Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Australia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Dyani Lewis1,
  • Danielle C Newton1,
  • Rebecca J Guy2,
  • Hammad Ali2,
  • Marcus Y Chen1, 3,
  • Christopher K Fairley1, 3 and
  • Jane S Hocking1Email author
BMC Infectious Diseases201212:113

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-113

Received: 30 November 2011

Accepted: 3 April 2012

Published: 14 May 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
30 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margaret Hammerschlag
27 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Dyani Lewis
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
14 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-12-113

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Population Health, University of Melbourne
The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales
Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Hospital