Ebola haemorrhagic fever outbreak in Masindi District, Uganda: outbreak description and lessons learned
© Borchert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 6 August 2010
Accepted: 28 December 2011
Published: 28 December 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Aug 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amy Hartman|
|12 Feb 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - sadegh chinikar|
|20 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francesco Maria Fusco|
|29 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vincent Munster|
|10 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Matthias Borchert|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Dec 2011||Editorially accepted|
|28 Dec 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-11-357|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.