Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Differences in fungi present in induced sputum samples from asthma patients and non-atopic controls: a community based case control study

  • Hugo Cornelis van Woerden1Email author,
  • Clive Gregory1Email author,
  • Richard Brown2,
  • Julian Roberto Marchesi2,
  • Bastiaan Hoogendoorn1 and
  • Ian Price Matthews1
BMC Infectious Diseases201313:69

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-69

Received: 10 August 2012

Accepted: 28 January 2013

Published: 5 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mihai Mares
6 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Valentina Arsic Arsenijevic
9 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Clive Gregory
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
28 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
5 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-13-69

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Primary Care & Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd
(2)
Cardiff School of Bioscience

Advertisement