Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Poststreptococcal syndrome mimicking conjunctival lymphoma

  • Iwona Rospond-Kubiak1Email author,
  • Agata Brązert1,
  • Jarosław Kocięcki1 and
  • Jan Bręborowicz2
BMC Infectious Diseases201313:149

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-149

Received: 27 May 2012

Accepted: 15 March 2013

Published: 25 March 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Micheal Gallagher
20 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Hinkle
11 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Iwona Rospond-Kubiak
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Iwona Rospond-Kubiak
14 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Hinkle
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
25 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-13-149

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Ophthalmology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences
(2)
Department of Oncologic Pathology, Chair of Oncology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences

Advertisement