Systematic screening with information and home sampling for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in young men and women in Norway: a randomized controlled trial
© Kløvstad et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 12 September 2011
Accepted: 18 January 2013
Published: 23 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Guy|
|31 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingrid Viola Francine van den Broek|
|19 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Low|
|1 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hilde Kløvstad|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Low|
|20 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hilde Kløvstad|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-13-30|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.