Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Laboratory testing for cytomegalovirus among pregnant women in the United States: a retrospective study using administrative claims data

  • Jessica Leung1Email author,
  • Michael J Cannon2,
  • Scott D Grosse2 and
  • Stephanie R Bialek1
BMC Infectious Diseases201212:334

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-334

Received: 20 June 2012

Accepted: 23 November 2012

Published: 3 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Klaus Hamprecht
23 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Liliane Grangeot-Keros
13 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jessica Leung
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
23 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
3 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-12-334

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2)
National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Advertisement