Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

CXCL13 may improve diagnosis in early neuroborreliosis with atypical laboratory findings

  • Johannes P Borde1, 2Email author,
  • Simone Meier3,
  • Volker Fingerle4,
  • Christiane Klier4,
  • Johannes Hübner1 and
  • Winfried V Kern1
BMC Infectious Diseases201212:344

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-344

Received: 13 May 2012

Accepted: 7 December 2012

Published: 10 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tobias Rupprecht
29 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Geetika Sood
24 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Johannes Borde
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
7 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-12-344

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Universitätsklinik Freiburg i.Br., Medizinische Klinik II / Sektion Klinische Infektiologie
(2)
Ortenauklinikum Offenburg-Gengenbach, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie
(3)
Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinik Freiburg i.Br.
(4)
Nationales Referenzzentrum für Borrelien

Advertisement