Immune response, antibody persistence, and safety of a single dose of the quadrivalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in adolescents and adults: results of an open, randomised, controlled study
© Borja-Tabora et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 23 May 2012
Accepted: 26 February 2013
Published: 5 March 2013
The best strategy to protect individuals against meningococcal disease is to immunize against multiple serogroups. Immunogenicity, antibody persistence, and safety of the EU-licensed meningococcal ACWY-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-TT) were evaluated in healthy participants aged 11–55 years from the Philippines and Saudi Arabia.
In this phase IIb, open, controlled study, 500 participants were randomised (3:1) to receive one dose of MenACWY-TT or a licensed meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine (Men-PS). Functional antibody responses against meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y were assessed by a serum bactericidal antibody assay using rabbit complement (rSBA) at Month 0, Month 1, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3. Vaccine response was defined as an rSBA titre ≥32 at Month 1 in participants who were seronegative (rSBA titre <8) pre-vaccination and as at least a four-fold increase in titre in participants who were seropositive pre-vaccination. Solicited symptoms were recorded up to Day 4, safety outcomes up to Month 6, and serious adverse events related to vaccination up to Year 3.
Pre-specified criteria for non-inferiority of MenACWY-TT versus Men-PS were met in terms of rSBA vaccine response and incidence of grade 3 general symptoms. At Month 1, 82.7%–96.3% of MenACWY-TT and 69.7%–91.7% in Men-PS recipients had a vaccine response for each serogroup. At Year 3, ≥99.1% and ≥92.9% of MenACWY-TT recipients retained rSBA titres ≥8 and ≥128, respectively, as compared to ≥86.7% and ≥80.0% in the Men-PS group. Both vaccines had a clinically acceptable safety profile, although injection site redness and swelling were more frequent in MenACWY-TT recipients.
These results suggest that MenACWY-TT could protect adolescents and adults against meningococcal disease up to three years post-vaccination.
This study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/NCT00356369.
KeywordsQuadrivalent meningococcal vaccine Conjugate vaccine Bactericidal activity Persistence Safety The Philippines Saudi Arabia
Neisseria meningitidis is a major cause of endemic and epidemic invasive bacterial disease worldwide and is associated with high morbidity [1–3]. Most invasive meningococcal disease is caused by six of the 12 known serogroups, namely serogroups A, B, C, W-135, Y, and more recently X [2, 3]. The epidemiology of meningococcal disease varies geographically and over time, and the increasing trend of international travel and migration facilitates the rapid intercontinental spread of meningococcal isolates [4–7]. Moreover, new strains may also appear in a region by bacterial capsular switching [3, 8].
In Asia and the Middle East, serogroups A, C, and W-135 are the most common serogroups [3, 5, 9]. In the Philippines, an outbreak caused by serogroup A occurred in 2004–2005 [3, 10]. A previous outbreak had been reported in 1989, but data on serogroup distribution from this earlier outbreak are not available . In Saudi Arabia, N. meningitidis has been responsible for various outbreaks during the annual Hajj pilgrimage [12, 13]. An outbreak caused by serogroup A occurred in 1987 and an outbreak caused by serogroup W-135 was also reported in 2000–2001 [12–15]. Pilgrims to the Hajj are at increased risk for infection because of overcrowding, shared living facilities, and close contact with people from various parts of the world, which are all known risk factors for meningococcal disease .
Immunisation with vaccines against multiple serogroups is likely to be the best strategy to protect individuals against meningococcal diseases. In both the Philippines and Saudi Arabia, vaccination is recommended for individuals who are at increased risk for meningococcal infection. In particular, vaccination is used to protect Hajj pilgrims against invasive meningococcal disease in Saudi Arabia [5, 12]. In response to the 1987 outbreak, vaccination with a bivalent polysaccharide vaccine against serogroups A and C was recommended for Hajj pilgrims, and the vaccination policy was updated following the outbreak in 2000–2001 to include serogroup W-135 . Presently, Saudi Arabia requires proof of vaccination with a quadrivalent meningococcal serogroup A, C, W-135, and Y vaccine to issue Hajj pilgrimage visa for all arrivals. Moreover, administration of chemoprophylaxis at the port of entry to all arrivals from the countries of the African meningitis belt is required in order to lower the carriage rate among Hajj pilgrims [15, 16].
Plain meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines against serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y are available for use in adults and children over two years of age. However, these vaccines are poorly immunogenic for serogroups C, W-135 and Y, do not elicit long-term protection in younger children, do not induce immune memory, do not reduce mucosal carriage (except for serogroup A), and do not confer herd protection [17–20]. Moreover, polysaccharide vaccines may induce hyporesponsiveness to subsequent vaccination, in particular for serogroup C . To overcome these limitations, capsular polysaccharides can be coupled to carrier proteins as demonstrated by monovalent meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccines [21–24]. In 2010, the Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia decided to replace the meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines by meningococcal conjugate vaccines for Saudi Arabian pilgrims, residents of Medina and Mecca Regions, and healthcare workers [12, 13]. The introduction of conjugate vaccines, which have an impact on carriage and transmission of the bacteria, could reduce the spread of isolates from asymptomatic pilgrims to their household contacts upon returning from the pilgrimage [6, 14].
Presently, two quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines against serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y are licensed in various countries [25–27]. Additionally, a new quadrivalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y tetanus-toxoid (TT) conjugate vaccine (Nimenrix™ [GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines]; MenACWY-TT) has been recently approved by the European Medicines Agency for individuals aged 12 months and above. Previous studies have shown that MenACWY-TT is immunogenic and well-tolerated in toddlers, young children, adolescents, and young adults [28–34]. In the present study, we compared the immunogenicity and safety of MenACWY-TT and a licensed quadrivalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y plain polysaccharide vaccine in participants 11–55 years of age in the Philippines and Saudi Arabia. The study was designed to evaluate the persistence of the immune response up to five years after vaccination; results up to the third year were available at the time of the preparation of this manuscript.
This was a phase IIb, open, randomised, controlled study conducted in two centres in the Philippines (Research Institute for Tropical Medicine and Phillippine General Hospital) and one centre in Saudi Arabia (King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh). The study consisted of two phases: the vaccination phase (including the extended safety follow-up until Month 6) and the long-term persistence phase (up to five years after vaccination). At the time of the preparation of this manuscript, results up to the third year post-vaccination were available (covering the period December 2006 to August 2010).
Participants were randomised (3:1) into two parallel groups to receive either one dose of the MenACWY-TT vaccine (ACWY-TT group) or one dose of the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine (Men-PS group) at Month 0. The randomisation list was generated at GlaxoSmithKline (Rixensart, Belgium) using a standard Statistical Analysis System (SAS®) program to number the vaccines. Treatment allocation at the investigator sites was performed using a central internet randomisation system. The randomisation algorithm used a minimisation procedure (block size of four) accounting for study centre and age of the subject (11–17 years and 18–55 years of age) in order to ensure a balanced distribution of the population in each group (2/3 of subjects were enrolled in the 11–17 year age stratum, and 1/3 of subjects were enrolled in the 18–55 year age stratum). The vaccines were administered in an open manner due to the differing appearance and route of administration of the study vaccines.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol and associated documents were reviewed and approved by local ethics committees (the Institutional Review Board from the National Guard Health Affair, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and from the Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, the University of the Philippines Manila Research Ethics Board (UPMREB), Manila, the Philippines). Written informed consent was obtained before enrolment from the participants aged at least 16 years in Saudi Arabia and 18 years in the Philippines. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents/guardians of younger participants, and a written informed assent was signed by these participants. In addition, consent was obtained if participants in the Philippines reached 18 years of age during the study. This study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00356369. A summary of the protocol is available at http://www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com (GSK study ID 107386).
The primary objectives of this study were to demonstrate non-inferiority of the MenACWY-TT vaccine over the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine for the entire population in terms of vaccine response (measured by a serum bactericidal antibody assay using baby rabbit serum as exogenous complement source [rSBA]) and incidence of any grade 3 general symptom reported within four days after vaccination.
The secondary objectives of the study were to compare the immunogenicity and the persistence of the immune response of the MenACWY-TT vaccine with that of the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine and to evaluate the reactogenicity and the safety of both vaccines.
Study participants were healthy adolescents and adults from the Philippines and Saudi Arabia aged 11 to 55 years at the time of vaccination, who had previously completed routine childhood vaccinations to the best of their, or their parents’/guardians’, knowledge.
Participants were excluded if they were immunosuppressed from any cause or were previously vaccinated with a meningococcal conjugate vaccine at any time or with a meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine against serogroup A, C, W-135, or Y within five years prior to the study. Participants with a history of meningococcal disease due to serogroup A, C, W-135, or Y; Guillain-Barré syndrome; any neurological disorders or seizures; allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine; or chronic alcohol consumption or drug abuse were also excluded. Moreover, participants were ineligible if they had used an investigational product within 30 days prior to the study, had received immunoglobulins or blood products in the preceding three months, or had a major congenital defect, serious illness, or acute disease at the time of enrolment. Females of childbearing potential were required to practice adequate contraception for 30 days prior to vaccination, have a negative pregnancy test at the time of vaccination, and continue contraceptive precautions for two months after vaccination.
One dose of the MenACWY-TT candidate vaccine (Nimenrix™, GlaxoSmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium) contained 5 μg of each of the meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y polysaccharides individually conjugated to TT. A single MenACWY-TT vaccine dose was administered intramuscularly in the non-dominant deltoid of the participants in the ACWY-TT group. One dose of the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine (Mencevax™ ACWY, GlaxoSmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium) contained 50 μg of each of the meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y polysaccharides. A single MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine dose was administered subcutaneously in the non-dominant upper arm of the participants in the Men-PS group.
Blood samples were collected from all participants at Month 0, Month 1, Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3. Functional antibody responses against meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y were assessed by rSBA . The target strains used in the rSBA assays were L10 for serogroup A, C11 for serogroup C, MP01240070 for serogroup W-135, and S-1975 for serogroup Y. rSBA titres ≥8 for serogroup C are considered to predict protection , and this threshold was extended to the other serogroups as well . rSBA titres ≥128, a more conservative correlate of protection, were also evaluated . Vaccine response was defined as an rSBA titre ≥32 at Month 1 in participants who were seronegative (rSBA titre <8) at pre-vaccination and as at least a four-fold increase in titre from Month 0 to Month 1 in participants who were seropositive at pre-vaccination.
In addition, antibody concentrations against TT were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with an assay cut-off of 0.1 IU/mL . All assays were performed at GlaxoSmithKline’s central laboratory (Rixensart, Belgium), and laboratory personnel were blinded to the treatment group of the subject.
Safety and reactogenicity assessment
Local (pain, redness, and swelling) and general (fatigue, fever, gastrointestinal symptoms, and headache) solicited symptoms were recorded during four days and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) during one month after vaccination. The intensity of each symptom was graded on a three-level scale. Injection site redness and swelling were of grade 3 intensity if their diameter was >50 mm and fever if oral temperature was >39.5°C. All other symptoms of grade 3 intensity were defined as symptoms preventing normal activity.
New onset of chronic illnesses (NOCIs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded for up to six months post-vaccination. SAEs were defined as any medical event resulting in death, any life-threatening event, any event causing disability or requiring hospitalisation or prolongation of hospitalisation, or any congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a study participant. Moreover, SAEs related to vaccination and any events related to lack of vaccine efficacy were reported throughout the study. All solicited local reactions were considered causally related to vaccination. Causality of all other AEs was assessed by the investigators at the local study sites (independent from the Sponsor of the study).
With a target sample size of 460 participants evaluable for immunogenicity (345 in the ACWY-TT group and 115 in the Men-PS group), the global power to meet all the primary objectives of the study was at least 76%.
The total vaccinated cohort, on which the safety analyses were performed, included all vaccinated participants. The analyses of immunogenicity were performed on the according to protocol (ATP) immunogenicity cohort and on the ATP cohort for antibody persistence Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3, which included all evaluable study participants, who were vaccinated during the vaccination phase, meeting the eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria during the study, and for whom data concerning immunogenicity endpoints were available for at least one tested antigen at Month 1, Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3, respectively.
The percentages of participants with antibody titres or concentrations above the proposed cut-offs and with a vaccine response as well as the geometric mean antibody titres (GMTs) or geometric mean antibody concentrations (GMCs) for the tested antigens were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in each treatment group. The GMTs/GMCs were calculated by taking the anti-log of the mean of the log10 titre/concentration transformations. Antibody titres/concentrations below the cut-off of the assay were given an arbitrary value of half the cut-off for the purpose of GMTs/GMCs calculation.
Non-inferiority of the rSBA vaccine response induced by the MenACWY-TT vaccine over the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine was demonstrated if the lower limit (LL) of the asymptotic standardised 95% CI for the difference between the ACWY-TT and the Men-PS groups in the percentage of participants with rSBA vaccine response was ≥ −12% for serogroups C, W-135, and Y and ≥ −15% for serogroup A (inferential analysis).
Potential statistically significant differences between groups were detected if the asymptotic standardised 95% CI for the difference in rates (percentages of participants with titres/concentrations above proposed cut-offs or with vaccine responses) between the two vaccine groups did not contain the value “0”, or if the 95% CI for the GMTs/GMCs ratios between groups did not contain the value “1” (exploratory analyses). The GMTs/GMCs ratios were computed by an analysis of covariance model on the log10 transformation of the titres/concentrations using the pre-vaccination log10 transformation of the titres/concentrations, the age strata, and the vaccine groups as covariates. No adjustment for multiplicity of secondary endpoints was made and significant results from the exploratory analyses should be interpreted with caution.
Non-inferiority of the MenACWY-TT vaccine over the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine in terms of incidence of grade 3 general symptoms was demonstrated if the upper limit (UL) of the asymptotic 95% CI for the difference between the ACWY-TT and the Men-PS groups in the incidence of any grade 3 general symptom within four days after vaccination was below 5% (inferential analysis).
The percentages of participants reporting each solicited local and general symptom and each unsolicited AE were tabulated with exact 95% CIs. NOCIs, SAEs, and withdrawals due to AEs were described in detail.
The statistical analyses were performed using the SAS® software version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States) and StatXact 7.0.
Summary of participant’s demographic characteristics at the time of vaccination
N = 374
N = 126
Age at Month 0 (years)
Mean ± SD
18.6 ± 7.62
19.3 ± 8.58
Female n (%)
Male n (%)
South East Asian heritage n (%)
Arabic/North African heritage n (%)
East Asian heritage n (%)
Differences in rSBA vaccine response rate between the ACWY-TT and the Men-PS groups
Difference in vaccine response rate (ACWY-TT minus Men-PS)
% [95% CI]
13.00 [3.52, 23.50]
4.18 [−1.03, 11.36]
4.58 [−0.07, 11.49]
8.05 [1.72, 16.17]
Percentage of participants with rSBA titres ≥8 and ≥128 and GMTs before and after vaccination
% ≥8 [95% CI]
% ≥128 [95% CI]
GMT [95% CI]
95.1 [92.0, 97.2]
89.5 [85.5, 92.7]
330.7 [285.8, 382.7]
100 [98.9, 100]
99.7 [98.3, 100]
4944.6* [4451.5, 5492.5]
99.7 [98.4, 100]
99.4 [98.0, 99.9]
2084.9* [1888.3, 2302.0]
99.7 [98.4, 100]
99.1* [97.4, 99.8]
1326.8* [1197.7, 1469.7]
100 [98.9, 100]
99.1* [97.3, 99.8]
1238.4* [1126.0, 1361.9]
87.1 [79.0, 93.0]
80.2 [71.1, 87.5]
227.8 [162.1, 320.2]
100 [96.8, 100]
100 [96.8, 100]
2190.1 [1857.5, 2582.2]
100 [96.8, 100]
99.1 [95.2, 100]
1099.1 [931.6, 1296.7]
99.0 [94.7, 100]
96.1 [90.3, 98.9]
698.9 [561.2, 870.4]
100 [96.5, 100]
94.2 [87.9, 97.9]
596.9 [488.5, 729.3]
78.1 [73.2, 82.5]
53.1 [47.5, 58.6]
84.1 [68.5, 103.4]
99.7 [98.4, 100]
99.7 [98.4, 100]
10073.7* [8699.9, 11664.5]
99.7 [98.4, 100]
97.2 [94.9, 98.6]
1848.6 [1620.3, 2109.2]
99.4 [97.9, 99.9]
96.2 [93.6, 98.0]
1162.0 [1013.1, 1332.9]
99.1 [97.4, 99.8]
92.9 [89.6, 95.4]
870.3 [757.1, 1000.4]
85.0 [77.0, 91.0]
49.6 [40.0, 59.1]
114.1 [80.3, 162.0]
100 [96.8, 100]
98.2 [93.8, 99.8]
6545.6 [5047.5, 8488.4]
99.1 [95.3, 100]
95.7 [90.1, 98.6]
1876.5 [1400.7, 2514.0]
98.2 [93.7, 99.8]
92.0 [85.3, 96.3]
1229.4 [876.4, 1724.7]
99.1 [95.0, 100]
93.6 [87.2, 97.4]
1124.8 [812.3, 1557,6]
75.5 [70.5, 80.1]
58.4 [52.9, 63.8]
93.0 [74.6, 116.0]
99.7 [98.4, 100]
99.4 [97.9, 99.9]
8576.5* [7614.9, 9659.5]
99.7 [98.4, 100]
99.4* [98.0, 99.9]
2993.5* [2618.8, 3421.9]
99.4 [97.9, 99.9]
98.6* [96.7, 99.5]
1984.6* [1757.1, 2241.4]
99.7* [98.4, 100]
98.8* [97.0, 99.7]
2109.2* [1842.5, 2414.5]
81.7 [73.1, 88.4]
61.5 [51.7, 70.6]
115.3 [81.6, 162.9]
100 [96.8, 100]
100 [96.8, 100]
2969.5 [2439.4, 3614.9]
100 [96.9, 100]
94.9 [89.2, 98.1]
699.9 [569.3, 860.4]
90.1 [83.0, 94.9]
81.1 [72.5, 87.9]
319.1 [228.0, 446.5]
86.7 [78.6, 92.5]
80.0 [71.1, 87.2]
332.8 [224.4, 493.8]
92.7 [89.4, 95.3]
80.0 [75.3, 84.2]
310.0 [261.2, 367.9]
100 [98.9, 100]
99.7 [98.4, 100]
10315.2* [9317.1, 11420.2]
100 [99.0, 100]
99.7 [98.4, 100]
4207.1* [3767.3, 4698.3]
99.7 [98.4, 100]
99.1* [97.5, 99.8]
3042.1* [2692.2, 3437.5]
99.7 [98.4, 100]
99.4 [97.9, 99.9]
2567.3* [2288.6, 2879.8]
92.9 [86.5, 96.9]
77.9 [69.1, 85.1]
282.8 [209.9, 380.8]
100 [96.8, 100]
100 [96.8, 100]
4573.7 [3863.9, 5413.9]
100 [96.9, 100]
98.3 [93.9, 99.8]
1386.5 [1104.2, 1740.9]
99.1 [95.1, 100]
94.6 [88.6, 98.0]
850.2 [667.5, 1082.9]
99.1 [94.9, 100]
97.2 [92.1, 99.4]
848.0 [682.6, 1053.5]
Persistence of the bactericidal antibodies
Exploratory analyses showed that rSBA GMTs adjusted for pre-vaccination titres and age strata for serogroups A, W-135, and Y were statistically significantly higher after vaccination with MenACWY-TT compared with the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine up to Year 3 (Additional file 2: Table S2).
At Month 1, the percentage of participants with anti-TT concentrations ≥0.1 IU/mL increased from 67.4% (95% CI: 62.0–72.4) to 95.6% (95% CI: 92.8–97.5) in the ACWY-TT group and a 28-fold increase of the anti-TT GMCs was observed in this group (from 0.35 [95% CI: 0.29 – 0.43] at Month 0 to 10.01 [95% CI: 8.34 – 12.03] at Month 1). As expected, the percentage of participants with anti-TT concentrations ≥0.1 IU/mL (60.0% [95% CI: 50.2-69.2] at Month 0 and 56.6% [95% CI: 47.0–65.9] at Month 1) and the anti-TT GMCs (0.28 [95% CI: 0.20–0.39] at Month 0 and 0.27 [95% CI: 0.19–0.38] at Month 1) remained stable between pre- and post-vaccination in the Men-PS group.
Difference between groups in the percentage of participants reporting grade 3 solicited and unsolicited symptoms
Difference in percentage (ACWY-TT minus Men-PS)
% [95% CI]
2.41 [−1.29, 4.91]
1.34 [−1.64, 3.09]
1.61 [−2.06, 3.90]
During the 6-month extended safety follow-up period, one participant reported a NOCI (food allergy) and one participant reported two SAEs (costochondritis and mental disorder). The SAEs were reported in the ACWY-TT group, but none were considered related to vaccination by the investigators. No participants reported NOCIs or SAEs that were considered related to vaccination or events related to the lack of vaccine efficacy up to three years after vaccination. In the persistence phase of the study, two participants of the ACWY-TT group died due to a traffic accident (one subject between Year 1 and Year 2 and a second subject between Year 2 and Year 3).
Non-inferiority of the immunogenicity of the MenACWY-TT vaccine as compared to the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine in terms of rSBA vaccine response to the four meningococcal serogroups was demonstrated. At one month post-vaccination, rSBA titres ≥128, which is the conservative threshold for protection against meningococcal diseases, were reached for each of the four serogroups by at least 99.4% and 98.2% of the participants vaccinated with MenACWY-TT and the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine, respectively. This observation is consistent with the results of previous studies in which the immune response induced by MenACWY-TT was evaluated in various age groups [28–34]. Moreover, the percentage of participants who retained rSBA antibody titres ≥8 up to three years after vaccination remained high for the four serogroups in both groups, indicating that the protection continues for at least three years in adolescents and adults. The high percentage (92.9%) of participants who retained rSBA titres ≥128 in the present study contrasts with previous observations, showing waning immunity in terms of hSBA titres and concerns about the potential for vaccine failure following vaccination with either the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine or another quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine using diphtheria toxoid as carrier protein (MenACWY-DT) . However, the two studies cannot be directly compared since a different assay using human complement (hSBA) was used in the study with MenACWY-DT.
Exploratory analyses showed that the rSBA GMTs for each meningococcal serogroup were statistically significantly higher at one month post-vaccination in participants vaccinated with MenACWY-TT compared with those who received the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine, although no differences were detected in terms of percentage of participants with rSBA titres ≥8 or ≥128. These results are consistent with those of previous studies conducted on the MenACWY-TT vaccine in children 3–5 years of age  and in adolescents and young adults  in Europe, and in children  and adolescents  in Asia. These results are also in-line with other studies showing that other quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines (MenACWY-DT and MenACWY-CRM197) induce higher antibody titres than plain polysaccharide vaccines in children, adolescents, and adults [25, 26, 41–43]. The rSBA GMTs for serogroups A, W-135, and Y remained statistically significantly higher in the participants who received the MenACWY-TT vaccine than in those who received the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine at three years post-vaccination, while comparable rSBA GMTs for serogroup C were measured in both vaccine groups. The antibody decay for each serogroup was highest between one month and one year post-vaccination and the rate of decay decreased at subsequent timepoints in both groups. These data indicate that decay over time may lead to the need for further booster doses if the individual remains at risk for meningococcal disease. The evaluation of additional timepoints in the current study will further contribute to the understanding of the expected long-term duration of protection.
In this study, high rSBA titres were measured in both groups at pre-vaccination. This was expected for the age groups studied (adolescents and adults) because immunity to meningococcal strains is known to increase in an age-dependent manner . Moreover, the likelihood of exposure to N. meningitidis and acquisition of functional antibodies due to natural immunity may vary by location as meningococcal disease epidemiology varies substantially by geographic area . Vaccine response rate was chosen as the primary endpoint to evaluate the immunogenicity of the vaccines as vaccine response assesses the ability of participants to respond to the vaccine regardless of their serostatus at pre-vaccination. As expected, immune responses to tetanus toxoid were observed in the participants who received the MenACWY-TT vaccine, but not in those who received the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine [28, 29, 33, 34].
Non-inferiority of the MenACWY-TT vaccine over the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine, in terms of incidence of solicited and unsolicited grade 3 general symptoms reported within four days after vaccination, was demonstrated. Of note, clinically relevant severe general symptoms and vaccine-related events are most likely to occur during the four-day post-vaccination period. However, the incidence of any grade 3 symptoms seemed higher in the participants who received the MenACWY-TT vaccine than the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine and this observation was driven by the local injection site reactions. The specific solicited injection site redness and swelling with any intensity were also more frequently reported in the participants who received the MenACWY-TT vaccine than the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine. These observations are likely due to the TT content of the conjugate vaccine and are consistent with previous studies showing that local reactions are more frequent in individuals vaccinated with quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines compared to plain polysaccharide vaccines [27–29, 33, 34, 43]. However, we cannot exclude that the intramuscular administration of the conjugate vaccine (versus subcutaneous for the polysaccharide one) may in part explain the higher reactogenicity as a previous study suggested that intramuscular administration of meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine induced higher rates of erythema compared to subcutaneous administration . No NOCIs or SAEs reported up to three years after vaccination were considered related to vaccination in this study and both vaccines were well-tolerated.
The present study was limited by its open design due to the differences in the appearance and administration mode of the two study vaccines. The open design would not have influenced the immunogenicity results because the laboratory personnel was blinded during serological testing but had the potential to bias the safety reporting in favour of the control plain polysaccharide vaccine versus the meningococcal conjugate vaccine. The interpretation of the results has also been limited by the absence of validated correlates of protection for serogroups A, W-135, and Y and by the numerous exploratory statistical comparisons, which should be interpreted with caution. The generalizability of our results was limited by the small sample size and by the fact that the study was conducted in two countries. Other studies are being conducted in parallel to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the MenACWY-TT vaccine in younger age groups and to compare this vaccine with other licensed quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines . Of note, at the time of study conduct, meningococcal conjugate vaccines were not licensed in Saudi Arabia or the Philippines.
This study showed that the MenACWY-TT vaccine, when administered as a single intramuscular dose to adolescents and adults 11–55 years of age, was non-inferior to a licensed meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine in terms of both immunogenicity and safety endpoints. Furthermore, MenACWY-TT induced an immune response against meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y, which persisted up to three years after vaccination; rSBA GMTs for serogroups A, W-135, and Y were statistically significantly higher compared with those in participants who received the MenACWY polysaccharide vaccine, while comparable rSBA GMTs for serogroup C were measured in both vaccine groups. Both vaccines were well-tolerated and their safety and reactogenicity profiles were comparable, except for higher reported rates of injection site redness and swelling after vaccination with MenACWY-TT.
Mencevax and Nimenrix are trademark of the GlaxoSmithKline Group of companies.
According to protocol
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Geometric mean antibody titres
Geometric mean antibody concentration
Meningococcal quadrivalent serogroups A, C,W-135 and Y vaccine with all serogroups conjugated to the tetanus toxoid (TT) carrier protein
Meningococcal quadrivalent polysaccharide vaccine
New onset of chronic illness
Serum bactericidal antibody assays using baby rabbit serum as exogenous complement source
(Serious) adverse event
The authors are indebted to the study participants and their parents, clinicians, nurses, and laboratory technicians at the study site as well as to clinical investigators for their contribution to this study. In particular, we thank Drs. G.N. Al Anizi, K.M. Al Qahtani, K.T. Leyritana, M.M. Montebon Chua, M.S. Al Qahtani, L.T. Sanchez, B. Al Otaibi and M. Al Anizi. We are also grateful to all teams of GSK Biologicals for their contribution to this study, including M. Soliman, W. Kandeel, S.R. Gatchalian, J.F. Napa, J.M. Torres, and M.E. Bassyouni for their assistance in coordination of the study; B. Cheuvart for statistical input and analysis; L. Moerman, F.G. Celzo, A. Stukkens and M.L. Franco for assistance in preparation of, or contribution to, study report; P. Vink for input into protocol development; and P. Lestrate and K. Maleux for conducting laboratory assays. We also thank Claire Verbelen (XPE Pharma & Science) for scientific writing support and Juliette Gray and Virginie Durbecq (XPE Pharma & Science c/o GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines) for editorial assistance and manuscript coordination.
Role of the funding source
GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA was the funding source and was involved in all stages of the study conduct and analysis. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA also took responsibility for all costs associated with the development and publishing of the present manuscript.
- Findlow J, Balmer P, Yero D, Niebla O, Pajón R, Borrow R: Neisseria Vaccines 2007. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2007, 6: 485-489. 10.1586/147605184.108.40.2065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pollard AJ: Global epidemiology of meningococcal disease and vaccine efficacy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004, 23: S274-279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harrison LH, Trotter CL, Ramsay ME: Global epidemiology of meningococcal disease. Vaccine. 2009, 27: B51-63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Memish ZA: Meningococcal disease and travel. Clin Infect Dis. 2002, 34: 84-90. 10.1086/323403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Memish ZA, Goubeaud A, Broker M, Malerczyk C, Shibl AM: Invasive meningococcal disease and travel. J Infect Public Health. 2010, 3: 143-151. 10.1016/j.jiph.2010.09.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilder-Smith A: Meningococcal disease in international travel: vaccine strategies. J Travel Med. 2005, 12 (Suppl 1): S22-29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aguilera JF, Perrocheau A, Meffre C, Hahne S: Outbreak of serogroup W135 meningococcal disease after the Hajj pilgrimage, Europe, 2000. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002, 8: 761-767. 10.3201/eid0808.010422.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Swartley JS, Marfin AA, Edupuganti S, Liu LJ, Cieslak P, Perkins B, Wenger JD, Stephens DS: Capsule switching of Neisseria meningitidis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997, 94: 271-276. 10.1073/pnas.94.1.271.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hausdorff WP, Hajjeh R, Al-Mazrou A, Shibl A, Soriano-Gabarro M: The epidemiology of pneumococcal, meningococcal, and Haemophilus disease in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region-current status and needs. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 1935-1944. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.11.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: Meningococcal disease in the Philippines - update 2: Global Alert and Response (GAR). 2012, Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/don/2005_01_28a/en/index.html [Last updated on January 28, 2005; accessed on January 16, 2012]Google Scholar
- Gopez I, Manoff S, White ME, Dayrit MM: Meningococcal disease outbreak in San Jose, Sipalay, Negros Occidental. Phil J Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991, 20: 17-22.Google Scholar
- Memish ZA: Health conditions for travelers to Saudi Arabia for (Hajj) for the year 1431H/2010. J Infect Public Health. 2010, 3: 92-94. 10.1016/j.jiph.2010.09.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Memish ZA, Shibl AM: Consensus building and recommendations based on the available epidemiology of meningococcal disease in Gulf Cooperation Council States. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2011, 9: 60-66. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2011.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilder-Smith A, Goh KT, Barkham T, Paton NI: Hajj-associated outbreak strain of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W135: estimates of the attack rate in a defined population and the risk of invasive disease developing in carriers. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 36: 679-683. 10.1086/367858.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lingappa JR: Al Rabeah AM, Hajjeh R, Mustafa T, Fatani A, Al Bassam T, Badukhan A, Turkistani A, Makki S, Al-Hamdan N, Al-Jeffri M, Al Mazrou Y, Perkins BA, Popovic T, Mayer LW, Rosenstein NE: Serogroup W-135 meningococcal disease during the Hajj, 2000. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9: 665-671. 10.3201/eid0906.020565.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Health Portal-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Health requirements for Hajj and Umrah pilgrims in 2011. 2011, Available at: http://www.moh.gov.sa/en/HealthAwareness/Hajj/Pages/003.aspx [Last updated on August 7, 2011; accessed on January 16, 2012]Google Scholar
- Harrison LH: Prospects for vaccine prevention of meningococcal infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006, 19: 142-164. 10.1128/CMR.19.1.142-164.2006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- MacDonald NE, Halperin SA, Law BJ, Forrest B, Danzig LE, Granoff DM: Induction of immunologic memory by conjugated vs plain meningococcal C polysaccharide vaccine in toddlers: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998, 280: 1685-1689. 10.1001/jama.280.19.1685.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jodar L, Feavers IM, Salisbury D, Granoff DM: Development of vaccines against meningococcal disease. Lancet. 2002, 359: 1499-1508. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08416-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dellicour S, Greenwood B: Systematic review: Impact of meningococcal vaccination on pharyngeal carriage of meningococci. Trop Med Int Health. 2007, 12: 1409-1421. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01929.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borrow R, Miller E: Long-term protection in children with meningococcal C conjugate vaccination: lessons learned. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2006, 5: 851-857. 10.1586/147605220.127.116.111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maiden MC, Ibarz-Pavon AB, Urwin R, Gray SJ, Andrews NJ, Clarke SC, Walker AM, Evans MR, Kroll JS, Neal KR, Ala'aldeen DA, Crook DW, Cann K, Harrison S, Cunningham R, Baxter D, Kaczmarski E, Maclennan J, Cameron JC, Stuart JM: Impact of meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccines on carriage and herd immunity. J Infect Dis. 2008, 197: 737-743. 10.1086/527401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ramsay ME, Andrews NJ, Trotter CL, Kaczmarski EB, Miller E: Herd immunity from meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccination in England: database analysis. BMJ. 2003, 326: 365-366. 10.1136/bmj.326.7385.365.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Trotter CL, Maiden MC: Meningococcal vaccines and herd immunity: lessons learned from serogroup C conjugate vaccination programs. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009, 8: 851-861. 10.1586/erv.09.48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jackson LA, Baxter R, Reisinger K, Karsten A, Shah J, Bedell L: Dull PM; V59P13 Study Group: Phase III comparison of an investigational quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine with the licensed meningococcal ACWY conjugate vaccine in adolescents. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 49: e1-10. 10.1086/599117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keyserling H, Papa T, Koranyi K, Ryall R, Bassily E, Bybel MJ, Sullivan K, Gilmet G, Reinhardt A: Safety, immunogenicity, and immune memory of a novel meningococcal (groups A, C, Y, and W-135) polysaccharide diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine (MCV-4) in healthy adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005, 159: 907-913. 10.1001/archpedi.159.10.907.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reisinger KS, Baxter R, Block SL, Shah J, Bedell L, Dull PM: Quadrivalent meningococcal vaccination of adults: phase III comparison of an investigational conjugate vaccine, MenACWY-CRM, with the licensed vaccine, Menactra. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009, 16: 1810-1815. 10.1128/CVI.00207-09.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Östergaard L, Lebacq E, Poolman J, Maechler G, Boutriau D: Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and persistence of meningococcal A, C, W-135 and Y-tetanus toxoid candidate conjugate (MenACWY-TT) vaccine formulations in adolescents aged 15–25 years. Vaccine. 2009, 27: 161-168. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.08.075.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knuf M, Kieninger-Baum D, Habermehl P, Muttonen P, Maurer H, Vink P, Poolman J, Boutriau D: A dose-range study assessing immunogenicity and safety of one dose of a new candidate meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, Y tetanus toxoid conjugate (MenACWY-TT) vaccine administered in the second year of life and in young children. Vaccine. 2010, 28: 744-753. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baxter R, Baine Y, Ensor K, Bianco V, Friedland LR, Miller JM: Immunogenicity and safety of an investigational quadrivalent meningococcal ACWY tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in healthy adolescents and young adults 10 to 25 years of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011, 30: e41-48. 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182054ab9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knuf M, Pantazi-Chatzikonstantinou A, Pfletschinger U, Tichmann-Schumann I, Maurer H, Maurer L, Fischbach T, Zinke H, Pankow-Culot H, Papaevangelou V, Bianco V, Van der Wielen M, Miller JM: An investigational tetravalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine co-administered with Infanrix hexa is immunogenic, with an acceptable safety profile in 12-23-month-old children. Vaccine. 2011, 29: 4264-4273. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.03.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vesikari T, Karvonen A, Bianco V, Van der Wielen M, Miller J: Tetravalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y conjugate vaccine is well tolerated and immunogenic when co-administered with measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine during the second year of life: An open, randomized controlled trial. Vaccine. 2011, 29: 4274-4284. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.03.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Memish ZA, Dbaibo G, Montellano M, Verghese VP, Jain H, Dubey AP, Bianco V, Van der Wielen M, Gatchalian S, Miller JM: Immunogenicity of a single dose of tetravalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135, and Y conjugate vaccine administered to 2- to 10-year-olds is noninferior to a licensed-ACWY polysaccharide vaccine with an acceptable safety profile. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011, 30: e56-62. 10.1097/INF.0b013e31820e6e02.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bermal N, Huang L-M, Dubey A, Jain H, Bavdekar A, Lin TY, Bianco V, Baine Y, Miller JM: Safety and immunogenicity of a tetravalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y conjugate vaccine in adolescents and adults. Hum Vaccin. 2011, 7: 1-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maslanka SE, Gheesling LL, Libutti DE, Donaldson KB, Harakeh HS, Dykes JK, Arhin FF, Devi SJ, Frasch CE, Huang JC, Kriz-Kuzemenska P, Lemmon RD, Lorange M, Peeters CC, Quataert S, Tai JY, Carlone GM: Standardization and a multilaboratory comparison of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A and C serum bactericidal assays. The Multilaboratory Study Group. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1997, 4: 156-167.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Borrow R, Balmer P, Miller E: Meningococcal surrogates of protection-serum bactericidal antibody activity. Vaccine. 2005, 23: 2222-2227. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Inadvertent misadministration of meningococcal conjugate vaccine-United States, June-August 2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006, 55: 1016-1017.Google Scholar
- Borrow R, Andrews N, Goldblatt D, Miller E: Serological basis for use of meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccines in the United Kingdom: Reevaluation of correlates of protection. Infect Immun. 2001, 69: 1568-1573. 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1568-1573.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Amanna IJ, Messaoudi I, Slifka MK: Protective immunity following vaccination: how is it defined?. Hum Vaccin. 2008, 4: 316-319. 10.4161/hv.4.4.5751.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Updated Recommendations for Use of Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccines - Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011, 60: 72-76.
- Pichichero M, Casey J, Blatter M, Rothstein E, Ryall R, Bybel M, Gilmet G, Papa T: Comparative trial of the safety and immunogenicity of quadrivalent (A, C, Y, W-135) meningococcal polysaccharide-diphtheria conjugate vaccine versus quadrivalent polysaccharide vaccine in two- to ten-year-old children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005, 24: 57-62. 10.1097/01.inf.0000148928.10057.86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reisinger KS, Black S, Stoddard JJ: Optimizing protection against meningococcal disease. Clin Pediatr. 2010, 49: 586-97. 10.1177/0009922809354327.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Black S, Klein NP, Shah J, Bedell L, Karsten A, Dull PM: Immunogenicity and tolerability of a quadrivalent meningococcal glycoconjugate vaccine in children 2–10 years of age. Vaccine. 2010, 28: 657-663. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldschneider I, Gotschlich EC, Artenstein MS: Human immunity to the meningococcus. J Exp Med. 1969, 129: 1307-1326. 10.1084/jem.129.6.1307.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ruben FL, Froeschle JE, Meschievitz C, Chen K, George J, Reeves-Hoché MK, Pietrobon P, Bybel M, Livingood WC, Woodhouse L: Choosing a route of administration for quadrivalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine: intramuscular versus subcutaneous. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 32: 170-172. 10.1086/317553.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/13/116/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.