Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Lymphocyte transformation assay for C neoformans antigen is not reliable for detecting cellular impairment in patients with Neurocryptococcosis

  • Katya C Rocha1, 5Email author,
  • Cinthia Pinhal1,
  • Sônia Cavalcanti1,
  • Monica SM Vidal1,
  • Matheus Toscano1,
  • Dewton Moraes-Vasconcelos1,
  • Alberto JS Duarte1,
  • Fernando LA Fonseca2, 3, 5,
  • Luiz Carlos de Abreu2,
  • Vitor E Valenti4 and
  • Anete SG Grumach1, 2
BMC Infectious Diseases201212:278

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-278

Received: 30 January 2012

Accepted: 17 October 2012

Published: 30 October 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bianca Bianco
9 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - denise christofolini
18 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Vitor E. Valenti
Resubmission - Version 3
18 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Vitor E. Valenti
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Vitor E. Valenti
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
17 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
30 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-12-278

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratório de Dermatologia and Immunodeficiências, Departmento de Dermatologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
(2)
Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC
(3)
Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de São Paulo
(4)
Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP
(5)
Departamento de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC

Advertisement