Contingency planning for a deliberate release of smallpox in Great Britain - the role of geographical scale and contact structure
© House et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 30 July 2009
Accepted: 14 February 2010
Published: 14 February 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Jul 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Sep 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James McCaw|
|4 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Brouwers|
|5 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hiroshi Nishiura|
|18 Dec 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Allan House|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Dec 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hiroshi Nishiura|
|8 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James McCaw|
|28 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Allan House|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Feb 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Allan House|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|9 Feb 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 Feb 2010||Editorially accepted|
|14 Feb 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-10-25|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.