Population-based cohort study of outpatients with pneumonia: rationale, design and baseline characteristics
© Eurich et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 June 2011
Accepted: 18 June 2012
Published: 18 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Jun 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - ALBERTO Capelastegui|
|12 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nathan Dean|
|13 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Dean Eurich|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nathan Dean|
|23 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Dean Eurich|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|23 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|18 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-12-135|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.