Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Pertussis re-emergence in the post-vaccination era

  • Elena Chiappini1,
  • Alessia Stival1,
  • Luisa Galli1 and
  • Maurizio de Martino1Email author
BMC Infectious Diseases201313:151

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-151

Received: 20 December 2012

Accepted: 19 March 2013

Published: 26 March 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
20 Dec 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kerrie Wiley
12 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Elena Chiappini
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
26 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-13-151

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Anna Meyer University Hospital, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence