Herpes simplex virus type 2 and HIV disease progression: a systematic review of observational studies
© Tan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 26 April 2013
Accepted: 21 October 2013
Published: 28 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Apr 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Darrell Tan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Edward Cachay|
|2 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Drake|
|6 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kenneth Fife|
|19 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Darrell Tan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Drake|
|5 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Edward Cachay|
|5 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kenneth Fife|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|21 Oct 2013||Editorially accepted|
|28 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-13-502|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.