Evaluation of intravenous voriconazole in patients with compromised renal function
© Lilly et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 24 March 2012
Accepted: 8 January 2013
Published: 16 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nikolaos Sipsas|
|3 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dionissios Neofytos|
|18 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Thompson|
|26 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - David Luke|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nikolaos Sipsas|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|8 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|16 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-13-14|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.