Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Identification of Streptococcus agalactiae by fluorescent in situ hybridization compared to culturing and the determination of prevalence of Streptococcus agalactiae colonization among pregnant women in Bushehr, Iran

  • Saeed Tajbakhsh1, 2Email author,
  • Marjan Norouzi Esfahani1,
  • Mohammad Emaneini3,
  • Niloofar Motamed4,
  • Elham Rahmani5 and
  • Somayyeh Gharibi2
BMC Infectious Diseases201313:420

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-420

Received: 17 April 2013

Accepted: 2 September 2013

Published: 8 September 2013



Pregnant women colonized by Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococci [GBS]) may transfer this microorganism to their newborns. S. agalactiae is an important cause of pneumonia, sepsis, and meningitis in newborns. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is considered as a method of identification in the field of diagnostic microbiology. In this paper, we have designed a study to compare the DNA FISH after 7 h Lim broth enrichment and culturing for the identification of S. agalactiae and to determine the prevalence of vaginal colonization by S. agalactiae among pregnant women in Bushehr, Iran.


Vaginal swab specimens were obtained from 285 pregnant women at 35 weeks or more than 35 weeks of gestation. The specimens were inoculated into Lim broth. In order to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of GBS DNA FISH after 7 h Lim broth enrichment, the specimens were tested using both FISH and conventional culture methods. In addition, the prevalence of GBS colonization was determined.


Based on the results of this study, both the sensitivity and specificity of FISH were 100%. S. agalactiae was detected by both culture and FISH in 27 of the 285 pregnant women. Thus, the prevalence of GBS colonization was 9.5%.


Since short-term (7 h) Lim broth enrichment followed by FISH using oligonucleotide probes showed a high sensitivity and specificity, this protocol is therefore a highly accurate and relatively rapid method for the detection of S. agalactiae. Our analysis suggests that the use of DNA FISH to screen for S. agalactiae colonization in pregnant women may be considered in the absence of GBS culture availability.


Streptococcus agalactiae Prevalence Pregnant women Fluorescent in situ hybridization FISH


Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococci [GBS]) can be found in the genital and anorectal areas of many adults. This organism is one of the leading causes of invasive infections in newborns. Neonatal infections present as two distinct clinical pictures: early-onset disease, characterized by sepsis and pneumonia within the first week of life, and late-onset disease, with meningitis and sepsis between 7 days and 3 months of age. Maternal colonization by GBS is the most important risk factor for the development of invasive disease in their newborns [1]. Vaginal colonization by S. agalactiae occurs in approximately 5-40% of pregnant women [2], and GBS is transmitted to 40-70% of these colonized women’s newborns [3] during labor and birth [4]. Among colonized newborns, 1-3% develop disease [3, 5]. Of these, 80% develop early onset disease [6]. The mortality rate ranges from 10% to 20%, and the infants who survive may suffer from mental retardation or visual loss [6, 7].

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend screening for GBS colonization in pregnant women at 35–37 weeks of gestation. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis of the GBS-colonized pregnant women is recommended [8]. These recommendations significantly decrease the incidence of early-onset neonatal GBS disease [9]. An optimum preventive strategy results in the treatment of GBS-colonized pregnant women and minimizes the treatment of women who do not require it [10]. In order to optimize this strategy, a correct diagnosis of GBS colonization status for each individual pregnant woman is needed.

In Bushehr, pregnant women are not screened for antepartum GBS colonization. The isolation and identification of S. agalactiae via conventional culture methods is time-consuming, requiring 36–72 h. Moreover, culture-based identification requires multiple media and tests, as well as several technicians. Therefore, molecular methods, such as fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), could be helpful in the detection of GBS, especially at our institutions that have limited staff. The prenatal care program for pregnant women at our institutions includes at least eight evaluation steps at various periods of pregnancy; one of the evaluations is performed at 35–37 weeks of gestation; thus, FISH can be used for the identification of GBS in this stage of prenatal care.

FISH using oligonucleotide probes has been used for the rapid detection of GBS directly in vaginal swabs [7, 11]. However, there is a discrepancy in the results. While Artz et al. reported FISH to be a highly sensitive technique (sensitivity of 98.3%) for the detection of S. agalactiae directly in specimens [7], Strus and colleagues could not confirm this sensitivity [11]. When we were designing our study, an article concerning the successful application of peptide nucleic acid (PNA) FISH for GBS detection after a short-term (7 h) Lim broth enrichment step was published; this procedure has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific [12]. However, in our laboratory, the FISH protocols have been established by using oligonucleotide (DNA) probes. Hence, a question was raised as to whether 7 h Lim broth enrichment followed by DNA-based FISH protocol results in a high sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the present study aims to compare the DNA FISH after 7 h Lim broth enrichment and culture method for the identification of S. agalactiae and to determine the prevalence of vaginal colonization by S. agalactiae among pregnant women in Bushehr, south west of Iran.


Bacterial strains

The Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSM) and the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) reference strains, as well as other organisms used in this study were S. agalactiae (DSM 2134 and four clinical isolates), S. pyogenes (ATCC 19615), S. sobrinus (ATCC 27607), S. sanguis (ATCC 10556), a species of group D streptococci (clinical isolate), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), E. faecium (clinical isolate), a beta-haemolytic strain of Enterococcus (clinical isolate), Lactobacillus acidophilus (ATCC 4356), and Lactobacillus fermentum (DSM 20052). These bacterial strains were used to check probe specificity. These strains were grown, harvested in exponential growth phase, and fixed with ethanol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), as described previously [13, 14]. The fixed bacterial strains were then tested by FISH, as described below.

Specimen collection

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences. Between April 2010 and January 2011, vaginal swab specimens were collected from eligible pregnant women attending the two major hospitals in the city of Bushehr (south west of Iran), Bentolhoda and Salman Farsi. In our region, pregnant women did not permit us to obtain rectal swabs (because of religion, etc.); thus, we obtained vaginal specimens instead of recto-vaginal specimens. The samples were collected from vaginal introitus [10, 15] using one sterile swab for each woman by one of four trained providers. The providers were blind to the delivery mode. The specimens were taken at 35–42 weeks of gestation. Women at a gestational age of 35 weeks or more who had not received antibiotics within two weeks prior to sampling were eligible. Of the eligible women, those who agreed to participate in this investigation and signed a consent form were included in the study. Eligible women were approached seven days per week during day and night shifts depending on the availability of providers to screen and consent women and to collect their samples. Women at a gestational age of less than 35 weeks, those who had received antibiotics within two weeks prior to sampling, and women who declined to participate were excluded from the study [2, 16].

Each swab specimen was inoculated into 1 ml Lim selective enrichment broth (Todd Hewitt broth supplemented with colistin and nalidixic acid; Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA). In order to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of GBS DNA FISH after 7 h Lim broth enrichment, the specimens were tested by using both FISH and conventional laboratory methods, such as gram stain, the detection of hemolysis type, catalase, bacitracin susceptibility and sulfamethoxazole – trimethoprim (SXT) susceptibility tests, hippurate hydrolysis, a CAMP (Christie-Atkins-Munch-Petersen) test, and a bile-esculin test.

Short-term (7 h) Lim broth enrichment

One vaginal swab from each woman was enriched in Lim broth to use for both FISH and culturing. Short-term (7 h) Lim broth enrichment was performed as described by Peltroche-Llacsahuanga et al. [12], with the following minor changes: Briefly, the tips of the swab specimens were cut and then put into the microcentrifuge tubes (Greiner bio-one) containing 1 ml of Lim broth. The microcentrifuge tubes with submerged tips were shaken by slight vortexing them for 15 min and were then placed into a shaking incubator (Heidolph, Schwabach, Germany) for 6 h and 45 min at 37°C at 350 rpm. Afterwards, the swab tips were removed, and the microcentrifuge tubes were centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 5 min. The sediment of each microcentrifuge tube was resuspended in 60 μl PBS. Of this, a volume of 50 μl was fixed with ethanol for testing via FISH. The remaining 10 μl was inoculated into a new Lim broth and incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h.

Isolation of S. agalactiae

After 18–24 h, the Lim broth tubes were observed in order to check the turbidity; then, subculturing from the turbid broth cultures to blood agar plates was performed. According to the manufacturer’s directions, the Lim broth tubes that were not turbid were reincubated for an additional 24 h. Colonies on the blood agar that were suspected for S. agalactiae were subcultured for purity, and the final identification was carried out by conventional laboratory methods. Criteria such as a positive reaction with hippurate hydrolysis and a CAMP test and a negative reaction with the catalase and a bile-esculin test, as well as resistance to bacitracin (usually) and SXT, were considered for GBS.


Oligonucleotide probes Saga and EUB338, which were synthesized and 5′-labeled (Metabion, Martinsried, Germany), were used in this study. The probe Saga (5′- GTA AAC ACC AAA CMT CAG CG -3′), which specifically targets and hybridizes to a 16S rRNA region of S. agalactiae, was used for the identification of this bacterium [14]. The 5′ end of Saga was labeled with fluorochrome Cy3, which emitted a red fluorescent signal. The probe EUB338 (5′- GCT GCC TCC CGT AGG AGT-3′), which hybridizes the 16S rRNA of almost all bacteria [17], was 5′-labeled with fluorochrome Fluo, which exhibits a green fluorescent signal.

FISH was performed according to a protocol described elsewhere [13, 14]. Briefly, 20 μl of each enriched and fixed specimen or 10 μl of each fixed control bacterial strain were placed on glass slides and air dried. The dehydration step was carried out in an ascending ethanol series. For the permeabilization of bacterial cells, an enzymatic treatment was performed with 1 mg/ml lysozyme (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany) for 15 min. For hybridization, specimens or bacterial strains were covered with a hybridization buffer (0.9 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl [pH 8], 0.01% SDS, 20% formamide) containing both the probes EUB338-Fluo and Saga-Cy3. Slides were then incubated at 46°C for 90 min in the humid chambers. Afterwards, the slides were incubated in a washing buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl [pH 8], 0.01% SDS, 225 mM NaCl) at 48°C for 15 min. Subsequently, DNA was stained with 4′, 6-diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI; Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Finally, the slides were mounted with a fluorescent mounting medium (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) and observed with an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon 80i, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a DS-5Mc-L1 digital camera. The time needed for the FISH technique itself was 3 h. The time-to-result was the 3 h for the FISH technique, plus the 7 h for the Lim broth enrichment, yielding a total time-to-result of 10 h.

For analysis of assay, the results of GBS DNA FISH after 7 h Lim broth enrichment were compared with results of conventional culture method.


Table 1 shows the results of the examination of the control strains via FISH using the oligonucleotide probes EUB338 and Saga. All bacterial strains were hybridized with EUB338. Only S. agalactiae strains were hybridized with Saga, which indicates the high specificity of this probe.
Table 1

Results of the examination of bacterial strains by FISH

Bacterial strains


Results of hybridization with probe




S. agalactiae

DSM 2134



S. agalactiae

Clinical isolate (from urine)



S. agalactiae

Clinical isolate (from vagina)



S. agalactiae

Clinical isolate (from wound)



S. agalactiae

Clinical isolate (from blood)



S. pyogenes

ATCC 19615


S. sobrinus

ATCC 27607


S. sanguis

ATCC 10556


A species of group D streptococci

Clinical isolate (from blood)


E. faecalis

ATCC 29212


E. faecium

Clinical isolate (from urine)


A β-haemolytic strain of Enterococcus

Clinical isolate (from vagina)


L. acidophilus

ATCC 4356


L. fermentum

DSM 20052


Two hundred and eighty-five vaginal specimens were enriched in Lim broth and examined by FISH and conventional culturing methods. In 27 of 285 specimens, S. agalactiae was detected via both FISH (Figure 1) and culturing methods. The remaining 258 specimens were negative for S. agalactiae according to both the FISH and culture results. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of GBS DNA FISH after 7 h Lim broth enrichment were both 100%. The prevalence of vaginal GBS colonization among pregnant women in Bushehr was 9.5%. The mean age of the pregnant women was 26.39 ± 5.33 years.
Figure 1

Application of the DNA FISH method for the detection of S. agalactiae. The red fluorescent signal of the GBS indicates hybridization with probe Saga-Cy3. Magnification, ×1000.


S. agalactiae remains an important cause of severe pneumonia, sepsis, and meningitis in neonates. GBS colonization of pregnant women increases the risk of the above-mentioned invasive diseases in neonates. To optimize the preventive strategy, a correct diagnosis of GBS colonization status for each pregnant woman is needed. The demand for the precise and rapid detection of infectious agents has made the application of molecular techniques, such as FISH, indispensable in diagnostic microbiology laboratories. In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of GBS DNA FISH after 7 h Lim broth enrichment. In addition, the prevalence of GBS colonization was determined among pregnant women in Bushehr, south west of Iran.

In our study, the oligonucleotide probe Saga was used to identify S. agalactiae. In the studies performed by Trebesius et al. [14] and Kempf et al. [18], the Saga probe was examined with many target and non-target strains. These authors showed that the DNA probe Saga is highly specific for the detection of S. agalactiae. We examined the use of the Saga probe on some bacterial strains that may be present in the female genital tract [19, 20]. Saga produced correct positive results with all target strains and correct negative results with all non-target strains. Therefore, Saga again proved to be a highly specific probe for the identification of S. agalactiae.

Some strains of S. agalactiae are non-hemolytic [19]. In many screening procedures, only beta-hemolytic colonies on blood agar plates are usually selected and further examined via conventional culture methods [7]. Therefore, non-hemolytic isolates will not be identified by these procedures. S. agalactiae DSM 2134, which is a non-hemolytic strain (as mentioned by the DSMZ), was hybridized with the DNA probe Saga. Thus, similar to GBS PNA FISH [12], non-hemolytic strains are also detectable by GBS DNA FISH.

Lactobacillus spp. are major members of the normal flora of the female genital tract. They are highly pleomorphic bacilli, which may appear in coccoid or spiral-shaped forms. The L. acidophilus complex constitutes the majority of the lactobacilli of the vagina, but other species, such as L. fermentum, have also been recovered [20]. To our knowledge, the probe Saga has not been previously tested on Latobacillus spp. We used L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 and L. fermentum DSM 20052 in our examinations, which showed the accurate function of Saga.

Specimens from 285 pregnant women were used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of DNA FISH for the detection of GBS from a 7 h Lim broth enrichment culture. No false-positive or false-negative results were observed. Therefore, both the sensitivity and specificity of our assay were 100%. Thus, DNA FISH, after short term (7 h) Lim broth enrichment, is a highly sensitive and specific procedure for the detection of S. agalactiae. This optimal sensitivity and specificity encourages us to perform the short-term Lim broth enrichment culture of swabs before FISH. Our results are in accordance with the results of the study done by Peltroche-Llacsahuanga et al. concerning the sensitivity and specificity of PNA FISH [12]. Also, in another investigation, conducted by Montague and colleagues, Lim broth enrichment followed by GBS PNA FISH showed high sensitivity and specificity (97.4% sensitivity and 98.3% specificity), but in their protocol, the incubation of the Lim broth was 24 h [21]. The preparation of PNA probes is expensive [22], and the inexpensive preparation of DNA probes is an important advantage of these probes over PNA probes.

Culture-based strategies require subculturing on blood agar plates, as well as multiple media and tests, for the definite identification of GBS. Sometimes, the application of these methods is not so easy because the growth of other microorganisms can cause some difficulty in the isolation of S. agalactiae, so staff must subculture several various suspect colonies for the sake of purity. In fact, they must perform identification tests for each suspect colony separately. However, the use of GBS FISH decreases these multiple handlings. Thus, it seems that FISH following short-term Lim broth enrichment is a useful detection protocol, particularly in settings with high volumes of specimens and limited personnel [12]. It should be emphasized that FISH is an easy and cost-effective technique that does not require specific equipment.

Nucleic acid amplification tests including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the detection of GBS that take 60–75 min, are also available. PCR is more rapid than our protocol; thus, PCR is a very helpful test for detecting intrapartum GBS carriers [23, 24]. In fact, the rapidity of PCR is an advantage of this method over our protocol. On the other hand, the optimal sensitivity and specificity (both were 100%) of our procedure is an advantage of this technique over PCR. Therefore, our procedure is a more suitable test for antepartum screening for GBS carriage.

In our study, the prevalence of S. agalactiae colonization among pregnant women in Bushehr was found to be 9.5%. This is in accordance with some other studies in Iran that reported a prevalence of 9.1% in Kerman (southeast of Iran) [2] and Shiraz (south of Iran) [25]. However, a prevalence of 20.6% has been reported in Tehran [15], which is higher than our finding. Also, various results regarding the GBS prevalence in pregnant women have been reported in other countries, e.g., 10.6% in Turkey [26], 21% in The Netherlands [10], 23% in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania [16], and 25.3% in Ismailia, Egypt [27]. The differences in these prevalences could be due to differences in the sampling sites, diagnostic techniques, type of culture media, gestational ages at sampling, investigated populations, socio-economic statuses of study groups, geographical regions, ethnic or genetic factors, marital statuses, and sexual behaviors [10, 15, 16, 26, 27].

According to CDC guidelines, swabbing both the vagina and rectum increases the yield of GBS detection as compared with sampling the vagina without swabbing the rectum [8]. It has been shown that in some women S. agalactiae can be found only in rectal specimens [28]. In our study, the women did not permit us to obtain rectal swabs. Thus, we obtained the vaginal specimen alone. This might influence the prevalence of GBS colonization that was achieved in the present study. GBS colonization could have been found to be more prevalent among our study population if recto-vaginal swabs had been collected. Similar to our investigation, in some other studies, only genital specimens were examined [5, 12, 15, 21, 27].


In conclusion, since 7 h Lim broth enrichment followed by FISH using oligonucleotide probes showed a high sensitivity and specificity, this procedure is a highly accurate and relatively rapid method for the detection of GBS. Our analysis suggests that using DNA FISH to screen for GBS colonization in pregnant women may be considered in the absence of GBS culture availability; larger studies are needed to further evaluate its clinical utility.



American type culture collection




Centers for disease control and prevention


4′, 6-diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride


Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen


Fluorescent in situ hybridization


Group B streptococci.



We thank the Vice-Chancellor of Research of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences for the financial support.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences
The Persian Gulf Tropical Medicine Research Center, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences
Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences


  1. Spellerberg B, Brandt C: Streptococcus. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Volume 1. Edited by: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA. 2007, Washington, DC: ASM Press, 412-429. 9,Google Scholar
  2. Mansouri S, Ghasami E, Shahabi Najad N: Vaginal colonization of group B streptococci during late pregnancy in southeast of Iran: incidence, serotype distribution and susceptibility to antibiotics. J Med Sci. 2008, 8: 574-578. 10.3923/jms.2008.574.578.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Davies HD, Adair CE, Partlow ES, Sauve R, Low DE, McGeer A: Two-year survey of Alberta laboratories processing of antenatal group B streptococcal (GBS) screening specimens: implications for GBS screening programs. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999, 35: 169-176. 10.1016/S0732-8893(99)00076-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rallu F, Barriga P, Scrivo C, Martel-Laferrière V, Laferrière C: Sensitivities of antigen Detection and PCR assays greatly increased compared to that of the standard culture method for screening for group B streptococcus carriage in pregnant women. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 725-728. 10.1128/JCM.44.3.725-728.2006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Convert M, Martinetti Lucchini G, Dolina M, Piffaretti J-C: Comparison of lightCycler PCR and culture for detection of group B streptococci from vaginal swabs. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005, 11: 1022-1026. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01275.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergeron MG, Ke D, Ménard C, Picard FJ, Gagnon M, Bernier M, Ouellette M, Roy PH, Marcoux S, Fraser WD: Rapid detection of group B streptococci in pregnant women at delivery. N Engl J Med. 2000, 343: 175-179. 10.1056/NEJM200007203430303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Artz LA, Kempf VAJ, Autenrieth IB: Rapid Screening for Streptococcus agalactiae in vaginal specimens of pregnant women by fluorescent in situ hybridization. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 2170-2173. 10.1128/JCM.41.5.2170-2173.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC): Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease-revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010, 59: 1-32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Schrag SJ, Zywicki S, Farley MM, Reingold AL, Harrison LH, Lefkowitz LB, Hadler JL, Danila R, Ciesalk PR, Schuchat A: Group B streptococcal disease in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 15-20. 10.1056/NEJM200001063420103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Valkenburg-van den Berg AW, Sprij AJ, Oostvogel PM, Mutsaers JAEM, Renes WB, Rosendaal FR, Joep Dörr P: Prevalence of colonisation with group B streptococci in pregnant women of a multi-ethnic population in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006, 124: 178-183. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Strus M, Pawlik D, Brzychczy-Włoch M, Gosiewski T, Rytlewski K, Lauterbach R, Heczko PB: Group B streptococcus colonization of pregnant women and their children observed on obstetric and neonatal wards of the University Hospital in Krakow, Poland. J Med Microbiol. 2009, 58: 228-233. 10.1099/jmm.0.002865-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Peltroche-Llacsahuanga H, Fiandaca MJ, von Oy S, Lütticken R, Haase G: Rapid detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from swabs by peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Med Microbiol. 2010, 59: 179-184. 10.1099/jmm.0.013995-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tajbakhsh S, Gharibi S, Zandi K, Yaghobi R, Asayesh G: Rapid detection of Streptococcus pyogenes in throat swab specimens by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011, 15: 313-317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Trebesius K, Leitritz L, Adler K, Schubert S, Autenrieth IB, Heesemann J: Culture independent and rapid identification of bacterial pathogens in necrotising fasciitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2000, 188: 169-175. 10.1007/s004300000035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fatemi F, Chamani-Tabriz L, Pakzad P, Zeraati H, Rabbani H, Asgari S: Colonization rate of group B Streptococcus (GBS) in pregnant women using GBS agar medium. Acta Med Iran. 2009, 47: 25-30.Google Scholar
  16. Joachim A, Matee MI, Massawe FA, Lyamuya EF: Maternal and neonatal colonisation of group B streptococcus at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: prevalence, risk factors and antimicrobial resistance. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9: 437-10.1186/1471-2458-9-437.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Amann RI, Binder BJ, Olson RJ, Chisholm SW, Devereux R, Stahl DA: Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990, 56: 1919-1925.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kempf VAJ, Trebesius K, Autenrieth IB: Fluorescent in situ hybridization allows rapid identification of microorganisms in Blood Cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 830-838.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS: Streptococcus, Enterococcus, and similar organisms. Bailey & Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology. 2007, St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 265-280. 12Google Scholar
  20. Fader RC: Anaerobes of clinical importance. Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. Edited by: Mahon CR, Lehman DC, Manuselis G. 2011, Maryland Heights: Saunders Elsevier, 502-538. 4Google Scholar
  21. Montague NS, Cleary TJ, Martinez OV, Procop GW: Detection of group B streptococci in Lim broth by use of group B Streptococcus peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization and selective and nonselective agars. J Clin Microbiol. 2008, 46: 3470-3472. 10.1128/JCM.00858-08.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Amann R, Fuchs BM: Single-cell identification in microbial communities by improved fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008, 6: 339-348. 10.1038/nrmicro1888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Young BC, Dodge LE, Gupta M, Rhee JS, Hacker MR: Evaluation of a rapid, real-time intrapartum group B Streptococcus assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 205 (4): 372.e 1–6-Epub 2011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. El Helali N, Nguyen JC, Ly A, Giovangrandi Y, Trinquart L: Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for universal intrapartum group B streptococcus screening. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 49: 417-423. 10.1086/600303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Namavar Jahromi B, Poorarian S, Poorbarfehee S: The prevalence and adverse effects of group B streptococcal colonization during pregnancy. Arch Iran Med. 2008, 11: 654-657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Arisoy AS, Altinişik B, Tünger O, Kurutepe S, Ispahi C: Maternal carriage and antimicrobial resistance profile of group B Streptococcus. Infection. 2003, 31: 244-246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Shabayek SA, Abdalla SM, Abouzeid AM: Vaginal carriage and antibiotic susceptibility profile of group B Streptococcus during late pregnancy in Ismailia, Egypt. J Infect Public Health. 2009, 2: 86-90. 10.1016/j.jiph.2009.03.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Brimil N, Barthell E, Heindrichs U, Kuhn M, Lütticken R, Spellerberg B: Epidemiology of Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in Germany. Int J Med Microbiol. 2006, 296: 39-44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Tajbakhsh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.