Perceptions of healthcare professionals regarding the main challenges and barriers to effective hospital infection control in Mongolia: a qualitative study
© Ider et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 December 2011
Accepted: 17 July 2012
Published: 31 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Borg|
|8 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jacqueline Randle|
|8 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tari Turner|
|24 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Bat-Erdene Ider|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tari Turner|
|19 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jacqueline Randle|
|23 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Borg|
|9 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Bat-Erdene Ider|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|31 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-12-170|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.