An update of “Cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in the Netherlands: the results of a Consensus Rotavirus Vaccine model”
- Hong Anh T Tu†1Email author,
- Mark H Rozenbaum†1,
- Pieter T de Boer1,
- Albert C Noort1 and
- Maarten J Postma1
© Tu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 23 July 2012
Accepted: 17 January 2013
Published: 30 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kow-Tong Chen|
|12 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elmira Flem|
|5 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zhao-jun Duan|
|13 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Maarten Postma|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elmira Flem|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|30 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-13-54|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.