Actinobaculum schaalii- invasive pathogen or innocent bystander? A retrospective observational study
© Tschudin-Sutter et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 28 March 2011
Accepted: 26 October 2011
Published: 26 October 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Mar 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dasja Pajkrt|
|1 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vincent Cattoir|
|6 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Val Hall|
|30 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Andreas Widmer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Val Hall|
|26 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Andreas Widmer|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|26 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|12 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Andreas Widmer|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|12 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|26 Oct 2011||Editorially accepted|
|26 Oct 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-11-289|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.