Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Bordetella pertussis in infants hospitalized for acute respiratory symptoms remains a concern

  • Ambra Nicolai1,
  • Raffaella Nenna1,
  • Paola Stefanelli2,
  • Anna Carannante2,
  • Concetta Schiavariello1,
  • Alessandra Pierangeli3,
  • Carolina Scagnolari3,
  • Corrado Moretti1,
  • Paola Papoff1,
  • Enea Bonci1,
  • Marianna Ferrara1,
  • Stefano Papasso1 and
  • Fabio Midulla1Email author
BMC Infectious Diseases201313:526

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-526

Received: 8 July 2013

Accepted: 30 October 2013

Published: 8 November 2013

Abstract

Background

Preliminary results suggest that pertussis infection might be considered in infants during a seasonal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) outbreak.

Methods

In order to analyze clinical features and laboratory findings in infants with pertussis hospitalized for acute respiratory symptoms during a seasonal RSV outbreak, we conducted a retrospective single-center study on 19 infants with pertussis (6 boys; median age 72 days) and 19 matched controls (RSV-bronchiolitis), hospitalized from October 2008 to April 2010. B. pertussis and RSV were detected from nasopharyngeal washes with Real Time-PCR.

Results

Infants with pertussis were less often breastfeed than infants with RSV bronchiolitis (63.2% vs 89.5%; p <0.06). Clinically, significantly fewer infants with pertussis than controls had more episodes of whooping cough (63.2% vs 0.0%; p < 0.001) and also less frequently fever at admission (15.8% vs 68.4%; p <0.01), apnea (52.6% vs 10.5%; p <0.006), and cyanosis (52.6% vs 10.5%; p < 0.006). Infants with pertussis had more often no abnormal chest sounds on auscultation than infants with RSV bronchiolitis (0% vs 42,1%; p < 0.005). The absolute blood lymphocyte and eosinophil counts were higher in infants with B. pertussis than in controls with bronchiolitis (23886 ± 16945 vs 10725 ± 4126 cells/mm3, p < 0.0001 and 13.653 ± 10.430 vs 4.730 ± 2.400 cells/mm3, p < 0.001). The molecular analysis of 2 B. pertussis isolates for ptxA1, ptxP3, and prn2 genes showed the presence of gene variants.

Conclusions

When infants are hospitalized for acute respiratory symptoms, physicians should suspect a pertussis infection, seek for specific clinical symptoms, investigate lymphocyte and eosinophil counts and thus diagnose infection early enough to allow treatment.

Keywords

Bronchiolitis Bordetella pertussis Infants Vaccine

Background

Pertussis is a major public health problem, affecting adolescents and adults as well as children. Despite a widespread vaccination program, over the past fifteen years was seen a return of pertussis worldwide [1]. Pertussis resurgence in Europe has been attributed to an incomplete immunization program or to genetic changes in Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis). [2] The currently used acellular pertussis vaccine contains the pertactin gene variant prn1 and the pertussis toxin-B S1 subunit [3, 4]. Molecular changes in these two genes over the past years suggest that the antigenic divergence may make pertussis vaccination less effective than before [5, 6].

In some countries pertussis immunization is not mandatory and in others vaccination schedules suggest the first dose to be given at the age of 3 months. Hence, some infants remain unimmunized or incompletely immunized. In those who are incompletely immunized pertussis may develop in an atypical clinical form and be difficult to diagnose. Pertussis can be especially difficult to diagnose in children under 1 year of age during winter season, when other pathogens, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), circulate. In these difficult cases, pertussis acute respiratory symptoms can overlap with those of bronchiolitis. A study conducted in a group of infants hospitalized for RSV bronchiolitis showed that almost 2% of the patients were co-infected with B. pertussis[7, 8]. Since B. pertussis-RSV co-infection is infrequent in young infants, physicians should keep the possibility of co-infections in mind as to diagnose it early and prevent bronchiolitis from becoming more severe [912].

Although the standard diagnostic criterion for identifying B. pertussis is culture obtained from nasal swabs or nasopharyngeal aspirates, confirmatory information comes nowdays from molecular techniques such as real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Usually, in clinical practice the diagnosis is generally reached without microbiological confirmation [13, 14]. What we conspicuously lack is the clinician’s awareness of the clinical and laboratory data needed to reach a suspected B. pertussis diagnosis in order to start treatment early.

The main purposes in our retrospective, single-center study were to describe and compare clinical and laboratory features in infants with pertussis infection to infants hospitalized for RSV bronchiolitis, and to analyze the genetic characteristics of B. pertussis.

Methods

Patients

In a retrospective single-center study, from a group of infants hospitalized from October 2008 to April 2010 at our Pediatric Emergency Department for acute respiratory symptoms we selected for study 19 consecutive infants aged less than 12 months (6 boys, median age 72 days, range 20-187) with Real Time-PCR confirmed pertussis. We also analyzed data for B. pertussis variants among hospitalized patients in whom B. pertussis was cultured. As a control group, we recruited 19 age- and sex-matched infants (6 boys, median age 71 days, range 20-183) from 164 infants, hospitalized during the same period with RT-PCR confirmed RSV bronchiolitis and negative for B. pertussis. The diagnosis of bronchiolitis was considered in infants less than 12 months with the first episode of acute infection of the lower respiratory tract. Infants with co-morbidity were excluded.

Detailed demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained from patients’ parents with a structured questionnaire and from medical files. Clinical outcome variables evaluated included gender, gestational age, birth weight, type of delivery, DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis) vaccination received, breast feeding history, age and weight at admission, number of siblings, siblings’ schooling, cough at admission (presence and duration), paroxysmal cough, presence of fever (body temperature >37.5°C), apnea and cyanosis, chest sounds, and hospitalization days. Laboratory outcome variables investigated were white blood-cell count (WBC), lymphocyte count, eosinophil count, neutrophil count, platelet count, hemoglobin (Hb), glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). At hospital admission, each infant was assigned a clinical severity score ranging from 0 to 8, according to respiratory rate (<45/min = 0, 45-60/min = 1, >60/min = 2), arterial oxygen saturation in room air (> 95% = 0, 95-90% = 1, < 90% = 2), retractions (none = 0, present = 1, present + nasal flare = 2), and ability to feed (normal = 0, reduced = 1, intravenous fluid replacement =2) [15].

All infants’ parents were asked to participate in the study and gave written informed consent. The study was approved by the Policlinico Umberto I institutional review board (Reference n° 2377/09.02.2012).

Nasal pharyngeal washing

From 1 to 3 days after hospitalization, all infants underwent nasal pharyngeal washing with 3 ml of sterile saline injected in each nostril and collected with a syringe. All samples were delivered at room temperature within 1-2 hours to the Department of Infectious, Parasitic & Immune-mediated Diseases at the Istituto Superiore di Sanità Rome to identify B. pertussis and to the Molecular Medicine Department, “Sapienza” University of Rome (Virology Laboratory), to identify RSV.

B. pertussisdetection

Pertussis was diagnosed using the Insertion Sequence (IS) IS481, and the ptxP gene as “target” genes [16]. For RealTime-PCR the SYBR Green Detection assay was performed using the LightCycler 2.0 (Roche Diagnostic). Data were analyzed with LightCycler software (version 4.0, Roche Diagnostic). All samples testing positive for B. pertussis were confirmed with the “Bordetella Real Time PCR” kit (Diagenode, Belgium). The specific primers and probes for detecting B. pertussis DNA with the commercially-available PCR kit (Diagenode, Belgium) were selected from the literature [17].

B. pertussis isolates were cultured on charcoal agar plates (Oxoid England) containing defibrinated sheep blood at 10% and incubated at 35°C up to 7 days, and inspected daily. The isolates were stored at -80°C in medium containing brain heart infusion (BHI, Oxoid England) supplemented with 15% glycerol. The chromosomal DNA from each B. pertussis strain was extracted using the QIAamp DNA minikit (QiaGEN, Hilden, Germany). To obtain gene molecular sequence data, the pertussis toxin S1 subunit (ptxA), pertussis toxin promoter (ptxP) and pertactin (prn) sequences were analyzed for two B. pertussis clinical isolates. The used primers are those described previously [2, 18, 19].

All the amplifications were done with the Mastercycler personal thermal cycler (Eppendorff, Hamburg, Germany). PtxA, ptxP and prn were amplified in 50 μl containing 5 μl of PCR buffer 10X (containing 15 mM of MgCl2), 50 mM MgSO4, 0.01 mM deoxynucleotide (dNTP, Finnzymes, Finlandia), 50 pmol of each primer and 0.5 U of HotStarTaq (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germania); 10% dimethyl sulfoxide was added also for the prn gene. The ptxA and ptxP genes were amplified with 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 s; 64°C (ptxA) and 60°C (ptxP) for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s; and the prn gene with 30 cycles at 95°C for 20 s, 55°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min. All amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis and purified with “QIAquick purification columns” kit (QIAGEN) for subsequent sequence analysis. Sequences were analyzed with BLAST program. The amino acid sequences resulting from the nucleotide sequences were compared using the DNAMAN program (version 5.2.10).

RSV detection

Upon arrival in the virological laboratory, the nasal washings were centrifuged to remove the mucus present in the sample and then divided into two aliquots. The first aliquot was used for nucleic acid extraction using a total nucleic acid isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and an RT-PCR panel that sought RSV and 13 more respiratory viruses: influenza A and B viruses, human coronavirus 0C43, 229E, NL-63, HUK1, adenovirus, parainfluenza virus 1-3, human-metapneumovirus, human-Bocavirus, and rhinovirus [14].

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using the SPSS program (version 17.0). Data were reported as median, range, mean, standard deviation, and percentage. Categorical variables were analyzed with Pearson chi-square (χ2) test and Fisher test continuous variables with the Mann-Whitney U test. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

No B. pertussis clustering was observed during the study. No significant differences were found between infants with confirmed B. pertussis and control infants with RSV-bronchiolitis for demographic characteristics including gender, gestational age, birth weight, type of delivery, DTaP vaccination status, age at admission, weight on admission, presence of siblings and schooling. The percentage of infants who were breast fed at hospitalization was lower in the group of infants with B. pertussis than in the one with RSV bronchiolitis (63.2% vs 89.5%, p <0.06) (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the 19 infants with pertussis and the 19 infants with RSV bronchiolitis

Demographic characteristics

Infants with pertussis

Infants with RSV bronchiolitis

p

Age at admission (days)

71.5 ± 48.0

71.4 ± 48.0

n.s.

Male:Female

6:13

6:13

n.s.

Siblings n° (%)

14 (73.7%)

12 (63.2%)

n.s.

Schooling n° (%)

11 (57.9%)

12 (63.2%)

n.s.

Gestational age median in weeks (range)

40 (36-42)

39 (37-42)

n.s.

Spontaneous delivery

12 (63.2%)

9 (57.9%)

n.s.

Weight at birth median in kg (range)

3.220 (2.100-4.000)

3.300 (2.130- 3.850)

n.s.

Weight at admission median in kg (range)

4.290 (2.820-7.850)

4.900 (3.230-7.730)

n.s.

Breast feeding at admission n° (%)

12 (63.2%)

17 (89.5%)

0.06

Breast feeding median in days (range)

20 (0-150)

30 (0-94)

n.s.

Vaccination (DTaP)

  

n.s.

  1st dose

4 (21.0%)

4 (21.1%)

 

  2nd dose

1 (5.3%)

0

 

p values by Mann-Whitney U test.

RSV: respiratory syncytial virus.

Data for the clinical characteristics showed that the percentage of infants with paroxysmal cough was significantly higher and cough at admission lasted longer in infants with pertussis than in control infants (63.2% vs 0.0%, p <0.001, 7 days vs 3 days, p <0.09). The percentage of infants with fever (TC > 37.5°C) was significantly lower in infants with pertussis than in the control group (15.8% vs 68.4%, p <0.001). The percentage of infants with apnea and cyanosis was significantly higher in infants with pertussis than in those with RSV bronchiolitis (apnea 52.6% vs 10.5%, p <0.006 and cyanosis 52.6% vs 10.5%, p <0.006). Finally, infants with pertussis less often had abnormal chest sounds on auscultation than infants with RSV bronchiolitis (0% vs 42,1%; p < 0.005). No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding clinical severity scores [median(range) 3(0-6) vs 5(0-7)] and days hospitalization [7(2-15) vs 5(1-27)]. Clinical complications rarely arose in the two groups: two infants in the pertussis group (10.5%) and only one infant in the bronchiolitis group (5.3%) had bradycardia (p = n.s.). Respiratory complications (pneumothorax) arose in three of the 19 patients with pertussis (15.8%) and in only one of the 19 with bronchiolitis (5.3%) (p = n.s.) (Table 2). No significant differences were found between the two groups for chest radiograph findings (air trapping, peribronchial thickening and consolidations).
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of the 19 infants with pertussis and the 19 infants with RSV bronchiolitis

Clinical characteristics

Infants with pertussis

Infants with RSV bronchiolitis

p

Paroxysmal cough

12 (63.2%)

0 (0.0%)

0.001

Cough at admission median in days (range)

7 (0-20)

3 (0-15)

0.09

Apnea

10 (52.6%)

2 (10.5%)

0.006

Cyanosis

10 (52.6%)

2 (10.5%)

0.006

Fever (> 37.5°C)

3 (15.8%)

13 (68.4%)

0.001

Chest sounds

  

0.005

  Rales

7 (36.8%)

11 (57.9%)

 

  Wheeze

3 (15.8%)

2 (10.5%)

 

  Rales and Wheeze

1 (5.3%)

6 (31.6%)

 

  Negative

8 (42.1%)

0 (0.0%)

 

Severity score median (range)

3 (0-6)

5 (0-7)

n.s.

Hospitalization length median in days (range)

7 (2-15)

5 (1-27)

n.s.

Complications

  

n.s.

  Bradycardia

2 (10.5%)

1 (5.3%)

 

  Respiratory

3 (15.8%)

1 (5.3%)

 

  Total

5 (26.6%)

2 (10.5%)

 

p values by Mann-Whitney U test.

RSV: respiratory syncytial virus.

Laboratory data showed significantly higher absolute WBC and lymphocyte numbers in children with pertussis than in infants with RSV bronchiolitis (23886 ± 16945, vs 10725 ± 4126 cells/mm3, p <0.0001 and 13.653 ± 10.430 vs 4.730 ± 2.400 cells/mm3, p <0.001 by Mann-Whitney U test). Finally, children with pertussis had higher absolute blood eosinophil numbers than children with RSV bronchiolitis (510 ± 500 vs 86 ± 123 cells/mm3 p <0.001). No significant differences were reported for absolute neutrophil numbers, absolute platelet numbers, Hb concentration, SGOT, SGPT, GGT, and CRP (Table 3).
Table 3

Laboratory characteristics of the 19 infants with pertussis and the 19 infants with RSV bronchiolitis

Laboratory characteristics

Infants with pertussis

Infants with RSV bronchiolitis

p

White blood cells (n/mm3) median (range)

18.760 (6.760-73790)

9.815 (4.770-20.910)

0.001

Lymphocyte count (n/mm3) median (range)

9.290 (4.320-38.665)

4.155 (1.803-8.366)

0.001

Neutrophil count (n/mm3) median (range)

4.500 (1.470-27.121)

4.170 (992-11.160)

n.s.

Eosinophil count (n/mm3) median (range)

375 (14-1.770)

45 (0-527)

0.001

Hemoglobin (mg/dl) median (range)

12.1 (10.2-15.9)

11.15 (9.40-16.60)

n.s.

Platelets (n/mm3) median (range)

576.000 (315.000-1.180.000)

507.000 (300.000-1.045.000)

n.s.

C-reactive protein (mg/dl) median (range)

0.13 (0.01-2.35)

0.62 (0-2.35)

n.s.

SGOT (UI/L) median (range)

39 (20-103)

41 (17-90)

n.s.

SGPT (UI/L) median (range)

31 (13-92)

23.5 (13-60)

n.s.

GGT (UI/L) median (range)

43 (13-166)

28 (7-117)

n.s.

RSV: respiratory syncytial virus; SGOT: Glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; SGPT: glutamic pyruvic transaminase; GGT: gamma-glutamyl transferase.

p values by Mann-Whitney U test.

Of the 19 infants with pertussis, four (21.0%) had received the first DTaP vaccination dose and only one (5.3%) had received two doses. In the control group, 4 infants (21.0%) received the first DTaP vaccination dose (Table 1). Of the 19 patients who tested positive for B. pertussis, 13 (68.4%) had already undergone macrolide antibiotic therapy when specimens were collected, 4 (21.0%) had specimens collected after antibiotic therapy, and 2 (10.5%) received no antibiotic therapy. Three of the 19 infants with pertussis infection (15.8%) were co-infected with RSV and two (10.5%) with Rhinovirus. No differences were found for clinical and demographic findings between infants with B. pertussis infection alone and infants with B. pertussis and RSV or RV co-infection.

Molecular analysis of pertussis cases

All 19 cases of suspected pertussis were confirmed by molecular analysis, of which for 2 B. pertussis strains have been isolated and analyzed for the evaluation of molecular variants. In particular, molecular analysis detected ptxA1, ptxP3 and prn2 allele variants (Table 4). Only 2 B. Pertussis strains were cultivated because 13 infants enrolled were already receiving specific antibiotic therapy when the specimen was collected or because technical problems arose during sample collection.
Table 4

Genetic analysis for the two cultured B. pertussis isolated

Patient

Age (months)

Sex

Vaccination

Macrolide therapy

ptxA

ptx-P

prn

1

1

F

No

No

ptxA1

ptx-P3

prn-2

2

5

M

No

No

ptxA1

ptx-P3

prn-2

ptxA1: pertussis toxin subunit 1, ptxP: pertussis toxin promoter; prn: pertactin.

Discussion

Our retrospective single-center study identified several demographic, clinical and laboratory features that might help in diagnosing suspected pertussis in infants hospitalized for acute respiratory symptoms. Another important finding in this study is that the B. pertussis strains circulating in our Pediatric Emergency Department seem to differ genetically from those currently used in DTaP vaccines. Of the 38 hospitalized infants enrolled in our study, five with pertussis and four with bronchiolitis had already been vaccinated. In Italy, vaccination schedule provides a first pertussis vaccine dose at the age of 3 months, and the booster doses at 5 and 12 months of age. This finding confirms previous reports, showing that many children with pertussis have never been vaccinated against pertussis, and that the first dose (or the first two doses) often provides scarce protection [14, 2025].

When we analyzed our patients’ demographic data, in line with others we found that children with whooping cough were breastfed less frequently than those with bronchiolitis [26, 27]. These results prevent us from conjecturing whether breast feeding might protect against the risk of B. pertussis infection in the first year of life and call for other studies to assess this important question [27].

Our study once again confirms that clinical data can help in diagnosing whooping cough diagnosis in infants [12, 15, 28]. As expected, the hallmark clinical characteristic specific for pertussis, is paroxysmal cough. In this study we confirmed that other clinical signs suggesting B. pertussis infection are episodes of apnea and cyanosis [4, 8, 15, 28]. On physical examination, fever is absent in children with pertussis, and more common in patients with bronchiolitis. In our study sample, on chest auscultation we found that over 40% of the children with pertussis had no abnormal chest sounds, whereas all the patients in control group had rales.

In the 19 infants hospitalized for suspected B. pertussis we studied, when clinical features suggested whooping cough as a diagnosis, additional proof might come from laboratory findings showing marked lymphocytosis [12, 15, 28, 29]. Another distinctive finding was the significantly higher eosinophil numbers in infants with pertussis than in the control group. Since the early 1960-1970s, research has questioned the role of B. pertussis and its toxin in the hyper-eosinophilia response to pertussis [3032], but the hypothesis awaits confirmatory data from other studies and research.

In two pertussis isolates, we undertook genetic molecular analysis to investigate gene variation in the pertussis toxin gene (ptx), in particular its S1 subunit (ptxA), the pertussis toxin gene promoter (ptx-P), and prn[46]. The “universal” indicator for characterizing the molecular features of B. pertussis is the catalytic subunit S1. Four S1 subunit variants have been described: S1-A (ptxA1), S1-B (ptxA2), S1-D (ptxA3), and S1-E (ptxA4) [2, 4, 6, 16, 18, 19]. Culture and molecular data allowed us to identify strains that express the S1-A variant, whereas pertussis vaccine contains the S1-B variant [4]. Pertactin gene polymorphisms reside in regions called R1 and R2. As many as eleven different prn alleles have been identified [5, 6]. Acellular pertussis vaccine contains the prn-1 allele. In the two infants whose aspirates were suitable for molecular genetic analysis, RT-PCR identified the prn-2 gene, also found in infants from other European countries (France and Finland) [5, 6] and in Japan [4]. We also found in both strains the ptx-P3 variant of the pertussis toxin promoter. This variant allows bacteria to increase toxin production so that more severe clinical signs and symptoms manifest [3]. Unfortunately, we were able to analyze B. pertussis strains in only two infants because cultures were negative in 16 infants with PCR confirmed pertussis who were already receiving specific antibiotic therapy when specimens were collected, or because technical problems arose during sample collection.

Without seeking information from an in-depth molecular genetic analysis with standard protocols [46] we cannot say whether the pertussis strain isolated from our two patients differs immunologically from vaccine variants. One of our two patients was 1 month old and the other 5 months old. Neither infant had been vaccinated against pertussis nor had they received macrolides antibiotic treatment at the time we collected their nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens. Equally important, the isolates contained the variant ptx-P3, known as high-producing pertussis toxin [31], a variant that results in increased virulence and immune suppression. For this reason, we cannot exclude the possibility that both infants might have manifested the disease even if they had been vaccinated, because the vaccine-induced immunity would not have immunized them against the particular strain isolated.

The median age at onset in the 19 infants hospitalized for pertussis was low (around 70 days). This finding confirms international evidence showing that a vaccination strategy envisaging an additional dose at birth or maternal immunization is advisable to prevent disease in the first six months of life [20, 28, 32]. In accordance with published data we assume that improving surveillance and diagnosis would allow more accurate epidemiological assessments of pertussis and help to establish better vaccination strategies (times and age at vaccination).

Limitations of our study are the small number of infants enrolled, the fact that we could analyze B. pertussis strains in only two patients, and that nasopharyngeal washing is not the reference standard for detecting B. pertussis in culture.

Conclusion

In conclusion, even during seasonal RSV outbreaks the differential diagnosis of bronchiolitis, especially in children younger than one year, should consider whooping cough. In the absence of exposure to ill contacts and local epidemiological surveillance, the major clinical factors for diagnosing whooping cough are typical paroxysmal cough, lymphocytosis, increased eosinophil numbers and absent abnormal chest sounds. Molecular analysis suggests that also in Italy B. pertussis strains differ from those included in the current vaccine. These findings might call for a change in the current pertussis vaccination, according also to the current strategies in the US and other countries that include maternal immunization with Tdap.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Cecilia Fazio who provided to culture and molecular study of collected samples.

We thank Mrs. Alice Crossman who provided medical writing service on behalf of “Onlus Il Bambino in Emergenza”.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Paediatrics, “Sapienza” University of Rome
(2)
Department of Infectious, Parasitic & Immune-mediated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità
(3)
Molecular Medicine Department, “Sapienza” University of Rome

References

  1. Bamberger ES, Srugo I: What’s new in pertussis?. Eur J Pediatr. 2008, 167: 133-139. 10.1007/s00431-007-0548-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mooi FR, van Oirschot H, Heuvelman K, van der Heide HG, Gaastra W, Willems RJ: Polymorphism in the Bordetella pertussis virulence factors P.69/pertactin and pertussis toxin in the Netherlands: temporal trends and evidence for vaccine-driven evolution. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 670-675.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Mattoo S, Cherry JD: Molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of respiratory infections due to Bordetella pertussis and other Bordetella subspecies. Clin Microbiol. 2005, 18: 326-382. 10.1128/CMR.18.2.326-382.2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassiday P, Sanden G, Heuvelman K, Mooi F, Bisgard KM, Popovic T: Polymorphism in Bordetella pertussis pertactin and pertussis toxin virulence factors in the United States, 1935–1999. J Infect Dis. 2000, 182: 1402-1408. 10.1086/315881.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Caro V, Njamkepo E, Van Amersfoorth SC, Mooi FR, Advani A, Hallander HO, He Q, Mertsola J, Riffelmann M, Vahrenholz C, Von König CH, Guiso N: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of Bordetella pertussis populations in various European countries with different vaccine policies. Microb Infect. 2005, 7: 976-982. 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.04.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hallander H, Advani A, Riffelmann M, von König CH, Caro V, Guiso N, Mooi FR, Gzyl A, Kaltoft MS, Fry NK, Mertsola J, He Q: Bordetella pertussis strains circulating in Europe in 1999 to 2004 as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45: 3257-3262. 10.1128/JCM.00864-07.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Walsh PF, Kimmel L, Feola M, Tran T, Lim C, De Salvia L, Pusavat J, Michaelson S, Nguyen TA, Emery K, Mordechai E, Adelson ME: Prevalence of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis in infants presenting to the emergency department with bronchiolitis. J Emerg Med. 2011, 40: 256-261. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.04.048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Walsh P, Overmeyer C, Kimmel L, Feola M, Pusavat J, Nguyen TA, Kuan S, Emery K, Rosengreen M, Mordechai E, Adelson ME: Prevalence of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis in samples submitted for RSV screening. West J Emerg Med. 2008, 9: 135-140.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Legru E, Lubrano M, Lemee L, Marguet C: Bronchiolites à VRS du nourrisson: chercher la coqueluche associée? Acute RSV bronchiolitis: Should we be looking for pertussis?. Arch Pédiatrie. 2009, 16: 283-284.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Aoyama T, Ide Y, Watanabe J, Takeuchi Y, Imaizumi A: Respiratory failure caused by dual infection with Bordetella pertussis and respiratory syncytial virus. Acta Paedia Japon. 1996, 38: 282-285. 10.1111/j.1442-200X.1996.tb03488.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Guinto-Ocampo H, Bennett JE, Attia MW: Predicting pertussis in infants. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008, 1: 16-20.Google Scholar
  12. Castagnini LA, Munoz FM: Clinical characteristics and outcomes of neonatal pertussis: a comparative study. J Pediatr. 2010, 156: 498-500. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tozzi AE, Pandolfi E, Pastore Celentano L, Massari M, Salmaso S, Ciofi degli Atti ML: Comparison of pertussis surveillance system in Europe. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 291-297. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.07.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tozzi AE, Celentano LP, Ciofi degli Atti ML, Salmaso S: Diagnosis and management of pertussis. Can Med Assoc J. 2005, 172: 509-515. 10.1503/cmaj.1040766.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Midulla F, Scagnolari C, Bonci E, Pierangeli A, Antonelli G, De Angelis D, Berardi R, Moretti C: Respiratory syncytial virus, human bocavirus and rhinovirus bronchiolitis in infants. Arch dis child. 2010, 95: 35-41. 10.1136/adc.2008.153361.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Xu Y, Xu Y, Hou Q, Yang R, Zhang S: Triplex real-time PCR assay for detection and differentiation of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis. Acta Path Micro Im. 2010, 118: 685-691.Google Scholar
  17. Templeton KE, Scheltinga SA, van der Zee A, Diederen BM, van Kruijssen A, Goossens H, Kuijper E, Claas EC: Evaluation of real-time PCR for detection of and discrimination between Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis, and Bordetella holmesii for clinical diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41 (9): 4121-4126. 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4121-4126.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Mooi FR, Hallander H, von König CH W, Hoet B, Guiso N: Epidemiological typing of Bordetella pertussis isolates: recommendations for standard methodology. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 19: 174-181. 10.1007/s100960050455.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mooi FR, van Loo IH, van Gent M, He Q, Bart MJ, Heuvelman KJ, de Greeff SC, Diavatopoulos D, Teunis P, Nagelkerke N, Mertsola J: Bordetella pertussis strains with increased toxin production associated with pertussis resurgence. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009, 15: 1206-1213. 10.3201/eid1508.081511.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Halasa NB, O’Shea A, Shi JR, LaFleur BJ, Edwards KM: Poor immune response to a birth dose of diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccine. J Pediatr. 2008, 153: 327-332. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.03.011.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Broutin H, Viboud C, Grenfell BT, Miller MA, Rohani P: Impact of vaccination and birth rate on the epidemiology of pertussis: a comparative study in 64 countries. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2010, 277: 3239-3245. 10.1098/rspb.2010.0994.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Guiso N, Liese J, Plotkin S: Global Pertussis Initiative: relation derived from the fourth regional roundtable, France, April 14-15. Landes Bioscience. 2010, 7: 481-488.Google Scholar
  23. CDC: Updated recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2010. MMRW. 2011, 60 (1): 13-15.Google Scholar
  24. Belloni C, De Silvestri A, Tinelli C, Avanzini MA, Marconi M, Strano F, Rondini G, Chirico G: Immunogenicity of a three-component acellular pertussis vaccine administered at birth. Pediatrics. 2003, 111: 1042-1045. 10.1542/peds.111.5.1042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Quinello C, Quintilio W, Carneiro-Sampaio M, Palmeira P: Passive acquisition of protective antibodies reactive with Bordetella pertussis in newborns via placental transfer and breast-feeding. Scand J Immunol. 2010, 72: 66-73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nafstad P, Jaakkola JJ, Hagen JA, Botten G, Kongerud J: Breastfeeding, maternal smoking and lower respiratory tract infections. Eur Respir J. 1996, 9: 2623-2629. 10.1183/09031936.96.09122623.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cherry JD, Heininger U: Pertussis and other Bordetella infections. Textbook of pediatric infectious diseases. Volume 1. Edited by: Feigin RD, Cherry JD, Demmler GJ, Kaplan S. 2004, Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co, 1588-1608. 6Google Scholar
  28. Guiso N: Bordetella pertussis and pertussis vaccines. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 49: 1565-1569. 10.1086/644733.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cohen SG, Sapp TM, Chiampi PN: Eosinophil leukocyte responses and hypersensitivity reactions in the Bordetella pertussis-treated mouse. J Allergy. 1970, 46: 205-215. 10.1016/0021-8707(70)90024-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tjabbes T, de Wied M: The influence of the ventral posterior hypothalamus on Bordetella pertussis vaccine-induced eosinophilia. Arch Intern Pharm Ther. 1962, 135: 218-222.Google Scholar
  31. King AJ, van der Lee S, Mohangoo A, van Gent M, van der Ark A, van de Waterbeemd B: Genome-Wide Gene Expression Analysis of Bordetella pertussis Isolates Associated with a Resurgence in Pertussis: Elucidation of Factors Involved in the Increased Fitness of Epidemic Strains. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (6): e66150-10.1371/journal.pone.0066150.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Shinall MC, Peters TR, Zhu Y, Chen Q, Poehling KA: Potential impact of acceleration of the pertussis vaccine primary series for infants. Pediatrics. 2008, 122: 1021-1026. 10.1542/peds.2007-3025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/13/526/prepub

Copyright

© Nicolai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.