Modelling the transmission of healthcare associated infections: a systematic review
© van Kleef et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 29 November 2012
Accepted: 21 June 2013
Published: 28 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|29 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Esther van Kleef|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laura Temime|
|22 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Bootsma|
|18 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carl van Walraven|
|18 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Esther van Kleef|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Esther van Kleef|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|20 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laura Temime|
|6 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carl van Walraven|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|21 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-13-294|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.