Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The development and validation of dried blood spots for external quality assurance of syphilis serology

  • Pieter W Smit1, 2Email author,
  • Thomas van der Vlis1,
  • David Mabey2,
  • John Changalucha3,
  • Julius Mngara3,
  • Benjamin D Clark2, 3,
  • Aura Andreasen2, 4,
  • Jim Todd2, 3,
  • Mark Urassa3,
  • Basia Zaba2 and
  • Rosanna W Peeling2
BMC Infectious Diseases201313:102

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-102

Received: 6 August 2012

Accepted: 21 February 2013

Published: 26 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
6 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Klatser
7 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yu-Hsiang Hsieh
30 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Pieter Smit
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
26 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-13-102

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Leiden Cytology and Pathology Laboratory
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
National Institute for Medical Research, NIMR
Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit