The disease burden of pertussis in adults 50 years old and older in the United States: a retrospective study
© McGuiness et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 6 April 2012
Accepted: 9 January 2013
Published: 23 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine McGuiness|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wiebke Hellenbrand|
|5 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Clark|
|30 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine McGuiness|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wiebke Hellenbrand|
|26 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Clark|
|30 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine McGuiness|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|30 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-13-32|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.