Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection in Libya: results from a national population based survey

  • Mohamed A Daw1, 3Email author,
  • Abdallah El-Bouzedi2 and
  • In association with Libyan Study Group of Hepatitis & HIV
BMC Infectious Diseases201414:17

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-17

Received: 10 June 2013

Accepted: 2 January 2014

Published: 9 January 2014

Editor's Note

An expression of concern to this article has been published in BMC Infectious Diseases (2015, 15:73). The expression of concern can be found here: http://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-015-0772-8

Abstract

Background

Libya is one of the largest countries in Africa and has the longest coast in the Mediterranean basin facing southern Europe. High rates of prevalence of viral hepatitis have been observed in various regions in Africa, but the prevalence in Libya is not well documented. We report on a large-scale nationwide study that evaluated the epidemiology of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in Libya and assessed the risk factors involved.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out in 2008 on 65,761 individuals all over Libya. The country was divided into 12 regions according to the population density and sampling within each region was carried out under the supervision of the National Centre for Prevention of Infectious Diseases. Serum samples were collected from both males and females of all ages in both urban and rural areas and tested for HBsAg for hepatitis B and anti-HCV antibody for hepatitis C. Prevalence rates were determined in regions and in different groups and correlated with different demographic and risk factors involved in the spread of these viruses.

Results

The prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses varied regionally across the country. The overall prevalence of hepatitis B was 2.2% (95% CI 2.1%-2.3%) and was higher among males than females (1.4:1.0). Hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence was 1.2% (95% CI 1.1-1.3) and it increased gradually after the age of 30 years (0.7-0.9% for < 30 years; 3.6% for ≥ 60 years). Prevalence of HBsAg was 0.8-0.9% below the age of 10 years, and higher but similar in older age groups (2.3-2.7%). There was an association between literacy and prevalence of hepatitis, particularly for HCV. Hospital admission, surgical operation, blood transfusion, and intravenous drug use were the main risk factors, and they were associated independently with a higher prevalence rate of viral hepatitis.

Conclusions

Libya may be considered an area of low-intermediate endemicity for hepatitis B virus infection, with lower rates in young age groups, and an area of low endemicity for hepatitis C. The prevalence of hepatitis B and C across Libya is not homogeneous, with indications of the effect of the higher rates in some neighbouring countries. Libya should adopt full coverage national plans and guidelines to face the future consequences of viral hepatitis, particularly hepatitis C virus.

Keywords

Hepatitis B virus Hepatitis C virus Libya Prevalence HBsAg Anti-HCV-Ab

Background

Hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV) are the major causes of liver diseases in the world. The relative importance of HBV and HCV infections varies greatly from one part of the world to another and changes over time [1]. Worldwide, over two billion people are infected by HBV alone, of whom about one million die annually. Hepatitis C virus affects about 200 million people [2]. However, in many countries its prevalence is expected to surpass that of hepatitis B, particularly among certain risk groups that are vulnerable to both hepatitis B and C viruses [3].

The endemicity of HBV infection varies greatly over the world, from highly endemic areas (> 8% infection rate), to intermediate (2-8%) and low endemicity areas (< 2%). Africa is among the highly endemic areas, but some countries in the north fall in the intermediate category, with an average rate of about 7%, whereas most regions of west and east Africa are highly endemic areas with chronic infection rates of 7-10% [4]. In some countries, such as Senegal, a large part of the population will be exposed in the course of their lives to HBV and become infected [5]. All of central and southern Africa is also in the high endemicity category [6]. Few studies evaluated the status of HBV in Libya. In 2000, Daw et al. [7] reported a HBV prevalence of 10% among hospital health-care workers and that infection was associated with certain occupational risk factors.

Hepatitis C virus infection is a major public health problem [8, 9]. African countries have among the highest prevalence rates of HCV in the world, ranging from 1 to 26% [10, 11]. More than 28 million people are chronically infected with HCV in this continent, and it is difficult to speculate about current and future trends [3, 12]. In Libya, one study reported that the prevalence of HCV among different populations varied according to the risk factor involved [13]. Recently, a comprehensive study was carried out on HCV genotypes in Libya. Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 was the predominant one, followed by HCV genotype 1 and then other less common genotypes [14]. However, further studies are needed to clarify the magnitude and impact of HCV in Libya.

Viral hepatitis has tremendous socioeconomic, health-care and even political repercussions. A better understanding of the epidemiology of viral hepatitis and the risk factors involved is among the priorities of any nation [15, 16]. Reliable epidemiological data on prevalence rates and transmission routes [17, 18] of viral hepatitis are essential for designing national control policies. The epidemiological data in Africa are scanty and vary greatly from one region to another [4]. Therefore, each country should adopt its own strategy to combat viral hepatitis.

Libya has an area of 1,775,500 km2 and a population reported in mid 2006 as 5,323,991, giving a population density of 2.9 persons per km2. The country boasts the highest literacy and educational enrolment in North Africa and among the Arab nations [19, 20]. Life expectancy (73 years) and health-adjusted life expectancy (64 years) are among the best in the Middle East and North Africa [19, 21]. Nevertheless, Libyan health services have been hampered by bureaucracy and lack of proper long-term planning [20, 22]. Both Libyan and international medical experts have voiced concerns about the potential for increases in infection, particularly viral hepatitis and AIDS [23, 24].

Recent data on the prevalence of hepatitis B and C viruses and risk factors among the Libyan population are lacking. Such data are important for understanding the burden of viral infection and for predicting future trends. Implementation of surveillance to guide public health policy is needed to efficiently control viral hepatitis spread in this country, and this requires reliable epidemiological data. In this comprehensive nationwide study we determined the prevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infections among the Libyan population and analysed the risk factors.

Methods

Study population

We conducted a national cross-sectional study stratified by region and age. The sample size in each region was set ahead of the survey and recruitment continued until the sampling teams fulfilled the required sample size. Those enrolled from each region were selected randomly. Regional representativeness was fulfilled by classifying the country into 12 regions including all administrative divisions and sampling based on population proportions. Sample sizes of males, females and age strata were determined by multi-stage cluster sampling in each region proportional to regional populations according to the latest national census in 2003–2004. Teams of medical doctors and nurses established the sampling frames and collected the information and samples in all the regions as described in Table 1. The following targeted age strata were selected:

– < 6 years: Pre-school children (maternal and child care centres);

– 7–19 years: School age below university level (primary, preparatory and high schools);

– 20–49 years: University graduate and post graduate students (universities and health services centres);

– ≥ 50 years: Employed and retired personnel (different community and governmental sectors).
Table 1

Numbers of samples collected from the 12 Libyan regions

Region

Number

Percent

Ratio*

Albatnan

4996

7.6

1.80

Aljabal Alakhdar

5944

9.0

1.10

Benghazi

6938

10.6

1.10

Ajdabia

4963

7.5

1.10

Sirt

3871

5.9

1.75

Misrata

4966

7.6

1.90

Almergeb

4913

7.5

1.10

Tarhuna

5023

7.6

1.10

Tripoli

8013

12.2

1.10

Alzawia

5022

7.6

1.80

West mountain

5752

8.7

1.10

Fezzan

5360

8.2

1.90

Total sample

65761

100

1.10

*Ratio of individuals testing positive for hepatitis B and C viruses to the total population in each region.

Demographic and epidemiological data questionnaire

Sample size calculations were based on the prevalence of HCV and HBV infections in prior studies in Libya. To detect a two-fold increase in prevalence among the lowest prevalence expected for HCV 1/1000 in each age group as compared with the next age, a sample of 25,476 has a power of 80% (beta error <0.2) to detect this difference at the alpha = 0.05 level (one-sided). A total sample of 51,000 would allow estimation of these parameters independently for males and females.

Individuals confirmed to be infected with HCV were referred to the main teaching hospitals in the major regions: Tripoli Central Hospital and Tripoli Medical Centre for western and central regions, Benghazi Medical Centre for the eastern regions, and Sebha Medical Centre for Fezzan area. These hospitals receive all individuals who test positive for anti-HCV, HBV or HIV from all over the country as a policy run under the control of the Libyan National Health Authority.

The questionnaire sought information about age, gender, education, residence and occupation, as well as history of major invasive interventions, use of recreational intravenous drugs, and promiscuous sexual practices. The questionnaire was completed by each participant and those of a younger age were helped by their parents in the presence of medical doctors and social assistants, who recorded the needed information and coded the questionnaire.

Laboratory tests

A blood sample of 5-10 ml was collected and transported immediately to the local laboratory in a general hospital within the same region. Serum was prepared and stored at -20°C until tested as previously described [14].

All samples were tested for HBsAg and anti-HCV markers by using a third-generation enzyme immunoassay (Axsym; HCV EIA 3.0; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois, and HBsAg, Axsym) as previously published [14]. Samples that were positive for anti-HCV were retested by the same method, and only if the retest was positive were they considered as positive.

Statistical analysis

Data were coded and entered into a data base, which was then cleaned and verified. Data were analysed by using the Chi-square test with Yates' correction or Student's t-test for univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed by using logistic regression, with anti-HCV serologic results as the dependent variable (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Prevalence estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI) determined by using the Poisson distribution approximation [18]. A type I error of α = 0.05 was assumed. Sample weighting was later performed and a weight was calculated according to age and sex within each region.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Libyan National Ethical Committee (Approval No. LY NS; HV299789). It was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration [25] and under the supervision of the Libyan Centre for Disease Control. All participants signed an informed consent form witnessed by the local health office before collection of data and blood samples. The questionnaire used to collect demographic and epidemiological data (Additional file 1: Table S1) was anonymous and linked to the blood sample tube only by a code.

Results

The overall prevalence of HBsAg positivity was 2.2% (95% CI 2.1%-2.3%). The prevalence varied from one region to another (Figure 1). The rate was highest in Sirt (6.6%) and Tarhuna (3.4%), and lowest in Aljabel Alakhdar (1.0%), Benghazi (1.0%), and Ajdabia (1.4%). The overall prevalence of HCV was 1.2% but it varied from one region to another (Figure 1). The highest rates were in Fezzan (2.2%) and Albatnan (1.8%) and the lowest were in Misrata (0.6%), Sirt (1.0%) and Western Mountain (1.1%). The rate of HBV prevalence was significantly higher in males (2.6%; 95% CI 2.4-2.7) than in females (1.8%; 95% CI 1.6-1.9). The probability of being HBsAg positive was 1.4 times higher among males than females.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2334-14-17/MediaObjects/12879_2013_Article_2969_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Map of Libya showing the prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections by region.

The overall unweighted prevalence of HCV was 1.2% (95% CI 1.1-1.3), and it rose to 1.3% after weighting. For those aged > 20 years, the unweighted and weighted percentages were not significantly different (1.5% and 1.6%, respectively). The prevalence rate was slightly higher among females than males but the difference was not statistically significant. The prevalence rates weighted for other factors (age group, education, marital status, type of dwelling, and risk exposure) are shown in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Figure 2 shows the prevalence of HBV and HCV among the Libyan population according to age. The prevalence of anti-HCV was stable at 0.8-0.9% until the age of 30 years, after which it rose steadily, reaching 2.7% in those above the age of 50 years. In contrast, the prevalence of HBsAg was lowest in the youngest age group (0.9%), and in the older groups it fluctuated between 2.0% and 2.9% without any evident temporal trend. However, it rose sharply after the age of 70 years.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2334-14-17/MediaObjects/12879_2013_Article_2969_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections by age, Libya, 2008.

The overall prevalence rates of HCV in males and females were similar (1.1% and 1.3%, respectively). The mean ages of anti-HCV positive females (31.7 ± 18.4 years) and males (35.6 + 20.9 years) were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than those of HBsAg positive females (26.3 + 16.8 years) and males (30.0 + 17.6 years). The mean age of HCV positive individuals was significantly higher than that of anti-HCV negative individuals for both males (almost 10 years difference) and females (7 years difference). The mean age of HBsAg positive individuals was also significantly higher (but to a lesser degree) among females (by < 2 years) and males (by < 4 years). More than 50% of the HBsAg positive individuals and about 40% of HCV positive cases were below 30 years of age.

The associations between hepatitis B and C virus infections and various factors are shown in Table 2. Hepatitis B virus was more prevalent among the illiterate group (2.9%) than among the literate groups: 1.6% among postgraduates and 2.3% among preparatory school students. The prevalence of HCV was also higher among the illiterate group (3.1%) whereas in the literate groups it ranged from 0.9% to 1.1%. The influence of marital status and living standard on the prevalence of hepatitis B and C is shown in Figure 3. Hepatitis B was more prevalent among the widowed, whereas HCV was more prevalent among single and younger individuals.
Table 2

Association between hepatitis B and C virus infections and influencing factors among the Libyan population

 

HCV

HBsAg

  

OR

95.0% C.I.

  

OR

95.0% C.I.

 

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Age group (years) relative to < 6

6-10

 

0.74

0.46

1.18

 

1.21

0.79

1.86

11-20

 

0.91

0.67

1.24

 

3.36

2.5

4.52

21-30

 

0.88

0.63

1.22

 

3.01

2.21

4.1

31-40

 

1.41

1.01

1.96

 

3.14

2.28

4.32

41-50

 

1.87

1.32

2.64

 

3.77

2.7

5.26

51-60

 

2.36

1.65

3.37

 

3.7

2.59

5.28

61-70

 

3.27

2.17

4.93

 

3.34

2.13

5.24

>70

 

3.32

2.01

5.49

 

5.69

3.54

9.15

Males vs females

 

0.86

0.74

0.99

 

1.51

1.35

1.68

Hospital admission

 

1.32

1.09

1.61

    

Dental procedure

 

0.84

0.71

0.99

 

0.85

0.76

0.96

Blood transfusion

 

1.55

1.22

1.97

    

Intravenous drug use

 

6.41

2.27

18.07

 

0

0

-

Surgery

 

1.35

1.08

1.67

    

Family HBV

 

1.52

1

2.3

 

1.97

1.46

2.64

Haemodialysis

 

4.37

1.71

11.2

    

Contact with HBV

     

1.66

1.23

2.23

Skin piercing

     

1.36

1

1.83

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2334-14-17/MediaObjects/12879_2013_Article_2969_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections by demographic and social variables, Libya, 2008. A. Gender B. Education C. Marital Status D. Type of housing.

We also analysed the influence of risk factors, such as hospital admission, surgical operation, blood transfusion, intravenous drug use, and sexual behaviour, on the prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C (Figure 4). Hepatitis B virus was most prevalent among those with previous surgical operations (2.4%) or history of hospital admission (2.4%), followed by blood transfusion (2.1%) and promiscuous sexual behaviour (1.6%). Hepatitis C was most prevalent among intravenous drug users (7.4%) and less prevalent but still substantial in those undergoing blood transfusion (2.7%), surgical operation (2.3%) or hospital admission (1.9%).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2334-14-17/MediaObjects/12879_2013_Article_2969_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections by risk factors, Libya, 2008 *Statistically significant at 0.05.

Table 3 shows the distribution of the estimated seroprevalence of HBV and HCV according to demographic characteristics. There were minimal differences in the estimated number of cases between males and females for HCV, but more than 60% of the estimated number of HBsAg positive individuals were males. Over 50% of them were below 30 years old, and about 40% of HCV cases were also below that age. In terms of educational level, the highest prevalence rate of infection was among illiterates for both viruses (weighted prevalence 2.6% for HBsAg, representing 12.3% of all estimated cases, and 3.0% for HCV, representing 21.8% of all estimated cases).
Table 3

Number of persons chronically infected by HBV and of anti-HCV positive individuals in Libya according to age, socio-demographic factors and risk factors

 

Nationwide estimated number of HBsAg positive persons

Nationwide estimated number of anti-HCV positive persons

 

n

%

n

%

Total

107,848

100

68,275

100.0

Gender

    

Females

42,297

39.2

34,845

51.0

Males

65,551

60.8

33,430

49.0

Age groups

    

≤ 5

4,861

4.5

4,699

6.9

6-10

4,110

3.8

3,881

5.7

11-20

26,148

24.2

8,889

13.0

21-30

26,153

24.2

10,147

14.9

31-40

20,139

18.7

13,966

20.5

41-50

11,436

10.6

9,738

14.3

51-60

6,856

6.4

6,633

9.7

61-70

3,613

3.4

6,415

9.4

≥71

4,532

4.2

3,907

5.7

Education

    

Below school age

4,957

4.6

5,235

7.7

Illiterate

13,318

12.3

14,850

21.8

Preparatory

34,927

32.4

20,685

30.3

High school

34,389

31.9

17,214

25.2

University

16,118

14.9

7,544

11.0

Post graduate

1,769

1.6

981

1.4

Unknown

2,370

2.2

1,766

2.6

Marital status

    

Married

39,844

36.9

32,605

47.8

Single

42,551

39.5

17,845

26.1

Widowed

1,425

1.3

3,403

5.0

Divorced

913

0.8

470

0.7

Below age

21,434

19.9

12,828

18.8

Unknown

1,681

1.6

1,124

1.6

Type of dwelling

    

Villa

13,545

12.6

6,944

10.2

Apartment

10,491

9.7

10,480

15.3

Rural house

80,646

74.8

49,398

72.4

Other

118

0.1

104

0.2

Unknown

3,048

2.8

1,349

2.0

Discussion

The few studies on the prevalence of hepatitis B and C viruses in Libya examined specific population groups, such as parturient women and their newborns [26], healthcare workers, blood donors, transfusion patients [13] and hemodialysis patients [27], or other issues such as prevalence of genotypes [14]. However, none of these studies lend themselves to extrapolation to the general population, and our study, the first of its kind in Libya and the largest in Africa, was done to provide a basis for prioritising public health measures in Libya.

In the European Mediterranean countries, the overall prevalence of HBV ranges between 2.5% and 3.5% [28, 29]. In contrast, North Africa is overall an area of relatively high HBV endemicity. Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco fall in the intermediate category, with current infection rates of about 7% [30]. But Egypt is classified among the highest endemicity countries, along with Sudan, Chad and Niger, all of which neighbour Libya [31, 32]. The lower prevalence rate of HBV we observed (2.2%) classifies Libya in the lower part of the low-intermediate endemicity class (2-7% category). This lower rate could be due to the better socioeconomic conditions and the early efforts by the National Prevention Program of Infectious Diseases in Libya. Vaccination against HBV infection has been strongly encouraged and offered free of charge in Libya since 1989, and in 1991 it became compulsory for infants 3 months of age and children 12 years of age.

Hepatitis C is an emerging problem among the Mediterranean countries, where the estimated prevalence ranges from 1.0-2.6%, and isolated areas in Italy and Greece have rates of 7-20% among the general adult population [33, 34]. A similar picture was also found in Tunisia and Morocco, where the rates ranged from 1.7 to 2.9%, with higher rates in some regions [35, 36]. Hepatitis C virus screening and surveillance is minimal at the national level in these countries. In Libya, a study conducted between 1991 and 2001 indicated that the prevalence of HCV ranged from 1.2% to 1.6% among blood donors and healthy individuals but was much higher (20.5%) among hospital personnel [13]. The 1.2% rate we observed in our country-wide study classifies Libya as a low endemicity country. Libya has made screening mandatory for all blood donors, pregnant women, and patients at high risk of having surgery, and has introduced a national registry system covering all positive individuals.

We were not surprised by the substantial regional variation in prevalence rate in Libya. Such variation has also been reported in other Mediterranean countries, such as Italy, Greece and Spain [3739]. The variation observed in Libya is probably related to different factors, including socioeconomic conditions, but one particular observation is noteworthy. The prevalence of HCV was highest in the southern region of Fezzan (2.08%) and the eastern region of Albatnan (1.77%). The high prevalence in the southern region could be related to its proximity to sub-Saharan countries and the hosting of many African immigrants. Likewise, the eastern region of Albatnan borders Egypt, which has the highest prevalence rate of HCV in the world [40, 41], and from where many workers, both legitimate and illegal, come to Libya.

In Libya, the prevalence of HBV was low in children < 10 years of age (0.8%), and in the other age groups it ranged from 2.0 to 2.9%. In most other African countries the prevalence is high among infants and increases rapidly until the age of 30 years, and it rises even higher among those over forty years old [5, 6, 42]. The lower rate in the Libyan population could be due to the compulsory children vaccination program, which was introduced earlier in Libya than in other African countries.

The overall prevalence of HCV in our study was not significantly different between females and males, and it increased gradually after the age of 30 years. This is in agreement with previous studies carried out in Libya, which showed a peak in the prevalence of HCV among those 46-55 years old [13]. Other studies, particularly from North America, also showed the highest prevalence in the 30-49 year age group in all racial groups [43, 44].

We also analysed the risk factors associated with HBV and HCV infections. The influence of risk factors on the prevalence rate was evident for HCV. The prevalence rate among those with risk factors ranged from 1.9 to 7.4%, whereas among those without risk factors it was 1.3% (p < 0.025). The most prominent risk factor was intravenous drug use, with 7.4% of intravenous drug users testing positive for HCV. In this context, it is important to note that active drug users are less likely to participate in health surveys, and the actual overall prevalence rate is likely higher than the observed rate [45, 46]. A recent study on ~1200 Libyan patients chronically infected with HCV correlated genotypes with risk factors. That study indicated that recent drug use was significantly linked to emergence of new genotypes, lending further credence to the role of intravenous drug use in HCV transmission in Libya [13]. Accordingly, we expect that the prevalence of HCV may increase in Libya because there is consensus that HCV-infected populations are heavily weighted towards intravenous drug use worldwide [4749].

Our findings show that the prevalence rates of HBV and HCV in Libya are relatively low, and this could be an indicator of the success of the national efforts to control these infections. However, we only assessed a marker of the prevalence of HBV chronic infection (HBsAg), which represents the reservoir of infection and of future complications (cirrhosis and liver cancer). We did not estimate the proportion of those who had ever been infected in Libya, which can be estimated by testing for serum anti-HBc antibodies. Moreover, the higher rates in regions bordering high endemicity countries and the poorly controlled state of these borders can lead to an increase in prevalence, especially during this time when the country as whole is experiencing many difficulties. Continuous surveillance and maintenance of the national program for combating hepatitis are essential, and further studies are needed, particularly on co-infection with HIV, which is a problem in this region. Our findings would be useful for making estimates and projections about the overall disease burden, including the complications of hepatitis infection, such as cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma [50]. Recently, El-Bouzedi [51] constructed a mathematical model using published epidemiological data on viral hepatitis to estimate the future consequences of hepatitis infection in Libya. Such modelling will inform health policy, resource allocation and healthcare delivery and may improve the management of patients with viral hepatitis.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

We are deeply grateful to the Libyan Study Group of Hepatitis & HIV and the National Centre for Disease Prevention for their advice and help in this survey. Special thanks go to Dr. Amin Bredan, Inflammation Research Centre, VIB & Ghent University, Belgium, for his professional contribution in reading, correcting and editing the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine
(2)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Biotechnology
(3)
Professor of Clinical Microbiology & Microbial Epidemiology, Acting Physician of Internal Medicine, Scientific Coordinator of Libyan National Surveillance Studies of Viral hepatitis & HIV

References

  1. Te HS, Jensen DM: Epidemiology of hepatitis B and C viruses: a global overview. Clin Liver Dis. 2010, 14 (1): 1-21. 10.1016/j.cld.2009.11.009. viiView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Parry J: At last a global response to viral hepatitis. Bull World Health Organ. 2010, 88: 801-802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Daw M, Dau A: Hepatitis C in Arab world: a state of cencern. Scientific World Journal. 2012, 2012: 719494-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Lavanchy D: Hepatitis B virus epidemiology, disease burden, treatment, and current and emerging prevention and control measures. J Viral Hepat. 2004, 11 (2): 97-107. 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2003.00487.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rey-Cuille MA, Seck A, Njouom R, Chartier L, Sow HD M, Ka AS, Njankouo M, Rousset D, Giles-Vernick T, et al: Low immune response to hepatitis B vaccine among children in Dakar, Senegal. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (5): e38153-10.1371/journal.pone.0038153.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Abdel-Hady M, Kelly D: Chronic hepatitis B in children and adolescents: epidemiology and management. Paediatr Drugs. 2013, 15 (4): 311-317. 10.1007/s40272-013-0010-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Daw MA, Siala IM, Warfalli MM, Muftah MI: Seroepidemiology of hepatitis B virus markers among hospital health care workers. Analysis of certain potential risk factors. Saudi Med J. 2000, 21 (12): 1157-1160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jafari N, Farajzadegan Z, Ataei B: Surveillance system for hepatitis C infection: a practical approach. Int J Prev Med. 2012, 3 (Suppl 1): S48-57.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Miller ER, McNally S, Wallace J, Schlichthorst M: The ongoing impacts of hepatitis c–a systematic narrative review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2012, 12: 672-10.1186/1471-2458-12-672.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Muhlberger N, Schwarzer R, Lettmeier B, Sroczynski G, Zeuzem S, Siebert U: HCV-related burden of disease in Europe: a systematic assessment of incidence, prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9: 34-10.1186/1471-2458-9-34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. WHO: Global surveillance and control of hepatitis C. Report of a WHO Consultation organized in collaboration with the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board, Antwerp, Belgium. J Viral Hepat. 1999, 6 (1): 35-47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Abdelwahab SF, Hashem M, Galal I, Sobhy M, Abdel-Ghaffar TS, Galal G, Mikhail N, El-Kamary SS, Waked I, Strickland GT: Incidence of hepatitis C virus infection among Egyptian healthcare workers at high risk of infection. J Clin Virol. 2013, 57 (1): 24-28. 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.01.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Daw MA, Elkaber MA, Drah AM, Werfalli MM, Mihat AA, Siala IM: Prevalence of hepatitis C virus antibodies among different populations of relative and attributable risk. Saudi Med J. 2002, 23 (11): 1356-1360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Elasifer HA, Agnnyia YM, Al-Alagi BA, Daw MA: Epidemiological manifestations of hepatitis C virus genotypes and its association with potential risk factors among Libyan patients. Virol J. 2010, 7: 317-10.1186/1743-422X-7-317.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Kershenobich D, Razavi HA, Cooper CL, Alberti A, Dusheiko GM, Pol S, Zuckerman E, Koike K, Han KH, Wallace CM, et al: Applying a system approach to forecast the total hepatitis C virus-infected population size: model validation using US data. Liver Int. 2011, 31 (Suppl 2): 4-17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Remis R: Final Report. Community Acquired Infections Division, Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control. Public Health Agency of Canada. 2009Google Scholar
  17. Daw MA, Dau AA, Agnan MM: Influence of healthcare-associated factors on the efficacy of hepatitis C therapy. Scientific World Journal. 2012, 2012: 580216-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Heisey-Grove DM, Church DR, Haney GA, Demaria A: Enhancing surveillance for hepatitis C through public health informatics. Public Health Rep. 2011, 126 (1): 13-18.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamdy A: ICT in Education in Libya. 2007, Libya Country Report: Survey of ICT and Education in Africa, http://www.infodev.org,Google Scholar
  20. El Oakley RM, Ghrew MH, Aboutwerat AA, Alageli NA, Neami KA, Kerwat RM, Elfituri AA, Ziglam HM, Saifenasser AM, Bahron AM, et al: Consultation on the Libyan health systems: towards patient-centred services. Libyan J Med. 2013, 8:Google Scholar
  21. Clark N: Education in Libya. 2004, World Eduction News and Reviews: World Education Services, http://www.wes.org/ewenr/PF/04Jul/PFPractical.htm,Google Scholar
  22. El Taguri A, Elkhammas E, Bakoush O, Ashammakhi N, Baccoush M, Betilmal I: Libyan National Health Services The Need to Move to Management-by-Objectives. Libyan J Med. 2008, 3 (2): 113-121.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Bagasra O, Alsayari M, Bullard-Dillard R, Daw MA: The Libyan HIV Outbreak How do we find the truth?. Libyan J Med. 2007, 2 (2): 57-62. 10.4176/070221.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Daw M, Elkhammas E: Libyan medical education; time to move forward. Libyan J Med. 2008, 3 (1): 1-3. 10.4176/071208.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. World Medical Association Ethics Unit: 2009, http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html,
  26. Daw MA, Elwarvelli MM, Siala IM, Backush M, Elussabie H: Prevalence of HBsAg among Libyan populations: a comparative study. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 2001, 21: 130-132.Google Scholar
  27. Alashek WA, Christopher W, McIntyre CW, Taal MW: Hepatitis B and C infection in haemodialysis patients in Libya: prevalence, incidence and risk factors. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2012, 12: 265-10.1186/1471-2334-12-265. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-265View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Karatapanis S, Skorda L, Marinopoulos S, Papastergiou V, Drogosi M, Lisgos P, Antsaklis A: Higher rates of chronic hepatitis B infection and low vaccination-induced protection rates among parturients escaping HBsAg prenatal testing in Greece: a 2-year prospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012, 24 (8): 878-883. 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328354834f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Romano L, Velati C, Cambie G, Fomiatti L, Galli C, Zanetti AR: Hepatitis B virus infection among first-time blood donors in Italy: prevalence and correlates between serological patterns and occult infection. Blood Transfus. 2013, 11 (2): 281-288.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Ezzikouri S, Pineau P, Benjelloun S: Hepatitis B virus in the Maghreb region: from epidemiology to prospective research. Liver Int. 2013, 33 (6): 811-819. 10.1111/liv.12135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Barth RE, Huijgen Q, Taljaard J, Hoepelman AI: Hepatitis B/C and HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: an association between highly prevalent infectious diseases. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2010, 14 (12): e1024-1031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wasfi O, Sadek N: Prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C virus antibodies among blood donors in Alexandria. Egypt. East Mediterr Health J. 2011, 17 (3): 238-242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Goritsas C, Plerou I, Agaliotis S, Spinthaki R, Mimidis K, Velissaris D, Lazarou N, Labropoulou-Karatza C: HCV infection in the general population of a Greek island: prevalence and risk factors. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000, 47 (33): 782-785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Raffaele A, Valenti M, Iovenitti M, Matani A, Bruno ML, Altobelli E, D'Alessandro A, Barnabei R, Leonardis B, Taglieri G: High prevalence of HCV infection among the general population in a rural area of central Italy. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001, 17 (1): 41-46. 10.1023/A:1010932832190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Benouda A, Boujdiya Z, Ahid S, Abouqal R, Adnaoui M: [Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in Morocco and serological tests assessment of detection for the viremia prediction]. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2009, 57 (5): 368-372. 10.1016/j.patbio.2008.07.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Mejri S, Salah AB, Triki H, Alaya NB, Djebbi A, Dellagi K: Contrasting patterns of hepatitis C virus infection in two regions from Tunisia. J Med Virol. 2005, 76 (2): 185-193. 10.1002/jmv.20342.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Cozzolongo R, Osella AR, Elba S, Petruzzi J, Buongiorno G, Giannuzzi V, Leone G, Bonfiglio C, Lanzilotta E, Manghisi OG, et al: Epidemiology of HCV infection in the general population: a survey in a southern Italian town. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009, 104 (11): 2740-2746. 10.1038/ajg.2009.428.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Garcia-Fulgueiras A, Tormo MJ, Rodriguez T, Perez-Flores D, Chirlaque D, Navarro C: Prevalence of hepatitis B and C markers in the south-east of Spain: an unlinked community-based serosurvey of 2,203 adults. Scand J Infect Dis. 1996, 28 (1): 17-20. 10.3109/00365549609027143.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Gogos CA, Fouka KP, Nikiforidis G, Avgeridis K, Sakellaropoulos G, Bassaris H, Maniatis A, Skoutelis A: Prevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infection in the general population and selected groups in South-Western Greece. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003, 18 (6): 551-557.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Breban R, Doss W, Esmat G, Elsayed M, Hellard M, Ayscue P, Albert M, Fontanet A, Mohamed MK: Towards realistic estimates of HCV incidence in Egypt. J Viral Hepat. 2013, 20 (4): 294-296. 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2012.01650.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Guerra J, Garenne M, Mohamed MK, Fontanet A: HCV burden of infection in Egypt: results from a nationwide survey. J Viral Hepat. 2012, 19 (8): 560-567. 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01576.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Triki H, Said N, Ben Salah A, Arrouji A, Ben Ahmed F, Bouguerra A, Hmida S, Dhahri R, Dellagi K: Seroepidemiology of hepatitis B, C and delta viruses in Tunisia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1997, 91 (1): 11-14. 10.1016/S0035-9203(97)90374-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim WR: The burden of hepatitis C in the United States. Hepatology. 2002, 36 (5 Suppl 1): S30-34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Uhanova J, Tate RB, Tataryn DJ, Minuk GY: A population-based study of the epidemiology of hepatitis C in a North American population. J Hepatol. 2012, 57 (4): 736-742. 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.05.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Havens JR, Lofwall MR, Frost SD, Oser CB, Leukefeld CG, Crosby RA: Individual and network factors associated with prevalent hepatitis C infection among rural Appalachian injection drug users. Am J Public Health. 2012, 103 (1): e44-52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wong NS, Chan PC, Lee SS, Lee SL, Lee CK: A multilevel approach for assessing the variability of hepatitis C prevalence in injection drug users by their gathering places. Int J Infect Dis. 2013, 17 (3): e193-198. 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.10.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. McDonald SA, Hutchinson SJ, Schnier C, McLeod A, Goldberg DJ: Estimating the number of injecting drug users in Scotland's HCV-diagnosed population using capture-recapture methods. Epidemiol Infect. 2014, 142 (1): 200-207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sood A, Sarin SK, Midha V, Hissar S, Sood N, Bansal P, Bansal M: Prevalence of hepatitis C virus in a selected geographical area of northern India: a population based survey. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2012, 31 (5): 232-236. 10.1007/s12664-012-0251-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Szabo SM, Bibby M, Yuan Y, Donato BM, Jimenez-Mendez R, Castaneda-Hernandez G, Rodriguez-Torres M, Levy AR: The epidemiologic burden of hepatitis C virus infection in Latin America. Ann Hepatol. 2012, 11 (5): 623-635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hagan LM, Schinazi RF: Best strategies for global HCV eradication. Liver Int. 2013, 33 (Suppl 1): 68-79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. El-Bouzedi A: Investigation and modeling the epidemiology of hepatitis C virus in Libya, Ph D Thesis. 2012, United Kingdom: University of Glamorgan, Faculty of Advanced TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  52. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/14/17/prepub

Copyright

© Daw and El-Bouzedi; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement