Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prospective evaluation of bone markers, parathormone and 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D in HIV-positive patients after the initiation of tenofovir/emtricitabine with atazanavir/ritonavir or efavirenz

  • Emanuele Focà1,
  • Davide Motta1,
  • Marco Borderi2,
  • Daria Gotti1,
  • Laura Albini1,
  • Alessandra Calabresi1,
  • Ilaria Izzo1,
  • Rita Bellagamba3,
  • Pasquale Narciso3,
  • Laura Sighinolfi4,
  • Alberto Clò5,
  • Davide Gibellini5,
  • Eugenia Quiros-Roldan1,
  • Nigritella Brianese1,
  • Bruno Mario Cesana6,
  • Maria Carla Re5 and
  • Carlo Torti1, 7Email author
BMC Infectious Diseases201212:38

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-38

Received: 21 September 2011

Accepted: 14 February 2012

Published: 14 February 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Carlo Torti
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gherardo Mazziotti
29 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giuseppe Nunnari
30 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elena Seminari
16 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Carlo Torti
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Carlo Torti
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gherardo Mazziotti
17 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elena Seminari
25 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Carlo Torti
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
14 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
14 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-12-38

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Infectious Diseases Department, University of Brescia
(2)
Infectious Diseases Section, University of Bologna
(3)
National Institute of Infectious Diseases
(4)
Infectious Diseases Department, S. Anna Hospital
(5)
Microbiology Section, University of Bologna
(6)
Medical Statistics and Biometry Section, University of Brescia
(7)
Institute of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University of Brescia, School of Medicine

Advertisement