Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Real-time PCR detection of Human Herpesvirus 1-5 in patients lacking clinical signs of a viral CNS infection

  • Birgitta Sundén1,
  • Marie Larsson1,
  • Tina Falkeborn1,
  • Jakob Paues2,
  • Urban Forsum1,
  • Magnus Lindh3,
  • Liselotte Ydrenius1,
  • Britt Åkerlind1 and
  • Lena Serrander1Email author
BMC Infectious Diseases201111:220

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-220

Received: 16 December 2010

Accepted: 17 August 2011

Published: 17 August 2011

Abstract

Background

Infections of the central nervous system (CNS) with herpes- or enterovirus can be self-limiting and benign, but occasionally result in severe and fatal disease. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has revolutionized the diagnostics of viral pathogens, and by multiple displacement amplification (MDA) prior to real-time PCR the sensitivity might be further enhanced. The aim of this study was to investigate if herpes- or enterovirus can be detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients without symptoms.

Methods

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 373 patients lacking typical symptoms of viral CNS infection were analysed by real-time PCR targeting herpesviruses or enteroviruses with or without prior MDA.

Results

In total, virus was detected in 17 patients (4%). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was most commonly detected, in general from patients with other conditions (e.g. infections, cerebral hemorrhage). MDA satisfactorily amplified viral DNA in the absence of human nucleic acids, but showed poor amplification capacity for viral DNA in CSF samples, and did not increase the sensitivity for herpes virus-detection with our methodology.

Conclusions

Viral pathogens are rarely detected in CSF from patients without signs of CNS infection, supporting the view that real-time PCR is a highly specific method to detect symptomatic CNS-infection caused by these viruses. However, EBV may be subclinically reactivated due to other pathological conditions in the CNS.

Background

Herpes viruses are neurotropic and may cause encephalitis, a serious condition with mortality rates around 10-20% overall mortality and up to 20-30% for untreated Herpes simplex-1 (HSV-1) encephalitis. Therefore the detection of these viruses in patients with suspected viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS) is well studied [17]. Due to their neurotropism, alpha-herpesviridae may reside latently in neurons after the primary infection. Dormant viruses may subsequently reactivate and cause symptoms of meningoencephalitis. However, it is not known if viral particles are shed into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during the latent phase, since few studies have investigated the presence of herpes viruses in the CSF of patients lacking symptoms of viral CNS infection [8, 9]. In an earlier study, Davies et al. showed that viral nucleic acid (NA) could be detected by PCR in 5% of patients classified as having a low probability of CNS infection [8].

Although PCR is a highly sensitive method for detection it may not always be sensitive enough for identification of viral DNA in CSF, due to the fact that viral shedding from latent infection may be very low. Multiple displacement amplification (MDA), a whole genome amplification (WGA) method for isothermal uniform amplification of total DNA, might serve to increase the sensitivity of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)[10, 11]. To our knowledge only a few studies have used MDA in connection with viral detection [1214].

The aims of this project were to investigate the possibility to detect viral nucleic acid in CSF from patients without clinical symptoms or signs of viral infection and if herpes- or enterovirus might cause symptoms mistaken for bacterial CNS infections. Attempts were made to increase the sensitivity by amplifying total DNA with MDA prior to real-time PCR.

Methods

Patients

Samples of CSF from 373 patients from Östergötland County were included in the study (Table 1). No viral analysis had been performed on the majority of these samples. Samples from two groups of patients were studied. Patient group 1 included samples from 167 patients that were sent to the clinical microbiological laboratory at the Linköping University Hospital, for bacterial culture because of a suspected bacterial infection in the CNS. The patients in this group had symptoms ranging from low-grade fever with or without increased white blood cells (WBC) in blood or CSF, to acute onset of decreased consciousness, confusion and sepsis. These samples were collected consecutively between January and September 2008. Patient group 2 consisted of 206 patients, who's CSF, collected consecutively from January to March and June to July 2007, had been previously analyzed serologically for neuroborreliosis. Many of these patients had diffuse symptoms such as persistent or intermittent headaches; others had a history or symptoms that can be indicative of neuroborreliosis. Four patients out of the 206 (2%) in this group were diagnosed with neuroborreliosis using the IDEIA™ Lyme Neuroborreliosis EIA kit (Oxoid Ltd, Ely UK).
Table 1

Sample population of patients

 

Age

Gender distribution

Total

 

Median

Range

Men (%)

Women (%)

Patients

Patient group 1

55

0-86

79 (47)

88 (53)

167

Patient group 2

49

3-84

92 (45)

114 (55)

206

Patient group 1 consisted of samples that were sent for bacterial culture because of a suspected bacterial infection in the CNS. Patient group 2 consisted of samples that had been previously analyzed for neuroborreliosis.

Viral nucleic acid extraction

Total nucleic acid was extracted from 200 μl CSF using MagAttract Virus Mini M48 kit (Qiagen, Solna, Sweden) according to manufacturer's instructions and eluted in 75 μl. All samples were frozen after extraction and after MDA-treatment, when performed.

MDA

GenomiPhi V2 DNA Amplification kit (GenomiPhi, GE Healthcare, Stockholm, Sweden) was used according to manufacturer's instructions on 76 samples, with modification for using 10 μl of DNA extract without sample buffer to maximize initial DNA content. The amplification capacity of MDA for each virus was evaluated by mixing positive herpesvirus DNA controls (Vircell, Santa Fé, Spain) in nuclease-free water or CSF at various concentrations. Real-time PCR results were compared for samples with and without MDA treatment. For this evaluation GenomiPhi was used with either 5 μl template mixed in 5 μl sample buffer, or with 10 μl template without sample buffer. REPLI-g Mini kit (Qiagen) was also used for this evaluation according to the manufacturers' recommendations with 5 μl template.

Real-time PCR

Real-time PCR reactions were performed on Rotor-Gene (Corbette Life Science, Sydney, Australia). Extracted samples with and without MDA treatment were thawed and analyzed in parallel. HSV-1 and HSV-2 were analyzed with 1X QuantiTect SYBR Green Master Mix (Qiagen), 5 μl template in a final volume of 25 μl. PCR for detection of Varicella zoster virus (VZV) followed the same protocol as HSV-1 and HSV-2, but using 1X QuantiFast Probe Master Mix (Qiagen). Sample results were analyzed for cycle threshold values and melting curve analysis for HSV-1 and HSV-2. Commercial kits Artus EBV RG PCR kit V1 (Qiagen) and Artus CMV RG PCR kit V1 (Qiagen) were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Enterovirus was detected with RNA UltraSense™ One-Step Quantitative RT-PCR System (Invitrogen, Paisly, United Kingdom) according to manufacturer's instructions, with 1X RNA UltraSense™ Reaction mix, 3 mM MgSO4, 1.25 μl UltraSense™Enzyme mix and 10 μl template to a final volume of 25 μl. Primers and probes for detection are shown in Table 2. In Patient group 1, real-time PCR analysis included 167 samples for Human herpes virus (HHV) 1 to 5 and samples from 93 patients for enterovirus. In Patient group 2, corresponding PCR analysis included 206 samples for HHV 1 to 4, 171 samples for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and samples from 110 patients for enterovirus.
Table 2

Primers and probes for HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV and enterovirus

Virus

Primer or probe

Sequence (5'-3')

Primer/probe concentration

HSV-11

Forward

CCATACCGACCACACCGACGA

400 nM

 

Reverse

CATACCGGAACGCACCACAC

400 nM

HSV-21

Forward

TCAGCCCATCCTCCTTCGGC

400 nM

 

Reverse

GCGCGGTCCCAGATCGG

400 nM

VZV

Forward

TGCAGGGCATGGCTCAGT

400 nM

 

Reverse

CCCAAGAACCACATGTCCAAC

400 nM

 

Probe

TCCAGGGACTTGGGACC

200 nM

Enterovirus

Forward

CCTGAATGCGGCTAATCCYAAC2

400 nM

 

Reverse

CRATTGTCACCATAAGCAGCCA3

900 nM

 

Probe

CCCAAAGTAGTCGGTTCCGCCACAGA

150 nM

1 Primers for HSV-1 and modified primers for HSV-2 from Franzén-Röhl 20087.

2 Degenerate primer, Y = T or C

3 Degenerate primer, R = G or A.

Results

Real-time PCR

Out of totally 167 patients in Patient group 1, with suspected bacterial CNS infection, viral NA was detected in the CSF of 15 patients using real-time PCR (Table 3). Epstin-Barr virus (EBV) was the most common viral DNA detected (9 patients). As described in Table 4, CNS symptoms was due to non-infectious causes in several cases; subarachnoid or cerebellar hemorrhage (n = 5), tumors (n = 3) or was explained by bacterial infection (n = 4) or shunt dysfunction (n = 2). In two cases, EBV DNA was detected together with HSV-1 or VZV DNA. Among the 206 patients with possible neuroborreliosis, (Patient group 2), viral NA (EBV) was detected in two cases.
Table 3

Real-time PCR detected viral DNA in the two patient groups

Virus

Patient group 1 (167 tot)

Patient group 2 (206 tot)

 

Positive

Percent

Positive

Percent

HSV-1

2

1%

0

0%

HSV-2

1

0.6%

0

0%

VZV

1

0.6%

0

0%

EBV

7

4%

2

1%

CMV

1

0.6%

0

0%

EV

1

0.6%

0

0%

HSV-2 + EBV

1

0.6%

0

0%

VZV + EBV

1

0.6%

0

0%

Total positive patients

15

9%

2

1%

Table 4

Clinical and laboratory finding in patients positive for virus in CSF

      

Symptoms

blood

CSF

  

Pat

Age

Sex

Results

Admission cause

Enceph

Mening

WBC

CRP

WBC

Poly

Mono

Diagnosis

AVT

1

77

M

 

EBV

acute onset, reduced conciousness

No

No

11

62

5

2

3

SAH, bacterial infection

 

2

64

F

VZV

EBV

fever, decreased consciousness

No

No

9

45

427

170

257

Brain tumor

 

3

53

M

HSV2

EBV

fever, decreased consciousness

No

Yes

11

109

135

27

108

Brain hemorrhage, meningitis

 

4

53

M

HSV1

 

headache, personality change

Yes

No

8

< 10

0.5

0.4

0.1

Hydrocephalus/encephalitis

 

5

82

M

 

CMV

fever, post op cerebi

No

No

17

63

21

5

16

Meningioma, infection

 

6

86

F

 

EV

fever, decreased consciousness

Yes

Yes

10

140

1.4

0

1.4

Herpes zoster, bacteremia

yes

7

61

F

 

EBV

post op double vision, CSF leakage

No

No

10

< 10

1315

515

800

Meningioma, post-op meningitis

 

8

70

F

HSV2

 

sudden headache

No

Yes

6

11

103

18.6

84

HSV2 meningitis

 

9

58

M

HSV1

 

acute confusion, dysphasia

Yes

No

16

< 10

27

0.6

26

HSV1 encephalitis

yes

10

52

F

 

EBV

dizziness, vomiting, headache

No

No

18

89

104

n.d

n.d.

SAH

 

11

56

M

VZV

 

Rash, decreased consciousness

No

Yes

6

111

26

0

26

varicella meningitis

yes

12

65

M

 

EBV

Fever, post op cerebri

No

No

11

32

150

2

148

Spinal metastasis, S. aureus inf

 

13

65

M

 

EBV

ventricular shunt dysfunction

No

No

5.5

< 10

109

3

106

ventricular shunt dysfunction

 

14

63

M

 

EBV

fever post-op

No

No

9

< 10

1.7

0.1

1.6

SAH

 

15

54

F

 

EBV

acute headache

No

No

16

98

96

n.d.

n.d

SAH, pneumonia

 

16

60

F

 

EBV

dizziness, arm weakness

No

No

6

< 10

1

0.2

0.6

cerebrovascular disease

 

17

40

F

 

EBV

double vision, dysphasia, headache

Yes

No

14

< 10

514

10

504

Borrelia

yes

SAH: subarachnoidal hemorrhage, Enceph: encephalitis, Mening: meningitis, WBC: white blood cells, CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, CRP: C-reactive protein, Poly: polymorphonuclear cells, Mono: mononuclear cells, AVT: antiviral treatment, n.d.: not determined.

MDA

Five samples (one each of HSV-1, HSV-2 and CMV, and two EBV) in which viral DNA was detected by PCR (without MDA) were negative by PCR after MDA. Conversely, one sample from Patient group 1 was positive for HHV DNA only after MDA amplification. This sample showed a very weakly positive signal after MDA treatment, suggesting that the amount of viral NA was close to the assay cut off. EBV was detected in two samples both with and without MDA. These two EBV samples displayed higher Ct values for MDA products, suggesting that MDA did not increase the sensitivity for viral DNA. Since MDA did not increase the sensitivity for detecting HHV it was not performed on more than 76 samples.

A reason why MDA-treatment did not increase sensitivity could be that viral DNA is scarce in CSF compared to the amount of human genomic DNA. Therefore we studied the amplification of viral DNA from infected cell cultures. MDA-treated viral DNA diluted in CSF compared to water showed a poorer amplification for viral DNA, particularly at lower concentrations. These results suggest that MDA negatively discriminates viral DNA in presence of human nucleic acid.

Discussion

In this study we found no support for low-grade or intermittent shedding of latent HHV DNA into the CSF in patients without signs of viral CNS infection. The identification of viral NA in samples sent for bacterial culture is interesting and probably reflects that clinical symptoms are not easily categorised as due to bacterial or viral infection in the CNS. Probably, bacterial culture is requested also in the absence of typical meningitis in patients who are old, have a complex medical history or are immunologically suppressed.

Viral NA was detected in 15 samples (8%) sent for bacterial culture on the suspicion of possible bacterial CNS infection (Patient group 1). HSV-1, HSV-2 or VZV DNA was detected in 6 of these cases. Five of these had a clinical presentation compatible with viral meningitis or encephalitis, while such symptoms were absent in one case (Pat no 2). CMV was detected in one patient, but the clinical picture did not support CMV-caused infection. EBV DNA was detected in 9 patients in Group 1, but only few of them had signs of CNS infection and none had symptoms typical for EBV infection (fever, mononucleosis). It has been described that EBV can cause CNS infections by itself, particularly in immunocompromised patients [1518] but EBV DNA has also been detected in CSF and synnovial fluid from patients without likely EBV-infection [8, 9, 19]. Our results support the latter, but it is important to note that our material primarily is from patients without suspected viral infection.

It is to our knowledge not yet known if EBV DNA detected in the CSF origins from the CNS itself or from infiltrative white blood cells due to inflammation. The explanation that EBV is borne by WBCs may be favoured, since we could only detect EBV in patients with other traumatic and/or inflammatory processes in the CNS, see Table 4.

Viral NA (EBV) was detected in only two of the samples in Patient group 2 (0.5%). One patient had a clinical presentation characteristic for neuroborreliosis, and did not have fever or other signs of EBV infection. The other patient had no signs of infection but suffered from cerebrovascular disease. The more rare detection of viral NA in Patient group 2 was not surprising because the majority of these samples were collected from patients with diffuse symptoms of long duration, drawn because the clinician wanted to exclude the possibility of neuroborreliosis.

Enterovirus infections in the CNS are common and may present as meningitis in a manner that may mimic bacterial infection. Still, enterovirus RNA was detected in only one positive sample in Patient group 1 and the sample was very weakly reactive. The patient did not have typical symptoms for enterovirus infection, nor increased white blood cells in the CSF.

The absence of detectable viral NA suggests that viruses were not present in the CSF or that our methods for detection are still not sensitive enough. Most real-time PCR methods detect 1 to 10 viral particles/PCR reaction, but the concentration of these viruses in CSF during subclinical infection might be very low. A higher sensitivity could probably be achieved by using larger CSF extraction volumes (5-20 ml), but in general this is not practically possible.

In our study, MDA amplified viral DNA satisfactorily in the absence of other nucleic acids, but showed poor amplification capacity for viral detection in CSF and did not overall increase the sensitivity for HHV detection with our methodology. A possible explanation why viral DNA was not amplified could be the viruses' shorter genome, the nature of viral DNA, or as reported in a study of H. pylori DNA, impact from excess of human genomic DNA [20]. The reportedly good performance of MDA amplification for human papilloma virus (HPV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may be explained by the fact that in these cases, viral DNA can be integrated into the human genome [13, 21]. This suggests that HHV DNA, which is not inserted into the human genome, is discriminated by this method.

Conclusions

In summary, our results show that viral infection, in particular HSV and VZV, should be suspected in patients with putative bacterial CNS infection. Conversly, patients presenting clinical symptoms suggesting HSV-1 encephalitis may have bacterial cause e.g. listerial infections [22, 23]. The findings also indicate that MDA does not serve to enhance the performance of real-time PCR, which alone is a both highly sensitive and specific method for detecting viral CNS infections.

Abbreviations

CNS: 

central nervous system

CSF: 

cerebrospinal fluid

HSV: 

herpes simplex virus

HHV: 

human herpesvirus

EBV: 

Epstein-Barr virus

CMV: 

cytomegalovirus

WGA: 

whole genome amplification

MDA: 

multiple displacement amplification

NA: 

nucleic acids

WBC: 

white blood cells.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Annika Allard, Clinical Virology, Umeå University Hospital, Annika Tiveljung-Lindell Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm and Kåre Bondesson, Clinical Microbiology, Uppsala University Hospital for valuable discussions and sharing of methods and Hans-Jürg Monstein and Anna Ryberg, Clinical Microbiology, Linköping University Hospital for valuable discussions concerning WGA methods.

This study was supported by Linköping University (ALF: LIO-17791)

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Div Clinical Microbiology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University
(2)
Div Infectious Diseases, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University
(3)
Department of Infectious Diseases, Section for Clinical Virology, University of Gothenburg

References

  1. Quereda C, Corral I, Laguna F, Valencia ME, Tenorio A, Echeverria JE, Navas E, Martín-Dávila P, Moreno A, Moreno V, Gonzalez-Lahoz JM, Arribas JR, Guerrero A: Diagnostic utility of a multiplex herpesvirus PCR assay performed with cerebrospinal fluid from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with neurological disorders. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 3061-3067.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. DeBiasi RL, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Weinberg A, Tyler KL: Use of PCR for the diagnosis of herpesvirus infections of the central nervous system. J Clin Virol. 2002, 25: 5-11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jha S, Patel R, Yadav RK, Kumar V: Clinical spectrum, pitfalls in diagnosis and therapeutic implications in herpes simplex encephalitis. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004, 52: 24-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tyler KL: Herpes simplex virus infections of the central nervous system: encephalitis and meningitis, including Mollaret's. Herpes. 2004, 11 (Suppl 2): 57A-64A.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aksamit AJ: Herpes Simplex Encephalitis in Adults and Older Children. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2005, 7: 145-150. 10.1007/s11940-005-0023-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hjalmarsson A, Blomqvist P, Skoldenberg B: Herpes simplex encephalitis in Sweden, 1990-2001: incidence, morbidity, and mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 45: 875-880. 10.1086/521262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Franzen-Röhl E, Larsson K, Skoog E, Tiveljung-Lindell A, Grillner L, Aurelius E, Glimåker M: High diagnostic yield by CSF-PCR for entero- and herpes simplex viruses and TBEV serology in adults with acute aseptic meningitis in Stockholm. Scand J Infect Dis. 2008, 40: 914-921. 10.1080/00365540802235741.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies NW, Brown LJ, Gonde J, Irish D, Robinson RO, Swan AV, Banatvala J, Howard RS, Sharief MK, Muir P: Factors influencing PCR detection of viruses in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with suspected CNS infections. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005, 76: 82-87. 10.1136/jnnp.2004.045336.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Mancuso R, Hernis A, Cavarretta R, Caputo D, Calabrese E, Nemni R, Ferrante P, Delbue S, Clerici M: Detection of viral DNA sequences in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis. J Med Virol. 2010, 82: 1051-1057. 10.1002/jmv.21764.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dean FB, Hosono S, Fang L, Wu X, Faruqi AF, Bray-Ward P, Sun Z, Zong Q, Du Y, Du J, et al: Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 5261-5266. 10.1073/pnas.082089499.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hosono S, Faruqi AF, Dean FB, Du Y, Sun Z, Wu X, Du J, Kingsmore SF, Egholm M, Lasken RS: Unbiased whole-genome amplification directly from clinical samples. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 954-964. 10.1101/gr.816903.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans MF, Adamson CS, von Walstrom GM, Cooper K: Use of multiple displacement amplification in the investigation of human papillomavirus physical status. J Clin Pathol. 2007, 60: 1135-1139. 10.1136/jcp.2006.041392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Torres-Muñoz JE, Núñez M, Petito CK: Successful application of hyperbranched multidisplacement genomic amplification to detect HIV-1 sequences in single neurons removed from autopsy brain sections by laser capture microdissection. J Mol Diagn. 2008, 10: 317-324. 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070074.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang Y, Kleespies RG, Ramle MB, Jehle JA: Sequencing of the large dsDNA genome of Oryctes rhinoceros nudivirus using multiple displacement amplification of nanogram amounts of virus DNA. J Virol Methods. 2008, 152: 106-108. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.06.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kremer S, Matern JF, Bilger K, Lioure B, Fornecker Y, Stoll-Keller F, Namer IJ, Dietemann JL, Fafi-Kremer S: EBV limbic encephalitis after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Neuroradiol. 2010, 37: 189-191. 10.1016/j.neurad.2009.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Roselli F, Russo I, Fraddosio A, Aniello MS, De Mari M, Lamberti P, Livrea P, Defazio G: Reversible Parkinsonian syndrome associated with anti-neuronal antibodies in acute EBV encephalitis: a case report. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2006, 12: 257-260. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2005.11.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Imai S, Usui N, Sugiura M, Osato T, Sato T, Tsutsumi H, Tachi N, Nakata S, Yamanaka T, Chiba S, et al: Epstein-Barr virus genomic sequences and specific antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid in children with neurologic complications of acute and reactivated EBV infections. J Med Virol. 1993, 40: 278-284. 10.1002/jmv.1890400405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Doja A, Bitnun A, Jones EL, Richardson S, Tellier R, Petric M, Heurter H, Macgregor D: Pediatric Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Encephalitis: 10-Year Review. J Child Neurol. 2006, 21: 385-391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Stahl HD, Hubner B, Seidl B, Liebert UG, van der Heijden IM, Wilbrink B, Kraan MC, Emmrich F, Tak PP: Detection of multiple viral DNA species in synovial tissue and fluid of patients with early arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000, 59: 342-346. 10.1136/ard.59.5.342.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Monstein HJ, Olsson C, Nilsson I, Grahn N, Benoni C, Ahrné S: Multiple displacement amplification of DNA from human colon and rectum biopsies: bacterial profiling and identification of Helicobacter pylori-DNA by means of 16S rDNA-based TTGE and pyrosequencing analysis. J Microbiol Methods. 2005, 63: 239-247. 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.03.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans MF, Adamson CS, Cooper K: Evidence of HPV16 integration in low- and high-grade cervical lesions that regress demonstrated by multiple displacement amplification and Southern blot hybridisation. J Clin Pathol. 2008, 61: 541-543. 10.1136/jcp.2007.051797.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Protopsaltis J, Kokkoris S, Brestas PS, Chrysos G, Salvanos L, Samara C, Giannoulis G: Neurolisteriosis mimicking herpes simplex encephalitis in an immunocompromized patient. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006, 38: 825-828. 10.1080/00365540600551323.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cunha BA, Fatehpuria R, Eisenstein LE: Listeria monocytogenes encephalitis mimicking Herpes Simplex virus encephalitis: the differential diagnostic importance of cerebrospinal fluid lactic acid levels. Heart Lung. 2007, 36: 226-231. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2007.01.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/220/prepub

Copyright

© Sundén et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement