Flocked nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate for detection of respiratory tract viruses in immunocompromised adults: a matched comparative study
© Öhrmalm et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 8 September 2010
Accepted: 26 November 2010
Published: 26 November 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Sep 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oana Falup-Pecurariu|
|25 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fausto Baldanti|
|2 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carlo Federico Perno|
|11 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Lars Öhrmalm|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Lars Öhrmalm|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Nov 2010||Editorially accepted|
|26 Nov 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-10-340|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.