A case of Mycobacterium goodiiprosthetic valve endocarditis in a non-immunocompromised patient: use of 16S rDNA analysis for rapid diagnosis
© Jönsson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 December 2011
Accepted: 29 October 2012
Published: 14 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bum-Joon Kim|
|15 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jakko van Ingen|
|31 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Goran Jonsson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|31 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bum-Joon Kim|
|23 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Goran Jonsson|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|23 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|14 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-12-301|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.