Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

An update of “Cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in the Netherlands: the results of a Consensus Rotavirus Vaccine model”

  • Hong Anh T Tu1Email author,
  • Mark H Rozenbaum1,
  • Pieter T de Boer1,
  • Albert C Noort1 and
  • Maarten J Postma1
Contributed equally
BMC Infectious Diseases201313:54

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-54

Received: 23 July 2012

Accepted: 17 January 2013

Published: 30 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
23 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kow-Tong Chen
12 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elmira Flem
5 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zhao-jun Duan
13 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Maarten Postma
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elmira Flem
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
30 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-13-54

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto