Assessing the long-term health impact of Q-fever in the Netherlands: a prospective cohort study started in 2007 on the largest documented Q-fever outbreak to date
© van Loenhout et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 3 July 2012
Accepted: 25 October 2012
Published: 30 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Joris van Loenhout|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Joris van Loenhout|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|16 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|30 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-12-280|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.