Epidemiological study of phylogenetic transmission clusters in a local HIV-1 epidemic reveals distinct differences between subtype B and non-B infections
© Chalmet et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 15 January 2010
Accepted: 7 September 2010
Published: 7 September 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Jan 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Kalayjian|
|16 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jorg Ruhe|
|21 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Young|
|27 May 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Chris Verhofstede|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 May 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Chris Verhofstede|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|6 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|12 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Chris Verhofstede|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|12 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|7 Sep 2010||Editorially accepted|
|7 Sep 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-10-262|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.