No excess risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with serological markers of previous infection with Coxiella burnetii: evidence from the Danish National Birth Cohort
© Nielsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 18 September 2012
Accepted: 14 February 2013
Published: 17 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Stine Yde Nielsen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Massung|
|7 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janna Munster|
|9 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wim van der Hoek|
|22 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Stine Yde Nielsen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|17 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-13-87|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.