains.
Probability of A1a, A1b, A2 and type B infected mice reaching drop point before Schu S 4 infected mice
Lower 95% CIa
Upper 95% CI
A1a versus Schu S4
A1b versus Schu S4
A2 versus Schu S4
Type B versus Schu S4
Differences in the length of time that mice spent in the normal and febrile phase of infection  revealed that the normal phase was statistically longer for mice infected with Schu S4 as compared to mice infected with A1b by an average of 42 hours (95% CI 18 to 65 hours). No statistical differences were observed between the normal phases of Schu S4, A2 and type B infected mice. When the length of time in the fever stage was compared, no statistical differences between Schu S4 and A1b, A2 or type B were observed. Similar to Schu S4 infected mice, the average time that type B infected mice were in the normal phase differed significantly from that of A1a and A1b infected mice. Type B infected mice were in the normal phase on average 47 hours (95% CI 15 to 80 hours) longer compared to A1a infected mice and on average 62 hours (95% CI 25 to 99 hours) longer compared to A1b infected mice.
Bacterial load comparison between mice infected with A1a strain Schu S4and A1b strain MA00-2987
Schu S4 serves as the prototypic type A strain for much of the current F. tularensis research being performed and is often classified as “fully virulent”. It has been distributed internationally among laboratories and the maintenance and propagation history among laboratories is unknown. Moreover, any laboratory adaptation this strain has undergone over the 60+ years since it was isolated, or genomic variation between Schu S4 strains of different laboratories is undetermined as only a single strain, Schu 4, has been sequenced at the whole genome level .
Our present data show that this particular Schu S4 strain is significantly less virulent than more recent clinical A1a strains as well as A1b and A2 strains. Beyond PFGE typing , limited studies have been performed to compare the virulence and genetic make-up between A1a strains; however, virulence differences between A1a and A1b strains have been reported . Twine et al. previously demonstrated a significant difference in time to death for BALB/c mice infected intradermally or via aerosol with Schu S4 as compared to the type A strain, FSC033 . FSC033 falls into the same canSNP group A.1.Br.001/002 as the two A1b strains tested here, MA00-2987 and MD00-2970. Specifically, mice infected with FSC033, expired significantly earlier than mice infected with Schu S4 (FSC237; Francisella Strain Collection, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Umea, Sweden). Thus, the difference in virulence between Schu S4 and other type A strains appears to be conserved among Schu S4 strains from different laboratories and within two mouse strains. The Schu S4 strain (FSC237) used in Twine et al. was the source of DNA for the published Schu S4 genome sequence. Twine et al. also reported unsuccessful attempts to enhance the virulence of Schu S4 by passage in mice; after five animal passages there was no change in the mean time to death for the Schu S4 strain. Together these results suggest that there is a fixed genetic basis responsible for the decreased virulence observed for Schu S4.
Surprisingly, the Schu S4 strain demonstrated a virulence phenotype with greater similarity to type B than to type A clinical strains. LD50- 100 experiments in rabbits and time to death experiments in mice or guinea pigs are lacking in the published literature for Schu S4, despite its use as a prototypic type A strain. F. tularensis Schu S4 was reported as being highly virulent based solely on an LD100 of 1–10 organisms in mice . However, Bell and Olsufiev both demonstrated that virulence of F. tularensis, derived from LD50 determinations, in mice does not differentiate between type A and type B; both subspecies show an LD50 of 1 [4, 20]. As no direct virulence comparisons (LD50 in rabbits or time to death differences in mice) have been reported in the literature, it is unknown if the virulence phenotype of the original Schu strain differs from that of Schu S4.
Schu S4 infected mice reached drop point in a significantly narrower timeframe as compared to mice infected with A1a, A1b, A2 and type B strains. Mice infected with A1a, A1b, A2 and type B consistently reached their drop point during two time frames as opposed to just one time frame as observed with Schu S4 infected mice. We hypothesize this is reflective of Schu S4 being a single colony selected from the original clinical isolate and laboratory adapted over time as compared to more recent clinical isolates with minimal laboratory manipulation. A few of the strains (recent clinical isolates) used in this study are also single colony picks. However, we tested whether this resulted in a selected phenotype by doing a side-by-side comparison of survival curves generated from mice infected with a single colony pick of the MA00-2987 strain and the original MA00-2987 isolate. There were no statistical differences between the two survival curves generated for these two infections (data not shown).
The mechanism for the difference in virulence of Schu S4 is unknown. However, our results indicate that bacterial burden at drop point was significantly higher in the blood and spleen of mice infected with the A1b strain, MA00-2987 as compared to mice infected with Schu S4. A similar observation was noted by Twine et al. who found that the FSC033 strain was better able to disseminate than Schu S4 from the original inoculation site to the spleen of infected mice . Additionally, we previously showed that the bacterial burden in the blood and spleen at time to death did not differ between mice infected with A1a and A1b strains . This suggests that the mechanism of bacterial dissemination may be altered in the Schu S4 strain as compared to MA00-2987 and other A1a strains. We also observed that Schu S4 infected mice remained in the normal phase (asymptomatic) significantly longer than mice infected with A1a or A1b clinical strains. Interestingly, type B infected mice which had a survival curve statistically indifferent (based on scale) from Schu S4 infected mice also displayed a longer normal phase length that was statistically different from those of A1a and A1b infected mice. Further studies are needed to better understand the virulence mechanisms of Schu S4 that differ from A1a and A1b strains and to determine how they compare to those of A2 and type B strains.
Overall, these findings indicate that infection of C57BL/6 J mice with Schu S4 does not completely mimic an infection with other type A strains. While the findings with Schu S4 in this study and in the Twine et al. study agree, it should be noted that the Schu S4 strain used here may not be equivalent to other Schu S4 strains distributed amongst various research institutions. Although the use of prototypic strains are important for consistency among research, the strain used should be appropriate for the work being performed and researchers need to acknowledge the limitations associated with this prototypic strain.
In summary, we have evaluated the relative virulence of Schu S4 as compared to more recent A1a, A1b, A2 and type B clinical isolates of F. tularensis using a murine model. We demonstrated that Schu S4 is less virulent as compared to other type A strains and more closely resembles the virulence of type B strains. Schu S4 is still the prototypic pathogenic strain used and although this strain has a permanent role for such research, the observations from this study call into question the benefits of using more recent F. tularensis type A strains in addition to using the Schu S4 strain. The use of Schu S4 for studying F. tularensis has advantages, including the expediting of research because this strain is more readily available than non-prototypic strains, Schu S4 is well characterized and the data that results from the use of this strain can be directly compared between laboratories. However, the choice of Schu S4 as a “fully virulent” strain and as the sole type A challenge strain in murine models that evaluate the efficacy of human vaccine and therapeutics against F. tularensis infection, should be reconsidered.
CRM performed the animal work, data analyses and drafted the manuscript. MJD performed the statistical analysis. BMY assisted with the mouse work and performed the culture work. JWY assisted in the design of the study and helped perform the mouse work. JTB assisted in the design of the study and helped draft the manuscript. MES assisted in the design of the study. JMP assisted in the design of the study and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Colony forming units
Cysteine heart agar supplemented with 9% sheep blood
Multi-locus variable number tandem repeat
Pulsed field gel electrophoresis
Single nucleotide polymorphism.
The authors would like to thank Animal Care Staff for their support with the animals. Claudia Molins was funded by the American Society for Microbiology and the Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases as a postdoctoral fellow while the work was being performed. Funding for John Belisle was provided by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant number U54AIO65357-01. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Health and Human Services.
- Wherry WB, Lamb BH: Infection of man with Bacterium tularense. J Infect Dis. 1914, 15: 331-340. 10.1093/infdis/15.2.331.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hesselbrock W, Foshay L: The morphology of Bacterium tularense. J Bacteriol. 1945, 49: 209-231.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Downs CM, Woodward JM: Studies on pathogenesis and immunity in tularemia III. Immunogenic properties for the white mouse of various strains of Bacterium tularense. J Immunol. 1949, 63: 147-163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olsufiev NG, Emelyanova OS, Dunayeva TN: Comparative study of strains of B. tularense in the old and new world and their taxonomy. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1959, 3: 138-149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olsufyev NG, Emelyanova OS: Further studies of strains of tularemic bacteria of the old and new world. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1962, 6: 193-205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eigelsbach HT, Braun W, Herring RD: Studies on the variation of Bacterium tularense. J Bacteriol. 1951, 5: 557-569.Google Scholar
- Larsson P, Oyston PCF, Chain P, Chu MC, Duffield M, Fuxelius H, Garcia E, Hälltorp G, Johansson D, Isherwood KE, Karp PD, Larsson E, Liu Y, Michell S, Prior J, Prior R, Malfatti S, Sjöstedt A, Svensson K, Thompson N, Vergez L, Wagg JK, Wren BW, Lindler LE, Andersson SGE, Forsman M, Titball RW: The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia. Nat Genet. 2005, 37: 153-159. 10.1038/ng1499.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farlow J, Smith KL, Wong J, Abrams M, Lytle M, Keim P: Francisella tularensis strain typing using multiple-locus, variable-number tandem repeat analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 3186-3192. 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3186-3192.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Johansson A, Farlow J, Larsson P, Dukerich M, Chambers E, Byström M, Fox J, Chu M, Forsman M, Sjöstedt A, Keim P: Worldwide genetic relationships among Francisella tularensis isolates determined by multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 5808-5818. 10.1128/JB.186.17.5808-5818.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pandya GA, Holmes MH, Petersen JM, Pradhan S, Karamycheva SA, Wolcott MJ, Molins C, Jones M, Schriefer ME, Fleischmann RD, Peterson SN: Whole genome single nucleotide polymorphism based phylogeny of Francisella tularensis and its application to the development of a strain typing assay. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9: 213-10.1186/1471-2180-9-213. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-213View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Staples JE, Kubota KA, Chalcraft LG, Mead PS, Petersen JM: Epidemiologic and molecular analysis of human tularemia, United States, 1964–2004. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12: 1113-1118. 10.3201/eid1207.051504.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Svensson K, Larsson P, Johansson D, Byström M, Forsman M, Johansson A: Evolution of subspecies of Francisella tularensis. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 3903-3908. 10.1128/JB.187.11.3903-3908.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vogler AJ, Birdsell D, Price LB, Bowers JR, Beckstrom-Sternberg SM, Auerbach RK, Beckstrom-Sternberg JS, Johansson A, Clare A, Buchhagen JL, Petersen JM, Pearson T, Vaissaire J, Dempsey MP, Foxall P, Engelthaler DM, Wagner DM, Keim P: Phylogeography of Francisella tularensis: global expansion of a highly fit clone. J Bacteriol. 2009, 8: 2474-2484.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kugeler KJ, Mead PS, Janusz AM, Staples JE, Kubota KA, Chalcraft LG, Petersen JM: Molecular epidemiology of Francisella tularensis in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 48: 863-870. 10.1086/597261.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersen JM, Molins CR: Subpopulations of Francisella tularensis ssp. tularensis and holarctica: identification and associated epidemiology. Future Microbiol. 2010, 5: 649-661. 10.2217/fmb.10.17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Molins CR, Delorey MJ, Yockey BM, Young JW, Sheldon SW, Reese SM, Schriefer ME, Petersen JM: Virulence differences among Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis clades in mice. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e10205-10.1371/journal.pone.0010205. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010205View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Twine SM, Shen H, Kelly JF, Chen W, Sjöstedt A, Conlan JW: Virulence comparison in mice of distinct isolates of type A Francisella tularensis. Microb Pathog. 2006, 4: 133-138.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Molins CR, Delorey MJ, Young JW, Yockey BM, Belisle JT, Schriefer ME, Petersen JM: Use of temperature for standardizing the progression of Francisella tularensis in mice. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e45310-10.1371/journal.pone.0045310. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045310View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- National Research Council: Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 1996, Washington D.C: National Academy Press, 1-118.Google Scholar
- Bell JF, Owen CR, Larson CL: Virulence of Bacterium tularense. I. A study of the virulence of Bacterium tularense in mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits. J Infect Dis. 1955, 97: 162-166. 10.1093/infdis/97.2.162.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/14/67/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.