Prognosis of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusbloodstream infection treated with teicoplanin: a retrospective cohort study investigating effect of teicoplanin minimum inhibitory concentrations
© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 October 2012
Accepted: 14 April 2013
Published: 19 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Fu-Der Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Junichi Yoshida|
|7 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tristan Ferry|
|24 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Fu-Der Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|24 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|19 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-13-182|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.