Comparative evaluation of the potential impact of rotavirus versus hpv vaccination in GAVI-eligible countries: A preliminary analysis focused on the relative disease burden
© Kim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 9 April 2010
Accepted: 16 June 2011
Published: 16 June 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Apr 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robbin Itzler|
|2 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Colin Sanderson|
|22 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Steven Sweet|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Colin Sanderson|
|13 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robbin Itzler|
|14 Mar 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Steven Sweet|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Mar 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robbin Itzler|
|4 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Steven Sweet|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|4 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|16 Jun 2011||Editorially accepted|
|16 Jun 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-11-174|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.